Admiring Light
Menu
  • Home
  • Review Index
  • Shop Talk
  • Technique and Vision
  • Opinion
  • Portfolio
  • Site Index
  • About
    • Privacy Policy
Menu

A surprising lens…

Posted on August 5, 2012 by Jordan Steele
Voigtlander Nokton 17.5mm f/0.95

I’ve got the Voigtlander Nokton 17.5mm f/0.95 in hand for evaluation (thanks to my friends at LensRentals.com), and I’m running it through its paces at the moment.  I will have a full in-depth review sometime in the next week,but for now I just wanted to share a few thoughts.  This lens is an all manual lens, with manual focus and aperture, though I’m rather used to that from using legacy glass on my Micro 4/3 cameras and my Canon DSLRs before that.  It’s a heavy beast of a lens (well, for a m4/3 lens), but it’s beautifully crafted and feels wonderful to operate.  Now, you’ll notice that the title of this post says that this is a surprising lens.  Here’s why:

If you’re not familiar with this lens, you may be thinking ‘f/0.95…that can’t be right.’  Well, it is the second f/0.95 lens from Voigtlander for the Micro 4/3 format (the other being the 25mm f/0.95).  Most people have never shot with a lens this fast.  I know I haven’t before I received the lens.  Now, if you’ve had experience with ultra-fast lenses in the past, you know that it’s rare that they are flawless wide open.    In fact, most are quite soft wide open with major aberrations until you stop down a stop or two.  There are exceptions, of course, like Canon’s 85mm f/1.2L and even the Canon 35mm f/1.4 isn’t bad wide open.  However, lenses faster than f/1 are extremely rare, and the only ones that have tended to be good wide open cost north of $5,000.  As a result, I expected the Voigtlander to perform OK wide open…usable, but not great.  Well, the surprising part is simply how sharp it is at f/0.95.   And it’s sharp from about 2 feet to infinity at f/0.95.  There are some color aberrations in contrasty light at that aperture…it fringes easily and has some visible longitudinal chromatic aberrations, but those can often be dealt with in post processing.  While it’s not going to break records wide open…this lens is quite sharp, and I’ve been shocked at the quality of the images I’m getting at f/0.95.

Check back in a few days for the full review!

A few quick sample images:

Immigrant Statue – Voigtlander Nokton 17.5mm f/0.95 @ f/0.95
Playing Makeup – Voigtlander Nokton 17.5mm f/0.95 @ f/0.95
Up close – Voigtlander Nokton 17.5mm f/0.95 @ f/0.95

 

3 thoughts on “A surprising lens…”

  1. Matt B says:
    August 5, 2012 at 11:19 pm

    Very interested in this lens. Full manual focus would be a nice way to work. Wish m43 cameras has focus peaking to help with focussing at f0.95. Interested to hear what you think of it.

    Found your site recently and its great. Really nice real world opinions. Great work.

    Reply
  2. canon lens reviews says:
    October 30, 2012 at 3:21 pm

    Hello Admiringlight,
    Very interesting Just before you start purchasing Canon lenses you’ve got to be informed about lens terminology. Some of the terminology is unique to Canon. Different camera manufacturers have their own as well. Canon and Nikon are the most in-demand camera makes. There are two principal categories of lenses.. Prime lenses have a fixed focal length. Zoom lenses make use of a variable focal length. Your spending budget along with the quality of photos you would like determines the lenses you will purchase.
    Thanks

    Reply
  3. Jack says:
    November 3, 2012 at 12:26 am

    I find the “magnify’ feature to be helpful with manual focus. I assume this feature would not work automatically with all manual lenses like this one, correct? I also assume that it would would work if assigned to a custom function button.

    Thanks!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow Me:

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on InstagramFollow Us on Mastodon

Most Popular Posts

  • "Full Frame Equivalence" and Why It Doesn't Matter (286)
  • Fuji X-Pro 2 vs. Sony A7 II: Noise Comparison (70)
  • Fuji 56mm f/1.2 vs. Panasonic Leica 42.5mm f/1.2 Nocticron (63)
  • Review: Metabones Speed Booster (Canon FD to Fuji X) (56)
  • Review: Olympus OM-D E-M5 (48)

Recent Comments

  • Frank on Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS vs. Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L
  • Giorgio on A Tripod in the Sky – DJI Air 2S Review
  • Sam Taylor on My Favorite Photos of 2022
  • Damien on Review: TTArtisan 50mm f/1.4 ASPH (RF Mount)
  • Jordan Steele on Review: TTArtisan 50mm f/1.4 ASPH (RF Mount)

Archives

©2023 Admiring Light | Theme by SuperbThemes
We use cookies to personalize content and ads and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. You may consent to the use of cookies or opt out. Accept Reject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

SAVE & ACCEPT