Review: Olympus Pen-F

High Resolution Mode

After the OM-D E-M5 Mark II, the Pen-F is the second Olympus camera to feature their sensor-shift High Resolution Mode (henceforth referred to in this article as HR mode).  The HR mode takes advantage of the precise control afforded by the excellent in-body image stabilizing system to precisely shift the sensor to capture significantly more data than is generally available with the native 20 megapixel sensor. It does this by taking 8 discrete photos and merging them into a single file.  First, the camera takes a shot, then shifts the sensor to the side one pixel, then down, then to the other side.  This doesn’t add any direct resolution, but instead shifts the Bayer color filter array around such that red, green and blue values are captured for every pixel location, rather than requiring interpolation.  This alone increases detail since color interpolation isn’t required like it is for almost all digital cameras.  It then follows by shifting the sensor up and to the side, placing the pixel array exactly halfway between pixels both horizontally and vertically.  It then completes the shifting to capture full color information at all of THOSE locations.

Blossom - Olympus Pen-F with Olympus 60mm f/2.8 Macro @ f/4, 80 MP High Res Mode
Blossom – Olympus Pen-F with Olympus 60mm f/2.8 Macro @ f/3.5, 80 MP High Res Mode

The result?  A true 80 megapixel RAW file with RGB color information at every one of the 80 megapixels. Because of diffraction effects, there’s not really a full 80 megapixels of detail here, but it’s still excellent.  Olympus manages expectations by outputting a 50 megapixel JPEG image, which captures essentially all the actual extra detail offered by this mode.  It works very well, but there are a few caveats.

First, the camera must be completely still, so you are limited to tripod mounted shooting, and if it’s windy, I wouldn’t try it.  Second, the scene itself must be still.  Objects that move will leave diagonal line artifacts in the final image.  If you’re photographing moving water or skies with long exposures, this is less of an issue (as you can easily blur out any visible artifacts), but for sharpness in your image, you’ll need to shoot still scenes on a rock solid tripod.  See below for an example.  The full image above was captured using the HR mode, and as you can see in the 100% crop below, there’s really quite a lot of extra detail here that wouldn’t have been captured in a single shot. This is a crop of the 80 megapixel RAW, which shows some softness due to diffraction, but there’s at least 50 megapixels of true data here.  I’t something to use sparingly, but when used well, it’s a great feature to have.

100% crop of 80 MP HR shot above. (Click to view full size)
100% crop of 80 MP HR shot above. (Click to view full size)

Image Stabilization

In-Body Image Stabilization

Of course, one of the best reasons to choose Olympus bodies for your MIcro 4/3 kit is the excellent in-body Image stabilization (IBIS).  The Pen-F inherits 5 Axis IBIS similar to those on the OM-D line of cameras, and like you’d expect, it works very well. In my experience, the IBIS system is generally useful for allowing an extra four stops of handholding at slower shutter speeds.  With wider angle lenses, I’ve even been able to get sharp shots as slow as 1/2 second.  The shot below, for instance, was taken at 1/4 second handheld and is very sharp.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA
Under the Railroad – Olympus Pen-F with Panasonic 12-32mm f/3.5-5.6 @ 22mm, f/5, 1/4 sec, ISO 200

However, the downside of the recent Olympus stabilizers are also present, and that is a tendency for shutter shock at shutter speeds between 1/60 and 1/200s.  It’s not too big of a problem, though, as the Pen-F includes a fully electronic shutter that also can be utilized as a first-curtain electronic shutter to help eliminate shutter shock.  Electronic first curtain is enabled by turning on ‘anti-shock’ with a 0 second delay.  Of course, turning on silent mode with full electronic shutter will eliminate it completely.

Focus Bracketing

The Pen-F is the second camera to debut with focus bracketing (and the fourth to have it, after the E-M5 II and E-M1 had it added via firmware update).  This is a great feature for creating focus stacks where depth of field is limited. If you aren’t familiar with focus stacking, it’s a process of taking many images, focused at different points in an image, and combining the in-focus parts into a single image.  This is exceptionally useful for macro shooting due to the extremely shallow depth of field that occurs when shooting macro.  When you want to get a lot of a macro subject in focus, often the solution is to stop down to very small apertures.  This does get more of the subject in focus, but often it still isn’t enough, and you also incur significant loss of sharpness due to diffraction softening at very small apertures.  The solution? Shoot many images at an optimal aperture and stack them.

This photo of a blossom was taken at f/4, an optimal aperture for sharpness, but the final image has very shallow depth of field.
This photo of a blossom was taken at f/4, an optimal aperture for sharpness, but the final image has very shallow depth of field.

In the past, a photographer has had to manually move the focus point bit by bit to create a good focus stack.  Given the very small movements required and the sheer number of images for a quality macro focus stack, this can be very time consuming and is prone to error if you overshoot focus on a few images.

The Pen-F automates that process completely.  You simply select focus bracketing, select a degree of movement (lower numbers move the point less than higher numbers) and select the number of exposures.  You then focus at the closest point that you want in focus, click the shutter, and the camera takes a series of images moved precisely in exact increments, covering the number of shots you wish to shoot.  Like the high-resolution mode, there are a few things to watch out for. First, this process uses the electronic shutter, I’d imagine to avoid shutter vibration and save actuations on the shutter mechanism, as you can blow through over a hundred frames in a single stack.  This is great, though be careful if shooting under fluorescent lighting at certain shutter speeds, as banding can be induced due to the flicker of the lights. Second, and perhaps most obviously, this process will also, in most cases, require the use of a tripod.  If you’re using a small number of images to focus stack a landscape, for instance, you could probably hand hold it and get a good result, as most stacking software can adjust for minor variations.  For many images in macro shooting, though, I’d definitely shoot tripod mounted.

The image above shows a blossom, taken with my Olympus 60mm Macro lens at f/4.  This provides for excellent sharpness, but given the very close focus distance, depth of field is extremely shallow as well.  Even stopping down to f/16 will not get the whole blossom in focus, and it will also reduce sharpness due to diffraction.  The shot below, however, shows a 40 image stack with Helicon Focus, with each image taken at f/4.  The whole process of taking the images took only around 4 or 5 seconds; a massive improvement on manually adjusting focus between each frame.

Blossom - Focus stack of 40 images, Olympus Pen-F with Olympus 60mm f/2.8 @ f/4
Blossom – Focus stack of 40 images, Olympus Pen-F with Olympus 60mm f/2.8 @ f/4

Wi-Fi

As is the standard with mirrorless cameras nowadays, the Pen-F has fully featured Wi-Fi capabilities, on par with those in the E-M10 Mark II and E-M5 Mark II, including image transfer, geotagging and remote control. Let’s start with image transfer: The Pen-F has the ability to transfer JPEG images, either singularly or in bulk, to a mobile device, simply by connecting the camera to your phone or tablet and booting up the Olympus Image Share app.  The camera can connect to your phone in a few different ways, but the easiest is via scanning a QR code displayed on the rear of the camera, which will then pass the WiFi network credentials to your phone or tablet.  Once connected, you can browse the contents of the camera and pick which images you’d like to transfer.

If you are primarily a RAW shooter, Olympus also has you covered, as the Pen-F includes a rather full-featured, if somewhat confusing to operate, RAW converter.  Simply select your image and choose RAW Data Edit.  At this point, you can make adjustments to exposure, highlight and shadow tone, color, tone curve, art filters, etc, and create a JPEG image from those settings.  Then you can transfer your developed JPEGs to your mobile device for sharing.  One downside to the Olympus RAW converter is that after creation of the JPEG, the image review starts at the created JPEG, so if you’re converting multiple files from earlier in a shoot, you’ll spend quite a bit of time scrolling through images as you make your way back to the images you’d like to convert.  Fuji had this same issue a while back, but changed this behavior last year via firmware update.

The Wi-Fi remote control is full featured and fairly responsive.
The Wi-Fi remote control is full featured and fairly responsive.

For geotagging, you’ll simply start a GPS log on your phone using the Image Share app. Prior to doing this, you’ll need to connect the camera at some point before to sync clocks, but this doesn’t need to be done frequently.  After a shoot, connect the camera to your phone over Wi-Fi and the app will prompt you to merge the GPS data with the images on the camera.

The Pen-F can also utilize remote capture via Wi-Fi, with full live view and the ability to change camera settings remotely.  The remote capture works well and allows for adjustment of aperture, shutter speed, ISO, focus point, and so on while viewing the live display.  I found the remote shooting on the Pen-F to be fairly responsive with relatively low lag. When shooting remotely, the camera will transfer the completed image to your phone automatically, which is a nice touch.

Other Features of Note

There are quite a few long-standing Olympus features that are also present on this camera as well.  Worth mentioning is the outstanding Live Time and Live Bulb features, which show a live developing preview of the image during long exposures. Also present is the Live Comp mode first introduced with the E-M5 Mark II, which allows you to take a reference exposure image, and then let the camera check for new areas of brightness over the course of subsequent exposures.  Effectively, it allows you to expose for the background and then do subsequent longer exposures to composite into the frame, such as painting with light, or something as simple as fireworks.

Continue: Image Quality

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5

Tags:

Comments

23 responses to “Review: Olympus Pen-F”

  1. Peter Avatar
    Peter

    A very informative and honest review. Do you recall if the EV dial is active, when in Manual mode and auto ISO? On the GX8, with such settings, it gets turned off. Such a waste.

  2. Sam Avatar
    Sam

    Finally a comprehensive and thorough reviewer who advises us that “your money is more wisely spent elsewhere.” As a satisfied owner of the E-M10 II I couldn’t agree more. To me, a camera that doesn’t offer comfortable haptics and ergonomics is a “no sale” no matter how nice is the rest of the package. There will just be no joy in using it. As for the price, the less said the better. Thank you for an excellent analysis. Respect.

  3. Peter Avatar
    Peter

    A very good review, as always. But in your conclusion you miss one – or, rather, *the* – crucial point: The Pen-F gives some “rangefinder feeling”, which no other Olympus does. Whether this is worth the price is a question which everybody must answer for him/herself.

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      No, I address it. The last paragraph. It really is the lack of a viewfinder hump. That’s it. It’s no smaller than the OM-D series cameras with the exception of the hump. I don’t feel the camera gives any more of a rangefinder feeling than any other Mirrorless camera. The only Mirrorless camera that comes close is the Fuji X Pro series, with the optical finder and frame lines. This just lacks a hump.

      It’s rangefinder styled, but it doesn’t have a rangefinder feel.

      1. Peter Avatar
        Peter

        With “rangefinder feeling” I didn’t mean the lack of the bulb, but rather that the camera doesn’t hide your face while photographing. It may be a minor point, but for me it allows for a completely different communication when photographing people. I agree that it’s not the same as a true rangefinder, of course.

        1. Peter Avatar
          Peter

          Correction: I meant to write “hump”, not “bulb”, of course.

        2. Andrew Avatar
          Andrew

          Hahah, my Koni Omega Rapid 200 is a real rangefinder (with a cinema-scale viewfinder to go with it), and definitely hides my face. It also weighs 2 kg, though. For me the rangefinder aspect is the super-precise feel of manual focussing with the rangefinder patch. With a well-calibrated lens, I feel like it’s possible to manually focus more quickly and accurately than any other system (better than any SLR OVF, better than focus peaking, and similar to magnified view but with the whole perspective). As Jordan says, I feel like the X-Pro 2 only gives part of that feeling, since the OVF is not usable for manual focussing in a conventional sense.

  4. cosinaphile Avatar
    cosinaphile

    thank for a very nice review , a great camera imho but imperfect ….id love to see an article about the best settings and why in the overly complex dense menus …..i still cant figure out how to lock the focus point in the center of the grid when using legacy lenses and also how to turn off the lcd screen

    ive got the pen F in silver and am enjoying using the .64 x version on the metabones speedbooster and nikon glass
    like fast nifty fifties and wiser primes like the 24mm,2.8 and 35mm 2 AND just picked up the wide body cap lens
    also the 12 -32 on the pen is a great combo

  5. Menkhoff Avatar

    A little disappointed by the pictures. Pen-F deserves another target that the poor Panasonic 14mm. It would be best suited to the Panasonic Leica 15mm

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      So you’re upset I didn’t go buy a $550 lens, so that when I took pictures of a camera, it looked better? Feel free to donate that money to the site, and I’ll gladly purchase one for product shots in future reviews.

      1. Eric Jones Avatar
        Eric Jones

        LOL!

    2. John Avatar
      John

      I think his example picture is more than “good enough”, especially the “Under the Railroad”, golden hours, flowers…

  6. Gilbert Tumbleweed Avatar
    Gilbert Tumbleweed

    I’ve always enjoyed reading the reviews here, always on point with great detail. The sample images are really good too!

  7. QBNY Avatar
    QBNY

    The “walking after the rain” is really good! Would’ve liked to see it in B&W. Still, very good composition.

  8. Flo Avatar
    Flo

    In the Focus Bracketing mode, I do not get a single stacked image. I get the 5 images but not a 6th one with them all stacked. Is there no in camera stacking in the PenF? TY

  9. Frank Villafane Avatar

    Jordan,

    Excellent article. I, however, disagree with your final statement that my money would be better spent elsewhere. I traded in my OMD EM5MII for the PEN-F and I have not regretted my decision. The EM5MII was (and is) an excellent camera, and certainly produces fantastic images, but I needed just that little bit “extra” with the 20mp vs the 16mp. Yes, I’d love to have the weather-sealing, but it’s not a show stopper for me if the camera doesn’t have it. Sure I would’ve preferred paying $200 less…but after spending the money, I find the results I’m getting more than justifies the cost (but of course, “your mileage may vary”).

    Is it perfect? No, there is no such camera. But when I’m out and about, it’s the first camera I grab and it’s with me on a daily basis. My biggest complaint is more with M43 cameras’ in general: their low-light capability lacks when compared to a capable DSLR (such as the Nikon D750, which I also shoot). So for now…as long as the light is good (dawn to dusk, really) I am assured of capturing great images at a very good frame rate. For the record, I find the best feature to be the silent shutter.

    One more thing: in my experience, the PEN-F raws are a bit more malleable than the comparable EM5MII raws. It may very well be due to the slightly greater detail resolution (20mp vs 16mp), but the new(er) sensor may also have a lot to do with it. What I’m finding is that I can shoot at or below optimal exposure and still pull out the shadows without an alarming increase in noise. I couldn’t do this with the EM5MII raws (since I shoot a great deal with the D750, the Nikon raws are almost “rubbery” in the amount of post-process manipulation that can be applied without any degradation…and that is the standard I use to compare the PEN-F raws).

    Excellent review, nonetheless. Thank you.

    Frank Villafane
    Urban Industrial Imaging

    You can view my mirrorless gallery at the link below:
    https://www.500px.com/urbanindustrialimaging/galleries/sin-espejo-mirrorless

  10. Mhs Vz Avatar
    Mhs Vz

    Thanks for a very thorough review. I agree, a little overpriced at $1,199 for the body only.

  11. Mahesh Avatar
    Mahesh

    Hi Jordan, just across this review as I am toying with the idea of getting the pen-f. Does the compact panasonic zoom work well with olympus cameras? Did you have to apply the lens profile in lightroom?
    Or I might just get GX800 with that compact zoom kit. 🙂
    Thanks

  12. Patrick Avatar
    Patrick

    Good review but I find the conclusion harsh. All these cameras , as long as they produce good pictures , fulfill a need. Pen F does not have a big grip because it is not to be used with long and heavier lens, there is the OMD for that. It is used as a discreet everyday camera. Most of the pictures which have changed the world come from this type of camera. The absemce of a grip make them easy to put in a pocket and to be there when needed.

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      I think my conclusion is more than fair. Sure it will fill a need for many people, and I say so in my review and in the conclusion, but it is hard to recommend due to the price, and that is still true today. The Pen F is 3 years old and still $999. That’s an absurd price given the competition. A Sony a6400 has better AF, a better EVF, a better sensor, is more comfortable to hold and shoot with, costs $100 less, and in a practical sense, is about the same size too.

      You can get a Fuji X-T30 for less money, and it is better in nearly every way.

      Olympus priced this camera at the time almost as if m4/3 was still the only player in the mirrorless world. That reality is gone now. The full frame Canon EOS RP is only $300 more expensive, and only $200 more than the Pen F was at launch.

      All that said, it’s still a very nice camera, and it may well be exactly what you are looking for. And that’s great. But it’s still overpriced.

  13. Cliff Etzel Avatar
    Cliff Etzel

    Jordan – I’m STILL shooting a trio of 7yo EM5’s with my 12mm f/2, 17mm f/1.8, 45mm f/1.8 & 75mm f/1.8 lenses and TBH, I’m not happy with the images I’m getting even though I’ve been shooting Olympus for 3 years after having shot Canon Film and DSLR’s since 1989.

    One of my friends/colleagues is an Olympus Visionary and I made the switch per his recommendation. As a documentary shooter, one of my biggest needs is shooting in marginal lighting conditions (ISO1600-3200) and getting as much IQ as possible. I’ve been investigating whether to stick with Olympus by going the Pen-f route or moving completely to Fuji X-E2/3’s or possibly X-Pro 1/2’s with their fast primes. Or do I look at Olympus Pro primes? The biggest limitations I’m really seeing is less dynamic range and alot of noise at higher ISO’s with the m43 platform. Fuji seems to have done things right but I’m still not totally convinced. The EM1 series I have no interest in due to its size. And the ergonomics of the EM bodies is still as unintuitive now as it was when I made the switch and that has gotten in the way on more than one occasion for me causing me to miss those decisive moments – Very Frustrating.

    I’m totally confused which way to go. I typically shoot RAW only but from what I’ve read, in camera Fuji jpgs cant be matched. Any thoughts? If too much to answer you can email me directly – I’d really appreciate it.

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      Fuji has its own quirks, but I think there is a nice bump in image quality moving to Fuji. Fuji controls are really a personal thing. I love them, and find them to be incredibly intuitive and easy to use. Others do not, so that’ll be up to you. You will definitely see an improvement in noise control with Fuji compared to m4/3. I will say that ergonomically, the X-E and X-Pro series are lacking in the grip department, but controls are very good. The X-T2/X-T3 is a lot more comfortable to hold, in my opinion.

  14. Erik Thoresen Avatar
    Erik Thoresen

    I love my PEN -F. Easy to carry and people like it . With the 17mm or 45mm Oly it’s Just there when I need it on my hikes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search


Categories


Recent Posts


  1. I think it is near Hillsboro.

  2. This article got me thinking… Why does Canon make RF S lenses starting with 18mm when most full frame RF…

  3. Great review. I shoot Nikon and may try an old Nikon D200 and see how it compares with the new…