Review: Fujifilm X-T10

Viewfinder and Rear Screen

One of the main differences between the X-T10 and the X-T1 is the T10’s smaller viewfinder.  The electronic viewfinder (EVF) of the X-T10 has the same 2.3 million dot EVF panel, but the optics used for display of that viewfinder produce an image that is notably smaller than the rather huge viewfinder of the X-T1.  The X-T10’s EVF has a magnification of 0.62x (considering a ‘normal’ lens), which is about the size of a typical APS-C sized DSLR viewfinder.  This is in contrast to the massive 0.77x finder in the X-T1, which is larger than most full-frame DSLR viewfinders.  The 0.62x size is roughly the same as the one found in the X-E2, though contrast appeared a bit better to my eye, and more on-par with the X-T1’s finder in that regard.

The X-T10’s viewfinder also inherits the T1’s rotating EVF display, such that shooting information will rotate orientation when the camera is in portrait orientation.  This works smoothly, but in consideration of the smaller view, the bottom information line actually wraps to a second line in the portrait orientation.

The rear screen of the X-T10 tilts up
The rear screen of the X-T10 tilts up

The rear screen on the X-T10 is a 3″ panel with 920,000 dots.  The rear screen is constructed similarly to the one on the X-M1 and X-A1/A2, which is strong and moves easily, though it’s a bit thicker than the one on the X-T1.  The screen can be tilted down at 45 degrees or laid flat, aimed 90 degrees upward, allowing for easy waist level shooting or using the camera with ease low to the ground.

I find the rear screen to be bright and contrasty with good detail and relatively accurate color.  There still is somewhat of a mismatch between what’s visible on the screen and what the final image will look like on your computer, but it’s not a huge difference.  Both the EVF and rear screen are in line with what I’d expect out of a camera in this price range.

Autofocus and Performance

The headline feature on the X-T10 is the all-new autofocus system, which further improves on Fuji’s AF algorithms.  The AF system that debuts with the X-T10 was also brought to the X-T1 via the recent v.4.0 firmware update, but the X-T10 is the first camera to feature this improved autofocus out of the box.

The X-T10’s AF is a hybrid contrast and phase-detection system, with 15 phase detection AF points in the central area of the image frame, in conjunction with contrast detect capabilities over the entire image frame.  Fuji’s been making continued strides in the autofocus arena every year, and with the X-T10, that system has finally reached maturity. Instead of simply choosing one focus point or letting the camera choose any point, there are now three modes for AF: Single point, Zone AF or Wide-Area AF.

The new Zone AF system allows for multiple AF points in a specific area to be utilized
The new Zone AF system allows for multiple AF points in a specific area to be utilized

The Single point system is the same 49 point affair as on previous cameras, with the central 9 focus points containing phase-detect information.  Any of these modes can be used with both single shot or continuous autofocus as selected by the switch on the front of the camera.

Overall performance with single shot AF is improved from previous X-series cameras, especially with lenses like the 27mm f/2.8 and 35mm f/1.4.  Both of these lenses see dramatic speed increases with far less hunting versus early X series cameras.  Low light accuracy is also improved, with less hunting and an ability to lock on surely even in very dim conditions.

When using continuous autofocus, the new modes shine.  While single point continuous AF is still good, and perhaps slightly improved, the camera shines when using the new Zone AF with continuous autofocus. Zone AF allows you to select groupings of 3×3, 5×3 or 5×5 focus points from which the camera will find focus. The Zone AF system, especially when the points in the central PDAF zone are used, dramatically improves continuous autofocus.

Using 5×3 Zone AF, I experienced very accurate predictive autofocus in high-speed burst mode, even with slower focusing lenses like the 35mm f/1.4.  The system proved capable of handling even challenging situations like in the image below, where the subject was quickly, but somewhat erratically, running towards the camera.  The X-T10 was able to track her movement and nail focus, even with the very slim depth of field at 56mm and f/1.4.

Skipping - Fujifilm X-T10 with Fujinon XF 56mm f/1.2 @ f/1.4, 5x3 Zone AF
Skipping – Fujifilm X-T10 with Fujinon XF 56mm f/1.2 @ f/1.4, 5×3 Zone AF

The Wide-Area AF mode  uses the entirety of the image sensor for focusing, but due to the wide field, you still specify an autofocus point, which is where the camera first looks for focus.  After focus is achieved, it will attempt to track that subject across the entire image frame, regardless of where it moves.  Because the wide-area AF uses contrast detection over most of the frame, it is not as adept at tracking motion that moves toward or away from the camera, though it can be a useful mode for following lateral action or slow-moving subjects.

The X-T10 also has a new and improved face-detection algorithm that can seek out individual eyes.  Settings allow preference for the right or left eye, or to allow the camera to determine which eye to focus on.  I found this feature to work quite well, and a very high percentage of shots were absolutely dead-on in focus using this mode.  It’s a great mode for capturing candids of children, given their unpredictable movement and how the framing may suddenly change.

Number Clock - Fujifilm X-T10 with Fujinon XF 35mm f/1.4 @ f/1.4, Eye Focus
Number Clock – Fujifilm X-T10 with Fujinon XF 35mm f/1.4 @ f/1.4, Eye Focus

In all, I find the X-T10’s autofocus upgrades to be excellent.  As the X-T1 now shares this same system, the X-T series as a whole clearly sits at the top of the heap of Fuji cameras with regards to autofocus performance.  While Panasonic and Olympus are still a bit faster in single shot shooting, and the Sony a6000 may have slightly better continuous AF (though it’s very close), the X-T10’s autofocus is predominantly on par with the competition in most circumstances, and the continuous AF in Zone AF mode is near the top of the heap among mirrorless cameras.

Performance

The X-T10 may focus quickly, but how does it do with overall performance and responsiveness? Well, there are positives and negatives here. On the plus side, the camera has the same processor and general speed of the more expensive X-T1.  Files write the card fairly quickly and the camera turns on and is ready without much delay.  There’s generally no waiting on the camera in everyday operation.  So, in this regard, there’s nothing to complain about.
The X-T10, like the X-T1 before it, has a top continuous burst speed of 8 frames per second.  This is fairly quick, though the 11fps of the Sony a6000 and the crazy high 15 fps of the Samsung NX1 both are faster.  However, it’s worth noting that the 8fps top burst speed is generally only available when shooting with a fixed focus point or in manual focus, as the burst rate slows down to maintain focus during continuous AF operations.  Depending on lens focus speed, the slowdown can be appreciable, with some bursts slowing to around 4fps during tracking.

However, the biggest impediment to using the camera for shooting action isn’t with the burst slowdown, but rather with the exceptionally small buffer.  While the X-T1 can rattle off around 20 RAW photos at 8fps, the X-T10 can manage only 7.  Even switching to JPEG raises that number to only 8.  That means an 8fps burst won’t even capture one full second of action when shooting RAW.  That means timing is critical.  While the buffer flushes moderately quickly, you are still going to have to wait a few seconds before another bust can be taken.

Flash

The X-T10 hides a small pop-up flash in the viewfinder hump of the camera.  As I mentioned earlier, this flash is released with a small switch located to the side of the drive mode dial.  The flash deploys instantly.  It pops up faster than any other pop-up flash I”ve seen.  It’s almost freaky quick.  However, the actual usage of the flash is simply typical of a small pop-up flash.  It can be useful for some fill-in flash here and there, or for throwing light during macro shooting, but the small height of the flash gives the rather ugly look that is typical of a small direct flash.  The flash is also really only useful with the smaller lenses in the Fuji system.

The X-T10's Pop-Up Flash
The X-T10’s Pop-Up Flash

I had no issues with the 27mm f/2.8, 35mm f/1.4, 60mm f/2.4 or even the 18-55mm f/2.8-4.  However, the larger lenses, such as the 10-24mm f/4, 23mm f/1.4 and 56mm f/1.2 caused a shadow in the lower part of the image frame when using the pop-up flash.

Continue: Key Features

Tags:

Comments

33 responses to “Review: Fujifilm X-T10”

  1. Red Slater Avatar
    Red Slater

    Excellent review. For us jpeger street shooters, this is the best camera out there. One thing, though. The Q-menu is customizable – you said it isn’t. And for for larger lenses, just attach the handgrip.

  2. Brian Caslis Avatar
    Brian Caslis

    I think the section about the Q menu is wrong. I can customize the Q menu on my X-T10 just like the X-T1 by holding down the Q button for a few seconds. Also the EVF can be set to auto brightness making darker indoors and brighter outdoors. I find it works very well.

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      Thanks. I looked all over and couldn’t find it like I could on the X-T1. I’ve updated the review.

  3. […] Admiringlight simply revealed its Fujifilm X-T10 evaluation. Here an excerpt from the conclusions: […]

  4. Daniel Avatar
    Daniel

    I guess I’m in the minority but I don’t get the appeal of Fuji images. It’s a beautiful looking camera and I love the lenses, but image quality lacks something to my eye.

    1. Chris Avatar
      Chris

      Daniel, I think what you’re noticing is that there’s sometimes a little less microcontrast in Fuji images. It’s a subtle thing, but I think it’s a reasonably fair generalization for some types of images. It depends on what style you’re going for. I think it works well for fashion in particular.

      1. Mk82 Avatar
        Mk82

        You do know that “Microcontrast” means exactly same thing as Contrast + Sharpness?

        If either one is lacking, you don’t get the results people mumble as “Microcontrast”.

        1. Rantanplan Avatar
          Rantanplan

          I’m not so sure, if it really is the same, or maybe it is not microontrast that’s missing.

          What I would say is:

          Sharpness, color, bokeh, of Fuji Lenses is really great (in the extreme corners not always, though).

          I think it all boils down to the X-Trans subpixel color pattern on the sensor (look at comparisons of X-A1 vs X-M1, etc.)

          The pros are: smooth gradiation of colors (lacking in high-freq. color, though. Good on low ISO, probably coz of the bigger rendering kernel of, smoothing out things. Still good (perhaps to good to be true) sharpness on “detected” high frequency stuff.

          And what some refer to the more “film-look” it does not accentuate edges to that level other digital cameras still do. That for me is the main thing to like about the images it produces.

          But one of the cons is that micro-contrast is missing in details that are not on full contrast, this is not much of a problem if you use VSCO and other filters that produce that trendy “matte look” anyways, coz for this type of images it really works perfectly.

          But as test have shown, even smaller MFT sensors, with good glass (Pana/Leica Nocticron) are able to outresolve all the Fufi-X cams when it’s purely about image detail (not pixel quality, per se).

          I have had an X-E1, still have a X100 and X-Pro1, but most probably will be selling the X-Pro1 again.

  5. Jano Avatar
    Jano

    Nice review and it really looks like a great camera for the price. Really hope they update the X-E2 to receive the major ones of these new features (better AF sensitivity, electronic shutter, EC in manual mode, direct AF point selection mainly). If not they really need to reduce the price of the X-E2…

    As far as I know the X100T was the first Fuji camera to be able to use EC in manual mode though. Pretty sad it took them so long

    Oh, and I think there shouldn’t be any Fuji review without a rant about waxy JPEG skin at high ISO and them not letting us turn it off.

  6. DJ Avatar
    DJ

    If you haven’t tried it already, you can change the EXIF data on the X-T10 files to “X-T1″ and open them in Photo Ninja perfectly. I use EXIFTools. The code to do it is -exif:Model=”X-T1”. My workflow is:

    1.) Import photos to Lightroom CC. Sort images, ratings, create collections etc. Basic adjustments, crops.
    2.) If I need the extra detail Photo Ninja provides, I will change the exif as described above.
    3.) PN is set up as plug-in to Lightroom. “Edit in” in PN, develop raw file save down to TIF.
    4.) Apply adjustments to TIF in Lightroom (local adjustments, crops, presets, etc.)
    5.) If the TIF doesn’t look quite right, go back to PN and repeat step 3.
    6.) When I’m happy with the TIF file as seen in Lightroom, go back into EXIFTools and reset the model to X-T10.

    Sounds complicated, but really not. Works great for now, until PictureCode updates PN to support X-T10 officially.

    X-T10 has been a great camera for the few weeks I’ve owned it. Took it to Ireland the day after I took delivery from Amazon…great for street, long exposure and landscapes in such a compact form factor. Lovin’ it so far.

    1. Roger Whitehead Avatar
      Roger Whitehead

      This trick also works for Lightroom and Capture One, probably other Raw processors too.

      Not being a fan of hand-to-hand combat with command-line interfaces, I use ExifToolGUI to manage Exiftool. It’s free.

      Roger

      1. DJ Avatar
        DJ

        Good tip on the GUI Roger. Thanks.

  7. ajurjans Avatar

    “Fuji is still the only camera company where I will sometimes prefer a JPEG I’ve made in camera to a processed RAW image, and that’s a nice thing to fall back on. While I still prefer the flexibility and added benefits of shooting RAW, if you are a JPEG shooter, the X-T10, as well as any other Fuji camera, should be on your short list.”

    Oh, yes! I am shooting with an X-E1 and I have NEVER ever previosuly been able to… set the camera to jpeg and not worry about the outcome. And that is after some notable experience with Canons, Nikons and latest Sony cameras. This is the FIRST system where the jpegs are as good as you can get.

    1. Mk82 Avatar
      Mk82

      Olympus even beats Fuji in that but is just amazing how there really are only two manufacturers, Fuji and Olympus that manages to make great usable JPEG out of the camera without requiring to go through image editing with RAW.

      Looking Canon, Nikon, Sony etc. It is just amazing how users of those branded cameras bash JPEG only because their cameras are incapable to compress RAW in camera with high quality and great colors.

      And when the JPEG from these cameras is like 99% of the time correctly what you need and want, you don’t need RAW in a same manner as those others.

  8. […] Sourced through Scoop.it from: admiringlight.com […]

  9. tobias Avatar
    tobias

    Great review. I’ll hopefully pick one of these up in the next couple of months. What leather strap is that? It looks great on the X-t10

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      It’s from Gordy’s Camera Straps. http://gordyscamerastraps.com

      I’ve had this one for two years now and it still looks brand new. They take about a month to really break in, and then the leather becomes very supple. I have another one with orange wrap cord for my A7II. I use the black/gray on my Fuji bodies. You’ll see the orange one if you come back either tomorrow or Thursday: my review of the Sony 90 Macro will hit then, and I have a shot showing that wrist strap. They make neck straps too, but I’ve always preferred wrist straps for my mirrorless cameras.

      1. tobias Avatar
        tobias

        Awesome thanks Jordan! I’ll look into your other review now. What size strap did you go for? Regular? Thanks again

        1. Jordan Steele Avatar

          I have the regular on my Fuji and the long on my Sony. The regular fits, but is just a bit tight if I sweat at all. Makes it hard to get off (it’s fine during shooting). The long fits me better. However, I’m a big guy.

  10. Andrius Avatar
    Andrius

    What camera system or camera itself is your favorite, what do you use most from equipment that you have ?

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      Now, that’s a loaded question! I have at least a small kit from all the systems that I regularly review: Micro 4/3, Fuji X, Sony E mount (both APS-C and full-frame). Most of my gear right now is in the Fuji system, and I use that for most of my family shooting as well as general all-around stuff. In that situation, it’s the X-T1 about 90% of the time, though I have an X-E2 as well that gets some use.

      The Sony A7 II also gets quite a lot of use. This year, the A7 II has gotten a real workout because of the amount of stuff that’s come out for FF Sony in the past year, while Micro 4/3 and Fuji are nearing complete systems and have slower release cycles at the moment. However, I grab my A7 II the most when I’m going out specifically for landscape work.

      My Micro 4/3 kit (OM-D E-M5) generally only gets used personally for macro work (I LOVE the Olympus 60mm macro) and for times I want a long lens with minimal bulk: so the Olympus 75-300 does a great job there.

      So, to sum up: the Fuji X-T1 and Sony A7 II get about 95% of my personal shots. Probably leaned a bit more towards the Fuji, but pretty close.

  11. Jeff Avatar

    Jordan,

    I have been getting this and a couple of your other posts over and over for days now. Any chance you can stop it please?

    Cheers,

    Jeff

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      I’m not quite sure what you mean. Can you describe what’s going on for you? I’m not sure I understand, and I’m not actively promoting anything at the moment through any outlet.

      1. Jeff Avatar

        I subscribe to your blog with NetNewsWire. This post keeps on showing up every time that a refresh happens. I mark it as read and it should not show up again, but it does.

        I have over a hundred subscriptions and yours are the only ones that this is haoppening to. It has only jsut started happening.

        Cheers,

        Jeff

        1. Jordan Steele Avatar

          Thanks. I’ll look into it.

  12. Dave Thornton Avatar
    Dave Thornton

    I know this is probably a bit late but what an excellent review of this camera! having had Nikon gear for years but finding it too heavy for my increasingly arthritic joints, I sold it all and bought into the Panasonic m4/3 system but never really gelled with it. I looked at the XT10 when it first came out, handled one in a shop, read your review and was sold! It (to me, anyway) is a brilliant piece of kit and I’m trying to avoid having a “GAS” attack until I am fully conversant with the camera. Excellent website by the way. Keep up the good work!

    Dave Thornton

  13. […] a minor update to the low-end X-A series, with the X-A2.  The second was the outstanding mid-range X-T10, a camera that has the majority of the features of the flagship X-T1 at a much more modest price. […]

  14. […] X-T10 (review here) is the X-T1’s little brother.  When it debuted, it supplanted the X-E2 as the second fiddle […]

  15. TOM BELL Avatar

    I was interested in your use of Olympus only with long lenses. I must say I have an XA1 with 18-55/18/27 lenses and am missing a camera with a viewfinder ….
    But the other thing about m43 is the GM5 with the little 12-32 / 15 prime …. It is so tiny a genuine tiny street camera jewel.

    But I am happy with 16mp and impressed that the 16 mp holds up SO well against the new 24mp cameras. Waiting for price fall but I am still weighing up the compactness of this little beauty with the water protection of the XT1 given that I live on rainy Dartmoor in England !!

    Thanks for such a thorough photographers review. Brilliant

  16. Cedric Avatar

    Hello Jordan
    I have a little question about this XT10 with the XF 60mm f2.4
    I know this lens is well known for it’s laggy AF, but I was wondering if using this lens with the XT10 would make things better (as it does with the 35mm f1.4) ?
    Any information about this ?

    Thank you in advance !

  17. […] dem Markt gehört. Und nun hat Fotograf Jordan Steele in seinem ausführlichen Test der X-T10 auf admiringlight.com auch einige Aspekte der X-T10 mit denen der A6000 […]

  18. […] late) X-T2 review comes the review of its little brother, the X-T20. The X-T20 is the successor to Fuji’s X-T10, which was released almost two years ago.  The X-T10 proved to be a very capable body with nearly […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search


Categories


Recent Posts


  1. I think it is near Hillsboro.

  2. This article got me thinking… Why does Canon make RF S lenses starting with 18mm when most full frame RF…

  3. Great review. I shoot Nikon and may try an old Nikon D200 and see how it compares with the new…