Admiring Light
Menu
  • Home
  • Review Index
  • Shop Talk
  • Technique and Vision
  • Opinion
  • Portfolio
  • Site Index
  • About
    • Privacy Policy
Menu

Review: Olympus M.Zuiko 17mm f/1.8

Posted on March 17, 2013March 19, 2013 by Jordan Steele

Contents

  • 1Around the Lens - Build Quality
  • 2Handling and Autofocus
  • 3Image Quality: Sharpness and color
  • 4Bokeh
  • 5Chromatic Aberration, Flare and Distortion
  • 6Conclusion
  • 7Image Samples

Image Quality: Sharpness and color

Reaching - Olympus 17mm f/1.8 @ f/1.8
Reaching – Olympus 17mm f/1.8 @ f/1.8 (click to Enlarge)

The Olympus 17mm f/1.8 is a sharp lens, but not a brilliant lens.  It seems to perform its best at close to medium focus distances, in the range where you’d be doing environmental portraiture or the like.  Here, I find the lens gives a great rendering with good sharpness at the focus point throughout the majority of the frame, right from wide open.  At greater focus distances and landscape type work, it’s good, but not great.  Center sharpness is good, but even stopped down, there is some softening at the edges.  It’s not bad, but I’ve seen better.

At closest focus, it also suffers from some softness at wider apertures.  It really seems that Olympus focused on optimizing the lens for ‘street’ shooting, and for that range, it’s really a great lens when coupled with the fast autofocus.

The Olympus 17mm f/1.8 renders scenes in a pretty neutral way, with good contrast and natural color.  There’s no big ‘pop’, but it lends itself well to environmental portrait work due to even skin tone rendering and neutral color palette.

Bokeh

As can be seen in the image above, bokeh on the 17mm f/1.8 is pretty nice.  Specular highlights are neutral with only the slightest hint of a ring, and the general rendering is smooth and pleasing.   This is the case on closer shots such as that photo.

However, when shooting more distant subjects, the bokeh changes considerably, mainly due to the presence of some longitudinal chromatic aberration.  Due to the wider focal length, shots taken at wide apertures at longer distances really don’t show a lot of blur, and when backgrounds are busy, this results in a very nervous appearance to the bokeh.  It can be a little distracting.   See the image below for an example:

Firefighter Memorial, Columbus, OH - Olympus 17mm f/1.8 @ f/1.8
Firefighter Memorial, Columbus, OH – Olympus 17mm f/1.8 @ f/1.8 (Click to Enlarge)

Chromatic Aberration, Flare and Distortion

The Olympus 17mm f/1.8 performs OK with regards to chromatic aberration.  There is visible lateral CA at all apertures, though nowhere near the level of its slower f/2.8 sibling.  Luckily, this can be easily corrected with software without much trouble.  As noted above, there can be some longitudinal CA as well, though it’s really only distracting in certain cases, such as the shot above.  For most work, especially at closer ranges, it isn’t an issue.

I didn’t have an opportunity to test flare with regards to direct sunlight, since in the week I had the lens for review, we literally had zero visible sunlight in central Ohio for the entirety of that week.  I did not notice any visible flaring with natural light sources, and it seemed to control flare quite well in everyday use.

Distortion on JPEGs or with RAW converters such as Lightroom/ACR that read the lens distortion metadata is very low.  However, there is a lot of camera/converter correction being applied, which may account for some of the softer corners.  When using a RAW converter such as Capture One Pro 7, that doesn’t read the distortion correction metadata, distortion is outrageously high, though corner resolution is improved. See the two images below.  These are the same image, converted from the same RAW file.  The Capture One Pro conversion (without distortion correction) is on the left, while the Lightroom conversion (with correction) is on the right.  Wow.

Capture One Conversion (Click to Enlarge)
Capture One Conversion (Click to Enlarge)
Lightroom Conversion (Click to Enlarge)
Lightroom Conversion (Click to Enlarge)

Next: Conclusion and Image Samples

Pages: 1 2 3

12 thoughts on “Review: Olympus M.Zuiko 17mm f/1.8”

  1. David S says:
    March 17, 2013 at 10:58 am

    Jordan,

    Thank you for the review. Very helpful. I’m looking for a 35mm equivalent lens for either my OM-D or X-E1 and you’ve now convinced me to wait for the Fujinon 23mm 1.4 to make its eventual appearance.

    While this lens sounds good for some uses, I’d also prefer it be good at landscapes too.

    Reply
  2. bousozoku says:
    March 18, 2013 at 6:44 pm

    So, it’s merely good (not great) but since it’s not as expensive as other micro Four-Thirds lenses, it’s a relative bargain?

    I may have missed the part about whether it is sealed for weather and dust but I had always assumed that it was not.

    Maybe, Olympus’ next iteration at 17mm will actually be great, weather-sealed, and remain at the same price.

    Reply
    1. Scott says:
      March 19, 2013 at 12:19 am

      I paid the equivalent of US $490 for my one, and at that price it is not a bargain. Not many m43 primes are more expensive – only the 12/2.0, 45/2.8 Macro and 75/1.8 that I can think of.

      It is not weathersealed.

      The clutch-focus system is pretty useless – something that this reviewer has not mentioned.

      However, I still like the lens a lot. My one is plenty sharp in the centre and is screamingly fast to autofocus. Corner sharpness is pretty good when stopped down to f8.

      Reply
      1. bousozoku says:
        March 19, 2013 at 2:34 pm

        That makes me sad. I hope you don’t feel cheated.

        I took the leap to micro Four-Thirds a few weeks ago but I’m really uncomfortable with the choices and I ended up buying the Olympus MMF-3 adapter to compensate, so that I can use my Four-Thirds lenses. I need to be able to shoot in the rain and after photographing out in three hurricanes with Olympus equipment and no trouble, I need to remind myself not to take my Four-Thirds mount Leica/Panasonic 25mm f/1.4 out in the rain.

        I hope Olympus (and Panasonic) come to their senses and treat more than the hobbyists.

        Reply
      2. Don Pope says:
        March 20, 2013 at 7:10 am

        I find the manual focusing system to be quite excellent. Feels almost like a legacy manual focus lens. What is not as useful is the DOF scale. It is rather vague and imprecise. They should have put more numbers in the “near” end of the scale.

        Reply
        1. Gert Jan Bollen says:
          January 12, 2015 at 4:27 pm

          I am confused with the DOF scale it is way to pessimistic!

          If I compare it with the DOF calculator.
          set to 3 meter it is sharp (circle of Confusion for Mft = 0.015mm) from inf to 1.35 meter at aperture 8

          But according the lens scale i need aperture 22 🙂

          Reply
        2. Gert Jan Bollen says:
          January 12, 2015 at 4:29 pm

          I am confused with the DOF scale it is way to pessimistic!

          If I compare it with the DOF calculator.
          set to 3 meter it is sharp (circle of Confusion for Mft = 0.015mm) from inf to 1.35 meter at aperture 8

          But according the lens scale i need aperture 22 🙂

          Kind regards Gert Jan newbe in MFT

          Reply
  3. Pingback: A new review of Olympus M.Zuiko 17mm f/1.8 lens - Blog for micro four third and competing cameras
  4. Big C says:
    September 22, 2013 at 3:30 pm

    This 17mm f/1.8 is a big disappointment if you ask me. Way too expensive for what you get. Merely good image quality. The Panasonic 20mm is mulch sharper and contrastier then this dud. The only thing it has going for it, is it’s focus speed. But I wouldn’t pay premium for that alone. Maybe if the price becomes more realistic (about 300 dollars) I would consider it. For now, I just hold on to my beloved Panasonic 20mm f/1.7 pancake. Smaller, cheaper, and optically noticeably better.

    Reply
  5. Julianne says:
    March 11, 2015 at 5:13 am

    Hi blogger, i found this post on 11 spot in google’s search results.

    You should reduce your bounce rate in order to rank in google.
    This is major ranking factor nowadays. There is very useful wordpress plugin which can help you.
    Just search in google for:
    Sisonum’s Bounce Plugin

    Reply
  6. Pingback: ??AF?????????? M.ZUIKO DIGITAL 17mm F1.8??????? | ?????????????
  7. Pingback: ????? M.ZUIKO DIGITAL 17mm F1.8?????????????????????????? | ?????????????

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow Me:

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on Instagram

Most Popular Posts

  • "Full Frame Equivalence" and Why It Doesn't Matter (286)
  • Fuji X-Pro 2 vs. Sony A7 II: Noise Comparison (70)
  • Fuji 56mm f/1.2 vs. Panasonic Leica 42.5mm f/1.2 Nocticron (63)
  • Review: Metabones Speed Booster (Canon FD to Fuji X) (56)
  • Review: Olympus OM-D E-M5 (48)

Recent Comments

  • Don McConnell on Review: Laowa 15mm f/4.5 Zero-D Shift
  • Scott on Review: Laowa 15mm f/4.5 Zero-D Shift
  • Logan ross on Canon RF 70-200mm f/4L IS vs. Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS
  • Tobie on Review: Panasonic Lumix G 25mm f/1.7
  • Carl Zeller on Using Manual Focus Lenses on Mirrorless Cameras

Archives

©2021 Admiring Light | Theme by SuperbThemes
We use cookies to personalize content and ads and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. You may consent to the use of cookies or opt out. Accept Reject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.