«

»

Mar 28

Review: Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II

It’s been three years since Olympus first rolled out their highly successful OM-D line of cameras with the E-M5.  That camera redefined what a mirrorless camera could be, and was the first mirrorless camera that truly made a push for the enthusiast photographer.  Since then, the exceptional E-M1 has followed as well as a lower cost E-M10.  This year, Olympus has updated the original, and today I review the E-M5 Mark II.  The E-M5 II is a camera that stays true to its predecessor, but adds a number of key features, including one that breaks serious new ground for Micro 4/3.  Let’s dive in and see what Olympus has managed to do.

The Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II

The Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II

If you’re not familiar with my reviews, I review from a real world shooting perspective. You won’t find lens charts or resolution numbers here. There are plenty of other sites that cover those. I review products on how they act for me as a photographic tool.  I am not a videographer, so my reviews concentrate on the still imaging capabilities of a camera.

Construction and Handling

The Olympus E-M5 Mark II stays true to the original E-M5 in its design, but features some notable upgrades in construction.  The camera is still made of magnesium alloy, but it feels harder, denser and simply more solidly built.  It’s the same feeling of quality that I got when I picked up the Sony A7 II.  This is a very sturdily built camera with a nice stippled matte finish. The camera is available in both black and silver.  I reviewed the black, but I have to say, I think the silver version of this camera looks downright amazing.

In any case, the solid construction extends to the dials and switches.  The two main dials sit atop the right side of the camera, allowing for easy access with the index finger and thumb.  Both dials are very beautifully knurled and move smoothly and positively, with nice clicks between settings.  The shutter button sits on top of the front dial and is also metal, unlike the original E-M5’s shutter button.  The buttons on the top and rear of the camera are fairly small, but they are notably bigger than the original E-M5’s, though they don’t have quite the polish and solid feel of the rest of the camera.

Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II with Olympus 12-40mm f/2.8

Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II with Olympus 12-40mm f/2.8

Despite a very similar appearance, Olympus has made some changes to the main grip of the camera, and those changes are a bit of a double-edged sword.  The grip retains the same subtle curve to grip, but instead of the vertical ridge that the original has, the Mark II features a curving edge as it moves up the body, which allows for a small finger hold near the top.  Combined with the new rubberized covering, the E-M5 Mark II’s grip is notably more secure than the original’s.  However, this comes at the expense of comfort. Despite the better purchase, the grip forced my middle and ring fingers down and towards the lens, making the it feel cramped.  The rubber is less slippery than the original mesh weave grip of the E-M5, but it’s also a very hard rubber, so there’s no cushioning to the cramped grip.  The result is a camera that is easier to hold on to, but less comfortable in the hand.

The E-M5 Mark II features the same improved weather sealing that first appeared on the OM-D E-M1.  The camera is sealed against dust and moisture and is freeze-proof to 10 degrees Fahrenheit.  I didn’t get a chance to shoot in the rain during my time with the camera, but knowing the robustness of both the original E-M5, which I’ve owned since it came out, and the E-M1, I have no doubt the camera would hold up very well when used with a weather sealed lens.

Operation and Controls

The top controls of the E-M5 II

The top controls of the E-M5 II

The OM-D E-M5 Mark II features a number of control updates to the original E-M5 that make it a more capable camera in the field.  First, as I mentioned earlier, the two main control dials are positioned perfectly.  The rear thumb operated dial is moved to the same position as on the E-M1, which makes it far easier to reach when the camera is to your eye.  The PASM mode dial is still on the left side of the camera, but it’s gained a push-button lock that allows you to keep the dial from moving if desired. Bizarrely, it also has switched orientation from the original, so that the selected mode is on the far left of the dial rather than the far right as on the E-M5.  The power switch is on the left side of the viewfinder hump, just like on the E-M1.  I’m not a huge fan of this position since it requires two hands to turn the camera on, but it didn’t pose a problem either.

The big adjustments come in the far greater number of controls available to the shooter without going into the menus.  The original E-M5 featured two programmable function keys, plus the four tiny directional buttons of the rear four-way controller.  The E-M5 Mark II retains these controls, but adds two additional programmable function buttons and adds another button in the center of the 2×2 Dual Control switch that sits above the screen. The top of the camera has the Fn2 button and movie record button in the same places as the original E-M5, but the new Fn3 and Fn4 buttons (which default to EVF control and HDR mode) also sit on top, to the left of the main dials.  All of these buttons are easily accessed with your index finger, though the movie record button is the hardest to press.  However, that is very likely intentional, as it makes accidentally pressing it difficult as well.

The rear of the camera features the four-way controller which has larger and easier to press buttons vs. the E-M5.  The E-M5 II’s 2×2 switch is tucked above the screen to the left of the rear dial.  Surrounding the four-way switch are the Menu, Info, Trash and Play buttons. All of the controls, save for one, are easy to access and difficult to press accidentally.  The control that isn’t easy to use is the 2×2 switch.  While the switch is easily moved from position 1 to position 2, flipping it back isn’t as easy.  The lever gets extremely close to the top of the screen, and there’s very limited space to flick the switch upward.  With bare hands, it’s not too bad, but it becomes very difficult to operate while wearing gloves.

The rear controls and screen of the E-M5 Mark II

The rear controls and screen of the E-M5 Mark II

If you haven’t had a chance to use the 2×2 Dual Control system on an Olympus camera before, it’s a very nice method of doubling the easy to access parameters using the main dials.   You can customize the operation of the dials in each position of the switch, but by default, when the switch is in position 1, the two dials control exposure parameters (shutter speed and aperture in manual mode, aperture and exposure compensation in aperture priority mode, etc).  When the switch is moved to position 2, the dials change to controlling ISO and White Balance (by default).

The overall degree of custom controls that can be had with the E-M5 Mark II is impressive, and after setting up the camera to your liking, it minimizes the amount of time you need to dive into menus during regular shooting.

The incredibly detailed main menu

The incredibly detailed main menu

Speaking of menus, there are two main interfaces for detailed settings on the E-M5 Mark II, and they both should be familiar to existing Olympus shooters.  First is the Super Control Panel, which is finally activated by default.  Pressing the OK button in the center of the four-way brings up this handy menu that allows one to change most of the main shooting settings, from In-Body Image Stabilization modes, self-timer, anti-shock, electronic shutter and High Resolution mode, AF point, Face Detection, JPEG settings, drive mode and more.

More detailed customization settings are found in the main menu. This too should be familiar to Olympus shooters and infuriatingly confusing to those new to the camera.  While it’s admirable that Olympus provides the ability to change behavior on an extremely wide variety of option, but despite their best efforts at organization, the sheer volume of options can be overwhelming until you become intimately familiar with the system.  There are five main sections of options, but the Custom Menu (gears) is where the real meat comes in, with a simply staggering number of options.  If this becomes your main camera, however, you’ll eventually become proficient in figuring out where things are.  The biggest reason to not worry too much is that after initial setup, you really don’t need to delve into the menu system that often, due to the customized buttons and the Super Control Panel.

Continue: Viewfinder, Performance and Flash

About the author

Jordan Steele

Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Admiring Light; Photographer; Electrical Engineer and Dad

18 comments

2 pings

Skip to comment form

  1. benji

    Quality review as always Jordan.

    When you say C-AF is very close to the E-M1, are you meaning the E-M1 with the new v3.0 firmware, or with earlier versions?

    1. Jordan Steele

      I’m comparing to the E-M1 when I tested it, which was shortly after release.

  2. jan

    translated to swedish it says you tested it after you whas released from jaile :-)

  3. Greg

    The HR mode is limited, of course. But is it as limited as some say? Here’s a landscape scenario: a lake, a speedboat, lovely green hills in the background. A light breeze is making the lake heave and the boat is moving. You take the picture in HR mode. The lake has that weird, greasy look and the boat is a smeared disaster. What will you do? In post, take the ORI file, and enlarge is to the same pixel dimensions as your HR file. Select the ORI lake, copy it, lay it on top of the HR file and there it is. A nice lake with a good-looking speedboat. The hills have nice DR and crispness and the big file may be good enough to print large. You could use the same technique to paste over a wind-smeared bush. You won’t be able to use this when shooting a forest in a wind storm but my point is that the usefulness of HR may be broader than some think. Having never used this camera, I’d appreciate critique on my speculation, especially as I probably will buy the camera.

  4. Rob

    If buying now would you buy the Em1 or the EM5ii?

  5. John

    Many thanks for the very informative review. I wonder if you were able to use the WiFi to make High Res exposures? It seemed to me that this would be a great way to minimize camera vibration, but I could not get it to work using the Olympus app on my iPhone. Do you any way this can be done?

    1. Jordan Steele

      I also was unable to get the camera to shoot a Hi-Res photo using remote control.

  6. Hendrik

    “… compose while looking to the side of the camera, which feels awkward to me”
    Absolutely. That is why I returned the Panasonic G1 way back when. I stopped using the fully articulated screen altogether as it was so odd to look beside the camera, jikes.

  7. SN

    Excellent review. I think the mail reason for offering PD auto focus on the EM5II would be to enable the use of the older Four Thirds system lenses on the EM5II. See Robin Wong’s review where he tries out Four Thirds lenses on the EM1. Adding a bigger sensor would have been ideal. I suspect that Olympus will continue to incrementally improve the camera, much like Apple and others do with their products, to get users to upgrade at regular intervals.

  8. Nathan

    Hi there, good work.
    Also, how can I have your original RAW file or JPEG in HiRes mode? It would be create if you can send the files.

    1. Jordan Steele

      Thanks! I’m sorry, but while I occasionally share full size images for my reviews most of the images here are my personal work…I just use the gear I’m reviewing as I would for regular personal shooting to see how it works for me, and I don’t give full size of those away.

  9. SSK

    As always, I appreciate your reviews.

    For my two cents, on the handling, I’ve had an interesting experience with the EM5 MkII. The front dial is positioned on the flat top plate, and I have to shift my grip uncomfortably with the pro lenses. Overall, the MkII feels out of balance with the pro lenses (12-40 and 40-150), but perfect with the smaller primes (20mm, 75mm). This is the reverse of the EM1 – pro lenses feel great, but the small primes feel a little lost on the larger body. The add on grip helps, but it’s an awkward solution. I’m actually trading in my MkII for a used EM1 after “upgrading.”

    Cheers.

    1. Nathan

      Well you know what? I have the original E-M5, it feels good with 75mm with or without the grip, 15/25mm is a bit too small with the add-on grip, 12-40 and 40-150 PRO certainly need the grip for extra handhold position, as well as the shutter button being placed on the right spot, place where your last 3 fingers hold the body and a place where your pointing finger place nicely on the shutter button.
      Totally agree with you when E-M1 with PRO Zoom, the deep grip is fantastic, but not so on the other small primes. To me, E-M1 overal has better ergonomic than the E-M5 with lens over 300g, that is where balance found just right.

  10. Jeffrey Modesto

    Just bought omd em5
    mkii. Brilliant camera I just upgraded to 2.2. Great review

  11. APagliano

    After installing firmware update 2.2 yesterday, the EFV eye sensor only works to shut the display off.
    When I turn the camera on with eye sensor enabled the display works, when i put my eye or a finger in front of the eye sensor the camera switches to the EVF but in no way will it switch back to the displayau5g when i take the eye or the finger away.
    Did anyone else notice this misbehaviour?

    Cheers

  12. APagliano

    Please, excuse me for the typos, I have been too hectic in writing my post.
    The correct message is the following:

    OM-D E-M5 Mark II firmware update 2.2 eye sensor problems.

    After installing firmware update 2.2 yesterday on my Olympus OM-D E-M5, coming from 2.0, the EFV eye sensor only works to shut the display off.

    When I turn the camera on with eye sensor enabled, the display works, when i put my eye or a finger in front of the eye sensor the camera turns the display off and switches to the EVF as expected, but in no way will it switch back to the display view when i take the eye or the finger away.

    Did anyone else notice this misbehaviour?

    Many thanks in advance

    Cheers

  13. G

    Hello, it’s possible to see a comparison between e-m5 II and a6000 image quality? (like a6000 vs a7 II)
    or just your impressions thanks!

  14. Tom Bell

    Thank you for a great review. I will hold onto the original OMD EM5 …. Until the iteration with a newer sensor.

  1. Review: Olympus 12-40mm f/2.8 PRO - Admiring Light

    […] I noted in my review of the E-M5 Mark II, the 12-40mm f/2.8 was excellent for continuous autofocus as well, and had a good hit rate while […]

  2. Mirrorless Year in Review 2015 - Admiring Light

    […] year, with releases of the Mark II versions of the venerable E-M5 and E-M10.  Both the E-M5 Mark II and E-M10 Mark II are extremely mature and complete cameras and I’d expect a Mark II version […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>


*

Switch to mobile version