Review: Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7

Image Quality: Dynamic Range and Color

Sunrise Reflection - Panasonic GX7 with Olympus 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 II
Sunrise Reflection – Panasonic GX7 with Olympus 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 II

The GX7 features a supposedly all new Panasonic designed 16 megapixel sensor.  The camera can shoot from a low ISO of 125 to a high of 25,600.  The sensor has excellent dynamic range, with especially notable ability for the shadows to be recovered with little to no color shifting, though noise is of course worse when recovering a lot of shadow detail.  Overall dynamic range is similar to the GH3 and OM-D E-M5, which provides plenty of range to capture most any scene.

The GX7 has an excellent color response, which by default is biased a little on the warm side.  As I quite like a slightly warmer color palette, the colors out of the GX7 provide an excellent starting point.  Other than being slightly warmer than some other cameras, the colors out of the GX7 are quite accurate.  One of the most amazing things about the GX7’s color response is that there is no discernible color shift at higher ISOs.  Most cameras I’ve used will have a shift towards magenta or green as the ISO rises to extreme levels.  The GX7 gets slightly more muted at higher ISO, but stays accurate and carries no visible color cast, even at ISO 25,600.

Image Quality: Noise

100% Crops of the GX7 and the Olympus E-M5.  Click to Enlarge
100% Crops of the GX7 and the Olympus E-M5. Click to Enlarge

The GX7 controls noise very well, and is in line with the other recent offerings by Olympus and Panasonic.  Noise control is very slightly noisier than the Olympus E-M5 (though these differences would be imperceptible in a print or web reduction), except at 25,600, where the GX7 is slightly better.  Click on the thumbnail to the left to see a 100% crop comparison for noise between the Panasonic GX7 and the OM-D E-M5.  After enlarging, you will need to click the green arrow at the bottom of the screen to view the image full size.

Noise is well controlled through ISO 3200, and even ISO 6400 is quite usable for 8×10 prints and screen usage.  Even the higher sensitivities are quite usable for web shots or for situations where you absolutely must have the shot. One advantage, as mentioned above, is that the higher sensitivities maintain neutral color balance, so the ISO 25,600 shots can be used quite well for web use in a pinch.

JPEG Quality

I am predominantly a RAW shooter, but I tested out the Panasonic’s JPEG engine to see how it performs.  Unfortunately, I still think the high quality JPEG output on the GX7 is a little overly compressed, and the color reproduction isn’t as robust as on some of its competition.  One very nice feature, however, is that you can carefully tweak the contrast curve and other parameters to fit your desired style for JPEG output.  This allows you to take control of your JPEG images, though unfortunately this can’t be applied after the shot.

Video

As mentioned at the beginning of the review, I am a stills photographer and am not particularly qualified to evaluate the video capabilities of a camera.  The GX7 does offer multiple video recording modes, including 1080p/60/50 and the much desired cinematic 24p.  Video quality is very nice, with no obvious artifacting and low noise even at moderately high ISOs.  You can shoot in all the main program modes for video as well as full manual, and autofocus is maintained during shooting.  Videographers will lament the inability to use the IBIS during video shooting and the lack of an external microphone input, but overall video quality is on a very high level.

Continue: Conclusion and Image Samples

Comments

32 responses to “Review: Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7”

  1. […] The Panasonic GX7 has picked up another new review, check it out at Admiring Light. […]

  2. Owen R Auer Avatar
    Owen R Auer

    I believe the GX-7 has a high burst rate of 10 fps, and a super high (with decreased resolution) of 40 fps.

    1. Owen R Auer Avatar
      Owen R Auer

      I agree about the rear thumb wheel, they should have milled it like the front one, My G2 rear wheel is impossible to use in cold weather or with gloves.

      1. jeffharris Avatar

        Wear fingerless gloves. That’s what I do with my GH2. Works great.

        1. Owen R Auer Avatar
          Owen R Auer

          and what do you do when your fiingertips get cold?

          1. Nikker Simon Avatar
            Nikker Simon

            I find a nearby cafe and order some food and a nice big Belgium beer.

    2. Jordan Steele Avatar

      I had mentioned the super high 40 fps, but the 5 fps is the limit with the mechanical shutter. You can shoot in full resolution at 10fps with the electronic shutter, but there is real potential when shooting fast action with the electronic shutter to have very odd distortion artifacts from the sensor read out, which makes it less useful than full speed with a mechanical shutter. I have updated the review to better clarify this.

  3. cosinaphile Avatar
    cosinaphile

    a clear concise effort …. your reviews are always excellent and illuminating

  4. omega34 Avatar
    omega34

    very nice thought out review Jordan!
    The photos do appear to have nice warm colours to them. Do you use Lightroom to process the RAW files and use standard Adobe profiles?

    I read this somewhere and was curious to hear from you – does the noise appear to be bit more film like ( grain) than the EM5 /EP5?

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      All the posted images were processed in Lightroom 5.2 with the standard Adobe Profile. I could create a custom profile, though since that requires a separate product, I review new products with what’s available to the average user. (Well, Lightroom is a separate product as well, but most shooters who will shoot RAW will own one of the big RAW converters).

      You can look at the noise sample provided in the Noise section at full size (click on the image, then click the green arrow at the bottom of the screen to go to 100%), which shows 100% crops of the GX7 and the E-M5 side by side at all ISOs. I personally find them to have very similar noise profiles, just that the GX7 has very slightly more noise except at 25,600 where it’s a little better. In any case, the output from these cameras is extremely close.

      1. agachart Avatar
        agachart

        why you test GX7 nosier than EM-5 all around website show the GX7 control ISO better than
        EM5/EP5 ,i want to know about lens and camera settings ,

        1. Jordan Steele Avatar

          Um, because that’s how the cameras work? Don’t trust me, look at the crops for yourself. These were tripod mounted with the same lens (25/1.4) at the exact same settings (ISO, aperture, shutter speed), taken less than 3 minutes apart.

          1. agachart Avatar
            agachart

            Sorry,if my comment so hard,
            may i will buy 2 cam for real result ,but i never know why result was variant about camera test,
            it so hard to control,business or brand royalty, and sometime i think it not science

            and you can answer to me 🙂

          2. agachart Avatar
            agachart

            camera test that i mean all around(web,magazine & other)

  5. Christian G Avatar

    Thanks for he great review.

    I have one question: did you test IBIS with non-OIS lenses? The GX7-IBIS does not work with OIS-lenses. I’ve seen other reviews that find the IBIS to be very effective..

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      See my reply to Bob B. below…

  6. Bob B. Avatar
    Bob B.

    Good review…but I have a question…I am reading some other side-by-side reviews on the web and am seeing a different conclusion than what you have arrived at regarding the still-image is. You go out of your way to say how superior that the 5-axis IS is in the EM5 and you site that IBIS as the primary reason that you will maintain using the EM5 As your go to camera.. For still images surprisingly the IBIS in the EM5 would appear to have no advantage over the GX7, (Of course the EM5 has the IS advantage in video mode as the GX7 has no IS in video mode). I am an EM5 owner myself and surprised at these findings, too.
    Perhaps if you did a side-by-side test you may be surprised.

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      I had done comparisons side by side with my E-M5. For instance, I tested the 25/1.4 on both cameras indoors. The GX7 was consistent down to about 1/30s. Below that, it was all over the place. Sometimes I was sharp at 1/5 sec, sometimes I was blurry at 1/20s. The E-M5 was consistently sharp at 1/5 sec. The biggest issue I had with the GX7’s IS was that I couldn’t trust it to get the shot at a certain speed. It would do fine sometimes 3 stops slower…but not all the time, which made it much less useful for me. You may be different, but I need to have faith in my gear that it will perform how I expect, when I need it. On the GX7, that meant trusting the IS to no slower than 1 stop below normal handholding speeds. It can do better…just not all the time.

      If you read a bunch of reviews, you’ll see the results from the IS are all over the place. CameraLabs had a similar experience to mine, while there was a different recent review that had better results with the GX7 than with the E-M1. I think a lot of it may come down to how each individual photographer manifests their hand shake. If one photographer moves almost entirely along the 2 axes that the GX7 corrects, they may have superior results. I likely have a more 3 dimensional shake pattern, which the OM-D corrects beautifully, but the GX7 doesn’t (though I don’t have issues with OIS lenses – the 35-100/2.8 and the Fuji 55-200 are both very solid with their OIS in my hands – but I did have similar results to the GX7 with the 2-axis Olympus Pens).

      I tested the IS with the Olympus 9-18, the 25/1.4, the 75/1.8 and the Canon FD 85mm f/1.8. The 35-100, of course, used its OIS when mounted.

  7. CS Avatar
    CS

    Did you notice any shutter shock with the GX7?

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      Not that I could pinpoint directly as shutter shock.

  8. Anna Avatar
    Anna

    Hi,
    Can anybody advise me if GX7 is better for young lady than Canon Rebel SL1?

    1. Naveed Akhtar Avatar

      Hi Anna!
      GX7 is deffinately better for any lady and any gentleman, IMHO!
      If you have any specific requirement though, we may discuss here, otherwise, I can’t see a reason to chose any Canon cropped sensor camera over GX7!

  9. Anatoly Avatar
    Anatoly

    It’s so fine and stylish review… Let me ask a couple of questions.
    I enrolled into a preliminary record to buy this camera in few closest weeks as soon as it would be available in my country.
    Actually I have to pay in advance in absence the camera that I have never seen alive,
    but I don’t expect to discover something wrong because I do trust in Panasonic, I was the owner of Panny GF1, G2 and G5 and generally I can imagine what I should get .
    The only thing disturbs me – the visual quality of GX7 EVF. My eyes is rather sensitive for any unplesant things related with viewfinder,
    I hate to see a jerky, flickering or moire patterns in EVF, it’s rather critical for me.
    Could you kindly comment if you noticed something similar looking via GX7 EVF?
    And else, whether it’s a real handicap that the 4:3 viewfinder mode is small because it’s actually a crop of the native 16:9 picture?
    Did you feel any visual discomfort due to this not so conventional EVF design?

    Thank you in advance!
    Anatoly

  10. milesT Avatar
    milesT

    Bummer you didn’t include ISO info in your sample shots so we could draw our own conclusions. Hopefully you’ll add that.

  11. Matt Avatar
    Matt

    Thanks for the review and beautiful sample photos.

    Quick question: I notice my GX1 (and GF1 before that) underexpose heavily at higher ISOs. Usually, I have to use up to +2 ev compensation to get properly exposed photos at 3200 – 6400.

    Does the GX7 do this as well?

  12. […] for for years, a high-end rangefinder style body with a corner EVF and in-body IS.  The resulting GX7 received high marks and praise for doing so.  Panasonic also leveraged what is Micro 4/3 greatest […]

  13. sanremo Avatar
    sanremo

    Can anyone offer any thoughts on the GX7’s EVF? I am very tempted to buy one, I already have a GF1. However the 16/9 viewfinder format surprise me somewhat as most snapper would be using 4×3 or 3×2. Is using 4/3 or 3/2 practical in a 16/9 finder? Or is the image too small?
    TNX

  14. Dan Avatar
    Dan

    Excellent review, thanks! Just one query, at the top of page two you state the movie button can be “commandeered for additional functions as well”. I would love to be able to set this to quickly shift ISO while keeping my eye to the viewfinder, but i can’t see where to set this! Any ideas?

  15. Ian Avatar
    Ian

    Your information about the Flash auto exposure compensation has made my flash usable! Many grateful thanks.

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      So glad I could help.

      1. Kjell Avatar
        Kjell

        Helped me too – today Aug 22, 2016!

  16. Tim in Singapore Avatar
    Tim in Singapore

    You say that the facility to enter the focal length of lenses with no electrical contacts is the first of its kind. Every Pentax DSLR has had that option from the beginning, the ability to use legacy K-mount lenses being one of the attractions of their line. That said, your review of the GX7 is very fair. I’ve had one for over a year and it reflects my experience. Including the relative ineffectiveness of the in-body stabilisation.

    GX8 review?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search


Categories


Recent Posts


  1. I think it is near Hillsboro.

  2. This article got me thinking… Why does Canon make RF S lenses starting with 18mm when most full frame RF…

  3. Great review. I shoot Nikon and may try an old Nikon D200 and see how it compares with the new…