Subtle Revision to the Fuji X-T1

The Fujifilm X-T1 has been a hot topic in the photography industry the past few months.  Many photographers are drawn to the old-school control scheme in a rugged, capable body with big performance improvements over previous Fuji cameras and a gloriously large EVF.  However, one of the things that has been nearly universally criticized about the camera is the tactile feel of the 4-way controller (or D-Pad) buttons on the rear of the camera.  In my review of the X-T1, it was certainly one of the things I knocked about the camera.

The Fujifilm X-T1
The Fujifilm X-T1
The Four Way Controller of the X-T1
The Four Way Controller of the X-T1

The early release of the X-T1 also revealed a light leak issue with early batches of the camera, where light could infiltrate the light box through the side ports or autofocus assist lamp.  While Fuji has publicly acknowledged the light leak, and has promised a fix for those early cameras and a change to current production to fix this, they have been silent about the 4-way controller buttons.  However, just because they have been quiet about them, doesn’t mean they haven’t been listening.  There have been some reports of users sending their X-T1s in to get repaired for the light leak, and coming back with better D-Pad buttons.  Others have also noted a better feel.

Having just obtained a second X-T1 with a 42A##### serial number, I can confirm that Fuji has indeed made a change to their manufacturing on the D-Pad from the early batches.  The X-T1 in my possession now features 4-way buttons that have a nice positive click to them.  The camera I reviewed in March had a distinctly mushy feel to the buttons. While the buttons are still somewhat recessed compared to the X-E2 or other X-Series cameras, they give notably better tactile feedback when pressing them compared to the first X-T1 I handled.  Nice to see that Fuji is listening, even in the middle of production.

Tags:

Comments

10 responses to “Subtle Revision to the Fuji X-T1”

  1. HF Avatar
    HF

    I bought a new one and paid attention to the buttons. My serial number starts with 41 and the buttons show a nice click. Originally I wanted to sell my OMD, but the 60mm macro lens still lets me keep it. The other lenses I don’t really need, since Fuji’s are really excellent.

    1. Jorge Avatar

      My serial number starts with 41 as well — and the buttons are too recessed and don’t click. I love the feel of the buttons on my X-E1. Supposedly they changed them to make them weather resistant (?)
      J

      1. HF Avatar
        HF

        Thats a pity. The shop keeper here in Germany opened two boxes to check the buttons. The latest releases showed the click, his first Fuji didn’t. I found the difference important for me, otherwise I wouldn’t have bought the camera.
        So my serial number indicates one of the later batches. Is it possible to exchange your Fuji for a new one?

  2. Jorge Avatar

    Well I just got off the telephone with Fuji in Edison NJ. Fortunately (?) my X-T1 does not have the light leak issue and unfortunately for me they are not aware of any immediate “fix” for the d-pad buttons. That d-pad and the video record button (which a firmware is needed to make that programmable) are the only two very minor issues I have with the X-T1. I do wish the d-pad was as tactile as my X-E1 though…
    Thanks for the update.
    J

  3. […] Subtle Revision to the Fuji X-T1 at admiringlight: “Having just obtained a second X-T1 with a 42A##### serial number, I can confirm that Fuji […]

  4. Tim L Avatar

    While it is plausible that Fuji has made changes to the D-pad, it also seems possible that this is sample-to-sample variation. Do you have a reason to believe it is not the latter, Jordan?

    Having read many, many threads on this topic, there are reports of users with early samples that have clicky buttons as well as users of later samples that have mushy buttons. There are reports of D-pads where some buttons are clicky and others are not. (This would drive me nuts.) In more than one interview by more than one Fuji exec at Japanese HQ, Fuji has denied that any D-pads have been changed out when addressing the light leak issue or that there is a “revised” D-pad. Of course, that doesn’t mean the situation hasn’t changed in the meantime.

    The whole issue of sample-to-sample variation is something that bothers me about Fuji gear. Take the aperture ring. In some units (same lens model) the aperture ring may be very loose or it might be quite tight. It would be easy to blame this on the subjective nature of this attribute were it not for users that own or have access to more than one copy of a particular lens who report the same thing.

  5. Florent Avatar

    Thanks for the review, Jordan.
    I’m a very happy MFT user (E-M1), but I’m quite frustrated by the lack of UWA rectinear prime. An X-E1 + 14mm sounds very tempting given an X-E1 body can be purchased for around $450 in Switzerland. Also an X-E1 + 56mm f/1.2 is still cheaper than the Panasonic 42.5 lens!
    A quick question: what RAW software do you use to postprocess your X-T1 files?
    What do you think of processing RAW files on the Fuji? Can you easily get similar results to the JPEGs produced by the camera?
    I use LR 4, but it seems like it’s quite poor at demosaicing X-Trans files…
    Thanks!

    1. Karl Avatar
      Karl

      @Florent. I don’t think 21mm FOV (1.5*14mm) is really UWA. If you are really going for that then you probably should go for a Sony A7/A7r with an old adapted UWA lens. Or a Leica ????

      1. Florent Avatar
        Florent

        Hi Karl.
        The 12mm Zeiss would be perfect although it’s quit a bit larger than the 14. Although it’s not super wide, the 14 would be OK. In MFT land the widest is only 24 equiv. Which sucks. I’m not interested in Sony. Historically they’ve shown to not be very committed to a given mount in terms of lens Dev. Also I don’t want FF for size reasons.

        1. Frank Avatar
          Frank

          According to current standards maybe 14 mm are not superwide but does everyone really need 10 mm to get happy and to get THE photo? IMO not. In former times I loved my Ais-Nikkor 20/2.8, my M-Elmarit 21/2.8 ASPH. and my Zeiss G 21/2.8. (Obviously I am a 21mm-loonie 😉 At this time there was no real necessity for me to buy a wider lens. My VC 15/4.5 was just a bargain, so i bought it. Used it seldom because I felt only little need. No wonder I have bought Fuji’s excellent 14/2.8 as soon as I could make it. This lens is stunning! Extremely well built and compact (!), f2.8 is fully usable, distortion very low, autofocus very quick and the price is very, very fair. IMO this lens is one of the three finest lenses in the Fuji portfolio. Go for it, you will not regret. 🙂

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search


Categories


Recent Posts


  1. I think it is near Hillsboro.

  2. This article got me thinking… Why does Canon make RF S lenses starting with 18mm when most full frame RF…

  3. Great review. I shoot Nikon and may try an old Nikon D200 and see how it compares with the new…