{"id":954,"date":"2012-06-24T19:05:42","date_gmt":"2012-06-25T00:05:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/?p=954"},"modified":"2012-06-24T22:05:03","modified_gmt":"2012-06-25T03:05:03","slug":"om-d-e-m5-is-effectiveness-with-long-lenses","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/om-d-e-m5-is-effectiveness-with-long-lenses\/","title":{"rendered":"OM-D E-M5 IS Effectiveness with Long Lenses"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_965\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-965\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><a href=\"http:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/omd_50-300-1.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-965\" title=\"omd_50-300-1\" src=\"http:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/omd_50-300-1-300x231.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"231\" srcset=\"https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/omd_50-300-1-300x231.jpg 300w, https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/omd_50-300-1.jpg 916w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-965\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Olympus E-M5 with Canon FD 50-300mm f\/4.5L. A 2x Teleconverter was added for this test.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>In body IS has been touted as a great stand in for optical IS for many years, \u00a0However, in practice, these systems often have fallen flat when it comes to stabilizing longer lenses. \u00a0The IS can&#8217;t shift enough to counteract the movement of a really narrow field of view, and as a result becomes largely irrelevant. \u00a0However, the in-body IS system on the Olympus OM-D E-M5 has proven to be the best implementation of IBIS thus far. \u00a0However, I was still curious about how well it could perform with really long lenses.<\/p>\n<p>With lenses from wide angle to moderate telephoto, I&#8217;ve found the E-M5 to be capable of stabilizing a lens by an average of three to four stops over the typical rule of thumb for \u00a0&#8216;hand holdable&#8217; shutter speed, which is 1\/(35mm equivalent focal length). \u00a0For micro 4\/3 it&#8217;s 1\/(2 x focal length). \u00a0I&#8217;ve used up to 300mm lenses with decent stabilization on the E-M5, which is equivalent in field of view to a 600mm lens on full frame. \u00a0But I wanted to see how it would do with a REALLY long lens.<\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"color: #c0c0c0;\">The Test<\/span><\/h3>\n<figure id=\"attachment_964\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-964\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"http:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/is_test.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-964\" title=\"is_test\" src=\"http:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/is_test-300x225.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"225\" srcset=\"https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/is_test-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/is_test.jpg 1000w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-964\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Typical shot &#8211; (this is IS ON, 1\/320 sec)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>I used my Olympus E-M5 and the Canon FD 50-300mm f\/4.5L with a Tamron 2x FD teleconverter. \u00a0This turns the lens into a 100-600mm f\/9, which has a field of view equivalent to a 1200mm lens on full frame!<\/p>\n<p>I then took aim at the light on my garage from a distance of about 20 feet, focused with 7x live view and took five shots hand held at each shutter speed in one stop increments from 1\/160 second to the nominal &#8216;handholdable&#8217; speed of 1\/1250 second. \u00a0I did this same test with IS on and with IS off.<\/p>\n<p>I then evaluated the shots at 100%, noting whether the shot was sharp, had relatively small amounts of camera shake (so not sharp, but still with general shapes and outlines present), or heavy blur (visible streaking).<\/p>\n<p>The results are below:<\/p>\n<h4>IS OFF:<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>1\/160 sec: 0 sharp, 1 mild blur, 4 heavy blur<\/li>\n<li>1\/320 sec: 1 sharp, 3 mild blur, 1 heavy blur<\/li>\n<li>1\/640 sec: 0 sharp, 5 mild blur, 0 heavy blur<\/li>\n<li>1\/1250 sec: 4 sharp, 1 mild blur, 0 heavy blur<\/li>\n<li>1\/2500 sec: 5 sharp, 0 mild blur, 0 heavy blur<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h4>IS ON:<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>1\/160 sec: 1 sharp, 3 mild blur, 1 heavy blur<\/li>\n<li>1\/320 sec: 4 sharp, 1 mild blur, 0 heavy blur<\/li>\n<li>1\/640 sec: 5 sharp, 0 mild blur, 0 heavy blur<\/li>\n<li>1\/1250 sec: 5 sharp, 0 mild blur, 0 heavy blur<\/li>\n<li>1\/2500 sec: 5 sharp, 0 mild blur, 0 heavy blur<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>So, to sum up: the E-M5&#8217;s In body IS system is still effective even with very long legacy lenses. \u00a0It took until the &#8216;rule&#8217; handholdable speed to get sharp shots without IS, with 4 out of 5 sharp. \u00a0However with the E-M5&#8217;s in body IS, this drops all the way to 1\/320 sec at the same hit mark of 4 of 5 sharp. \u00a0At 1\/640 second and faster, every shot is sharp. \u00a0I feel confident saying that with proper handholding technique, the E-M5 is good for two full stops of extra handholdability with a lens with a field of view like that of a 1200mm lens on full frame. \u00a0Impressive!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In body IS has been touted as a great stand in for optical IS for many years, \u00a0However, in practice, these systems often have fallen flat when it comes to stabilizing longer lenses. \u00a0The IS can&#8217;t shift enough to counteract the movement of a really narrow field of view, and as a result becomes largely [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":965,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"cybocfi_hide_featured_image":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"enabled":false},"version":2},"_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[22],"tags":[46,45],"class_list":["post-954","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-shop","tag-e-m5","tag-om-d"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/omd_50-300-1.jpg","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p28RGq-fo","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/954","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=954"}],"version-history":[{"count":14,"href":"https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/954\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":971,"href":"https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/954\/revisions\/971"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/965"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=954"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=954"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admiringlight.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=954"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}