Review: Panasonic Lumix GX8

Image Quality

The GX8 is the first Micro 4/3 camera to gain a bump in resolution since the GH2 came out way back in 2010. The GX8’s features an all-new 20 megapixel sensor, which helps bring Micro 4/3 up a bit to compete with other recent interchangeable lens cameras, which predominantly feature resolutions of 20 megapixels or higher.  Let’s see how well this new sensor performs.

Dynamic Range and Color

Panasonic has had good dynamic range capabilities with their most recent 16 megapixel sensors used in the GH3 and GH4, and the new 20 megapixel sensor in the GX8 essentially matches the performance of those sensors. This puts the dynamic range performance on par with the most recent Olympus cameras and around a stop behind the typical full-frame and better APS-C sensors.  The dynamic range of the GX8 is enough for the vast majority of shooting situations.  RAW capture allows for the recovery of a bit more than a stop of highlight detail.  In most situations, I could push the shadows quite a lot at low ISO and maintain good color response and high levels of detail with minimal noise.  Pushing the very darkest shadows will result in some speckled noise artifacts, however. In all, it’s a very good performance.

Columbus Before Dawn - Panasonic GX8 with Panasonic 25mm f/1.7 @ f/11
Columbus Before Dawn – Panasonic GX8 with Panasonic 25mm f/1.7 @ f/11, 2s, ISO 200

The GX8 produces RAW files that are rather muted out of camera, often requiring rather intensive saturation adjustments to bring the files up to where I’d like them. The good thing is that the RAW files take these adjustments in stride, with the end result of a pleasing color palette with smooth gradients.  It’ not going to match the depth of larger sensors, but it’s definitely good enough for most any shooting.

Detail and Noise

With the highest resolution Micro 4/3 sensor around, there’s the potential for increased detail levels along with the possibility of a bit higher noise. With regards to detail, I”m happy to report that indeed, at low ISO you will notice a small increase in the detail level that the GX8 can resolve in comparison to other Micro 4/3 cameras. It’s not a big improvement, but it will give a bit of extra flexibility with cropping and some extra fine detail in prints. Unfortunately, the resolution advantage disappears at high ISO, as the slight increase in noise negates the slight increase in resolution.

As I said, the GX8’s sensor is very slightly noisier than the other recent Micro 4/3 cameras at the pixel level.  That is, you’ll see a slight increase in noise when viewing images at 100% on your screen. However, because the GX8 files are 20 megapixels, that noise increase is negated and the resulting file has about the same level of detail and same level of noise at the same magnification.  In other words, at high ISO, prints and web reductions will look almost identical in noise performance to something like the GH4 or OM-D E-M5 Mark II.

Waiting for Santa - Panasonic GX8 with Panasonic 25mm f/1.7 @ f/1.7
Waiting for Santa – Panasonic GX8 with Panasonic 25mm f/1.7 @ f/1.7, ISO 3200

In general, the GX8 produces images with reasonable noise levels up to around ISO 1600, with ISO 3200 and 6400 being useful if you don’t mind a bit of grain. ISO 12,800 could be used in a pinch for black and white or small shots, but things get a bit too noisy for my taste at 12,800 or 25,600.

JPEG Quality

Panasonic has come a long way since the first G series cameras were released with regards to JPEG quality.  The GX8 has the best JPEGs I’ve seen from a Panasonic camera.  Low ISO shots retain excellent detail and have very low compression.  Even at ISO 800 and 1600, the level of detail retained is quite good and the noise reduction is held in check. Panasonic has also pulled the tone curves down to help retain as much dynamic range as possible in the JPEGs.  Color is also rich and vibrant without being unnatural.  It’s nice to see Panasonic continuing to make strides in this department, and the JPEGs are truly useful for final output.

Columbus (Straight out of camera JPEG) - Panasonic GX8 with Panasonic 12-32mm f/3.5-5.6 @
Columbus (Straight out of camera JPEG) – Panasonic GX8 with Panasonic 12-32mm f/3.5-5.6 @ 12mm, f/5.6, ISO 200

Video

The GX8, like most recent Panasonic cameras, is capable of shooting 4K video internally, at 24 or 30 frames per second, as well as 1080p up to 60 fps with bit rates as high as 100Mbps. 4K shooting will crop the frame somewhat, reducing the field of view of your lenses by around 1.25x. As I mentioned at the beginning of the review, I’m not a videographer, and I don’t shoot enough video to properly evaluate the nuances in video shooting. I will say that the quality looked quite good, though high ISO movies show a bit too much compression. There’s a full range of manual controls that will be helpful to video shooters.  I will say I was quite disappointed to see that in-body image stabilization is not available in video mode, so stabilization options are only useful if you use a stabilized lens.  This is a missed opportunity, as video stabilization is one of the better features of IBIS capable cameras. Aside from that, however, the GX8 is a very capable video camera and will please most shooters who have both stills and video in mind.  For dedicated video shooters, the GH4 is going to be the better option.

Continue: Conclusion and Image Samples

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5

Tags:

Comments

23 responses to “Review: Panasonic Lumix GX8”

  1. carol Avatar
    carol

    Thanks for this review. Just one point, the camera definitely DOES have in camera Raw processing, I use it all the time. If you go into the playback menu there is a menu option for ‘Raw processing’ This allows you to do full Raw processing and, on completion, outputs a Jpeg file to the card.

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      Thanks for the heads up. I wish I had been able to find it. I’ll revise the review later tonight.

  2. Andy Miles Avatar

    It’s great that there can be two systems in micro four thirds that are different enough to suit individual preferences. Regarding adjusting the focus point in the EVF using the rear touch screen – Panasonic let you choose either mode on several of their cameras, so you can change to offset mode using a menu option.

  3. Clive Dyson Avatar
    Clive Dyson

    Great review as always. Thanks.

    One small correction. The GX8 does let you customise the Quick Menu, in the same way as all other Lumix G cameras I’ve used – see page 68 of the advanced manual. You have to set [Q.MENU] in the [Custom] menu to [CUSTOM] and can then customise it via a button in the lower left of the Quick Menu. I do like to change this to get the settings I want quickly available.

  4. Andrew Smallman Avatar

    Jordan, Good review, particularly about the ergonomics of the thing, which are in many respects unsatisfactory.

    I have analysed why I think this is so in more detail on my Camera Ergonomics blog

    http://cameraergonomics.blogspot.com.au/2015/10/panasonic-gx8-ergonomic-evaluation-and.html

    If you want to browse through more stuff, I recommend starting with the ‘Discovering Camera Ergonomics’ page.

    Andrew

  5. Tom Avatar
    Tom

    Disappointing and unprofessional review

    So you think “However, like the GX7, I found the IBIS of the GX8 to be a step behind the other systems that feature body-based stabilization.” the Dual IS feature lacks behind other systems but the only lens you have is the “The only optically stabilized Micro 4/3 lens I have is the tiny 12-32mm f/4-5.6 pancake zoom, which is compatible with the new Dual IS system present on the GX8.”

    Didn’t you think it would be a good idea to use on the stills flagship Panasonic GX-8 camera, the flagship “pro” level Zoom 12-35mm f/2.8 to test the IBIS?

    From my personal experience with this combination the IBIS works amazing and for me much much better with Tele focal lengths as Olympus, because of the stabilized EVF.
    Check it out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sRK6WfCboM8
    For stills (!) a much better solution then Olys way!

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      First of all, my comment about the IBIS being disappointing is in relation to the IBIS by itself. It, like the GX7 was only good for 1-2 stops for almost all my shooting with the camera. This is in comparison to the 3 stops I get regularly with the A7 II and nearly 4 stops I regularly get with the OM-D series. That’s a big difference.

      Second, the dual IS feature should enhance optically stabilized lenses similarly regardless of whether it’s the 12-35/2.8 or the 12-32/3.5-5.6. It adds an extra stop or so. Nice, yes…amazing? No. If I owned the 12-35mm, I would have tested it with it. I can’t afford to spend $1,000 to do a slightly more thorough test of one feature.

      I’m glad the GX8+OIS lenses works great for you. I find it kind of odd that you think it’s a much better solution than Olympus, however, but if it works well for your shooting, that’s fantastic. You mention that it’s great because of the stabilized EVF: well, the Olympus has a stabilized EVF with ALL lenses, not just ones with OIS (which are stabilized anyway in the viewfinder, even on cameras that have no IBIS). The GX8 does not stabilize the view with non-OIS lenses…Olympus does it even with adapted manual focus lenses.

      1. Tom Avatar
        Tom

        Jordan, yesterday I tried a couple of shots with the 12-35mm f’/2.8 and Dual IS @35mm and 1/2s (!) shutter speed. 7 out of 10 perfect sharp (with experience in photography of 25 yrs) and as you know 35mm on m4/3 is equivalent 70mm an a full frame sensor. Without stabilization a shutter speed of 1/80s would be necessary, so 1/2s means 5-6 stops of stabilization (1/80 – 1/40 – 1/20 – 1/10 – 1/5 – 1/2).

        Of course I would be able to provide pictures with EXIFs, but I’m not able to show you they are shot handheld so it makes unfortunately no sense.

        I apologize for my direct way and hope you will on some day retest the GX8 Dual IS feature with a proper lens, the results are really amazing.

        1. Jordan Steele Avatar

          I don’t doubt your results. Thing is: it doesn’t add to my data point because everyone’s amount of handshake is different. You may be a much steadier hand-holder than I am. You may have shake only in certain directions that the GX8 corrects better than a more rotational shake that perhaps I have. Besides, it’s only one stop better than what I received. The dual IS helps a lens with OIS…I got 4 stops with the 12-32. Thing is, I got 3 stops with the 12-32 on its own, so the Dual IS only added one stop or so. When I reviewed the 12-35, I consistently got sharp shots at 1/8s at 35mm. A one stop added would bring that to 1/4s, and then you might be a stop or half stop steadier than me.

          The fact is, I could only consistently count on the Gx8 to give me an extra stop of handholding, whether on a non OIS lens or adding to an OIS lens. That’s nice, but it’s not a game changer and is behind the other systems. If the camera works great for you, then that’s fantastic. If you are happy with the camera that’s all that matters. It’s a quality device that is capable of creating great images.

  6. Hal Knowles Avatar
    Hal Knowles

    Hello Jordan. As usual, a very thorough and informative review with some really gorgeous images. I am a long time follower of your blog and it has been a lot of fun watching your art and talent evolve and improve over the years!

    I have used many Micro Four Thirds bodies and lenses since 2012 and I love both Panasonic and Olympus for their unique offerings. I had a GX7 for a bit over a year and loved it! I recently had a GX8 for a few weeks over December and tried to fall in love with it, but I found many of the same personal ergonomic challenges as did you. The location and action of the exposure compensation dial and the AF mode dial/button were especially awkward for my hands. The 2.5 mm mic-in jack and grip were also strange. Despite loving the huge EVF, loving the images coming from the new sensor, and generally finding the camera to be really well built, it ultimately did not feel right in my hands. I ended up finding a new open box GH4 for only a bit more and it fits my hands and my needs perfectly!

    I think many people may find the GX8 to fit their needs well. It was just not for me. All the best to you and your family this new year!

  7. Andy Miles Avatar

    Agreed, I love checking this site out, eagerly awaiting each post. I think the GX8 is one of those cameras you either love or hate, but for me it was both. I bought one when they first came out and didn’t take to it at all. I was use to the GH3 grip and physical interface, and quite pleased when I found the GX8 had a fault and had to be returned. Move on a few months and I was keen to give it a try again due to the improvements of the GH3. Ironically the price drop, cashback, strange Amazon kit pricing, and trading in my GH2 + GH3 meant I could buy both the GX8 and GH4 for less than the GX8 at launch. Using it a second time it felt like a different camera and I really came to appreciate things like the tiltable viewfinder and physical exposure compensation dial.

  8. W. Nicholls Avatar
    W. Nicholls

    I have different complaints about the ergonomics. The grip is shallow enough that I accidentally activate buttons on the back of the camera when I hold the camera with a more substantial lens mounted. There’s no ridge on the back grip for the heel of your hand, and for me, that means it’s easy to switch into ISO, DISP, and WB settings unintentionally. Needless to say, that’s extremely annoying and can cause lost shots. You can reduce the problem by locking out all but the DISP button, but that also slows access to settings. I’ve partially solved the problem by creating a grip pad that supports the heel of my hand. I’m surprised that more people don’t complain about this issue – go figure.

    I find the exposure comp dial to be quite easy to find by feel, and I use it a lot. It’s far easier to find and set by feel than using anonymous buttons that control ISO in combination with a command dial (like my GH3 or my Nikon D800).

    Image stabilization is good with OIS lenses that have been updated to the new firmware. Only a few lenses have firmware available to-date. With non-OIS or adapted lenses, stabilization is useful, but not nearly as good as it is in dual mode.

    You don’t list the mediocre battery life as a con. I do. And it’s ridiculous for a camera its size to have the memory card access behind the battery compartment door. The microphone jack size is also annoying – and unnecessary.

  9. T. Simpson Avatar
    T. Simpson

    Liked the extensive and personal review. – many thanks

    However, the enormous weight given to IBIS which I use a few times a year surprised me. Also I am not a video man but to just write off the amazing possibilities for capturing exactly the best moment in an action that the 4K photo options offer was difficult to understand, Using it for a static picture of a bottle begs belief!

    Totally agree about the handling taking time to get used to, especially coming from the GX7 as I did.
    We have the same views on the EVF and screen.

    Pity you do not have a larger lens collection – mention it before your next birthday.

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      Regarding 4K photo – I thought my text covered it well. I did use it for more than a static photo, but the people I used it on while testing did not want their images posted for the world to see. The bottle shot is simply to show the interface for selection.

  10. Otto Von Avatar
    Otto Von

    A really honest review for sure Jordan. I own the GX8 and completely agree with you on the placement of the EC dial. It’s actually quite frustrating and pretty much ensures I hardly ever use it. And what’s extremely annoying is that Panasonic forces that that poorly positioned dial for EC!!! I would love to program (while in Aperture Priority mode) the shutter dial to change my EC. But this isn’t allowed – how frustrating. But overall I do enjoy the camera and the image quality is what I need for both stills and video. Thanks.

  11. I. Brekke Avatar
    I. Brekke

    I find your blog interesting and you write about much of the equipment I am interested in. I also think you have written a good review of the camera based on your experience and your preferences, so I can not say you are wrong about anything. At the same time I find it somehow too critical about a camera I have bought myself and have fantastic experience with. It has a great feel, build quality, picture quality, responsiveness and autofocus. I find it is the first M43 camera that I would be truly comfertable to use in professional settings. I agree that the handling too a couple of days to get used to, but now I like it better then any, I love the feel of the dials. The IBIS might not be as good as the market leading Olympus, but how often do you really shoot at 1/10 of a second?

    Still, nice review and keep up the good work!

  12. Hendrik Avatar
    Hendrik

    “It’s not a rather substantial body”
    presumably should read
    … *now* …

    That notwithstanding an excellent read.

  13. Frank Avatar
    Frank

    My main complaint about the GX8 in comparison to the GX7 is its increase of size. I love my GX7 which is my minimalist travel companion with an Olympus 12/2 mm and a Panasonic 42,5/1.7 mm. Wow, what a flexible high-class combination in such a small package! I would love to get the improved 20 MP sensor in a compact GX7 sized body. I do not need a fully articulated screen, I am very happy with the tilt touchscreen of the GX7. So why carrying a bigger body? (Maybe that is necessary because of the integration of 4k, but I am not a video guy.)
    That is the reason why I stick to the GX7. This is still a wonderful camera, following the idea of Micro FourThirds: beeing small.

  14. james wilson Avatar
    james wilson

    Love my GX8 and enjoyed the review despite the quibbles but I wanted to offer a note on post focus. It is the ultimate solution for focus stacking. If you are in low light and want to avoid high ISO/long exp noise and want your whole scene in focus you can shoot wide open at low ISO and stack all the images to provide a completely focused scene with low noise. Subject movement not appreciated. Helicon focus has produced a feature for their software that will take a post focus video capture and stack all the frames for a full focused shot automatically. In my experience with the feature I have found that if subject movement spoils part of the image I can select the single image of the affected area and blend in the static image to the composite image in just that part and recover the area spoiled by movement. Far more than being a toy feature I can imagine many ways that Post Focus will benefit my commercial shooting. The only downside is the 8mpx capture.

    1. Andrew Avatar
      Andrew

      Wow, didn’t know that Helicon Focus could do the stacking straight from the video. That’s great. Do you know which license version you need for that feature?

    2. Jordan Steele Avatar

      For my use, the way the focus bracketing feature on the Olympus E-M10 II (and added to the E-M5 II and E-M1 in firmware) is much more useful. Still automatically records individual images for focus stacking, but captures full resolution RAW files (or JPEG if you choose). Much higher quality than stitching 8 MP JPEGs. Panasonic’s process is a bit more automatic, but Oly’s isn’t hard to set up.

      1. james wilson Avatar
        james wilson

        I have done high res focus bracketing with Panasonic using touch focus on the screen. Not very fast but can do a good job.

  15. Hen3ry Avatar

    Good job, Jordan.

    I can see what you eman about the AF/MF switch and its button. What on earth are they doing there? Nicely located in the GX7.

    What really, really gets me, though, is the AF/AE lock button n ac little raised island to the right of the thumb. I think the same applies to the PEN F. How to you use that and hold the camera too? You have to change your grip and LOSE your grip! On the GX7, this switch is actually under the thumb, it does NOT get pressed by accident, but it is very convenient to press when you want to use that feature AND retain your grip on the camera.

    There have been some complaints about accidentally pressing the WB (in the 4 way) and DISP buttons on the GX8. This also happens on my G6 and has been reported on the G7. I beat it on the G6 by gluing a little bit of plastic stuff on the outside of the 4 way, and some more on the thumb rest point above the switches which lift my thumb above them. A correspondent on the DPReview m43 forum did a very nice job with little piece he moulded out of one of those two ingredient putties.

    I have never had this problem with the GX7 and when I look at it, I can see why.

    It offers just a few mills more real estate to the right of the 4 way so the lower part of my thumb can rest on that. That area actually curves out just a tiny bit too.

    The designers had the chanceto set everything a little to the left because of the flip up screen, rather than the fully articulated screen with its big hinge (twice as bit as that on the PEN F, I notice).

    In the same part of the G6 and GX8, the body is already curving away to the front. The DPREview guy’s molding provided those extra few mills needed for the lower part of the thumb to have a gripping action (as does the bit of plastic stuff I have glued to the G6) but without interfering with the controls under it.

    But yes, the buttons you mention, and the CRAZY little raised island with the wrongly angled AF/AE lock switch on it.

    And after doing so very well with the GX7.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search


Categories


Recent Posts


  1. I think it is near Hillsboro.

  2. This article got me thinking… Why does Canon make RF S lenses starting with 18mm when most full frame RF…

  3. Great review. I shoot Nikon and may try an old Nikon D200 and see how it compares with the new…