Review: Olympus Pen-F

Conclusion

Pros

  • Very well constructed body with tight tolerances and excellent fit and finish
  • Controls are well laid out
  • Very customizable interface
  • Electronic viewfinder is very nice
  • Fully articulated rear screen with responsive touch capabilities
  • 20 megapixel sensor resolves excellent detail
  • Very good dynamic range for the sensor size
  • Good noise control: an improvement on the older 16 megapixel sensor
  • Outstanding color response
  • High resolution mode allows for exceptionally detailed 50 megapaixel JPEGs and 80 megapixel RAW files
  • Excellent in-body image stabilization
  • Great Wi-Fi capabilities
  • Focus bracketing is great for macro shooters
  • Compact size
  • Very fast and accurate single shot autofocus
  • Continuous AF is fairly good for CDAF
  • TouchpadAF is very useful

Cons

  • Grip is a bit cramped
  • Dials aren’t as fluid as some other Olympus cameras
  • No weathersealing
  • Rear screen is difficult to pull out
  • No PDAF limits usefulness of continuous autofocus compared to many other mirrorless cameras
  • Two key controls are limited to adjusting JPEG output
  • Price

The Pen-F is an interesting camera.  It’s by far the best PEN camera Olympus has made, and it will satisfy almost any Micro 4/3 shooter with its very full feature set, very good image quality and compact size.  It finally adds a corner EVF to the package, which is something that was lacking on the E-P5.  It also gains many excellent features from recent OM-D cameras, such as the sensor shifting high resolution mode, focus bracketing and, of course, Olympus’ excellent in-body image stabilization.  It’s a quality camera that is effectively an OM-D E-M5 Mark II in a smaller body and a smaller viewfinder.  So, everyone should buy one, right?

Well, no.  The biggest issue with the Pen-F is price. It’s priced at $1199 body only, a full $200 more than the E-M5 Mark II, but with almost no advantages over that camera.  The only clear advantage is the slightly newer sensor. While that sensor is nice, it’s not a huge upgrade, and you also lose the bigger viewfinder, and perhaps most importantly, weather sealing.  Paying $200 more for a camera with no sealing and a smaller EVF with only a minor sensor bump is a tall order.  In fact, save for the High Resolution mode, a fully articulating screen and the new sensor, the Pen-F feature set is almost exactly the same as that of the E-M10 Mark II, which is HALF the price of the Pen-F.  With these two options coming in at significantly lower prices, it’s very hard to justify the price on the Pen-F.  The E-M10 II has better ergonomics as well.

If you’re in love with the look or the lack of a viewfinder hump, you’ll be pleased with the Pen-F.  It’s an excellent camera, despite a few handling quirks. Olympus has done a good job with the camera, but I think your money is more wisely spent elsewhere.

Image Samples

Click on an image to enlarge.

Blossoms - Olympus Pen-F with Olympus 60mm f/2.8 @
Blossoms – Olympus Pen-F with Olympus 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 @ 300mm, f/6.7, ISO 800
Under the Railroad - Olympus Pen-F with Panasonic 12-32mm f/3.5-5.6 @
Under the Railroad – Olympus Pen-F with Panasonic 12-32mm f/3.5-5.6 @ 18mm, f/5, 1/5s, ISO 200
Columbus Sunrise - Olympus Pen-F with Olympus 40-150mm f/4.5-5.6 @ 40mm
Columbus Sunrise – Olympus Pen-F with Olympus 40-150mm f/4.5-5.6 @ 40mm, f/5.6, ISO 200
Walking in the Spring - Olympus Pen-F with Panasonic 12-32mm f/3.5-5.6 @ 12mm, f/
Walking in the Spring – Olympus Pen-F with Panasonic 12-32mm f/3.5-5.6 @ 12mm, f/5.6, ISO 200
Columbus Train - Olympus Pen-F with Panasonic 12-32mm f/3.5-5.6 @
Columbus Train – Olympus Pen-F with Panasonic 12-32mm f/3.5-5.6 @ 16mm, f/7.1, 8s, ISO 200
Magnolia - Olympus Pen-F with Olympus 60mm f/2.8 @
Magnolia – Olympus Pen-F with Olympus 60mm f/2.8 Macro @ f/6.3, ISO 200
Walking after the rain - Olympus Pen-F with Panasonic 12-32mm f/3.5-5.6 @
Walking after the rain – Olympus Pen-F with Panasonic 12-32mm f/3.5-5.6 @ 32mm, f/5.6, ISO 200
Geese in the Morning - Olympus Pen-F with Olympus 40-150mm f/4-5.6 @
Geese in the Morning – Olympus Pen-F with Olympus 40-150mm f/4-5.6 @ 74mm, f/5, ISO 200
Daffodil - Olympus Pen-F with Olympus 60mm f/2.8 Macro @
Daffodil – Olympus Pen-F with Olympus 60mm f/2.8 Macro @ f/5, ISO 800
Up at the Grand - Olympus Pen-F with Panasonic 12-32mm f/3.5-5.6 @ 12mm, f/5.6, ISO 200
Up at the Grand – Olympus Pen-F with Panasonic 12-32mm f/3.5-5.6 @ 12mm, f/5.6, ISO 200
Flying Goose - Olympus Pen-F with Olympus 40-150mm f/4-5.6 @
Flying Goose – Olympus Pen-F with Olympus 40-150mm f/4-5.6 @ 150mm, f/5.6, 1/15s, ISO 200

 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5

Tags:

Comments

23 responses to “Review: Olympus Pen-F”

  1. Peter Avatar
    Peter

    A very informative and honest review. Do you recall if the EV dial is active, when in Manual mode and auto ISO? On the GX8, with such settings, it gets turned off. Such a waste.

  2. Sam Avatar
    Sam

    Finally a comprehensive and thorough reviewer who advises us that “your money is more wisely spent elsewhere.” As a satisfied owner of the E-M10 II I couldn’t agree more. To me, a camera that doesn’t offer comfortable haptics and ergonomics is a “no sale” no matter how nice is the rest of the package. There will just be no joy in using it. As for the price, the less said the better. Thank you for an excellent analysis. Respect.

  3. Peter Avatar
    Peter

    A very good review, as always. But in your conclusion you miss one – or, rather, *the* – crucial point: The Pen-F gives some “rangefinder feeling”, which no other Olympus does. Whether this is worth the price is a question which everybody must answer for him/herself.

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      No, I address it. The last paragraph. It really is the lack of a viewfinder hump. That’s it. It’s no smaller than the OM-D series cameras with the exception of the hump. I don’t feel the camera gives any more of a rangefinder feeling than any other Mirrorless camera. The only Mirrorless camera that comes close is the Fuji X Pro series, with the optical finder and frame lines. This just lacks a hump.

      It’s rangefinder styled, but it doesn’t have a rangefinder feel.

      1. Peter Avatar
        Peter

        With “rangefinder feeling” I didn’t mean the lack of the bulb, but rather that the camera doesn’t hide your face while photographing. It may be a minor point, but for me it allows for a completely different communication when photographing people. I agree that it’s not the same as a true rangefinder, of course.

        1. Peter Avatar
          Peter

          Correction: I meant to write “hump”, not “bulb”, of course.

        2. Andrew Avatar
          Andrew

          Hahah, my Koni Omega Rapid 200 is a real rangefinder (with a cinema-scale viewfinder to go with it), and definitely hides my face. It also weighs 2 kg, though. For me the rangefinder aspect is the super-precise feel of manual focussing with the rangefinder patch. With a well-calibrated lens, I feel like it’s possible to manually focus more quickly and accurately than any other system (better than any SLR OVF, better than focus peaking, and similar to magnified view but with the whole perspective). As Jordan says, I feel like the X-Pro 2 only gives part of that feeling, since the OVF is not usable for manual focussing in a conventional sense.

  4. cosinaphile Avatar
    cosinaphile

    thank for a very nice review , a great camera imho but imperfect ….id love to see an article about the best settings and why in the overly complex dense menus …..i still cant figure out how to lock the focus point in the center of the grid when using legacy lenses and also how to turn off the lcd screen

    ive got the pen F in silver and am enjoying using the .64 x version on the metabones speedbooster and nikon glass
    like fast nifty fifties and wiser primes like the 24mm,2.8 and 35mm 2 AND just picked up the wide body cap lens
    also the 12 -32 on the pen is a great combo

  5. Menkhoff Avatar

    A little disappointed by the pictures. Pen-F deserves another target that the poor Panasonic 14mm. It would be best suited to the Panasonic Leica 15mm

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      So you’re upset I didn’t go buy a $550 lens, so that when I took pictures of a camera, it looked better? Feel free to donate that money to the site, and I’ll gladly purchase one for product shots in future reviews.

      1. Eric Jones Avatar
        Eric Jones

        LOL!

    2. John Avatar
      John

      I think his example picture is more than “good enough”, especially the “Under the Railroad”, golden hours, flowers…

  6. Gilbert Tumbleweed Avatar
    Gilbert Tumbleweed

    I’ve always enjoyed reading the reviews here, always on point with great detail. The sample images are really good too!

  7. QBNY Avatar
    QBNY

    The “walking after the rain” is really good! Would’ve liked to see it in B&W. Still, very good composition.

  8. Flo Avatar
    Flo

    In the Focus Bracketing mode, I do not get a single stacked image. I get the 5 images but not a 6th one with them all stacked. Is there no in camera stacking in the PenF? TY

  9. Frank Villafane Avatar

    Jordan,

    Excellent article. I, however, disagree with your final statement that my money would be better spent elsewhere. I traded in my OMD EM5MII for the PEN-F and I have not regretted my decision. The EM5MII was (and is) an excellent camera, and certainly produces fantastic images, but I needed just that little bit “extra” with the 20mp vs the 16mp. Yes, I’d love to have the weather-sealing, but it’s not a show stopper for me if the camera doesn’t have it. Sure I would’ve preferred paying $200 less…but after spending the money, I find the results I’m getting more than justifies the cost (but of course, “your mileage may vary”).

    Is it perfect? No, there is no such camera. But when I’m out and about, it’s the first camera I grab and it’s with me on a daily basis. My biggest complaint is more with M43 cameras’ in general: their low-light capability lacks when compared to a capable DSLR (such as the Nikon D750, which I also shoot). So for now…as long as the light is good (dawn to dusk, really) I am assured of capturing great images at a very good frame rate. For the record, I find the best feature to be the silent shutter.

    One more thing: in my experience, the PEN-F raws are a bit more malleable than the comparable EM5MII raws. It may very well be due to the slightly greater detail resolution (20mp vs 16mp), but the new(er) sensor may also have a lot to do with it. What I’m finding is that I can shoot at or below optimal exposure and still pull out the shadows without an alarming increase in noise. I couldn’t do this with the EM5MII raws (since I shoot a great deal with the D750, the Nikon raws are almost “rubbery” in the amount of post-process manipulation that can be applied without any degradation…and that is the standard I use to compare the PEN-F raws).

    Excellent review, nonetheless. Thank you.

    Frank Villafane
    Urban Industrial Imaging

    You can view my mirrorless gallery at the link below:
    https://www.500px.com/urbanindustrialimaging/galleries/sin-espejo-mirrorless

  10. Mhs Vz Avatar
    Mhs Vz

    Thanks for a very thorough review. I agree, a little overpriced at $1,199 for the body only.

  11. Mahesh Avatar
    Mahesh

    Hi Jordan, just across this review as I am toying with the idea of getting the pen-f. Does the compact panasonic zoom work well with olympus cameras? Did you have to apply the lens profile in lightroom?
    Or I might just get GX800 with that compact zoom kit. 🙂
    Thanks

  12. Patrick Avatar
    Patrick

    Good review but I find the conclusion harsh. All these cameras , as long as they produce good pictures , fulfill a need. Pen F does not have a big grip because it is not to be used with long and heavier lens, there is the OMD for that. It is used as a discreet everyday camera. Most of the pictures which have changed the world come from this type of camera. The absemce of a grip make them easy to put in a pocket and to be there when needed.

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      I think my conclusion is more than fair. Sure it will fill a need for many people, and I say so in my review and in the conclusion, but it is hard to recommend due to the price, and that is still true today. The Pen F is 3 years old and still $999. That’s an absurd price given the competition. A Sony a6400 has better AF, a better EVF, a better sensor, is more comfortable to hold and shoot with, costs $100 less, and in a practical sense, is about the same size too.

      You can get a Fuji X-T30 for less money, and it is better in nearly every way.

      Olympus priced this camera at the time almost as if m4/3 was still the only player in the mirrorless world. That reality is gone now. The full frame Canon EOS RP is only $300 more expensive, and only $200 more than the Pen F was at launch.

      All that said, it’s still a very nice camera, and it may well be exactly what you are looking for. And that’s great. But it’s still overpriced.

  13. Cliff Etzel Avatar
    Cliff Etzel

    Jordan – I’m STILL shooting a trio of 7yo EM5’s with my 12mm f/2, 17mm f/1.8, 45mm f/1.8 & 75mm f/1.8 lenses and TBH, I’m not happy with the images I’m getting even though I’ve been shooting Olympus for 3 years after having shot Canon Film and DSLR’s since 1989.

    One of my friends/colleagues is an Olympus Visionary and I made the switch per his recommendation. As a documentary shooter, one of my biggest needs is shooting in marginal lighting conditions (ISO1600-3200) and getting as much IQ as possible. I’ve been investigating whether to stick with Olympus by going the Pen-f route or moving completely to Fuji X-E2/3’s or possibly X-Pro 1/2’s with their fast primes. Or do I look at Olympus Pro primes? The biggest limitations I’m really seeing is less dynamic range and alot of noise at higher ISO’s with the m43 platform. Fuji seems to have done things right but I’m still not totally convinced. The EM1 series I have no interest in due to its size. And the ergonomics of the EM bodies is still as unintuitive now as it was when I made the switch and that has gotten in the way on more than one occasion for me causing me to miss those decisive moments – Very Frustrating.

    I’m totally confused which way to go. I typically shoot RAW only but from what I’ve read, in camera Fuji jpgs cant be matched. Any thoughts? If too much to answer you can email me directly – I’d really appreciate it.

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      Fuji has its own quirks, but I think there is a nice bump in image quality moving to Fuji. Fuji controls are really a personal thing. I love them, and find them to be incredibly intuitive and easy to use. Others do not, so that’ll be up to you. You will definitely see an improvement in noise control with Fuji compared to m4/3. I will say that ergonomically, the X-E and X-Pro series are lacking in the grip department, but controls are very good. The X-T2/X-T3 is a lot more comfortable to hold, in my opinion.

  14. Erik Thoresen Avatar
    Erik Thoresen

    I love my PEN -F. Easy to carry and people like it . With the 17mm or 45mm Oly it’s Just there when I need it on my hikes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search


Categories


Recent Posts


  1. I think it is near Hillsboro.

  2. This article got me thinking… Why does Canon make RF S lenses starting with 18mm when most full frame RF…

  3. Great review. I shoot Nikon and may try an old Nikon D200 and see how it compares with the new…