Admiring Light
Menu
  • Home
  • Review Index
  • Shop Talk
  • Technique and Vision
  • Opinion
  • Portfolio
  • Site Index
  • About
    • Privacy Policy
Menu

Fuji 10-24mm vs Fuji 14mm f/2.8 and Fuji 23mm f/1.4

Posted on April 6, 2014 by Jordan Steele

Contents

  • 1The Lenses
  • 2Fuji 10-24mm f/4 vs Fuji 14mm f/2.8
  • 3Fuji 10-24mm f/4 vs Fuji 23mm f/1.4
  • 4Conclusion

Fuji 10-24mm f/4 vs Fuji 23mm f/1.4

To compare the 10-24mm against the 23mm f/1.4, I thought it best to do two separate tests.  The 35mm equivalent focal length is a useful one that is used for both landscape type work as well as more intimate shooting such as environmental portraiture and street shooting.  For this reason, I did one test focused near infinity, and a second test (shooting only at f/4 to provide some background blur) with a focus distance of about 1m, to test closer performance.

Below is the full scene for the distance test.  As with the 14mm test, only the lenses were changed on the tripod mounted camera.

10-24mm vs 23mm f/1.4 - Test at infinity
10-24mm vs 23mm f/1.4 – Test at infinity

Below are the 100% crops for the above image. Again, click to enlarge, then click on the green arrow to view full size.

100% Crops, 23mm test - Click to Enlarge
100% Crops, 23mm test – Click to Enlarge

Looking at the crops above, this one is a little more one-sided.  The 10-24mm isn’t quite as strong at the long end of its range as it is at the wider end, and it shows here.  The 23mm f/1.4 is notably sharper at f/4 and at f/8 both in the center and especially on the edges.  The 10-24mm certainly creates a decent image here, but it’s no match for the outstanding 23mm f/1.4.

Now let’s look at closer performance. Below is the full shot for the close-shooting test:

23mm Test - Close Focus (1m)
23mm Test – Close Focus (1m)

And below are the 100% crops.  Again, click to enlarge then click the green arrow to view full size:

100% Crops, 23mm Test - Close Focus - Click to Enlarge
100% Crops, 23mm Test – Close Focus – Click to Enlarge

Again, this is a decisive win for the 23mm f/1.4.  The 23mm is slightly sharper in the center at f/4, but the 23mm f/1.4 is also sharp in the extreme corner at this aperture, while the 10-24mm just produces a soft mess.  The 23mm also has much smoother bokeh at f/4 (in addition to having an extra 3 stops beyond this).  In all, a clear victory for the 23mm.

Conclusion

Well, the results are largely how I expected them to play out.  The 10-24mm is shaping up to be a very good ultra-wide zoom, but like most ultra-wide zooms, it’s not going to perform as well as a top-notch prime lens.  To be fair, this is seriously stiff competition.  The Fuji 14mm and 23mm are two of the best lenses in the X-System; both are among the best lenses in their range of any I’ve ever used.  It’s unrealistic to expect a zoom with this range to match such great optics.  That said, there is a lot to be said for convenience as well as versatility and the added capability of even further width with the 10-24mm.  Come back soon for my full review of the 10-24mm, which should be ready in around a week.

Pages: 1 2

12 thoughts on “Fuji 10-24mm vs Fuji 14mm f/2.8 and Fuji 23mm f/1.4”

  1. Gnondpomme says:
    April 7, 2014 at 12:28 am

    Once again a nice review that will help a lot of us to decide between those incredible lenses… I would just have liked that you had the 18mm f2 to finish the competition… Maybe next time!

    Reply
  2. Pingback: Fujinon XF 10-24mm tests (vs Canon's 16-35 mm, XF 14mm and XF 23mm) | Fuji RumorsFuji Rumors
  3. Charles Eklund says:
    April 7, 2014 at 9:57 am

    Thanks, Jordan. This a good start to another real world test and I am looking forward to the rest of it. It would also be interesting to see how the 10-24 compares to the 18-55 at common focal lengths. I think the lens it a very useful addition to the system.

    Reply
    1. Karl says:
      April 7, 2014 at 10:31 pm

      Isn’t that relatively obvious? Weakest part of the range for the10-24 to the strongest part of the range for 18-55.

      Reply
  4. Pingback: Test ?ng kính Fuji XF 10-24mm - Thông tin máy ?nh
  5. Arnold says:
    April 8, 2014 at 7:24 am

    Did you try a second copy? My first 10-24 was horrible in the corners, even @ f/8. I returned it and received a new one. The second one is tack sharp and from f/5.6 there’s no noticeable difference between the 10-24 and my 14mm.

    It’s too bad that Fuji’s QC is so so, i’ve seen bad copies from other lenses as well.
    Take a look at this comparison, it’s the opposite from your findings. At 14mm the 10-24 is sharper at the very corners.
    http://www.martin-doppelbauer.de/foto/fujixe1/1024mm-1/index.html

    Only at 24mm the 10-24 corners are not that great compared to the 23mm prime.

    Reply
  6. Cedano says:
    April 9, 2014 at 4:31 pm

    Jordan if you have to choose 10-24 or 14mm + 23mm witch one do you choose for street photography?

    Regards

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      April 9, 2014 at 7:31 pm

      For street photography, I prefer primes, so I’d take the 23/1.4 all day. But that’s me. I don’t do a TON of street photography, but I do shoot a bunch around the city. I think the 10-24 has a good use in a lot of bags when you need versatility. For landscape or architectural shooting, having this very wide range of wide angle focal lengths available is wonderful. One could easily shoot a wide variety of subjects with just the 10-24, the 35/1.4 and the 55-200. That said, the primes are better lenses and have other advantages, notably speed in the case of the 23mm. For me, I’m glad I have the 14 and the 23mm. That said, I could see myself adding the 10-24mm to my bag eventually for times I’d be shooting things that require more depth of field, or for times I want more width.

      Reply
  7. Mike V says:
    April 20, 2014 at 2:05 am

    I just picked up the x-t1 and in the process of getting rid of my Nikon DSLR gear. I have the 56mm f1.2 and X100 right now and thinking of what makes sense. Right now the options are to get the 10-24 and the 35mm. the other option is the 14 and 23. I’d get a nice small normal lens in the 35 f1.4 and a good zoom. I’m not one for alot of landscape but will be traveling to south africa for a safari at the end of the year.

    In general I like primes, but I’m wondering if the 10-24 is good enough to replace the 23 (35mm) and wide angle range with the IS, or if I should just get the primes and eat the additional cost

    Reply
  8. Hochzeitsfotograf Essen says:
    April 23, 2014 at 9:10 am

    Nice review!
    As a former Canon user I can say (and compare) that the 10-24mm impresses me and is in my opinion a better lens than my already sold 16-35mm II.
    The image stabilisation of the Fuji rocks!

    Reply
  9. Jason from Sydney says:
    June 24, 2014 at 4:40 am

    Thank you for the detailed review, your write up has helped me make my decision to go with the 14mm as my next lens purchase. I’m an extremely happy XF 23 mm and XF 56 mm user currently.

    The picture quality with the Fuji lenses are so impressive ( Coming from a FF Canon user with a bag full of L series lenses). Keep up the good work!

    Reply
  10. www.modularkitchenindia.In says:
    September 22, 2014 at 1:31 am

    These new concepts have been termed as “Modular Kitchen” and this is very much required just than a cooking
    place. They borrow from the best, sleekest and most modern designers
    all over the world, while asking of its customers a
    reasonable investment. Closed kitchens are a good choice if
    you have lot of space and lots of items to stock.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow Me:

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on Instagram

Most Popular Posts

  • "Full Frame Equivalence" and Why It Doesn't Matter (286)
  • Fuji X-Pro 2 vs. Sony A7 II: Noise Comparison (70)
  • Fuji 56mm f/1.2 vs. Panasonic Leica 42.5mm f/1.2 Nocticron (63)
  • Review: Metabones Speed Booster (Canon FD to Fuji X) (56)
  • Review: Olympus OM-D E-M5 (48)

Recent Comments

  • Don McConnell on Review: Laowa 15mm f/4.5 Zero-D Shift
  • Scott on Review: Laowa 15mm f/4.5 Zero-D Shift
  • Logan ross on Canon RF 70-200mm f/4L IS vs. Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS
  • Tobie on Review: Panasonic Lumix G 25mm f/1.7
  • Carl Zeller on Using Manual Focus Lenses on Mirrorless Cameras

Archives

©2021 Admiring Light | Theme by SuperbThemes
We use cookies to personalize content and ads and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. You may consent to the use of cookies or opt out. Accept Reject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.