Admiring Light
Menu
  • Home
  • Review Index
  • Shop Talk
  • Technique and Vision
  • Opinion
  • Portfolio
  • Site Index
  • About
    • Privacy Policy
Menu

Review: Fujifilm Fujinon XF 55-200mm f/3.5-4.8 R LM OIS

Posted on August 3, 2013August 3, 2013 by Jordan Steele

Contents

  • 1Around the Lens: Build Quality
  • 2Around the lens: Handling, Operation and Autofocus
  • 3Image Quality: Sharpness
  • 4Image Quality: Bokeh
  • 5Image Quality: Color, Chromatic Aberration and Flare
  • 6Conclusion
  • 7Image Samples

Conclusion

Pros:

  • High end build quality makes for a solid lens
  • Very sharp throughout the zoom range from wide open, and extremely sharp stopped down just a bit.
  • Outstanding bokeh for a zoom lens. Heck, outstanding bokeh for any lens.
  • Rich, vibrant color and good chromatic aberration control
  • Moderately fast and silent autofocus with excellent accuracy
  • Exceptional image stabilization that is good for 3-4 stops at all focal lengths
  • Good value at $699

Cons:

  • Large and heavy for a mirrorless lens
  • Edges aren’t the greatest wide open
  • Zoom ring is a little too stiff
  • Balance is a little front heavy due to the extending lens on the rangefinder styled X bodies

Overall, Fuji has created a truly outstanding zoom lens with the Fujinon XF 55-200mm f/3.5-4.8 R LM OIS. It’s a lens that is not only sharp throughout the range, but has excellent color rendering, beautiful bokeh and good control of lens aberrations.

While certainly quite large for a mirrorless lens, most of the handling issues became footnotes for me once I started shooting with the 55-200mm. When I received the lens, I was intrigued but disappointed by the size. By the time I returned it after the review period, I had started saving up to purchase it. At $699, it’s a no-brainer purchase for anyone who needs a telephoto lens for the X-Series. Another great optic for the X-system!

Image Samples

Click to Enlarge

 

Lioness - Fujinon XF 55-200mm f/3.5-4.8 R LM OIS @ 200mm, f/4.8
Lioness – Fujinon XF 55-200mm f/3.5-4.8 R LM OIS @ 200mm, f/4.8
Bird - Fujinon XF 55-200mm f/3.5-4.8 R LM OIS @ 200mm, f/4.8
Bird – Fujinon XF 55-200mm f/3.5-4.8 R LM OIS @ 200mm, f/4.8
North Bank Park - Fujinon XF 55-200mm f/3.5-4.8 R LM OIS @ 55mm, f/9
North Bank Park – Fujinon XF 55-200mm f/3.5-4.8 R LM OIS @ 55mm, f/11
Penguin - Fujinon XF 55-200mm f/3.5-4.8 R LM OIS @ 200mm, f/4.8
Penguin – Fujinon XF 55-200mm f/3.5-4.8 R LM OIS @ 200mm, f/4.8
Posing - Fujinon XF 55-200mm f/3.5-4.8 R LM OIS @ 200mm, f/4.8
Posing – Fujinon XF 55-200mm f/3.5-4.8 R LM OIS @ 200mm, f/4.8
Meters - Fujinon XF 55-200mm f/3.5-4.8 R LM OIS @ 200mm, f/4.8
Meters – Fujinon XF 55-200mm f/3.5-4.8 R LM OIS @ 200mm, f/4.8
Tiger Cub - Fujinon XF 55-200mm f/3.5-4.8 R LM OIS @ 200mm, f/4.8
Tiger Cub – Fujinon XF 55-200mm f/3.5-4.8 R LM OIS @ 200mm, f/4.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pages: 1 2 3

19 thoughts on “Review: Fujifilm Fujinon XF 55-200mm f/3.5-4.8 R LM OIS”

  1. Frank says:
    August 4, 2013 at 12:06 am

    Another great lens for fuji it seems… which is pushing me closer to clicking the add to cart on b&h 🙂

    Great rev!

    Reply
  2. Pingback: My full review of the Fuji 55-200 is up
  3. Pingback: miXed zone: X20 and street photography, ghost town, admiringlight 55-200 review and more | Fuji Rumors
  4. cosinaphile says:
    August 10, 2013 at 10:48 pm

    thanks for an information packed review that was enjoyable to read , im glad i will be adding this lens to my
    x mount stable… the ois which impressed you so , is it noticeably better than ois in the 18-55 2.8-4? [which seems good to me .]

    the only lenses i have currently are the 14mm and 18-55 in native mount….this will be welcome

    Reply
  5. Pingback: Mirrorless news roundup… | Mirrorless Rumors
  6. Nick Chaldakov says:
    October 12, 2013 at 3:57 am

    Jordan Steele thank you for nice review !

    Reply
  7. Pingback: fujifilm 55-200mm
  8. Pingback: fujifilm 55-200 review
  9. Pingback: The Fujinon 55-200mm f3.5-4.8 R LM OIS – My Review | pixels4ublog
  10. Pingback: Fujifilm Fujinon XF 55-200mm f/3.5-4.8 R LM OIS | NEWSGRAPHY
  11. Richard says:
    May 31, 2014 at 11:11 pm

    Thanks for your interesting article and great sample shots. It would be handy to many people, I expect, if you might add your shutter speeds to the captions; people already know the lens aperture range.

    Reply
  12. Philip says:
    June 6, 2014 at 2:01 pm

    I purchased the 55-200 zoom about three months ago, but I’ve been disappointed with the image quality. The sample photos that you provided are great. I’m not sure why my experience with this lens has been somewhat different. The images that I’ve shot have not been as sharp as your samples.

    Reply
  13. Frank says:
    June 7, 2014 at 11:52 am

    I totally agree with Jordan. This telezoom is an excellent performer, its price is very reasonable. No matter if it is used at full aperture or stopped down, the results are top notch. Love this lens!

    Reply
  14. Sam Taylor says:
    July 29, 2015 at 4:28 pm

    It’s a couple of years since you posted this review and lots of lenses have been added to the Fuji system since then. Would you consider adding a post-script to this review to reflect on how the lens compares to more recent Fuji telephotos like the 50-140 or the 90? Like many others I love the compact Fuji primes but often find myself missing a little telephoto reach. I want something longer than my 56 but the bulk of the 50-140 seems to defeat the point of a small mirrorless system. Is the 55-200 the answer I’m looking for or do the newer lenses outclass it?

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      July 29, 2015 at 6:05 pm

      The newer lenses are definitely better optically. The 90 is the best all around lens yet made for the X series in my opinion. That said, it’s also less versatile. The 50-140 is fantastic, but much, much larger. For what it’s worth, the 55-200 is still what’s in my bag. I may have to add the 90 at some point, though not as a replacement. I did a comparison between the 50-140 and the 55-200 when I had the former for review: https://admiringlight.com/blog/fuji-50-140mm-f2-8-vs-fuji-55-200mm-f3-5-4-8/

      Reply
      1. Sam Taylor says:
        July 31, 2015 at 5:34 pm

        Great comparison Jordan – thanks for passing that on. The 90 certainly is tempting. One of the reasons I haven’t yet abandoned my Canon 5DmkII is the 135 f2 which is close to my favourite lens of all time. I’m personally very comfortable with the constraints that field of view imposes so the Fuji 90 may just tip me over the edge! Incidentally I’d like to say how greatly I appreciate and admire your work. The quality of the sample images you provide with your reviews is always exceptional. Thanks for all the advice – and inspiration – you share with us all.

        Reply
  15. Pingback: Review: Fujifilm Fujinon XF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR - Admiring Light
  16. Lou Poll says:
    April 30, 2016 at 3:35 pm

    Mine is noticeably soft at 170mm and above, at any aperture. Even manually focusing it. Quite disappointing.

    Reply
  17. Tilman says:
    June 24, 2019 at 1:25 pm

    I’ve got it and love it. Use the 55-200mm even for my professional work (theater/ event/ portrait photography). See some samples here: https://tilmankoeneke.de/?s=55-200mm

    Cheers, Tilman

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow Me:

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on InstagramFollow Us on Mastodon

Most Popular Posts

  • "Full Frame Equivalence" and Why It Doesn't Matter (288)
  • Fuji X-Pro 2 vs. Sony A7 II: Noise Comparison (70)
  • Fuji 56mm f/1.2 vs. Panasonic Leica 42.5mm f/1.2 Nocticron (63)
  • Review: Metabones Speed Booster (Canon FD to Fuji X) (56)
  • Review: Olympus OM-D E-M5 (48)

Recent Comments

  • Anonymous on Ready for Launch!
  • Jordan Steele on Canon EOS R8 – First Impressions
  • J Williams on Canon EOS R8 – First Impressions
  • Davide on Review: Tamron 70-180mm f/2.8 Di III VXD
  • Peter on A Tripod in the Sky – DJI Air 2S Review

Archives

©2023 Admiring Light | Theme by SuperbThemes
We use cookies to personalize content and ads and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. You may consent to the use of cookies or opt out. Accept Reject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

SAVE & ACCEPT