Thoughts on the Schneider-Kreuznach 14mm f/2.0 Super Angulon

Schneider-Kreuznach is a well respected lens maker, who primarily has specialized in ultra-high end cinema lenses and large format photographic lenses for their subsidiary company B+W, which is probably the most well respected photographic filter maker in the business.    They also make many of the lenses for the Samsung NX series mirrorless cameras, though the construction isn’t quite reminiscent of their other top grade lenses.

On Thursday, Schneider-Kreuznach announced their first entry into the Micro 4/3 system with their new Super-Angulon 14mm f/2.0 lens.  Schneider joined the Micro Four Thirds group a while back, so it’s great to finally see the fruits of their labor.  I think this release is notable and very exciting for a few reasons and underwhelming for a few reasons as well, and I’ll elaborate in a shot bit, but let’s first take a look at the new lens:

Schneider-Kreuznach 14mm f/2.0 Super Angulon for Micro 4/3

What’s Disappointing:

There are a few things that are a little disappointing about this lens, at least how it fits into the existing Micro 4/3 range of lenses.

  1. At 14mm, it covers a range that is already massively represented by existing Micro 4/3 lenses.  Already covering this range are all versions of the Olympus 14-42mm kit lens, All versions of the Panasonic 14-45mm and 14-42mm kit lenses, the Olympus 12-50mm zoom, both the Panasonic and Olympus 14-150ish super zooms and the Panasonic 14mm f/2.5 pancake lens.  Needless to say, it’s not a focal length that is missing from the lens lineup.
  2. At f/2.0, it offers only a slightly brighter view than the much smaller Panasonic 14mm f/2.5 pancake.
  3. While not unexpected, this lens will be quite expensive.  No official price has been released, but they have said the target is ‘under €1500’.  That’s not cheap.

For this reason, it’s not going to be a lens that I think will sell in large volume.   There’s nothing wrong with that, but it’s a lens that isn’t going to stir a ton of excitement on specs alone.  However, I think there IS reason to be excited for this lens for high end users.

What’s Exciting:

  1. While some of the more ‘exotic’ lens makers like Zeiss and Cosina Voigtlander have made lenses for many different formats, including Micro 4/3, when these lenses have come to formats other than their native mount (or any mount in the case of Voigtlander), they have been strictly manual focus lenses.  While Zeiss has at least made for autoaperture control with their ZE and ZF line for Canon and Nikon, they still are left without AF.  Schneider-Kreuznach, however, has made this first entry a true, completely native Micro 4/3 lens.  It has full electronic aperture and autofocus, plus a focus ring that works like the rest of the native lenses.  It’s wonderful to see a high end lens maker embrace a third party mount with such completeness.  It bodes very well for the future.
  2. The Super-Angulon lenses have historically been absolutely stellar optics.  There is every reason to believe, especially given the premium pricing, that this will be the highest performing Micro 4/3 wide-angle, and probably by a good margin.  There’s a little pressure here as well if it doesn’t live up to expectations, but I’d expect this lens to be essentially razor sharp corner to corner with extremely minimal CA and distortion.  Should be a truly pro-grade optic.
  3. Schneider-Kreuznach has said two additional lenses are slated to be released later already.  We can only hope that they build out a rather exciting lineup of really high grade stuff.  Again, ultra-high grade native lenses are a really welcome addition to the system.

So there you have it.  While this lens will likely be well out of my budget for a 14mm lens, I am really excited to see that they’ve committed to the m4/3 mount in full force with a truly native lens.  The company’s reputation for creating outstanding lenses gives me hope that this lens will be a truly world-class optic.  I hope for more great things to come from this new entry to the format.

Comments

8 responses to “Thoughts on the Schneider-Kreuznach 14mm f/2.0 Super Angulon”

  1. […] because it's a high end lens that's truly a native lens. I wrote some more detailed thoughts here. Thoughts on the Schneider-Kreuznach 14mm f/2.0 Super Angulon @ Admiring Light __________________ —————————— Jordan Steele – http://www.jordansteele.com […]

  2. Dane Avatar
    Dane

    I’m looking forward to reading the reviews (and hearing the final price)…even if the focal length doesn’t interest me much. At some point I’ll need something in this range, and it will be nice to have options.

  3. Mertt Avatar
    Mertt

    I agree the focal length is covered by other lenses but comparing a kit zoom to this bad boy is comparing dirt to diamonds. the premium prime lenses for MFT are the Panasonic/Leica 25, the voigtlander 25 and 17 and the upcoming Oly 75mm. The rest are not in the same league…

  4. bousozoku Avatar
    bousozoku

    I have to wonder how it will compared to the wide end of Olympus ZD 14-35mm f/2.0, which is rather amazing on its own.

  5. Why Bother? Avatar
    Why Bother?

    14mm f/2.0? BAH!

    Get the Olympus m.Zuiko 12mm f/2.0 instead. Cheaper, wider, and optically excellent.

  6. Ben Avatar
    Ben

    I am now waiting for the new SK lenses (MFT and HDSLR) for quite a while (actually for more than 3 years). Maybe it is time that somebody informs the company that MFT does not mean “(M)aybe in (F)our years (T)hinkable” and HDSLR does not mean “(H)ow (D)oes (S)chneider (L)enses (R)einvent” (because I think this is not necessary). Time from announcement to availability: not adequate for a company which claims to be a world market leader in photography !!!

  7. Eskimo Micronian Avatar
    Eskimo Micronian

    I do believe this lens will fill a gap in the MFT range, namely a wide angle lens that is as sharp and renders color as well as the 75mm Olympus. Owning the 12mm f2, I can say it is not in the same league as the 75. The extra glass in the Super Angulon, should add sharpness and reduce distortion. The 12 and Oly 17mm both have massive distortion, corrected in camera at the expense of resolution. I bet Schneider’s research indicated they could squeeze more IQ out of a 14mm than they could out of a 12. I will definitely pick one up for critical studio work, perhaps replacing my Nikon D3x and 24-70mm.

  8. JohnZ Avatar
    JohnZ

    It has been 3 years since Schneider announced its PRO grade lens…….
    Oly perhaps announce their 14mm F1.0 or 12mm F1.0 next year

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search


Categories


Recent Posts


  1. This article got me thinking… Why does Canon make RF S lenses starting with 18mm when most full frame RF…

  2. Great review. I shoot Nikon and may try an old Nikon D200 and see how it compares with the new…

  3. Your article brings back some very fond memories. I had exact setup you describe. The 15-85 lens on the 30D…