Review: Sony A7R II

Review: Sony A7R II

Viewfinder and Rear Screen

The A7R II features an upgraded electronic viewfinder (EVF) from the A7R or any other previous A7 series camera.  The most notable change is in the finder optics, which enlarge the EVF to 0.78x magnification, which just passes the Fuji X-T1’s 0.77x magnification to become the largest viewfinder currently available on a 35mm format or smaller camera. The viewfinder is clear and has good color response and the extra size gives the EVF a beautiful full view of your scene.  While the hardware side of the EVF is quite excellent, there is a down side with regards to the software implementation when magnifying the view.

The A7R II's new EVF has an element with Zeiss T* coating
The A7R II’s new EVF has an element with Zeiss T* coating

If you regularly plan on using adapted manual focus lenses with the A7R II, then the viewfinder is actually slightly worse than the original A7R or the A7 II for focusing while magnified.  Something in the EVF scaling when magnification is activated with adapted lenses is quite off, especially at the 5x level. At this magnification, the view is a soft fuzzy mess.  Bizarrely, this isn’t the case when magnifying using a native FE mount lens.  The 12.5x magnification isn’t as bad as the 5x, but it still doesn’t appear as clear as the other A7 finders.  I’m hoping Sony issues a fix for this oddity, as it can be quite difficult to resolve fine details at the 5x magnification level.

The rear screen is a 3″ 1.2 million dot screen that is extremely good. Viewing angles are excellent and the display is clear, rich and has great contrast. Colors are fairly accurate as well. The rear screen also is on a tilt mechanism like most of the E-mount cameras, which can tilt flat to point up at 90 degrees, or down at approximately 45 degrees. The tilting mechanism is, like the rest of the camera, very robustly constructed.  It’s a shame that Sony still doesn’t feel the need to make the rear screens on their recent cameras touch sensitive, which would add a nice added dimension to shooting with the camera.

Autofocus

The A7R II gains an all new sensor that has a whopping 399 phase-detect autofocus points spread across the central 50% of the sensor area.  As a result, the focusing has been improved quite a bit from the original A7R.  In my experience with the camera, the biggest difference was in low-light focus acquisition, where the A7R II consistently was able to quickly and accurately focus in extremely dim lighting conditions, something I can’t say about earlier A7 series cameras.  With my A7 II, I will often have times where even fast native lenses have trouble quickly and accurately finding focus in dimmer light, especially when the subject is backlit.  Happily, the A7R II’s AF system handles these situations with ease.  I found the A7R II to quickly lock focus in most any type of light.  Well done here.  It’s the best single shot performance I’ve experienced on a Sony camera.

The PDAF area is outlined in the viewfinder
The PDAF area is outlined in the viewfinder

Continuous autofocus has been improved dramatically from the CDAF-only A7R,  but unfortunately I found the improvement over the A7 II to be minimal to non-existent.  The camera performed fairly poorly when tracking moving subjects, even those as common as a person walking towards the camera.  While I’d get occasional hits dead on in the middle of a burst when someone would walk towards me, in many cases, the camera didn’t seem to be predicting where the subject would be, but would rather track focus and lock it when the picture was taken, resulting in a substantial portion of my C-AF shots with focus just behind where the intended point of focus was. As an example, the sequence below was one of the worst.  I utilized single point with AF expansion, keeping the AF point directly over the subject’s face, while he walked towards me.  The shot below, the 11th photo in a 17 shot burst, was one of only two photos in the burst to absolutely nail focus.  The other shot was the first in the sequence.  While this sequence was one of the worst I took when testing C-AF, the very best of the 10-15 different runs, with differing subjects, both indoors and out, was only around a 60% hit rate.

Walking - Sony A7R II with Zeiss Batis 85mm f/1.8 @ f/1.8, Continuous AF
Walking – Sony A7R II with Zeiss Batis 85mm f/1.8 @ f/1.8, Continuous AF

 

Sony’s recent cameras also have their new Eye AF focus algorithm, which can be assigned to a custom function button.  Like the other recent cameras, this function works quite well on the A7R II.  If your subject is in focus enough for the camera to analyze the scene for faces, it will find faces, find the eyes, and lock focus to the nearest eye.  It’s an excellent feature for use with fast glass to make sure the eyes are in focus.

The big hullabaloo about the A7R II’s focus system, however, has been with adapted lenses that have electrical communication: specifically Sony A mount and Canon EF mount lenses.  Unfortunately, I don’t have a stable of Canon EF lenses to test, nor do I own a Metabones EF to E mount adapter.  I do, however, have an EF mount Sigma 50mm f/1.4 EX and the much cheaper Fotga EF to E mount adapter.  The Fotga when used on my A7 II is effectively only a manual focus lens adapter.  It attempts to focus on that camera, but actually locking is an extremely rare feat.  Aperture control works perfectly, of course.

With the A7R II, Ithe difference was night and day.  My Fotga adpater has some odd quirks in that it will sometimes work great and other times seems to not do much of anything with regards to AF.  However, when it does work, the A7R II was able to focus my Sigma 50mm f/1.4 essentially as fast as a native Canon DSLR body, at least in good light.  I was able to quickly change focus from close to far away with quick and sure focus moves that were very accurate.  This is not a fast focusing lens, but the performance I saw was only a bit slower than what I got with my Canon 1Ds Mark II. See the hastily shot video (handheld with my phone to the EVF) below to see the performance I was able to get with this lens. I apologize for the video quality here..but I didn’t have time to do a more controlled setup.

It’s worth noting that the reports I’m seeing are showing mixed performance with regards to AF performance with Canon lenses.  Some lenses seem to work very well while others won’t work at all, or are inaccurate or slow to focus. It’s worth doing some detailed research if you plan on using autofocus EF lenses with the A7R II.

Performance

With regards to performance, the A7R II is generally quite responsive. The maximum frame rate of 5 frames per second is certainly not going to endear the camera to action shooters, but it’s a sufficient speed for most photographers.  The A7R II has a deep buffer, though, and is capable of maintaining the top shutter speed for a maximum of 23 RAW images or 40 Fine JPEG images in my testing with a Lexar 633x UHS-I U3 memory card. Oddly, Extra Fine JPEG images share the same 23 image buffer as RAW files. Given the 42 MB files size for RAW files, this equates to moving nearly 1GB of data in a full burst. Five frames per second may not be blazing speed, but given the size of the images, it’s not bad at all.

Overall performance is quite good for a camera packing this much imaging power into its small frame, with relatively minimal shutter lag and generally snappy operation.  However, the large RAW files do take some time to write to the card, so count on a few seconds of delay after a shot before the image is ready for review.  If you take a long burst, the camera will write for quite a while, even with a fast memory card.

Continue: In-Body Image Stabilization and other key features

Tags:

Comments

12 responses to “Review: Sony A7R II”

  1. […] time with the camera.  Look forward to my full A7R II review later this month.  Edit 8/23/15: My full review of the A7R II is now […]

  2. Mike Aubrey Avatar

    Thanks, Jordan,

    I’ve written up my thoughts on the EVF with manual focus lenses on TalkEMount. Initially I was with you on the problem, but when I got back to the computer and looked at my images, my hit rate with MF was the same as it was before with my original A7. So at least for me, while the change looks weird, uncomfortable, and makes me nervous, it hasn’t hindered my shooting. So I’m slowly coming around to accepting it simply as a different look.

    Still, currently I like the old EVF more for MF. We’ll see how that changes with more experience…

  3. Stephen Avatar
    Stephen

    I think this is the first review I read that saying the continuous AF improvement over A7ii is minimal. I don’t have A7Rii yet, I am still waiting.

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      Yeah, I looked to see if I was doing anything off, though having had success with my a6000 and even decent success with my A7 II, I didn’t really see that as an issue. However, I can tell you I tried every focus mode, turned it to AF priority, etc. I tested with both the FE 55mm f/1.8 and the Batis 85mm f/1.8. I do test difficult subjects: all of these cameras can easily track subjects that are primarily moving laterally. The differences are when things are moving towards or away from the camera. To be honest, the very best C-AF I’ve used in mirrorless is with Fuji cameras with firmware 4.0 on the X-T1 (and likewise the X-T10). The latest firmware bumped them from pretty good to very good. Their PDAF area is much smaller, but I’ve had great accuracy in tracking, even with lenses like the 56mm f/1.2. Sony’s been a bit more hit or miss in this department, with the a6000 turning in a very good performance overall.

      That said, the A7R II is a smashingly good camera, and I was very pleased to see the low light AF improvements that are very real on this camera.

  4. AmpCAT Avatar
    AmpCAT

    Thanks for the comparisons to the A7II’s autofocus. I already bit the bullet and purchased the A7II, figuring the saved money could get me a nice lens at the least. I was almost hoping you’d find the A7rII’s AF all around not much better, but alas, now I just have to keep convincing myself that I really don’t need the more expensive camera. Because I don’t. But it really would make me feel all fuzzy inside.

    Thanks again for a great review!

  5. Holger Avatar
    Holger

    Interesting read on the AF. On my A7ii I use flexible spot (small) and continuous low in AFC mode. This gives me good results if s.b. is approaching me. But continuous high is not working properly. Did you experience the same behaviour in both modes?
    Very nice review with great pics.

  6. Vlad Avatar
    Vlad

    I think the resolution is overkill for most uses, until one considers two things:
    – using primes and cropping, thus having to lug less gear and ultimately reducing the kit to the point that m43 or APS-C alternatives don’t offer any advantage (this depends, of course, on what lenses one uses)
    – dispensing with TS lenses for perspective correction

  7. […] hairs at this level.  That said, having shot the Batis on the ultra-high resolution A7R II (full review here), I will say that it would not surprise me at all that if Fuji had an ultra high resolution body, […]

  8. Guido Avatar
    Guido

    Hello Jordan,
    it’s the first time I write here, but I often read your nice reviews.
    I have a complete Fuji system, the X-T1 and several lenses, but the new Sony is tempting a lot.. I can’t justify to own both systems, it’s just an hobby, so I am considering a switch.
    The main reasons: 1) Fuji AF is still frustrating when doing portraits of kids, 2) resolution and IQ for landscape photography. I find the Fuji is great to photograph people, less so for landscape. I like to shoot both..
    Any thoughts about the two systems? Are they in competition or in completely different leagues? What would be your choice if you could only own one?
    Thanks
    Guido

  9. joe Avatar
    joe

    Forest Sunrise is excellent!

  10. Gustavo Campos Avatar
    Gustavo Campos

    Hi.

    First, thanks for the excellent review. I’ve just bought my A7rii (not yet in hands!!! Trembling out of anxiety!)… but something that struck me in not being mentioned in your review was your experience with Canon glass, especially the 85mm 1.8 you used. I’ve read elsewhere that autofocus with this lens is awful, but I’d like to hear your opinion on the matter.

    Thanks again for your time in charing.

    G. Campos

  11. […] design. While the A7 II was released at the end of 2014, Sony made waves with the release of the A7R II this summer, packing a new 42 megapixel sensor, on-camera 4K video recording and a stunning array […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search


Categories


Recent Posts


  1. I think it is near Hillsboro.

  2. This article got me thinking… Why does Canon make RF S lenses starting with 18mm when most full frame RF…

  3. Great review. I shoot Nikon and may try an old Nikon D200 and see how it compares with the new…