Review: Fujifilm X-Pro 2

Hybrid Viewfinder and Rear Screen

The biggest difference between the X-Pro series of cameras and the rest of the X-series bodies is the unique hybrid viewfinder.  In the same finder, Fuji packs a rangefinder-style optical viewfinder (OVF) and a high-resolution electronic viewfinder (EVF). Let’s touch on the electronic viewfinder briefly before we dive into the more unique OVF.

The X-Pro 2’s EVF features the same high-resolution 2.38 million dot panel featured on the X-T10, with almost identical magnification.  While the size isn’t anything special, the optics provide good eye relief for me as a glasses wearer, and the sharpness, brightness and clarity are outstanding.  The finder on the X-T1 is superior due to its notably higher magnification, but otherwise, I’d put the X-Pro 2 in 2nd place among Fuji EVFs.  In low light, when set to high performance mode, the EVF shows very good refresh and almost no lag. When switching to the EVF, you’ll get a very nice experience.Fuji displays the EVF by physically moving a panel to block the light from the OVF, in which case the projected electronic display becomes very visible and clear. Oddly, this panel stays down until you raise the camera to your eye, at which point the eye sensor tells the camera to raise the barrier and have it click into place. It happens quickly, but the sound of the mechanism switching is slightly annoying.

As nice as the EVF is, the OVF is the main reason for a lot of people to consider the X-Pro 2.  Switching between the OVF and EVF is as simple as pulling the front lever on the camera. The OVF has two magnifications and will switch automatically between each depending on the lens you have mounted.  The wide-angle optics cover lenses from 14mm (which fills the entire viewfinder) to 27mm, while the higher magnification is used for 35mm and longer focal lengths.  The actual frame captured is denoted by bright frame lines that adjust based on focal length and focus distance. If you are using one lens and are curious about how another lens would frame the scene, you can press the button on the lever to bring up a bright frame preview of focal lengths in the magnification you are currently using .  The image below shows the preview and field of view at the higher magnification for longer focal lengths.  You can see that the 35mm frame fills most of the optical finder, while the 90mm frame is just a small portion in the center. If you want to preview the frames at the wider magnification, simply pull the viewfinder lever and hold it for a few seconds, and it’ll switch.  It will stay in that position until you switch it back, turn off the camera or attach a different lens.

The Bright Frame Preview in the OVF
The Bright Frame Preview in the OVF

Composing with the OVF is more akin to a rangefinder experience than an SLR or mirrorless camera, as, with the exception of the 14mm frame lines, you can see not only the area captured by the camera, but also the area outside the frame.  This is great for street shooters who can use this extra info to better time a person walking into the frame, or to see elements converge before they enter the frame. The frame lines adjust based on focus position, and attempt to compensate for parallax, though at very close focus distances, this can be somewhat off.

One issue that parallax can cause is with focus point placement.  By default, the camera comes with the ability to simply select your focus point and shoot. You’ll see an overlay in green on the OVF just like you would on the EVF, that shows the position of the focus point.  This position is quite accurate when focused close to infinity, but the actual position of the focus point when focusing closer is down and to the right.  If you’re shooting for eyes with shallow depth of field, this can be a challenge…as you won’t see confirmation in the viewfinder of accurate focus.  To address this problem, Fuji has added two features, both of which are visible in the shot below.

The optical viewfinder of the X-Pro 2
The optical viewfinder of the X-Pro 2

The shot above shows the viewfinder with the XF 56mm f/1.2 attached.  The solid square indicates the selected focus point.  The broken square below is a guide to show where the focus point will be when focused at its closest focus distance.  At intermediate distances, the actual point will be somewhere between the two.  The two squares helps give an idea of where the actual focus point is going to fall.  For extreme precision, however, the X-Pro 2, like Fuji’s X100T, has the ability to overlay a magnified EVF patch in the lower right corner, which shows a magnified view of the focus point.  If you see your subject in the magnified patch, your focus point is dead on it.  The patch can also be used with Fuji’s focus aids, which still include focus peaking and their unique digital split-prism focusing. To bring the focus patch up, you simply push away from your hand on the viewfinder lever when the OVF is activated.  It’s a great little feature than can really help when shooting people using the OVF.

While the hybrid viewfinder is the main reason for the X-Pro 2 in the Fuji lineup, the question becomes: is it a reason for you to get one?  For some shooters, it will be fantastic.  Street shooters especially, I think would like having the OVF capabilities. I personally found it great when walking around the city in broad daylight: it’s bright, clear and beautiful.  However, the OVF is also quite limited.  It’s really only good to use with the prime lenses from 18mm to 60mm.  While 90mm and 14mm lenses will work, and zooms will get framelines to 135mm, it becomes difficult to compose with these focal lengths.  Beyond them, you have to use the EVF in order to frame your subject.  Then there’s dimmer light.  Anyone who has extensively used EVFs in dimmer light recently can attest that they make seeing in lower light conditions significantly brighter and easier to view than an optical finder, and the same is true here.  While the OVF will work fine indoors, it’s also dim and flat (as youx expect), while the EVF is quite bright. I also very much like (and am accustomed to) seeing the final image as it’s going to be shot, where the EVF shines.  I used the OVF a lot during my time with the camera, but for my shooting: I prefer the EVF in the vast majority of situations.

The rear screen on the X-Pro 2 is a very high-resolution 1.6 million dot 3 inch display, and it is very bright, crisp and clear, with excellent contrast. It’s the best screen on any Fuji camera with regards to quality, but it’s also fixed in place. As one who uses the tilt screen on most of my other cameras, there were times I felt a bit frustrated that I couldn’t shoot low to the ground without difficulty. Luckily, WiFi remote shooting can take the pressure off if you really need to shoot low.

Autofocus and Performance

The autofocus system in the X-Pro 2 is largely similar to the AF system in the X-T1 (on firmware 4) and the X-T10, but the new X-Trans CMOS III sensor features a much larger phase-detection capable area, plus some firmware tweaks and other improvements that help speed things up.  The X-Pro 2’s phase detect autofocus (PDAF) points cover over half the sensor, and the majority of the camera’s 273 autofocus points. When in the PDAF area, I found speed in most lighting situations to be very similar to what I achieve with the PDAF points on my X-E2 or X-T1, but when light levels drop, the X-Pro 2’s better low light focus acquisition helps lock focus faster and more surely. The faster processing on the X-Pro 2 also adds a slight benefit to speed when using the outer contrast detect (CDAF) points over earlier Fuji cameras.

The final result is single point autofocus that is quite quick with most lenses, though falling a bit short of the ultra-fast Panasonic and Olympus bodies.  I do feel Fuji’s strides in autofocus speed are considerable over the past few years, though, and for most any situation, I feel the speed is excellent.

The X-Pro 2 allows selection of all 277 points (top), or a more manageable 77 points (bottom)
The X-Pro 2 allows selection of all 273 points (top), or a more manageable 77 points (bottom)

The camera allows you to set up focus point selection for precision placement by selecting one of all 273 AF points, but I feel most people will opt for the much more manageable 77 point grid.  The 77 point grid still covers the majority of the frame and is dense enough to allow for very precise focus placement, without dealing with the clutter of hundreds of points.

The wider phase-detect area on the X-Pro 2 also allows it to be a bit better for continuous autofocus duty.  As with earlier Fuji cameras, the zone AF selection, where a group of points can be selected, really allows the camera to track movement quite well.  While still not up to DSLR standards in the continuous AF department, I’ve always had a very good success rate with my Fuji cameras, and the X-Pro 2 is no different.  However, I also didn’t notice a dramatic improvement over earlier bodies, save for the wider phase-detection area.

Biking - Fujifilm X-Pro 2 with Fujinon XF 56mm f/1.2 @ f/2, Continuous AF (ACROS film simulation)
Biking – Fujifilm X-Pro 2 with Fujinon XF 56mm f/1.2 @ f/2, Continuous AF (ACROS film simulation)

The new processor in the X-Pro 2, which Fuji dubs the ‘X-processor Pro’, keeps data flowing smoothly and the camera responsive at all times.  X-Pro 1 shooters who have waited to upgrade will be amazed at the speed. The X-Pro 2 is a camera that writes quickly, processes quickly, and moves between options quickly.  I never found myself waiting on the camera, even after a large burst of photos.  Speaking of burst, the X-Pro 2 can rattle off 8 frames per second and shoot around 30 RAW images or over 80 JPEGs before slowing down. It’s a quick camera that responds exactly how you’d want a camera to respond.

Key Features

Normally I split this section into its own page, but I’m doing a condensed version for the X-Pro 2 for a simple reason: the big features on this camera, when compared to the X-T1 and other X-Series cameras, lie in the viewfinder and the upgraded controls, both of which I’ve covered in-depth.  The rest of the feature list reads just like that on the X-T1 or X-T10.  The X-Pro 2 has fully featured Wi-Fi capabilities, including remote control, image transfer and geotagging.  It has the same excellent intervalometer, the same great built-in RAW conversion and the same electronic shutter capabilities.  If you want a more detailed summary of these features, check out the Key Features part of my X-T10 review: the way they operate on the X-Pro 2 is unchanged.

The X-Pro 2's dual SD card slots
The X-Pro 2’s dual SD card slots

There are a few things of note that aren’t covered there, however. First up: Dual card slots. As I alluded to when discussing the focus stick, the X-Pro 2 is the first Fuji body (and the first mirrorless interchangeable lens camera) to feature dual SD card slots.  The X-Pro 2’s two slots can be configured to write data in one of three ways.

  • The camera writes the same data to both cards, creating an instant backup of data
  • The camera will write data to the card in slot 1 until it’s full, and will then continue to card 2
  • The camera will write RAW images to card 1 and JPEG images to card 2

The entire time I shot with the camera, I chose to shoot with the camera set with the third option, which was outstanding.  I could offload RAW files when I downloaded to my computer, but had already generated JPEG images for quick sharing, or if I wanted to take a look at the camera’s output for a particular image, without having to take up my primary card’s space with JPEGs.  Pros will really love this feature, and a lot of serious amateurs will also find great use for it.  I hope the same dual card slots find their way into the X-T2 when it comes out.

Bracketing

Finally, Fuji has taken the leash off the auto exposure bracketing and allowed for greater than 3 shots at + or – 1 stop of exposure latitude.  On the down side, they’ve only expanded it to 3 shots at + or – 2 stops of exposure.  While this is often all that is needed for quality HDR shooting, I just don’t understand why, when making the change, they couldn’t have allowed for 5 shots at 2 stop intervals, or 3 shots at 3 stops intervals.  Is it that hard to program?  Good on Fuji for finally making the change, but unfortunately, it’s still lacking compared to the competition.

Shutter

Finally, this sounds ridiculous, but I had to briefly mention the mechanical shutter.  The new mechanical shutter goes to 1/8000s, which is excellent, especially given the faster glass that Fuji has in its lineup, but the best part: it has the most satisfying sound on any camera I’ve ever used.  It’s hard to describe, but it’s simply beautiful.  A soft, yet distinct snap that just makes me want to shoot.

Continue: Image Quality

Pages: 1 2 3 4

Tags:

Comments

33 responses to “Review: Fujifilm X-Pro 2”

  1. Rudy Avatar
    Rudy

    terrific review. Really agree with the conclusion. It is an awesome camera. I returned mine, because the XT-1 just seems to be a better fit for me, my shooting style. Large EVF, articulating LCD made all the difference.

    1. Steve Solomon Avatar

      First, excellent review, Jordan! You hit on the features, functionality, and most importantly, image quality improvements in the camera. Thanks for your insights as well!
      Rudy, as a happy XT-1 user (with some stelar Fujinon optics), I too, was hesitant to jump into the rangefinder-style X-Pro2, since I’m not a “street” or portrait guy. My initial thought was to wait on the XT-2. However, upon reading professional reviews such as this one, the improvement in detail and overall image quality, plus the “intrigue factor” with the rangefinder, led me to make the leap! I’m still testing it and comparing image files with the XT-1, but so far, am quite impressed! I’ve made some superb 24×36″ prints from XT-1 files, so really anxious to see what the new sensor can do at that print size! That said, I too, am wanting to see what of these new features will make it into the XT-2. Perhaps at that point, I may sell my XT-1 and then have two bodies with the same sensor. Bottom line though, the Fujinon optics are what really made me go mirrorless, after many years with DSLRs (and SLRs!).
      Good luck!

  2. Jeeve Stobs Avatar
    Jeeve Stobs

    Your review makes no sense. First you state how Fujifilm really thinks about how people use cameras and then point out multiple design flaws with the controls.

    There’s nothing, absolutely nothing in this camera that couldn’t have been sold 2-3 years ago. Fujifilm again has been asleep at the wheel.

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      The flaws I point out are there, but they are minor. ALL cameras have design that is less than perfect. I’ve never seen a camera with ‘perfect’ controls.

  3. David Avatar
    David

    This was a great review, and I think you hit the nail on the head. I bought the camera a week ago, coming from an X-T1, and before that an X-Pro1 and X100. I loved the X-Pro1, but there were some design and autofocus issues that eventually pushed me to the X-T1, but with the X-Pro2, I think I’ll shoot it till it breaks. You are exactly right about the design flaws, but they are minor. The price is the biggest detractor, but as you say, if it’s the camera for you, then it’s worth the price.

  4. GF Avatar
    GF

    Beautiful photographs with the 56

  5. Mike Avatar
    Mike

    Having just a couple of weeks under my belt with the X-Pro2, I am still learning and getting things embedded within my brain so that everything hopefully becomes second nature. I agree you have to want this camera, but did I want it! Coming from the X-100 and X-E1, this has nailed it for me. Specifically, the handling is superb with really fast operation and auto-focus, and the controls tweaked so that everything falls naturally to hand. The image quality improvements and Acros film emulation are the icing on the cake. As well as landscape and architecture, I do enjoy shooting on the street with primes, and the OVF is fantastic for this. Could it be more perfect? Sure. I would love an articulating screen, but I realise this would have added more weight and thickness, so I respect FujiFilm’s design decision on this. Otherwise, I am finding it truly satisfying to use. Thanks for your review!

  6. IKO Avatar

    Hi, ‘will it be a good camera for pro Family photography in studio and outdoor ?
    Thank you

    1. Florent Avatar

      *Any* recent camera, whether Fuji, Sony, Canon, Nikon, Olympus, Panasonic or Pentax would.
      To put things in perspective: the lowest end camera one can buy today offers better IQ than pro gear from 10 years ago…

      1. Jordan Steele Avatar

        I agree with this assessment.

  7. Wolfgang Lonien Avatar

    Nice review, and you have adorable kids. I’m still with my Olympus cameras, but I’d love to have that ACROS simulation…

  8. Dibo Avatar
    Dibo

    “The biggest downside is the price of the camera…for an APS/C camera”. That remains the whole discussion with the Fujifilm X-series. Fuji film is clearly targeting to become the APS/C champion able to withstand all FF competition because of their real, film-focussed photography background. I don’t know myself that’s as well from a technical as a commercial point a wise decision. On the renowned rumor sites there’s a fierce battle going on about needing FF or not, and the superiority of the APS/C X-Trans design. Owning both – FF DSLRs and Fuji X – I’m not fully buying into Fujifilm’s strategy. I’m not even believing the story that XF-glass is really beating anything else in the market – that’s just a myth. If the X-Pro2 would have been received the latest gen Sony 42MP FF-sensor with an X-trans CFA it would have been immediately a Leica M/SL killer and a serious option next to the Sony A7. Now – I don’t know that this choice is even able to sustain a credible future path. The Fuji fanboys seem to be the only ones to take that challenge. Don’t forget that with today’s technology – 24MP for APS/C seems due to the pixel density a bit at the edge of what this size of sensor can deliver without compromises. I’ve read quite a few reliable reviews now of magazines that didn’t end without comments on the DR, noise and even color accuracy at higher iso’s – and another remark too, that always returns, is that the difference with the old 16MP X-Trans is not very impressive. I can’t tell, I haven’t used the X-Pro2 yet but I get more and more the feeling this isn’t the magical upgrade quite a bit of serious photographers were expecting at the end of the day – in particular when it comes to better, usable high ISO-competences.

    1. Matt Avatar

      I also agree that the price is unreasonable for this camera. I would’ve been happier if it were selling new in the $1400-1500 range personally.

      With that being said, I think the FF/APS-C discussions (or wars depending on what site you’re on) are a little ridiculous. If someone can’t make good photos with an APS-C camera, it’s not because the lack of FF. While the ceiling for the APS-C sensor’s performance is near, what more could someone want from a camera? Looking at the images above and at the samples all over the web, it’s easy to see that APS-C camera images aren’t hurting because of their smaller sensor. And from my personal experience, the X-Trans is no slouch when it comes to dynamic range, noise and color accuracy. I haven’t read many reliable reviews that don’t praise the X-Trans sensors for their image quality. A cropped sensor may not be the path to the future, but at the very least, they can definitely coexist as formidable cameras next to full frame sensors.

  9. Wubba Avatar
    Wubba

    The young girl (your daughter?) uses the same gear as I do.
    The old, trusty GX1 and the 14mm prime.
    It obviously can’t compete with that X-Pro 2 …
    (except for bracketing abilities)
    By the way: I like your photos!

  10. Matt Avatar
    Matt

    Nice write-up.

    In my initial impressions, I came to similar conclusions as you did regarding the X-Pro2, especially about the price. While it’s a beautiful, high-end X camera, the $1700 price tag still seems a bit steep.

    The joystick is my favorite new feature of the camera. The ISO dial? Not so much.

    Thanks again for your thoughts.

  11. cosinaphile Avatar
    cosinaphile

    jordan , frankly im appalled at this “review” and feel you should seek professional …….

    i understand you were quite taken by sound the shutter makes…..

    warmest….

      1. cosinaphile Avatar
        cosinaphile

        april 1,….. jordan …..april first

        the review was a good read , one of the better ones out there actually

        i still find the x pro too large and await a xe2 sized body update with 24 mp sensor … new better organized menus
        and a good corner positioned EVF… fuji didn’t get my money this cycle ….i got a pen f in silver , its quite striking
        but quite behind the image quality of fuji , but adequate for most work

        1. Jordan Steele Avatar

          Cool. I’m reviewing the Pen F right now. Neat little camera.

          1. cosinaphile Avatar
            cosinaphile

            i n your upcoming review of the pen f please examine the movable focus enlarge box , is there a way to fix it in the center? it keeps moving all over the place upper left bottom right ….i want to fix it in the center and enlarge
            focus and recompose with legacy lenses

            also my Panasonic gx1 will return to full view after an enlarged vie for focus with a 1\2 push of the shutter can this pen f be set for this behavior ?.. also id love it if you gave a recommended settings for using legacy glass
            so the enlarge box will stop jumping around ….olympus menus are beyond fustration

            thanks in advance for whatever can make it to the pen f review ….i eagerly await it

  12. Florent Avatar

    Thanks for this review, Jordan.
    As usual, it is well written, clearly presented, and objective. I also like your pragmatic approach in your reviews, ie. using the camera in real conditions.

    I agree that the price is too high in the current market.

    One feature I was really hoping to see in the X-Pro2 is the ability to change the auto ISO behavior. Currently, one can set a minimum shutter speed. It’s great with prime lenses, but very sub-optimal with zoom lenses.
    Fuji should include a mode where the camera choses the shutter speed depending on the current focal length (say 1/FL or 1/1.5*FL). Additionally, one should be able to bias the algorithm toward slower or higher shutter speeds. That’s what Nikon and Pentax implement in their bodies. This makes much more sense when using zooms and also prime. Every time I change lens, I need to change the minimum shutter speed which is a pain and sometime I forget (for instance, 1/40 works well with the 14mm, but will lead to blurry shots with the 56mm).
    This feature could easily be implemented in a firmware update. I’m not sure why Fuji doesn’t do it since quite a few users are asking for it.

  13. Dr D Hoyle Avatar
    Dr D Hoyle

    I found the review fair and helpful. I love this camera, although I agree it’s a little expensive. I’m getting on in age now, but the thing I like most of all about the X-Pro 2 (as I did about the X-Pro 1) is its capacity to allow me to turn everything off: set the ISO to 400, go to manual focus, aperture and shutter and – hey presto! (to use a technical term) I’m back in 1981 with my Nikon F3, and in complete complete control. Everything else it does – which is a lot – is a huge bonus. Nostalgia meets technology: perfect.

  14. […] the most part, Fuji has done a fantastic job with the camera,” Conclusions from Admiringlight:” In summary, Fujifilm X-Pro 2 is an excellent camera with great image quality, excellent […]

  15. Thomas Avatar
    Thomas

    I don’t like the old school shutter, it triggers below that barrel that protects it and my fingers hitting that barrel causes camera shake. Maybe I’ll start shooting with my smart phone. And what’s with all the bad issues and defective lenses and bodies I keep reading about? Is Fuji that sloppy with their QC? do all camera systems have so many issues? I love this camera and am still hanging on to my D3 and 24-70 which feels like 20 lbs in the bag. Any ideas On the shutter, how to adjust or get around that issue. Still getting used to the Rangefinder, My Koni Omegas and Press cameras were easier because of their size. Can’t wait to master it though and get some of those Leica like results I keep seeing. This site is the best I’ve found. Thanks Jordan.

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      A few things. If you have trouble with the shutter button, look for a soft release that will screw into the button. You can get cheap ones for $5 or spend $30 for custom wooden ones.

      Lens QC? Fuji is probably a bit better than average, actually. Reviewing and owning so many lenses over many systems, I have experienced lemons from every manufacturer, including Fuji. No manufacturer is immune to the occasional bad lens.

  16. Gerard Avatar
    Gerard

    Great review Jordan. Very proper job! Keep on doing the good work!
    Have to admit, the price here (Netherlands) is even a bit steeper.. 1800 euros thank you very much. Yet, as with the Pro 1, thought about it , thought about it again a little bit, than bought the “silly bugger” and never thought about it again. Never any regrets! The fun, the satisfaction I got/get from these machineries(machinations), the pleasure, the files that come from BOTH!
    Worth every penny!

  17. […] so other people who runs blogs for mainly that purpose will have to help with these. Just read a good camera review of the Fuji X-Pro2 mentioned above from Jordan Steele, where he says that for digital, these ones come probably […]

  18. Woj Avatar
    Woj

    Is the AF better only with certain lenses or with all lenses? I saw a review stating the former, specifically the 2.8 zooms gaining the advantage. Thanks

  19. Dominique Avatar
    Dominique

    When will we have a review of panasonic 14mm ? I see that you (and now your daughter^.-) have ^^
    I hesitate between 14mm and 15mm.

  20. Larry Pao Avatar
    Larry Pao

    I am enjoying the XPRO 2 tremendously, but I’m a bit concerned about the camera “warming up” after light usage. (Less than 50 shots.) Is this normal? It’s no where near “over-heating”, however. None of my Fuji cameras exhibit this anomaly. (X100T and XT-1 or any other previous DSLRs.) Have you heard about or have you experienced the “warming?” Thanks for your help.

  21. azmi Avatar
    azmi

    Thats a nice idea about the Panny 14mm Dominique.. any chance of a short review Jordan?.. ps, this a great review of Xpro2..especially your images covering things & people..most helpfull. I love the Fuji jpegs and find it is all i need in street photography.. so thanks again Jordan.

  22. […] Sourced through Scoop.it from: admiringlight.com […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search


Categories


Recent Posts


  1. I think it is near Hillsboro.

  2. This article got me thinking… Why does Canon make RF S lenses starting with 18mm when most full frame RF…

  3. Great review. I shoot Nikon and may try an old Nikon D200 and see how it compares with the new…