Review: Fujifilm X-T10

Portions of this section are borrowed from my review of the X-T1, as the feature set is almost identical.

Electronic Shutter

The X-T10 is the first X-Series interchangeable camera to debut with full electronic shutter capabilities.  The X-T1 had this feature added with firmware version 3.0, and the X-T10 keeps this capability from the beginning. With electronic shutter enabled, the camera can use shutter speeds of up to 1/32,000 second, which is incredibly short.  Due to the way the sensor data is read, however, this speed isn’t really useful for capturing fast motion.  There’s the potential for a warping of items in motion with electronic shutter.  It is, however, perfect for shooting in bright sunlight with fast lenses without the need for neutral density filters.  The electronic shutter is also completely silent.  In conjunction with turning off focus confirmation beeps, it allows the camera to operate without making any noise whatsoever, which is fantastic for event photography for quiet occasions.

Sandbox - Fujifilm X-T10 with Fujinon XF 35mm f/1.4 @ f/1.4, 1/4400s with electronic shutter
Sandbox – Fujifilm X-T10 with Fujinon XF 35mm f/1.4 @ f/1.4, 1/4400s with electronic shutter

Wi-Fi

The Fuji X-T10 follows in the footsteps of other recent X-Series cameras with full-featured Wi-Fi capabilities.  The X-T10 sets up similarly to the way the other Fuji cameras do: a wireless network is created, and you simply need to connect your smartphone or tablet to the network and open the Fujifilm Remote App.  The Wi-Fi capabilities allow for image transfer to mobile devices, geotagging of images and full remote control.  Like the remote control capabilities of the X-T1 and X-E2 (with the most recent firmware), all the major functions of the camera can be changed from the app. This includes ISO, shutter speed, aperture, exposure compensation, focus point, and even film simulation, macro mode, flash mode and self timer.

The X-T10's Wi-Fi setup screen
The X-T10’s Wi-Fi setup screen

Continuous bursts aren’t possible, but for regular shooting, it does a really nice job.  The delay between the camera and the view on your phone is relatively short, but there is a small lag.  While there’s still room for some added capabilities, I think Fuji has done a nice job with its Wi-Fi implementation.

Intervalometer

The X-T10 is now the third Fuji X-system camera to have a built-in intervalometer.  This capability debuted with the X-T1 and was added to the X-E2 via firmware update.  The intervalometer can be accessed through the menu and allows you to set a time interval as short as 1 second and as long as 24 hours. You can set the number of frames to be captured (from 1 to 999).  The shooting can start immediately or at a time up to 24 hours later.  One nice touch to the interval shooting is a countdown timer, which shows in the upper left corner of the screen to let you know how much time is remaining until the next shot.  You can cancel shooting at any time.

Intervalometer setup
Intervalometer setup

While multi-day time-lapse shoots with mirrorless cameras typically require either multiple batteries or an AC connection, Fuji has done its best to maximize battery life when shooting with intervals longer than 30 seconds.  In these situations, the camera actually shuts itself down between shots.  The camera turns itself on 5 seconds before a shot and stays on 5-7 seconds after the shot before shutting down again. Presumably, only the timer is running in the background, saving tremendous amounts of power.  While the savings are somewhat minimal with a 30 second interval, the energy savings will be huge for longer intervals.

In-Camera RAW Conversion

While this feature is unchanged from all other Fuji-X Series cameras, I feel it’s worth discussing again.  Fuji has, in my opinion, the most straightforward and useful in-camera RAW conversion capabilities.  This is especially useful when shooting RAW only and transferring images via Wi-Fi, as it allows you to do moderately nuanced conversion to a full-size JPEG, which you can then directly share with Wi-Fi.

Fuji's excellent in-camera RAW conversion
Fuji’s excellent in-camera RAW conversion

The in-camera RAW conversion function can be called up simply by pressing the Q button during image review.  You are then presented with a multi-page list of parameters that can be adjusted.  These allow you to change white balance, push or pull exposure, adjust highlight and shadow roll-off, change to any of the excellent built-in film simulations and more.  Once you’ve made your adjustments, you can preview the result and then save it if you like what you see, or continue adjustment if you so desire.  While some other makers also have in-camera RAW conversion (Olympus and Samsung do a very nice job as well), it’s something I’d like to see on all cameras.

Other Items of Note

  • It’s been 3 years and numerous people have begged, but there it is again: exposure bracketing is limited to three shots at +/- 1 stop.  Why, Fuji, why?  Why can’t you update this?  It’s mentioned in almost every review of every camera by every writer…just change it already.  It’s embarrassing.
  • The camera has the same group of advanced art filters and other features, such as automatic panorama stitching and multiple exposure capabilities, that has been present in the X-Series for some time.  These work just fine, but don’t generally fit into my workflow on a regular basis.

Continue: Image Quality

Tags:

Comments

33 responses to “Review: Fujifilm X-T10”

  1. Red Slater Avatar
    Red Slater

    Excellent review. For us jpeger street shooters, this is the best camera out there. One thing, though. The Q-menu is customizable – you said it isn’t. And for for larger lenses, just attach the handgrip.

  2. Brian Caslis Avatar
    Brian Caslis

    I think the section about the Q menu is wrong. I can customize the Q menu on my X-T10 just like the X-T1 by holding down the Q button for a few seconds. Also the EVF can be set to auto brightness making darker indoors and brighter outdoors. I find it works very well.

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      Thanks. I looked all over and couldn’t find it like I could on the X-T1. I’ve updated the review.

  3. […] Admiringlight simply revealed its Fujifilm X-T10 evaluation. Here an excerpt from the conclusions: […]

  4. Daniel Avatar
    Daniel

    I guess I’m in the minority but I don’t get the appeal of Fuji images. It’s a beautiful looking camera and I love the lenses, but image quality lacks something to my eye.

    1. Chris Avatar
      Chris

      Daniel, I think what you’re noticing is that there’s sometimes a little less microcontrast in Fuji images. It’s a subtle thing, but I think it’s a reasonably fair generalization for some types of images. It depends on what style you’re going for. I think it works well for fashion in particular.

      1. Mk82 Avatar
        Mk82

        You do know that “Microcontrast” means exactly same thing as Contrast + Sharpness?

        If either one is lacking, you don’t get the results people mumble as “Microcontrast”.

        1. Rantanplan Avatar
          Rantanplan

          I’m not so sure, if it really is the same, or maybe it is not microontrast that’s missing.

          What I would say is:

          Sharpness, color, bokeh, of Fuji Lenses is really great (in the extreme corners not always, though).

          I think it all boils down to the X-Trans subpixel color pattern on the sensor (look at comparisons of X-A1 vs X-M1, etc.)

          The pros are: smooth gradiation of colors (lacking in high-freq. color, though. Good on low ISO, probably coz of the bigger rendering kernel of, smoothing out things. Still good (perhaps to good to be true) sharpness on “detected” high frequency stuff.

          And what some refer to the more “film-look” it does not accentuate edges to that level other digital cameras still do. That for me is the main thing to like about the images it produces.

          But one of the cons is that micro-contrast is missing in details that are not on full contrast, this is not much of a problem if you use VSCO and other filters that produce that trendy “matte look” anyways, coz for this type of images it really works perfectly.

          But as test have shown, even smaller MFT sensors, with good glass (Pana/Leica Nocticron) are able to outresolve all the Fufi-X cams when it’s purely about image detail (not pixel quality, per se).

          I have had an X-E1, still have a X100 and X-Pro1, but most probably will be selling the X-Pro1 again.

  5. Jano Avatar
    Jano

    Nice review and it really looks like a great camera for the price. Really hope they update the X-E2 to receive the major ones of these new features (better AF sensitivity, electronic shutter, EC in manual mode, direct AF point selection mainly). If not they really need to reduce the price of the X-E2…

    As far as I know the X100T was the first Fuji camera to be able to use EC in manual mode though. Pretty sad it took them so long

    Oh, and I think there shouldn’t be any Fuji review without a rant about waxy JPEG skin at high ISO and them not letting us turn it off.

  6. DJ Avatar
    DJ

    If you haven’t tried it already, you can change the EXIF data on the X-T10 files to “X-T1″ and open them in Photo Ninja perfectly. I use EXIFTools. The code to do it is -exif:Model=”X-T1”. My workflow is:

    1.) Import photos to Lightroom CC. Sort images, ratings, create collections etc. Basic adjustments, crops.
    2.) If I need the extra detail Photo Ninja provides, I will change the exif as described above.
    3.) PN is set up as plug-in to Lightroom. “Edit in” in PN, develop raw file save down to TIF.
    4.) Apply adjustments to TIF in Lightroom (local adjustments, crops, presets, etc.)
    5.) If the TIF doesn’t look quite right, go back to PN and repeat step 3.
    6.) When I’m happy with the TIF file as seen in Lightroom, go back into EXIFTools and reset the model to X-T10.

    Sounds complicated, but really not. Works great for now, until PictureCode updates PN to support X-T10 officially.

    X-T10 has been a great camera for the few weeks I’ve owned it. Took it to Ireland the day after I took delivery from Amazon…great for street, long exposure and landscapes in such a compact form factor. Lovin’ it so far.

    1. Roger Whitehead Avatar
      Roger Whitehead

      This trick also works for Lightroom and Capture One, probably other Raw processors too.

      Not being a fan of hand-to-hand combat with command-line interfaces, I use ExifToolGUI to manage Exiftool. It’s free.

      Roger

      1. DJ Avatar
        DJ

        Good tip on the GUI Roger. Thanks.

  7. ajurjans Avatar

    “Fuji is still the only camera company where I will sometimes prefer a JPEG I’ve made in camera to a processed RAW image, and that’s a nice thing to fall back on. While I still prefer the flexibility and added benefits of shooting RAW, if you are a JPEG shooter, the X-T10, as well as any other Fuji camera, should be on your short list.”

    Oh, yes! I am shooting with an X-E1 and I have NEVER ever previosuly been able to… set the camera to jpeg and not worry about the outcome. And that is after some notable experience with Canons, Nikons and latest Sony cameras. This is the FIRST system where the jpegs are as good as you can get.

    1. Mk82 Avatar
      Mk82

      Olympus even beats Fuji in that but is just amazing how there really are only two manufacturers, Fuji and Olympus that manages to make great usable JPEG out of the camera without requiring to go through image editing with RAW.

      Looking Canon, Nikon, Sony etc. It is just amazing how users of those branded cameras bash JPEG only because their cameras are incapable to compress RAW in camera with high quality and great colors.

      And when the JPEG from these cameras is like 99% of the time correctly what you need and want, you don’t need RAW in a same manner as those others.

  8. […] Sourced through Scoop.it from: admiringlight.com […]

  9. tobias Avatar
    tobias

    Great review. I’ll hopefully pick one of these up in the next couple of months. What leather strap is that? It looks great on the X-t10

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      It’s from Gordy’s Camera Straps. http://gordyscamerastraps.com

      I’ve had this one for two years now and it still looks brand new. They take about a month to really break in, and then the leather becomes very supple. I have another one with orange wrap cord for my A7II. I use the black/gray on my Fuji bodies. You’ll see the orange one if you come back either tomorrow or Thursday: my review of the Sony 90 Macro will hit then, and I have a shot showing that wrist strap. They make neck straps too, but I’ve always preferred wrist straps for my mirrorless cameras.

      1. tobias Avatar
        tobias

        Awesome thanks Jordan! I’ll look into your other review now. What size strap did you go for? Regular? Thanks again

        1. Jordan Steele Avatar

          I have the regular on my Fuji and the long on my Sony. The regular fits, but is just a bit tight if I sweat at all. Makes it hard to get off (it’s fine during shooting). The long fits me better. However, I’m a big guy.

  10. Andrius Avatar
    Andrius

    What camera system or camera itself is your favorite, what do you use most from equipment that you have ?

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      Now, that’s a loaded question! I have at least a small kit from all the systems that I regularly review: Micro 4/3, Fuji X, Sony E mount (both APS-C and full-frame). Most of my gear right now is in the Fuji system, and I use that for most of my family shooting as well as general all-around stuff. In that situation, it’s the X-T1 about 90% of the time, though I have an X-E2 as well that gets some use.

      The Sony A7 II also gets quite a lot of use. This year, the A7 II has gotten a real workout because of the amount of stuff that’s come out for FF Sony in the past year, while Micro 4/3 and Fuji are nearing complete systems and have slower release cycles at the moment. However, I grab my A7 II the most when I’m going out specifically for landscape work.

      My Micro 4/3 kit (OM-D E-M5) generally only gets used personally for macro work (I LOVE the Olympus 60mm macro) and for times I want a long lens with minimal bulk: so the Olympus 75-300 does a great job there.

      So, to sum up: the Fuji X-T1 and Sony A7 II get about 95% of my personal shots. Probably leaned a bit more towards the Fuji, but pretty close.

  11. Jeff Avatar

    Jordan,

    I have been getting this and a couple of your other posts over and over for days now. Any chance you can stop it please?

    Cheers,

    Jeff

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      I’m not quite sure what you mean. Can you describe what’s going on for you? I’m not sure I understand, and I’m not actively promoting anything at the moment through any outlet.

      1. Jeff Avatar

        I subscribe to your blog with NetNewsWire. This post keeps on showing up every time that a refresh happens. I mark it as read and it should not show up again, but it does.

        I have over a hundred subscriptions and yours are the only ones that this is haoppening to. It has only jsut started happening.

        Cheers,

        Jeff

        1. Jordan Steele Avatar

          Thanks. I’ll look into it.

  12. Dave Thornton Avatar
    Dave Thornton

    I know this is probably a bit late but what an excellent review of this camera! having had Nikon gear for years but finding it too heavy for my increasingly arthritic joints, I sold it all and bought into the Panasonic m4/3 system but never really gelled with it. I looked at the XT10 when it first came out, handled one in a shop, read your review and was sold! It (to me, anyway) is a brilliant piece of kit and I’m trying to avoid having a “GAS” attack until I am fully conversant with the camera. Excellent website by the way. Keep up the good work!

    Dave Thornton

  13. […] a minor update to the low-end X-A series, with the X-A2.  The second was the outstanding mid-range X-T10, a camera that has the majority of the features of the flagship X-T1 at a much more modest price. […]

  14. […] X-T10 (review here) is the X-T1’s little brother.  When it debuted, it supplanted the X-E2 as the second fiddle […]

  15. TOM BELL Avatar

    I was interested in your use of Olympus only with long lenses. I must say I have an XA1 with 18-55/18/27 lenses and am missing a camera with a viewfinder ….
    But the other thing about m43 is the GM5 with the little 12-32 / 15 prime …. It is so tiny a genuine tiny street camera jewel.

    But I am happy with 16mp and impressed that the 16 mp holds up SO well against the new 24mp cameras. Waiting for price fall but I am still weighing up the compactness of this little beauty with the water protection of the XT1 given that I live on rainy Dartmoor in England !!

    Thanks for such a thorough photographers review. Brilliant

  16. Cedric Avatar

    Hello Jordan
    I have a little question about this XT10 with the XF 60mm f2.4
    I know this lens is well known for it’s laggy AF, but I was wondering if using this lens with the XT10 would make things better (as it does with the 35mm f1.4) ?
    Any information about this ?

    Thank you in advance !

  17. […] dem Markt gehört. Und nun hat Fotograf Jordan Steele in seinem ausführlichen Test der X-T10 auf admiringlight.com auch einige Aspekte der X-T10 mit denen der A6000 […]

  18. […] late) X-T2 review comes the review of its little brother, the X-T20. The X-T20 is the successor to Fuji’s X-T10, which was released almost two years ago.  The X-T10 proved to be a very capable body with nearly […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search


Categories


Recent Posts


  1. I think it is near Hillsboro.

  2. This article got me thinking… Why does Canon make RF S lenses starting with 18mm when most full frame RF…

  3. Great review. I shoot Nikon and may try an old Nikon D200 and see how it compares with the new…