Admiring Light
Menu
  • Home
  • Review Index
  • Shop Talk
  • Technique and Vision
  • Opinion
  • Portfolio
  • Site Index
  • About
    • Privacy Policy
Menu

Review: Olympus Pen-F

Posted on April 16, 2016April 21, 2016 by Jordan Steele

Contents

  • 1Construction and Handling
  • 2Operation and Controls
  • 3Viewfinder and Rear Screen
  • 4Autofocus and Performance
  • 5Flash
  • 6High Resolution Mode
  • 7Image Stabilization
  • 8In-Body Image Stabilization
  • 9Focus Bracketing
  • 10Wi-Fi
  • 11Other Features of Note
  • 12Image Quality
  • 13Detail and Noise
  • 14Conclusion

Image Quality

The Pen-F is the first Olympus camera to have an upgraded 20 megapixels image sensor, and follows the Panasonic GX8 as the second Micro 4/3 camera at that resolution.  Let’s see how it performs.

Dynamic Range and Color

While the sensor in the Pen-F is ‘all new’, I can’t say I see much difference with regards to dynamic range and color.  The dynamic range is still very good, and competitive with many APS-C sensors on the market, but falling short of the most recent APS-C efforts. This is most visible as a bit of a harsher transition of tones in the highlights and deep shadows.  This sounds bad, but it’s a very subtle difference to be honest. Despite trailing some of the competition in the mirrorless space, the Pen-F’s dynamic range is still good enough to provide a wide range of tones that will capture the majority of scenes in a single capture.  The Pen-F, like most Olympus cameras, tends to gear their RAW files towards underexposure, so you’ll likely have a fair bit of highlight headroom to recover in your RAW files, while shadows tend to get noisy a bit faster than larger sensors.  Still, the performance here is similar to the later 16 megapixel sensors used by Olympus, which should be plenty for most photographers.

Magnolia - Olympus Pen-F with Olympus 60mm f/2.8 Macro @ f/2.8, ISO 200
Magnolia – Olympus Pen-F with Olympus 60mm f/2.8 Macro @ f/2.8, ISO 200

Color response is typical Olympus, which is excellent. Olympus manages excellent tonality and color in the JPEG files, and the RAW files react very well to color adjustments.  The resulting images are natural, but with some vibrance, which I find very pleasing.

Detail and Noise

The Pen-F’s big advantage over earlier Olympus cameras is in the extra detail the 20 Megapixel sensor can provide.  The move from 16 megapixels to 20 is a modest one, but the Pen-F seems to make the most of this move.  I felt that the improvement in resolution felt more than you’d expect from the move to 20 megapixels, and I can’t really explain why.  Perhaps it’s the slight increase in detail combined with Olympus’ excellent contrast curves, but I felt the detail popped quite a bit with this camera.  You’re not going to be able to print appreciably larger due to the 4 megapixel increase, but I think you’ll see a small, but visible difference in prints at 12×18″ and larger.

With an increase in pixel density, there’s often an increase in noise, and thankfully, the Pen-F avoids this pitfall.  Per-pixel noise seems very similar to earlier MIcro 4/3 cameras at lower ISOs and a slight improvement at 100% at higher ISOs, but since each pixel makes up a smaller part of the image, the overall noise level in the image is definitely lower.  The change isn’t huge, but it gives a bit of extra breathing room at the high end, and I’d put the advantage of the Pen-F somewhere around a half a stop over something like the E-M5 Mark II.  The Pen-F looks good to ISO 1600, while ISO 3200 images are perfectly usable when exposed correctly.  ISO 6400 gets a bit noisy, but with proper noise reduction can still produce good prints and excellent web reductions.  ISO 12,800 gets into the realm of web use and small images only. I’d avoid 25,600 altogether.

Eggs - Olympus Pen-F with Panasonic 25mm f/1.7 @ f/1.7, ISO 1600
Eggs – Olympus Pen-F with Panasonic 25mm f/1.7 @ f/1.7, ISO 1600

JPEG Quality

There’s been no change with regards to the Olympus JPEGs.  The camera still produces extremely high quality JPEG images that are among the best in the industry. Images are saved with minimal compression, have nice natural colors and contrast.  There is a bit too much smoothing in the noise reduction algorithm when set to default, but adjusting that setting down helps improve the results quite a bit.  Once noise reduction is lowered, JPEGs yield a fair bit more detail and, in my opinion, a more natural looking file that is truly excellent.

Video

As I note at the beginning of each review, I’m not a videographer, so for a true look at the video features, I’d look to other review sites.  The Pen-F can shoot 1080p video at 60, 30 and 24 frames per second (though getting to 24p is a bit tricky at first).  There’s no microphone input, so serious video shooters will want to look elsewhere.  One thing most everyone can enjoy, though, is the excellent IBIS system when shooting in video mode, which creates very stable handheld movies.

Continue: Conclusion and Image Samples

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5

22 thoughts on “Review: Olympus Pen-F”

  1. Peter says:
    April 17, 2016 at 6:59 am

    A very informative and honest review. Do you recall if the EV dial is active, when in Manual mode and auto ISO? On the GX8, with such settings, it gets turned off. Such a waste.

    Reply
  2. Sam says:
    April 18, 2016 at 1:55 am

    Finally a comprehensive and thorough reviewer who advises us that “your money is more wisely spent elsewhere.” As a satisfied owner of the E-M10 II I couldn’t agree more. To me, a camera that doesn’t offer comfortable haptics and ergonomics is a “no sale” no matter how nice is the rest of the package. There will just be no joy in using it. As for the price, the less said the better. Thank you for an excellent analysis. Respect.

    Reply
  3. Peter says:
    April 18, 2016 at 6:39 am

    A very good review, as always. But in your conclusion you miss one – or, rather, *the* – crucial point: The Pen-F gives some “rangefinder feeling”, which no other Olympus does. Whether this is worth the price is a question which everybody must answer for him/herself.

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      April 18, 2016 at 6:46 am

      No, I address it. The last paragraph. It really is the lack of a viewfinder hump. That’s it. It’s no smaller than the OM-D series cameras with the exception of the hump. I don’t feel the camera gives any more of a rangefinder feeling than any other Mirrorless camera. The only Mirrorless camera that comes close is the Fuji X Pro series, with the optical finder and frame lines. This just lacks a hump.

      It’s rangefinder styled, but it doesn’t have a rangefinder feel.

      Reply
      1. Peter says:
        April 18, 2016 at 8:38 am

        With “rangefinder feeling” I didn’t mean the lack of the bulb, but rather that the camera doesn’t hide your face while photographing. It may be a minor point, but for me it allows for a completely different communication when photographing people. I agree that it’s not the same as a true rangefinder, of course.

        Reply
        1. Peter says:
          April 18, 2016 at 8:39 am

          Correction: I meant to write “hump”, not “bulb”, of course.

          Reply
        2. Andrew says:
          April 19, 2016 at 10:56 am

          Hahah, my Koni Omega Rapid 200 is a real rangefinder (with a cinema-scale viewfinder to go with it), and definitely hides my face. It also weighs 2 kg, though. For me the rangefinder aspect is the super-precise feel of manual focussing with the rangefinder patch. With a well-calibrated lens, I feel like it’s possible to manually focus more quickly and accurately than any other system (better than any SLR OVF, better than focus peaking, and similar to magnified view but with the whole perspective). As Jordan says, I feel like the X-Pro 2 only gives part of that feeling, since the OVF is not usable for manual focussing in a conventional sense.

          Reply
  4. cosinaphile says:
    April 19, 2016 at 12:44 am

    thank for a very nice review , a great camera imho but imperfect ….id love to see an article about the best settings and why in the overly complex dense menus …..i still cant figure out how to lock the focus point in the center of the grid when using legacy lenses and also how to turn off the lcd screen

    ive got the pen F in silver and am enjoying using the .64 x version on the metabones speedbooster and nikon glass
    like fast nifty fifties and wiser primes like the 24mm,2.8 and 35mm 2 AND just picked up the wide body cap lens
    also the 12 -32 on the pen is a great combo

    Reply
  5. Menkhoff says:
    April 21, 2016 at 4:15 am

    A little disappointed by the pictures. Pen-F deserves another target that the poor Panasonic 14mm. It would be best suited to the Panasonic Leica 15mm

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      April 21, 2016 at 4:34 am

      So you’re upset I didn’t go buy a $550 lens, so that when I took pictures of a camera, it looked better? Feel free to donate that money to the site, and I’ll gladly purchase one for product shots in future reviews.

      Reply
      1. Eric Jones says:
        May 5, 2016 at 2:35 am

        LOL!

        Reply
    2. John says:
      April 21, 2016 at 7:49 am

      I think his example picture is more than “good enough”, especially the “Under the Railroad”, golden hours, flowers…

      Reply
  6. Gilbert Tumbleweed says:
    April 21, 2016 at 8:23 am

    I’ve always enjoyed reading the reviews here, always on point with great detail. The sample images are really good too!

    Reply
  7. QBNY says:
    May 28, 2016 at 8:50 pm

    The “walking after the rain” is really good! Would’ve liked to see it in B&W. Still, very good composition.

    Reply
  8. Flo says:
    July 17, 2016 at 4:42 pm

    In the Focus Bracketing mode, I do not get a single stacked image. I get the 5 images but not a 6th one with them all stacked. Is there no in camera stacking in the PenF? TY

    Reply
  9. Frank Villafane says:
    July 28, 2016 at 1:24 pm

    Jordan,

    Excellent article. I, however, disagree with your final statement that my money would be better spent elsewhere. I traded in my OMD EM5MII for the PEN-F and I have not regretted my decision. The EM5MII was (and is) an excellent camera, and certainly produces fantastic images, but I needed just that little bit “extra” with the 20mp vs the 16mp. Yes, I’d love to have the weather-sealing, but it’s not a show stopper for me if the camera doesn’t have it. Sure I would’ve preferred paying $200 less…but after spending the money, I find the results I’m getting more than justifies the cost (but of course, “your mileage may vary”).

    Is it perfect? No, there is no such camera. But when I’m out and about, it’s the first camera I grab and it’s with me on a daily basis. My biggest complaint is more with M43 cameras’ in general: their low-light capability lacks when compared to a capable DSLR (such as the Nikon D750, which I also shoot). So for now…as long as the light is good (dawn to dusk, really) I am assured of capturing great images at a very good frame rate. For the record, I find the best feature to be the silent shutter.

    One more thing: in my experience, the PEN-F raws are a bit more malleable than the comparable EM5MII raws. It may very well be due to the slightly greater detail resolution (20mp vs 16mp), but the new(er) sensor may also have a lot to do with it. What I’m finding is that I can shoot at or below optimal exposure and still pull out the shadows without an alarming increase in noise. I couldn’t do this with the EM5MII raws (since I shoot a great deal with the D750, the Nikon raws are almost “rubbery” in the amount of post-process manipulation that can be applied without any degradation…and that is the standard I use to compare the PEN-F raws).

    Excellent review, nonetheless. Thank you.

    Frank Villafane
    Urban Industrial Imaging

    You can view my mirrorless gallery at the link below:
    https://www.500px.com/urbanindustrialimaging/galleries/sin-espejo-mirrorless

    Reply
  10. Mhs Vz says:
    August 19, 2016 at 7:09 am

    Thanks for a very thorough review. I agree, a little overpriced at $1,199 for the body only.

    Reply
  11. Mahesh says:
    March 29, 2017 at 5:52 pm

    Hi Jordan, just across this review as I am toying with the idea of getting the pen-f. Does the compact panasonic zoom work well with olympus cameras? Did you have to apply the lens profile in lightroom?
    Or I might just get GX800 with that compact zoom kit. 🙂
    Thanks

    Reply
  12. Patrick says:
    June 23, 2019 at 9:08 am

    Good review but I find the conclusion harsh. All these cameras , as long as they produce good pictures , fulfill a need. Pen F does not have a big grip because it is not to be used with long and heavier lens, there is the OMD for that. It is used as a discreet everyday camera. Most of the pictures which have changed the world come from this type of camera. The absemce of a grip make them easy to put in a pocket and to be there when needed.

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      June 23, 2019 at 11:55 am

      I think my conclusion is more than fair. Sure it will fill a need for many people, and I say so in my review and in the conclusion, but it is hard to recommend due to the price, and that is still true today. The Pen F is 3 years old and still $999. That’s an absurd price given the competition. A Sony a6400 has better AF, a better EVF, a better sensor, is more comfortable to hold and shoot with, costs $100 less, and in a practical sense, is about the same size too.

      You can get a Fuji X-T30 for less money, and it is better in nearly every way.

      Olympus priced this camera at the time almost as if m4/3 was still the only player in the mirrorless world. That reality is gone now. The full frame Canon EOS RP is only $300 more expensive, and only $200 more than the Pen F was at launch.

      All that said, it’s still a very nice camera, and it may well be exactly what you are looking for. And that’s great. But it’s still overpriced.

      Reply
  13. Cliff Etzel says:
    June 25, 2019 at 1:36 pm

    Jordan – I’m STILL shooting a trio of 7yo EM5’s with my 12mm f/2, 17mm f/1.8, 45mm f/1.8 & 75mm f/1.8 lenses and TBH, I’m not happy with the images I’m getting even though I’ve been shooting Olympus for 3 years after having shot Canon Film and DSLR’s since 1989.

    One of my friends/colleagues is an Olympus Visionary and I made the switch per his recommendation. As a documentary shooter, one of my biggest needs is shooting in marginal lighting conditions (ISO1600-3200) and getting as much IQ as possible. I’ve been investigating whether to stick with Olympus by going the Pen-f route or moving completely to Fuji X-E2/3’s or possibly X-Pro 1/2’s with their fast primes. Or do I look at Olympus Pro primes? The biggest limitations I’m really seeing is less dynamic range and alot of noise at higher ISO’s with the m43 platform. Fuji seems to have done things right but I’m still not totally convinced. The EM1 series I have no interest in due to its size. And the ergonomics of the EM bodies is still as unintuitive now as it was when I made the switch and that has gotten in the way on more than one occasion for me causing me to miss those decisive moments – Very Frustrating.

    I’m totally confused which way to go. I typically shoot RAW only but from what I’ve read, in camera Fuji jpgs cant be matched. Any thoughts? If too much to answer you can email me directly – I’d really appreciate it.

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      June 29, 2019 at 2:50 pm

      Fuji has its own quirks, but I think there is a nice bump in image quality moving to Fuji. Fuji controls are really a personal thing. I love them, and find them to be incredibly intuitive and easy to use. Others do not, so that’ll be up to you. You will definitely see an improvement in noise control with Fuji compared to m4/3. I will say that ergonomically, the X-E and X-Pro series are lacking in the grip department, but controls are very good. The X-T2/X-T3 is a lot more comfortable to hold, in my opinion.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow Me:

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on Instagram

Most Popular Posts

  • "Full Frame Equivalence" and Why It Doesn't Matter (286)
  • Fuji X-Pro 2 vs. Sony A7 II: Noise Comparison (70)
  • Fuji 56mm f/1.2 vs. Panasonic Leica 42.5mm f/1.2 Nocticron (63)
  • Review: Metabones Speed Booster (Canon FD to Fuji X) (56)
  • Review: Olympus OM-D E-M5 (48)

Recent Comments

  • Harry on Review: Tamron 70-180mm f/2.8 Di III VXD
  • Jordan Steele on Review: Tamron 70-180mm f/2.8 Di III VXD
  • Harry on Review: Tamron 70-180mm f/2.8 Di III VXD
  • Harry on Review: Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM
  • Jordan Steele on Review: Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM

Archives

©2021 Admiring Light | Theme by SuperbThemes
We use cookies to personalize content and ads and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. You may consent to the use of cookies or opt out. Accept Reject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.