Review: Fujifilm Fujinon XF 10-24mm f/4 R OIS

Image Quality

Sharpness

Milestone 229 - Fujinon XF 10-24mm @ 10mm, f/8
Milestone 229 – Fujinon XF 10-24mm @ 10mm, f/8

Following in the footsteps of the other high quality zoom lenses in the Fuji lens lineup, the 10-24mm f/4 is a very solid performer when it comes to image sharpness.  The lens particularly excels at the wide and middle regions in the zoom range.  When shot at the widest focal lengths, the lens starts out with very good central image sharpness and passable borders.  Stopping down to f/8 yields images that are quite sharp corner to corner.  This level of performance continues through to about 18mm.  Beyond 20mm, the lens does take a bit of a hit.  While the center and most of the image frame is still outstanding, the borders and corners can’t quite keep up.  Overall, one of the best performances by an ultra-wide zoom lens that I’ve had the pleasure to use.

With that said, the 10-24mm can’t quite reach the truly outstanding resolution provided by the Fuji 14mm f/2.8 and 23mm f/1.4, though I don’t think most rational photographers would expect an ultra-wide zoom to match these lenses.

Bokeh

An f/4 ultra-wide zoom isn’t going to be a lens that you typically use to provide high levels of subject isolation, though it is possible to produce a bit of a blurred background at the long end of the zoom.   While it’s possible to blur out the background some with the 10-24mm, it’s not a lens that produces a particularly pleasing out of focus rendering.  The bokeh of the 10-24mm is relatively nervous and produces some harsh outlining on finer details that are out of focus.

Color, Contrast and Chromatic Aberration

The Fuji 10-24mm f/4 OIS produces images with high contrast and rich color at all apertures and throughout the focal range.  When using a lens like this, landscape, travel and architectural photography come to mind, and the 10-24mm has a contrast curve that suits those applications.

Alley Sunrise - Fujinon XF 10-24mm f/4 R OIS @ 22mm, f/8
Alley Sunrise – Fujinon XF 10-24mm f/4 R OIS @ 22mm, f/9

The 10-24mm controls lateral chromatic aberration very well.  There is a very small amount of CA visible at the edges of the frame upon close inspection, though you really need to look for it to see it.  As with most minor CA, it can be cleaned up extremely easily in your postprocessing workflow.

Distortion, Flare and Vignetting

The Fuji 10-24mm turns in a pretty nice performance when it comes to distortion control for an ultra-wide zoom. While some other reviews I’ve seen have noted some rather significant barrel distortion at the wide end, I have to say I saw only minor barrel distortion at the wide end in my shooting, even when shooting in tight city alleys.  In the mid-range of 14-20mm, distortion is negligible.  I found the pincushion distortion present at the longer end of the zoom to be more objectionable than the barrel distortion at the wide end.

The 10-24mm generally works fairly well against strong light sources, especially at the wide end of the zoom range.  Even shooting into the sun, contrast loss is minimal and ghosting artifacts are almost entirely absent at the wide end.  Zooming more towards the long end of the zoom range does show an increase in flare artifacts.  At the long end, some ghosting and minor contrast loss is visible in images with very bright light sources in the frame, as shown on the image to the left, though overall this still isn’t a bad performance.

The 10-24mm also controls vignetting quite well, as only minor corner darkening is visible at f/4 and 10mm, and is virtually invisible at 24mm and f/4.  Nothing to worry about here.

Continue: Conclusion and Image Samples

Tags:

Comments

14 responses to “Review: Fujifilm Fujinon XF 10-24mm f/4 R OIS”

  1. […] To Go Kit by Joe Farace at shutterbug.com // Fuji Fujinon XF 10-24 mm f/4 R OIS Jordan Steele by at admiringlight.com // Fuji FinePix S9400W by Mark Goldstein at photographyblog.com // Nikon Coolpix P7800 by Mike Lowe […]

  2. Anurag Avatar

    I find heavy barrel distortion in the first photo and so I found on many other photos on other posts. The only reason I am holding back my purchase of this lens is that I have Canon 10-22mm which has much lower barrel distortion than this lens and as per my knowledge, it has the lowest distortion amongst all superwide lenses available in the world in this focal length range.

    Also, you no where mentioned whether in-camera correction (or correction in post processing) was applied or not. Fujifilm corrects distortion in-camera which keeps you from knowing the real distortion level of the lens.

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      Where are you seeing heavy barrel distortion in the first photo? There is heavy PERSPECTIVE distortion, which causes the verticals to converge due to the angle of the camera in the scene, but this is a function of camera position and not the optical characteristics of the lens. Look at the last two images and see how straight the vertical lines are. Heavy barrel distortion would cause those vertical lines to bow from the center out. There is a tiny bit that’s perceptible, but it’s quite a small amount for a UWA zoom.

      All of these images were processed from RAW, mostly in Lightroom. Lightroom can apply distortion correction, though I’m not sure if it does it for Fuji lenses. However, C1 Pro doesn’t apply corrections (to my knowledge), and the images look the same to my eye in C1.

      1. Anurag Avatar

        As per imatest, the distortion at 10mm on this lens is 5.03% and on my Canon 10-22mm, it is around 1.25%.

      2. Zach Wagner Avatar
        Zach Wagner

        Just FYI; I know this is an older review and this particular query may have been sorted by now, but C1 Pro does actually automatically apply corrections. At least on my version (8). While I have yet to use this lens personally, if you take a look at the review over on Lenstip, they show comparisons of raw and jpeg distortion, and the distortion in the raw files is significant.
        I don’t use Lightroom anymore, but I’ve read you can’t turn off distortion correction that is being applied due to information imbedded in the raw files. In C1, you can.

        I think it’s important to recognize this type of thing going forward with lenses, as more and more often manufacturers are relying on software to fix what would otherwise be a more difficult manufacturing task. While I’m generally okay with this philosophy, many aren’t, and certainly an argument can be made that to pay so much for an instrument that in itself is poorly corrected is a bit hard to swallow.

        That all said, I’m excited to receive my copy of the lens (I just ordered it) and enjoy its merits, through software or otherwise.

        Cheers.

  3. […] fujivsfuji.com undated martin-doppelbauer.de undated news.mapcamera.com (JP) 2013-04-15 admiringlight.com 2014-03-31 photographyblog.com 2014-04-15 […]

  4. Michel Avatar
    Michel

    How would you rate this lens in comparison to the 14mm? I’m still not decided yet – the flexibility and wider focal length of the zoom vs. the smaller dimension, and probably slightly(?) better image quality of the fixed one.

  5. Kevin Avatar
    Kevin

    Hi Jordan, since you have reviewed both the Panasonic 7-14 and this Fuji 10-24, is it possible that you give some comment about these two UW lenses.

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      I have a lot more experience with the 7-14, as I owned it for about 2-3 years, while the 10-24 I only had for a week when I had my review sample. Both are excellent lenses. The 10-24 is a significantly large lens and has optical stabilization, so that may make a difference, unless you’re shooting the 7-14 on an Olympus body. The 7-14 on the E-M5 (not sure if it’s this way on the E-M10 or E-M1) can produce some odd purple flares, which is something to be aware of. Both are very sharp throughout. The 7-14 might better at the long end than the 10-24, but the 10-24 is probably a little better at the wide end. It’s really hard to pick between, considering the different formats and the total image quality is tied to the camera a bit as well. If I’m remembering correctly, the 10-24 controls CA a bit better overall. Both are very sharp. If I had to pick, I’d guess the 10-24 is probably the slightly better lens overall, but it would be very close, and again, that’s with the caveat of only having used the 10-24 for a week.

      1. Tank Johnson Avatar
        Tank Johnson

        The Fujifilm lens has far too much distortion compared to the Panasonic.

        1. Zach Wagner Avatar

          Where do you get your info? Just curious. In comparing technical reviews from 2 sites, photozone and lenstip (lenstip is one of the best technical lens review sites, but they didn’t have a review for both lenses), the distortion (speaking geometrically) is worse on the Panasonic. Not too much worse; the Fuji runs around -4.62% and the Panasonic clocks in at -5.24% (at the wide end of course). However, vignetting is worse on the Fuji to be sure, with the Fuji putting in a pretty much abysmal showing at -1.93ev, with the Panasonic tossing in a much more respectable -1.2ev. Fuji does a little better with CA, except at small apertures at the 24mm setting (a bit odd).

          At any rate, it seems to me that the Fuji and Panasonic are in pretty close company as it relates to distortion.

  6. Kevin Avatar
    Kevin

    Thank you so much for your reply. Good to know either choice will be a good one. As for 7-14 on EM1, Cameralab did a test on that combo and the result is discouraging. So Olympus body may not correct Panasonic lens after all. Anyway, really appreciated your reply and I enjoyed your reviews a lot. Very user oriented. We’ll done.

  7. John Wright Avatar
    John Wright

    With thin filters, is it possible to stack a CPL and ND on the 10-24 without vignetting? I use the combination with waterfall images on my 16-35 to blur the water and saturate the color (and typically avoid the sky).

  8. Aaron Avatar
    Aaron

    Amazing images and review! Thank you!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search


Categories


Recent Posts


  1. I think it is near Hillsboro.

  2. This article got me thinking… Why does Canon make RF S lenses starting with 18mm when most full frame RF…

  3. Great review. I shoot Nikon and may try an old Nikon D200 and see how it compares with the new…