{"id":5246,"date":"2015-07-12T12:03:21","date_gmt":"2015-07-12T17:03:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/?p=5246"},"modified":"2015-08-20T08:16:58","modified_gmt":"2015-08-20T13:16:58","slug":"macro-battle-sony-90mm-vs-olympus-60mm-vs-fuji-60mm","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/macro-battle-sony-90mm-vs-olympus-60mm-vs-fuji-60mm\/","title":{"rendered":"Macro Battle: Sony 90mm vs Olympus 60mm vs Fuji 60mm"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>So, a quick and fun little comparison for today. &nbsp;I have the new Sony FE 90mm f\/2.8 Macro in for review this week, and should have that review up in the next few days. &nbsp;So with one excellent macro lens in for review, I thought it would be fun to do a very quick and down and dirty comparison of this lens with the two macro lenses I own: the Fuji 60mm f\/2.4 and the Olympus 60mm f\/2.8. &nbsp;Both are good, and the Olympus, mounted on my E-M5, is my personal go-to rig for macro shooting: it&#8217;s very small, light, has outstanding stabilization and brilliant optics. &nbsp;So, how do the others compare? &nbsp;Let&#8217;s find out.<\/p>\n<h3>The Lenses<\/h3>\n<p>These macro lenses are all native to their respective mounts and all have excellent reputations. &nbsp;Of course, there are differences to be had. &nbsp;First of all, we have different sensor formats. &nbsp;The Olympus 60mm is designed for the Micro 4\/3 system, and such covers the 4\/3 sized sensor. &nbsp;Since this is a 1:1 macro, it also can create the tightest framing of all the lenses. &nbsp;The Fuji 60mm f\/2.4 is designed for the APS-C Fuji X system, and is the only macro lens in this comparison that can&#8217;t do 1:1 focusing: it maxes out at 1:2 magnification. The Sony 90mm f\/2.8 is a full-frame lens that can be used on both the A7 series of cameras as well as Sony&#8217;s APS-C line of E-mount cameras. I tested the Fuji using the X-E2, the Olympus using the OM-D E-M5 and the Sony using both the A7 II and a6000.<\/p>\n<p><figure id=\"attachment_5247\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-5247\" style=\"width: 640px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/macro_lenses.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-5247\" src=\"http:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/macro_lenses.jpg\" alt=\"The competitors: Fuji 60mm f\/2.4, Olympus 60mm f\/2.8, Sony 90mm f\/2.8\" width=\"640\" height=\"427\" srcset=\"https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/macro_lenses.jpg 1200w, https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/macro_lenses-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/macro_lenses-1024x683.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-5247\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">The competitors: Fuji 60mm f\/2.4, Olympus 60mm f\/2.8, Sony 90mm f\/2.8<\/figcaption><\/figure>As you can see above, there is also a huge difference in size. &nbsp;The Fuji is the shortest, while the Olympus is overall the smallest: it&#8217;s thinner and lighter than the others. &nbsp;The Sony, on the other hand, simply dwarfs the other two lenses. &nbsp;It&#8217;s significantly larger and heavier than the other two lenses. &nbsp;The Sony is also the only lens with optical image stabilization.<\/p>\n<p>Because of the different formats, the lenses also have differing fields of view for normal shooting. &nbsp;The Olympus 60mm has the same field of view as a 120mm lens on Full Frame, while the Fuji 60mm matches the Sony 90mm&#8217;s field of view. &nbsp;The Sony 90mm on the APS-C cameras has a 135mm equivalent field of view. &nbsp;For macro shooting, it doesn&#8217;t matter all that much. &nbsp;For the same image height, the Olympus will have the longest working distance due to its shorter length, with the 90mm on APS-C coming very closely behind&#8230;the 90 on full frame has the shortest working distance due to the length of the lens.<\/p>\n<h3>The Test<\/h3>\n<p>I only had time to run a quick test, and so I performed the test with all lenses producing essentially the same framing. &nbsp;This is 1:2 magnification on the Fuji, 1:2 on the a6000\/90mm, around 1:2.6 on the Olympus and approximately 1:1.3 on the A7II\/90mm set. &nbsp;I set the cameras up on a tripod, focused manually with magnified view and used 2 second self timer to eliminate any residual shake. &nbsp;I then resized the Sony files to 16 megapixels to try to normalize resolution between the cameras. &nbsp;Obviously, the Sony cameras will be capable of slightly higher resolution due to their 24 megapixel sensors.<\/p>\n<p><figure id=\"attachment_5251\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-5251\" style=\"width: 520px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/macro_block.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-large wp-image-5251\" src=\"http:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/macro_block-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"The full shot for the test\" width=\"520\" height=\"347\" srcset=\"https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/macro_block-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/macro_block-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/macro_block.jpg 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 520px) 100vw, 520px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-5251\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">The full shot for the test<\/figcaption><\/figure>Below are 100% crops at full stop aperture clicks from f\/2.8 to f\/8. &nbsp;Click on the image to view at full size.<\/p>\n<p><figure id=\"attachment_5249\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-5249\" style=\"width: 520px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/macro_battle.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-large wp-image-5249\" src=\"http:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/macro_battle-1024x1004.jpg\" alt=\"Macro Battle - 100% Crops - Click to Enlarge\" width=\"520\" height=\"510\" srcset=\"https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/macro_battle-1024x1004.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/macro_battle-300x294.jpg 300w, https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/macro_battle.jpg 1808w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 520px) 100vw, 520px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-5249\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Macro Battle &#8211; 100% Crops &#8211; Click to Enlarge<\/figcaption><\/figure>Well, I guess I should have expected this. &nbsp;There&#8217;s really very little difference between any of them. &nbsp;The one thing that can be seen is that the Fuji is the weakest of the three lenses. &nbsp;It&#8217;s producing good results here, but both the Olympus and the Sony are producing slightly sharper images. &nbsp;I maybe see a slight edge to the Olympus at f\/2.8 and a slight edge to the Sony stopped down, but it&#8217;s really, really close.<\/p>\n<p>Next I took a quick look into the corners. &nbsp;I&#8217;m looking only at f\/2.8 and f\/8 here, and you can see that the Fuji is again last at f\/2.8, while the Olympus and Sony are again very close. &nbsp;At f\/8, all the lenses look quite similar, with the Sony having a very slight edge in the corner. &nbsp;This is the case on both full-frame and APS-C, which tells me that the Sony will likely look great even at 100% on the ultra-high resolution A7R II.<\/p>\n<p><figure id=\"attachment_5248\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-5248\" style=\"width: 520px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/corner.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-large wp-image-5248\" src=\"http:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/corner-1024x520.jpg\" alt=\"100% Corner Crops - Click to Enlarge\" width=\"520\" height=\"264\" srcset=\"https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/corner-1024x520.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/corner-300x152.jpg 300w, https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/corner.jpg 1773w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 520px) 100vw, 520px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-5248\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">100% Corner Crops &#8211; Click to Enlarge<\/figcaption><\/figure>Finally, I did a quick framing at maximum magnification, just to give an idea of how sensor size plays into this. &nbsp;As you can see, the Olympus at 1:1 can enlarge the scene the most, while the Sony on the a6000 is next. &nbsp;The Fuji has the lowest magnification, just behind the Sony when used on full frame. &nbsp;Nothing major to say, but it is an important consideration when looking at macro lenses and systems if you&#8217;re a macro shooter.<\/p>\n<p><figure id=\"attachment_5250\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-5250\" style=\"width: 520px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/max_mag.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-large wp-image-5250\" src=\"http:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/max_mag-538x1024.jpg\" alt=\"The lenses at maximum magnification\" width=\"520\" height=\"990\" srcset=\"https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/max_mag-538x1024.jpg 538w, https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/max_mag-158x300.jpg 158w, https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/max_mag.jpg 946w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 520px) 100vw, 520px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-5250\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">The lenses at maximum magnification<\/figcaption><\/figure>So, this was a quick down and dirty test, and, as expected all are extremely good lenses. &nbsp;The Sony 90mm is pulling a very impressive performance, though, equaling or even slightly exceeding the performance of the outstanding Olympus 60mm Macro. &nbsp;<i>Edit: Check out my <a href=\"http:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/review-sony-fe-90mm-f2-8-macro-g-oss\/\">full review of the Sony FE 90mm Macro.&nbsp;<\/a><\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>So, a quick and fun little comparison for today. &nbsp;I have the new Sony FE 90mm f\/2.8 Macro in for review this week, and should have that review up in the next few days. &nbsp;So with one excellent macro lens in for review, I thought it would be fun to do a very quick and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":5247,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"cybocfi_hide_featured_image":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"enabled":false},"version":2},"_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[22],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5246","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-shop"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/macro_lenses.jpg","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p28RGq-1mC","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5246","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5246"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5246\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5425,"href":"https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5246\/revisions\/5425"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5247"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5246"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5246"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5246"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}