Review: Pergear 14mm f/2.8 II

Conclusion

Pros

  • Well constructed body with nicely damped focus and aperture rings
  • Very affordable
  • Excellent included filter lens hood
  • Good sharpness wide open and excellent sharpness across the frame stopped down
  • Almost zero distortion
  • Very good control of chromatic aberration
  • Decent bokeh when focused close up

Cons

  • Significant red and white ghosting can cause issues, depending on the position of bright light
  • Field curvature limits cross frame sharpness at wider apertures
  • High vignetting wide open that doesn’t fully go away

The Pergear 14mm f/2.8 II is a surprisingly good lens, and I was a bit shocked when I first started looking at the images. While field curvature limits its use in low light situations where you need edge to edge resolution, when stopped down the lens is quite sharp even into the corners, showing performance not too far behind lenses 10 times its price. The most shocking revelation is the near total lack of distortion, which is an exceptional achievement in a 14mm lens at any price point, and is absolutely incredible for a lens costing just $290.

Things aren’t perfect of course, and the Pergear lacks the refined coatings of more expensive glass, which can lead to significant ghosting when the sun is in certain positions. Vignetting is high wide open and contrast is average, but overall, the lens does a remarkable job for a budget ultra-wide. In my experience, you need to spend around $1,600 or more before you start finding 14mm lenses that will best this in overall optical quality, and it easily surpasses the Samyang 14mm f/2.8 to become my new recommended budget ultra-wide.

If you are interested in this lens, Pergear does have a couple of sales going on right now, with 20% off now through December 1st on Pergear’s website with the code BFCM2023PERGEAR. If you miss out on that, they’re offering a 10% discount on Amazon beginning December 2, using the code 107XFUAA.

Image Samples

Click on an image to enlarge. As this lens does not transmit EXIF data, aperture information is not available. I will mark the aperture if I remember what an image was shot at.

One Columbus – Nikon Z8 with Pergear 14mm f/2.8 II @ 1/60s, ISO 200
Sun through the Trees – Nikon Z8 with Pergear 14mm f/2.8 II @ f/8 or f/11, 3-shot HDR, ISO 200
Ohio House of Representatives – Nikon Z7 II with Pergear 14mm f/2.8 II @ f/8, 1/8s, ISO 800
Leveque Tower – Nikon Z8 with Pergear 14mm f/2.8 II @ f/8, 1/60s, ISO 64
Columbus Alley – Nikon Z8 with Pergear 14mm f/2.8 II @ f/5.6, 1/60s, ISO 200
Statehouse Rotunda – Nikon Z7 II with Pergear 14mm f/2.8 II @ f/5.6, 1/8s, ISO 1600
Leveque Tower – Nikon Z8 with Pergear 14mm f/2.8 II @ 1/160s, ISO 64
Statehouse Stairwell – Nikon Z7 II with Pergear 14mm f/2.8 II @ f/5.6, 1/10s, ISO 1600
City Hall – Nikon Z8 with Pergear 14mm f/2.8 II @ ISO 200 (3 shot HDR)
Fish Fountain – Nikon Z8 with Pergear 14mm f/2.8 II @ f/2.8, 1/400s, ISO 200
Christmas Bow – Nikon Z7 II with Pergear 14mm f/2.8 II @ f/2.8, 1/13s, ISO 1600
CFD Memorial – Nikon Z8 with Pergear 14mm f/2.8 II @ 1/125s, ISO 64
House Gallery Nikon Z7 II with Pergear 14mm f/2.8 II @ f/5.6, 1/15s, ISO 1600
If you enjoyed this review, check out my other reviews in the Review Index

Pages: 1 2 3

Comments

4 responses to “Review: Pergear 14mm f/2.8 II”

  1. Erwin Avatar
    Erwin

    Excellent review. Thank you.

  2. Dave Conlin Avatar
    Dave Conlin

    I purchased this lens in part based on your review, so thanks for your efforts. I received it today and I am checking it out. Thanks also for specifically mentioning the force needed to attach the filter holder, I was reluctant to try with too much force until I re-read this review and found your comment on this, I have now overcome that problem! I note also that my copy has no lens name written on it, all the photos I have seen in the web stores and other reviews had this and I was wondering if my lens was a reject from QA or something. Then I noticed that yours also has no name written on it (based on the photo in the review). I know this is cosmetic but it does make you wonder? I assume the lens with no name has been good for you. I have sent an e-mail to Pergear questioning this.

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      The lens with no name has been exactly as shown in the review. It was a little odd to not have any markings on the lens itself, but I certainly am not worried about it given the price and relative performance. Hope you enjoy the lens!

  3. TJ Williams Avatar
    TJ Williams

    Well…. I think I’m gonna have to buy this lens.
    I was on the fence. Your review helped me decide.
    I’ll come back and comment after I receive my copy and have had some time with it.
    Thanks for doing this review.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search


Categories


Recent Posts


  1. I think it is near Hillsboro.

  2. This article got me thinking… Why does Canon make RF S lenses starting with 18mm when most full frame RF…

  3. Great review. I shoot Nikon and may try an old Nikon D200 and see how it compares with the new…