Review: Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH3

Operation and Menus

Panasonic GH3 - Top
Panasonic GH3 – Top

As I mentioned on the first page, Panasonic has outfitted the GH3 with a huge array of direct controls, which makes changing settings very easy. The rear of the camera has four function buttons, and there is a fifth function button on the top of the camera. While I found the default settings for these buttons to be very nice, they can all be customized to a huge variety of functions. Having five programmable function buttons gives you tremendous amounts of control over how you choose to operate the camera.

The nicest thing is that the top of the camera also features three additional buttons that are fixed to control ISO, white balance and exposure compensation (though I used the rear dial for exposure compensation). The only negative here is that I wish the ISO button was swapped in position with the white balance button, as the white balance button is far easier to reach, and I have a greater need to change ISO often. In addition to the front dial, there is a rear thumb dial and a rear wheel surrounding the menu button, plus a mode dial and drive mode dial (which includes timer and exposure bracketing). Then, of course, there’s the excellent touch screen capabilities as well.

Needless to say, the GH3 allows for a crazy amount of direct control and customization, which makes it easy to set up to your liking regardless of how you like to shoot. Compared to the OM-D, which often buries some controls so deep in menus you need a map, the GH3 is truly a photographer’s camera.

The menu system for the GH3 is, as you might expect, also rather extensive, with several main sections that are then divided into multiple pages. The menus are well laid out and logical to use. If you use the traditional buttons to navigate the menus, it can take a long time to navigate to a specific option simply based on the sheer number of options available. This is where the touch screen comes in very handy, as there are page up and down buttons that can be easily manipulated by touch to speed things up.

The touch screen can be positioned in nearly any angle and position, allowing you to easily shoot from any height or angle. You can easily set focus points by touch, and there is a swipe out menu that allows easy access to other functions without generally clogging the display.

Panasonic GH3 - Screen Swivel
Panasonic GH3 – Screen Swivel

While overall, the GH3 is a wonderful camera from a usability standpoint, there are still a few things that are somewhat annoying. First, while previous Panasonic bodies have made the rear dial a push button as well, which allows for easy viewfinder magnification when using adapted lenses, the GH3 removes this capability. Viewfinder magnification has to be done by pressing a few buttons in the AF point selection, or by touching the screen. Also, the rear wheel (that also functions as a four-way controller) is recessed on the right side. This is both good and bad. It’s good because it prevents the heel of your hand from accidentally operating it, but bad because it impedes the usage when quickly moving the wheel.

Also, a minor nitpick, but potentially problematic if shooting in the rain: the SD card door, which is on the right hand side, opens far too easily. I accidentally had the door spring open on me multiple times in the week I shot with the camera, just from shifting my camera position. I like the side position of this door, but it needs to be firmer and harder to open, much like the one of the Olympus OM-D.

Performance

The GH3 is a quick and responsive camera in most every way. Startup is quick, shutter delay is minimal, the camera isn’t impeded in any way when it’s writing to a card, and can shoot 6 frames per second in RAW, up to 18 RAW images in a burst. If you are willing to shoot JPEG, you can use the electronic shutter and capture 20 frames per second for up to four seconds.

Autofocus performance is outstanding in single shot mode. You can select a focus point anywhere on the screen, in any position, with large or super small focus points, and the camera will lock on to your subject nearly instantly with a fast focusing lens. It is alarmingly fast and critically accurate autofocus, and, in my opinion, is the best single-shot autofocus available in ANY camera on the market today.

Unfortunately, the same can’t be said for continuous autofocus, as it is still hamstrung by the same limitations as previous models due to the way contrast-detect autofocus works. There are occasions where the AF is quick enough to nab you a few sharp frames in a burst when a subject is running towards you, but it’s going to be a very low percentage of in-focus shots. It does fine when shooting moving subjects moving side to side, as there minimal focus adjustment needed there.

All in all, with the exception of continuous autofocus, the GH3 feels truly pro-level in its responsiveness and performance. I was never waiting on the camera…the camera was waiting on me.

Flash

The GH3 has a built-in pop-up flash that is built a little more robustly than previous models. Flash exposure was generally good and even, but it’s still a pop-up flash, and so delivers that harsh light that direct flash gives. Unlike the less sturdy, but more functional flash in the Panasonic GX1 or Fuji X-E1, the GH3’s flash can’t be tilted up to provide bounced flash.

Next: Wi-Fi, and other features

Comments

16 responses to “Review: Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH3”

  1. Libby Avatar

    It’s a great release Jordan and I appreciate your comments. I’m still making decisions on another m4/3 body, and the GH3 is in the running. The video crowd found a real gem in the little GH2, and Pansonic really brought it home for the cinema guys. Panasonic listened, and that’s part of the big difference here.

  2. lisandra Avatar
    lisandra

    beautiful samples here Jordan! DO you still have it? theres an option in the wireless flash menu that blew me away; full power wireless flash shooting! GOod read as always, the first sample blew my mind, its so surreal!

  3. Chuck Avatar
    Chuck

    I think you nailed this review. I have had a GH3 for three months and used it as a still camera constantly. Like you I am not much of a videographer and will probably never challenge it capabilities in that area. I also have an EM-5. I agree the images are for me impossible to tell apart and are the same to work in Lightroom. I find myself reaching for the GH3 more often because it fits my hand and the buttons fit my shooting style. The sized doesn’t bother me, because as you commented the system is smaller. I also like the swivel screen and controlling it from my iPhone. And I really like your accompanying images, especially, the winter tree.

  4. Wolfgang Lonien Avatar

    Yes, that winter tree is definitely a keeper. And thanks for the nice review as well.

  5. […]  Expect full reviews of the Fuji X-E1 and Panasonic GH3 in the coming weeks. Edit 3/2/13: My full review of the Panasonic GH3 is now […]

  6. bousozoku Avatar
    bousozoku

    I’ve had a GH3 since Thursday. I’ve been using the Olympus E-1 since April 2004 and the E-5 since November 2011.

    I’ve been adapting to the GH3 through about 1000 wrestling and basketball photos I’ve taken this weekend. I find that the continuous auto focus is much better than the E-5’s. I have fewer shots to delete because of focus issues.

    My main problem with the GH3 is that the display is frozen while shooting, Whether this is just something for burst mode or not, I don’t know. I can still shoot, as I’ve found today, while the files are being written, but I have to guess where I’m going with the camera to get the shots.

    Where I would normally have been at ISO 1600 on the E-5, the auto ISO sensitivity functionality is generally choosing 3200 and the image quality is much, much better, also without the yellow-ish tinge but colour changes drastically when it chooses ISO 2000 or 2500 and looks yellow-ish.

    I was hoping for Olympus innards in a Panasonic body, but it works well enough and I’ll adapt to the miseries of the mirror-less world eventually. Now, if Olympus would just release some SHG zooms for micro Four-Thirds, I’d be set.

  7. david moreno Avatar
    david moreno

    Nice review,
    I used a panasonic gh2 for a long time, when i first saw the gh3 i thought it was too big for m4/3 and bough a omd, but now i use all the time the omd with the part one of the hdl grip attach. Please you have use the two cameras, its there a big different in size and weights between omd+part 1 grip and gh3?

    Thanks for the answer and for this really nice review

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      There is still a fairly decent size difference. The height is equalized (and the weight is darn close) when you add the horizontal grip to the OM-D, but the GH3 is still a fair bit wider, and the grip is bigger and more comfortable than the OM-D with horizontal grip. The biggest way you notice this is with a large diameter lens like the 35-100mm f/2.8. On the OM-D+grip, there’s not a ton of room between the lens and the grip, so you are slightly cramped. It’s still comfortable, but a little tight. There’s plenty of room, though with the GH3.

      The size of the GH3 is only a detriment when putting the camera in your bag, where it takes up a good amount of room. In hand, it feels fantastic.

  8. John Rappold Avatar

    Great review. I bought the grip because I shoot lots of timelapse and video. While it adds an even better feel when held in landscape mode, for me it is rather poor if you want to use it in portrait mode looking through the evf. The ergonomics don’t work because you have to hold the cam higher because of the evf position, and it makes the grip feel awkward. Also, with my heaviest lens (14-140mm) attached with the grip, the GH3 is fairly wieghty…not a huge deal since the grip will mostly be used when mounted on a tripod.

    Also, if anyone is wondering, the GH3 still has a remote input if you need to shoot with an external intervalometer or timelapse motion control system.

    The Gh3 is a great cam. For the price, it offers a much better build and tons more features than the $1500 (w/ kit lens) I paid for my D90 in 2008.

  9. Mark Smith Avatar
    Mark Smith

    A very good, objective review of a great camera. I was impressed to see that you are the only reviewer that noticed the problem which caused me to return my GH3: the SD card door opens with little energy. Both copies of GH3 that I tried had the same problem so I concluded that this was by design. The door routinely popped open when I’d put it in my holster. Since I use my cameras in the out of doors and in wet conditions, I couldn’t live with the problem. It was a difficult decision given that the GH3 had so many pluses.

  10. Steffen Moestrup Avatar
    Steffen Moestrup

    Great review. Thanks for that. I seriously consider purchasing a GH3 since I have both still and video needs in my job as a freelance journalist. However, do you know about the possibilities of using vintage lenses with the GH3? I have some Cosina lenses, for instance a macro 70-210 that was used on an Olympus OM 40 analogue – would that lens be usable with the GH3?

  11. […] Steffen Moestrup on Review: Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH3 […]

  12. Herbert H Avatar
    Herbert H

    Has anyone tried a prime lens with a Lumix? Either GH3 or older (I have G3). I know Panasonic and Olympus make great ones…but anyone try others (Nikon)? With an adapter? Any loss of features such as autofocus or video capture issues? Thanks!

  13. Stephen Davies Avatar

    Little late on this reply –
    You will lose autofocus and auto-aperture control with an adapted Nikon lens.
    You will have metering and auto-exposure capability in aperture priority mode (aperture set manually).
    I’m not sure what you mean by video capture issues.
    IQ is excellent, as good as the Nikon lens you are using, and you are using the sharpest, center portion of the lens.

    Hope this helps.
    Aloha, Stephen

  14. […] ways is a sort of ‘second flagship’ camera for Panasonic, which, along with the GH3 (reviewed here), is designed for enthusiasts and professionals who want a highly capable body in a small […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search


Categories


Recent Posts


  1. I think it is near Hillsboro.

  2. This article got me thinking… Why does Canon make RF S lenses starting with 18mm when most full frame RF…

  3. Great review. I shoot Nikon and may try an old Nikon D200 and see how it compares with the new…