Review: Olympus M.Zuiko 12mm f/2

Review: Olympus M.Zuiko 12mm f/2

Ojito Wilderness, NM – Panasonic GX1 with Olympus 12mm f/2

Image Quality

When I first got this lens, the first copy I owned had a severe element decentering issue, which caused the right side of the lens to be sharp, while the left 1/3 of the lens was exceedingly soft.  I returned it for a second copy which displayed a fair amount of even sharpness, but for some reason had extreme field curvature, where the left and right side of the frame would be focused at around 5-10 feet, while the center was at infinity.  A third copy finally displayed the image quality characteristics I had read about in other reviews and seen in other images.  Of course, I have kept that, and is the basis for this review.  I am hoping that my experience was a rare anomaly, but know that if you get a sub-par copy of the lens that the lens shouldn’t perform poorly – return it for another.

So, aside from questionable quality control, the lens is a stellar performer.  Images are sharp right from wide open, with only subtle corner softness at f/2.  Stopping down a bit takes away almost all of the corner softness, providing an edge to edge sharp frame with great contrast and good color.  When shooting closeup at wide apertures, fairly decent background blur is achievable, and bokeh is very even and creamy as well.

Daffodils in the City – Panasonic GH2 with Olympus 12mm f/2 @ f/2

Flare is generally well controlled, but in rare situations can present an issue, especially if the bright source of light is relatively close to the lens.  Flare caused by light sources out of frame could be helped by a hood, though I have generally not experienced too many problems even without the hood.

The lens exhibits some red/cyan chromatic aberration at the edges of the frame that is easily fixed by CA correction in RAW (either with sliders in something like Lightroom 3 or PTLens, or completely with the automatic CA removal in Lightroom 4).  Even if shooting JPEG, the CA is not bad enough to ruin images, though when uncorrected it is visible at 100% enlargement.

Autofocus

Autofocus on the Olympus 12mm f/2 is very fast and accurate, even in very low light.  I can’t remember a single instance in the field where the autofocus failed to find its mark.  Of course, the limited focus throw due to being a wide angle lens helps in this speed.  The only complaint here is that the minimum focus distance of 8 inches is slightly long for a lens this wide.  In practice it doesn’t pose many problems, but you won’t be doing wide angle macro work with this lens.

Walking at Night – Panasonic GX1 with Olympus 12mm f/2 @ f/2

The Intangibles

So, the lens is great optically, well built and has nice quick autofocus.  What else?  The lens isn’t perfect.  It’s got a little bit of CA and I had to go through three copies to get a really good one.  It’s expensive (I had to sell two other lenses and my GH1 to afford to buy one since I’m on a strict ‘no extra money for camera gear’ moratorium at the moment) and doesn’t include accessories that really should be standard.

That said, this lens, especially when paired with a little camera like my Panasonic GX1, is perhaps more fun to shoot with than any lens I’ve ever owned.  I have found myself many times going out with just the GX1 and 12mm, sometimes with the 45mm f/1.8 plopped in a pocket for a telephoto shot if one should arise.  It’s a great general purpose focal length that allows for creative composition and is an absolute joy for shooting in low light environments, especially interior architecture when you can’t bring a tripod.  Because the lens is sharp right from f/2, it can be really useful for shooting interiors where light is limited or even outdoors at night for available light street photography.  Generally there is enough depth of field as well provided you aren’t shooting something very close up.

Rusty Door – Panasonic GX1 with Olympus 12mm f/2

Conclusion

Pros:

  • Excellent sharpness – sharp right from f/2, and sharp corner to corner from f/2.8.
  • Outstanding color and contrast at all apertures.  There’s a really nice balance of high microcontrast and vibrant macrocontrast without becoming overly harsh.  Bokeh is quite nice as well.
  • Large aperture for low light shooting or for isolating details when shooting closeup.
  • Excellent build quality with tight tolerances and a wonderful manual focus feel with the focus clutch mechanism.
  • Extremely fun to shoot with, and capable of truly outstanding, professional grade results.

Cons:

  • Lens hood is not included, which is frankly obnoxious given the relatively high price of the lens.
  • Quality control may be an issue – had to go through three copies before obtaining a properly performing lens.
  • Some lateral chromatic aberration at the edges of the frame, though correctable in RAW conversion.
  • Lens ‘steps’ through the focus when using the manual focus ring pulled back.

While the bullet points above are nearly equal in number for pros and cons, you’ll see that the positives are big positives, while the cons are a little less critical, though if you get a bad lens, it could certainly be more than a minor issue if you can’t easily return it.  All things considered, this lens has earned a permanent place in my kit.  In fact, I could be pretty happy with only this lens, the Olympus 45mm f/1.8 and the Panasonic Leica 25mm f/1.4 (which I will review sometime in the future).  The Olympus M.Zuiko 12mm f/2 is a stellar optic, a joy to shoot with and one of the top choices in the Micro 4/3 lineup for serious photographers.

Image Samples

The following images were all taken with the Olympus 12mm f/2.  Click on an image to view larger.

Fountain Lines – Panasonic GX1 with Olympus 12mm f/2
Miraculous Stairway – Panasonic GX1 with Olympus 12mm f/2
Petroglyph, Albuquerque, NM – Panasonic GX1 with Olympus 12mm f/2 @ f/2
Bockscar – Panasonic GX1 with Olympus 12mm f/2 @ f/2

Comments

22 responses to “Review: Olympus M.Zuiko 12mm f/2”

  1. […] seen most of the images, but the lens has seen a huge portion of my shooting since I got it. Olympus M.Zuiko 12mm f/2 Review @ Admiring Light __________________ —————————— Jordan Steele – http://www.jordansteele.com […]

  2. cosinaphile Avatar
    cosinaphile

    i can say that this is an accurate balanced view of the lens , i got this lens when it first came out and found its iq excellent , and its build quality above avg , with the engraved metal barrel and finite damped throw of the mf dial to be nice touches

    thanks for a great review

  3. Mark Avatar

    Jordan, a minor correction about your review. The 12mm lenshood is reversible. Pictures here.

  4. Jordan Steele Avatar

    Thank you for that, Mark – the review has been updated.

  5. Forrest Avatar
    Forrest

    Thanks for the review. I like these sort of reviews that are real world explanations and not a pixel peeping extravaganza. I will be cheking out your site more. I followed the link you posted on Dpreview.com.

  6. Geoffrey Heard Avatar

    Excellent review, Jordan. I must say, I admire your stick-to-it-ness! After two failed copies, I might have given up! 🙂

    Very balanced, and I agree with what you have said. I finally decided against the f2 12mm, deciding in favor of smallness with the f2.5 14mm (for professional reasons I also have to have the 9-18 zoom, given that there’s no 9mm or 10mm prime, which is what I would really like), but zi looked very closely at it and agonized over it.

    I even went so far as to buy Panny’s 24mm (equiv) OVF, the VF1, which they produced for the bottom end of the LX3’s zoom. I use an OVF (a rather expensive Voigtlander) with the Panny 14 — it’s magic! If you get the opportunity to get your hands on to the Panny OVF (or any other 24mm equiv accessory OVF) I recommend giving it a try. More fun that a lot of stuff that’s not even legal! 🙂

    Certainly the lens hood should be included, as should a bag for the lens. I bought JJC hoods for my lenses and whole they work okay, they’re not as good as the branded ones (and you must not, under any circumstances, try to reverse the 9-18 hood) but having spent serious money buying the Oly lenses, there was no way I was going to unbelt again for the lens hoods.

    I’m using my little lenses on the E-PL3. It delivers so much photographic fun and performance I don’t even mind about the IBIS being useless! It sounds as though you’re have lots of small camera fun too.

    Thanks again for an excellent review.

    Cheers, geoff

  7. Blake Avatar
    Blake

    Hi Jordan

    Do you have any sample images from the 2 faulty lenses that you had?

    Cheers,

    Blake

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      Actually, the “Fountain Lines” shot above is with the first lens. Looks good, right? Well, the misaligned element basically caused it to act as a tilt shift lens, with the tilt causing the wedge of focus to go from near left to far right. (In that shot, from close bottom to far top). Due to the distances involved in that shot, the flaw was actually beneficial…allowing me to get the closer pole in better focus than would have been otherwise possible. However, when shooting flat field subjects, it was terrible. The second lens really wasn’t all that bad…I probably would have been happy with it overall, but by then the third lens was available to try and it was stellar, so I made the swap. The second lens was generally good for most subjects, but the field curvature could cause the edges of the frame to be out of focus when shooting distant subjects.

  8. Mori Avatar
    Mori

    Hi Jordon, I have just received my 12mm F2 and I’m not blown away by the sharpness. Can you provide some methods I could use to test the sharpness? I’m not an expert analyst of photos, but is there certain target objects that could help me determine if I have a faulty lens?

  9. Reb Avatar
    Reb

    Hi Jordan,

    Thank you very much for this review… very informative.
    I love the picture Fountain lines. The magic of a faulty lens…

    I recently bought a 12mm F2 as well (used on Panasonic GH2), and it seems to me that the distortion is not as well corrected as it is with the 7-14mm F4 Panasonic (when also shooting at 12mm).

    Is this something you have also experienced?
    Is the distortion effect corrected as it is for the 7-14mm? Is it because it is an Olympus lens on a Panasonic camera and somehow does not benefit from the correction?

    Or maybe my own eyes need some software correction….

    Thanks,

    Reb

  10. dreamcatcher Avatar
    dreamcatcher

    would you rather the 12mm f2.0 or the 45mm f1.8?
    i have heard there is a new lens coming out for olympus
    “The M.ZUIKO DIGITAL ED 75mm F1.8 lens”
    what is the best prime for m zuiko???
    as a fashion photographer id love your advice on these primes in comparison to each other?
    thanks

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      If I could only have one, I’d keep the 45/1.8, but that’s because I also have the excellent Panasonic 7-14mm to cover the 12mm range. I also have the Leica 45/2.8 macro, but I’d also sell that before the 45/1.8, as I have an OM 50mm macro that works very well for macro if I need it. I too am looking forward to the 75/1.8. I think it’ll be good, but we’ll have to wait until release!

  11. […] can check out my reviews of other Olympus prime lenses for Micro 4/3…the excellent 12mm f/2 and 45mm […]

  12. […] who wants a smaller system.  So far, it seems to be working.  Last year, they released the incredibly good 12mm f/2, which was not only outstanding optically, but had a pro-grade metal build as well.  The less […]

  13. […] who wants a smaller system.  So far, it seems to be working.  Last year, they released the incredibly good 12mm f/2, which was not only outstanding optically, but had a pro-grade metal build as well.  The less […]

  14. Richard Avatar
    Richard

    Mr. Steele,
    I’ve been seriously considering either the 12mm reviewed here, or the 17mm, F1.8 for my new OM-D EM-5. Your review and especially the sample images have swayed me toward the 12mm. Yet, I have one last question…..you used the 12mm on the Panasonic cam, which I believe has a sensor that provides a different color and contrast quality than the Olympus sensor. Is this correct? I would like to capture the color and contrast of your shots. Do you believe this is possible with the OM-D sensor and this lens? IF so, I will find the money for the 12mm lens. Also, I agree that Olympus is harming it’s reputation with the lens hood issue.

    1. John Avatar
      John

      24mm and 35mm (equivalent) lenses have a significantly different field of view. I think that should be the deciding factor for anyone looking for a lens. I have both the Olympus 12mm f/2 and the Panasonic 15mm f/1.7 (and the Olympus 25mm f/1.8) and to me they are not interchangeable.

  15. Chad Johnson Avatar
    Chad Johnson

    I love this lens. I got it for it’s small size, for flying on a quadcopter attached to a GH4. But I also like to use the lens indoors at night since it’s so fast, which is why I don[t like the manual focus stepping. I like to rack focus, and the stepping is pronounced IMO. Here’s a test video I just made: http://youtu.be/NqqFzXi1IuA

    I wasn’t sure if I had a bad unit until I saw this review. I was going to return it to my friend I bought it from used, and get the new black version at B&H for 100.00 off! Oh well…

  16. Madalyn Avatar
    Madalyn

    Would you recommend this 12mm lens over the Panasonic 15mm f1.7? My general purpose is for landscape photography, but I also would like to get into astrophotography as well. I also have the 14-42mm kit lens that came with my Panasonic G7, so I’m not sure if getting the 15mm would be redundant. Thanks for your help!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search


Categories


Recent Posts


  1. I think it is near Hillsboro.

  2. This article got me thinking… Why does Canon make RF S lenses starting with 18mm when most full frame RF…

  3. Great review. I shoot Nikon and may try an old Nikon D200 and see how it compares with the new…