Admiring Light
Menu
  • Home
  • Review Index
  • Shop Talk
  • Technique and Vision
  • Opinion
  • Portfolio
  • Site Index
  • About
    • Privacy Policy
Menu

Fuji 50-140mm f/2.8 vs. Fuji 55-200mm f/3.5-4.8

Posted on December 11, 2014December 23, 2014 by Jordan Steele

Contents

  • 1Construction and Handling
  • 2Sharpness
  • 3Bokeh
  • 4Some additional first impressions on the 50-140mm f/2.8

Bokeh

I was originally going to show 100% crops of out of focus areas throughout a range, but after a short while, it became apparent that the two lenses are remarkably similar in that department, at least in this test.  To show an idea of out of focus rendering, see the reduced areas of blur from the two lenses at 90mm, with the focus point about 8 feet from the camera.

Bokeh - Fuji 50-140mm f/2.8 @ 90mm, f/2.8
Bokeh – Fuji 50-140mm f/2.8 @ 90mm, f/2.8
Bokeh - Fuji 50-140mm f/2.8 @ 90mm, f/4
Bokeh – Fuji 50-140mm f/2.8 @ 90mm, f/4
Bokeh - Fuji 55-200mm f/3.5-4.8 @ 90mm, f/4
Bokeh – Fuji 55-200mm f/3.5-4.8 @ 90mm, f/4

As you can see above, the bokeh is quite similar between the two lenses.  Neither is a cream machine, but both are respectable in this department.  Overall, it’s clear to me that the 50-140mm f/2.8 is the superior lens from an optical standpoint.  Is the difference and speed worth the added bulk and the much higher price tag?  Only you can decide that.

Some additional first impressions on the 50-140mm f/2.8

I’ve been shooting with the 50-140mm for the past two days, and I’m quickly becoming very impressed with the lens.  It is very sharp at any focal length and aperture, has excellent color and contrast, fairly decent bokeh in most situations (though there are some caveats there), and most surprisingly: it seems to be essentially apochromatic.  I’ve got a lot more shooting to do with the lens before making final judgments, but my first impressions are very positive.  I will have my full in-depth review of the Fuji 50-140mm f/2.8 coming later next week! Edit: Check out my full review of the 50-140mm here!

In the meantime, here are a few quick image samples (Click to enlarge):

Smile - Fujifilm X-T1 with Fujinon XF 50-140mm f/2.8 @ 110mm, f/2.8
Smile – Fujifilm X-T1 with Fujinon XF 50-140mm f/2.8 @ 110mm, f/2.8
Walking Home - Fujifilm X-T1 with Fujinon XF 50-140mm f/2.8 @ 140mm, f/2.8
Walking Home – Fujifilm X-T1 with Fujinon XF 50-140mm f/2.8 @ 140mm, f/2.8
Airplane Cross - Fujifilm X-T1 with Fujinon XF 50-140mm f/2.8 @
Airplane Cross – Fujifilm X-T1 with Fujinon XF 50-140mm f/2.8 @ 50mm, f/4
Presents - Fujifilm X-T1 with Fujinon XF 50-140mm f/2.8 @ 140mm, f/2.8
Presents – Fujifilm X-T1 with Fujinon XF 50-140mm f/2.8 @ 140mm, f/2.8
Pages: 1 2

14 thoughts on “Fuji 50-140mm f/2.8 vs. Fuji 55-200mm f/3.5-4.8”

  1. Pingback: Fuji 50-140mm f/2.8 vs. Fuji 55-200mm f/3.5-4.8 | Jordan Steele › Von TOMEN
  2. Gene Lowinger says:
    December 12, 2014 at 1:45 pm

    Nice write up. I was out with the new lens last night, specifically to test the AF speed and the new OIS. I was deeply impressed by both. Was going to do the same kinds of tests you wrote about, but I hate pixel peeping, and I’m no engineer, so I’ll leave that stuff to you. Looking at my images from last night though, I just know the new lens is a winner.

    Reply
  3. Jorge says:
    December 12, 2014 at 3:01 pm

    I was deciding between the 50-140 and the 55-200. I went with the 55-200 which is being delivered today only because of the size and weight. My whole purpose of (working on) ridding myself of my Nikon D300, 700, and 800 plus the Nikon glass is to give my back and shoulders a break. Even though this is a really sweet lens, the 55-200 won out. I do love this comparison. I feel I made the right decision for me. I will happily sacrifice some sharpness in order to shave off some weight.
    Thanks for the review.
    J

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      December 13, 2014 at 8:21 am

      I understand. For my own day to day use, the 55-200 will definitely be in the bag. If I buy the 50-140 for myself, it’ll be for event use and occasions where the size isn’t an issue. It is a great lens, though.

      Reply
  4. Steve says:
    December 12, 2014 at 4:08 pm

    How have you found the IQ and AF speed compared to the Olympus 40-150mm f2.8 ?

    Reply
  5. Sam says:
    December 12, 2014 at 6:02 pm

    Thank you for your analysis and thoughts.
    Did you try shooting handheld?

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      December 13, 2014 at 8:17 am

      I’ve done lots of handheld shooting, and will have full analysis of the OIS in my final review. (Hint…it’s really good). My full review should be done sometime next week.

      Reply
  6. Pingback: Fuji 50-140mm vz Fuji 55-200mm |
  7. Pingback: miXed zone: Firmware Feedback, X-Gear reviews, Capture One 8.1 with X100T support, Fiji Workshop, Nissin i40 and more! | Fuji Rumors
  8. Jano says:
    December 22, 2014 at 6:07 am

    Sorry, but the sharpness comparisons are typical engineering junk. Nothing useful to see here.
    A good lens is always optimised for the typical working distance and since this is a workhorse lens for portrait and event photographers this lens will be used mainly within a distance of several meters. Ergo comparing sharpness at infinity is useless because it in no way represent real world results.
    Even 3 out of your 4 example images are shot at close distance. Those are interesting for comparing sharpness!

    Reply
  9. Rod Smith says:
    December 22, 2014 at 8:55 am

    Great write up Jordan. I have been on the fence over what telephoto to get. Seeing the size and weight difference, not to mention price, I think the 55-200 will be more than adequate for my needs, at least for now.

    Rod

    Reply
  10. Pingback: Fujifilm XF 50-140mm F2.8 Lens Reviews, Samples
  11. Chuxk says:
    December 23, 2014 at 9:54 pm

    The results with the 50-140 are not surprising. It is expected to be (and should be) somewhat better. However, I can tell you from experience with my 55-200mm, that on its own merits, it is an excellent lens – very sharp. You cannot go wrong with the 55-200mm. And the best bang for the buck. I’m happy with it and have no plan to get the 50-140. And the fact that I also have the excellent 18-135mm means that I basically have it all covered for my type of photography.

    Reply
  12. Steve Solomon says:
    May 3, 2016 at 11:43 am

    Jordan, man, In glad I found your review and comparison of these two Fujinon lenses! As an XT-1 shooter of landscapes, small products, and macro images, I am debating on one of these two zooms to complement my superb XF 16-55 zoom, however, without too much sacrifice in sharpness or overall image quality. If I planned to use the long zoom as a primary lens, I can see that the 50-140 is the sharper of the two, as well as WR and better-built. However, for the occasional landscape or marathon coverage I plan to use it for, based on your thoroughly professional testing (thank you!), I may now lean towards the more affordable but still quite good 55-200, with the possible addition of the XF 90 as the “sharpness king”. Thanks again sir!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow Me:

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on Instagram

Most Popular Posts

  • "Full Frame Equivalence" and Why It Doesn't Matter (286)
  • Fuji X-Pro 2 vs. Sony A7 II: Noise Comparison (70)
  • Fuji 56mm f/1.2 vs. Panasonic Leica 42.5mm f/1.2 Nocticron (63)
  • Review: Metabones Speed Booster (Canon FD to Fuji X) (56)
  • Review: Olympus OM-D E-M5 (48)

Recent Comments

  • Don McConnell on Review: Laowa 15mm f/4.5 Zero-D Shift
  • Scott on Review: Laowa 15mm f/4.5 Zero-D Shift
  • Logan ross on Canon RF 70-200mm f/4L IS vs. Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS
  • Tobie on Review: Panasonic Lumix G 25mm f/1.7
  • Carl Zeller on Using Manual Focus Lenses on Mirrorless Cameras

Archives

©2021 Admiring Light | Theme by SuperbThemes
We use cookies to personalize content and ads and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. You may consent to the use of cookies or opt out. Accept Reject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.