Review: Panasonic Lumix LX100

Image Quality

Lens

Click to view a full size image.
Click to view a full size image.

The LX100 manages to cram a 24-75mm equivalent lens with a fast maximum aperture of f/1.7-2.8 into the small body of the camera, which is a rather ambitious design.  As a result, there are some optical compromises in the lens, though the overall quality remains on a high level.

Image sharpness is quite high in the central part of the frame at all focal lengths and aperture.  Stopping down improves edge sharpness, though some residual edge and corner softness remains, especially at the wide-angle portion of the zoom range.  A lot of this has to do with the absolutely massive distortions at the wide end that are corrected both in JPEG and in Lightroom. This correction does result in a final image that has minimal distortion, but at the expense of corner and edge resolution.  Uncorrected files at the wide end show extreme amounts of barrel distortion.  Luckily, most users will never see this distortion as the lens corrections were certainly designed into the camera.

Color and contrast are very good, though the lens is only mediocre in the flare department.  For the most part, images are fine, but with a bright source in the frame, such as the sun, the camera lens can show a small bright green blob in the frame and some purple artifacts around the light source, but I’ve definitely seen much worse.  Veiling flare isn’t much of an issue.

The fast aperture does allow for some shallow depth of field.  While it’s not going to reach the capabilities of a proper interchangeable lens kit with fast glass, it does allow for more depth of field control than other high end zoom compacts.  Overall bokeh quality is pleasing for a lens like this, especially at the telephoto end.  It’s not super creamy, but it also avoids being distracting over most of the zoom range.  At moderate distances at the wide end of the range, some nervousness can definitely creep in, though.

Chromatic aberration is relatively well controlled.  There is some minor lateral CA present in uncorrected files, but the lens profile in JPEG and in Lightroom completely eliminates it.

While the lens isn’t perfect and pixel peepers may be critical of the performance at the edges, overall I was rather impressed with the LX100’s optics.  The zoom range is versatile and the wide aperture range allows for some moderately shallow depth of field while producing images with good resolution and a good look.  Click the image above and to the right to view a full size image, processed with Lightroom 5.7.  Click the green arrow at the bottom of the enlarged image to view at 100%.

Statues - Panasonic LX100 @ 10.9mm, f/1.7, ISO 200
Statues – Panasonic LX100 @ 10.9mm, f/1.7, ISO 200

Color and Dynamic Range

If you’ve used a recent 16 Megapixel Micro 4/3 camera from Panasonic, then you generally know how the LX100’s sensor performs.  It has the same sensor as the Panasonic GX7, though it only uses about 12.8 megapixels of that frame.  Aside from the slightly lower resolution, image quality is essentially identical, and that’s a good thing.  The LX100 has good color response, which is somewhat muted in the RAW files, but can be adjusted quite well.

The dynamic range of the LX100 is excellent, providing plenty of shadow detail and lots of room in the highlights for high contrast scenes.  For most situations, the camera can capture the tones in the scene without clipping at the extremes. However, this is a  camera that I feel really benefits from the use of RAW.

JPEG Quality

The JPEG production of the LX100 is not bad, and is an improvement on older Panasonic cameras, but there is still too much mushy noise reduction and artifacting that can happen in smooth areas of color, even at base ISO.  At high ISO, the images are fairly clean, but the noise reduction is very heavy, which obliterates detail.  When looking at the JPEGs, the LX100’s image quality looks like a decent quality compact camera.  When using RAW, it looks like a high quality mirrorless camera.  I highly recommend shooting RAW if you are going to purchase the LX100.

Noise

As with the other sensor characteristics, the pixel level noise is on par with recent Panasonic Micro 4/3 cameras, which is really quite good.  While there is some fine grain in skies even at base ISO, overall noise is well controlled up through about ISO 800. While ISO 1600 and 3200 show a fair bit of grain, they retain lots of detail, making these two ISOs more than usable for a wide variety of situations.

Ohio Statehouse - Panasonic LX100 @ 10.9mm, f/5.6, ISO 3200
Ohio Statehouse – Panasonic LX100 @ 10.9mm, f/5.6, ISO 3200

Even ISO 6400 through 25,600, while quite noisy for sure, can be usable for the web or small prints, due to the high level of detail retained, though 25,600 would want to be saved for emergency use only, simply due to how quickly the shadows become muddied and the color cast that begins to creep in at that ISO.  Click on the images below for 100% crops at ISO 6400 and ISO 25,600, from RAW in Lightroom, to get an idea of the detail vs. noise you get at these ISOs.

100% crop at ISO 6400
100% crop at ISO 6400

100% Crop @ ISO 25,600
100% Crop @ ISO 25,600

 Video

As I noted at the beginning of the review, I am most definitely not a videographer, so I don’t feel comfortable discussing in-depth the ins and outs of camera video usage, but with the LX100 capable of shooting 4K video natively, I did shoot a few clips, and here are my thoughts.

Autofocus in video mode works rather well, but can quickly jitter in and out of focus during filming of static subjects, as it seeks to confirm focus, which can be somewhat jarring upon playback. The camera can utilize full manual control of video, and aperture, exposure compensation and shutter speed can all be changed on the fly during recording.  The camera doesn’t have a separate microphone input, so you will have to deal with the relatively sub-par sound recording unless you want to utilize a separate sound recorder and sync the video and audio tracks later.

Image quality on video was very good, with a 100Mbps 4K stream at 24p available.  Detail was excellent, and color and contrast quite nice.  While I don’t have a 4K monitor or television to watch the videos I took at full resolution, I did view them zoomed to 100% to see what the detail looked like at full size, and it was quite good.  I noticed in scenes where I was panning  the camera, the loss of fine resolution due to the slower shutter speed is much more apparent at this resolution than at 1080p.

Single frame pulled from a 4K video clip taken from the LX100.  Click to view the full frame and click the green arrow at the bottom of the screen to view at 100%.
Single frame pulled from a 4K video clip taken with the LX100. Click to view the full frame and click the green arrow at the bottom of the screen to view at 100%.

One very nice thing about shooting 4K video is the ability to pull 8 megapixel images out of the video stream, and Panasonic has a 4K photo mode if this is your intention from the beginning.  This mode allows for faster shutter speeds and non-16:9 aspect ratio photos.  This has some great potential if you have space for the data and you want precise timing of a shot, though it would be impractical to shoot this way at all times. Click the image above to view a full size still image plucked from a standard frame of 4K video.  This is easily high enough quality for 8×12″ prints and probably larger.

The video mode also crops in slightly to have true 1:1 pixel representation in video, so the wide end becomes limited to approximately 27mm equivalent when shooting 4K video.  While the video on the LX100 probably won’t entice too many professional filmmakers due to the handling and lack of audio input, the LX100 is certainly ready for this next generation of televisions and home movies of the highest quality.

Continue: Conclusion and Image Samples

Tags:

Comments

18 responses to “Review: Panasonic Lumix LX100”

  1. Chris Avatar
    Chris

    Great review. I’ve been wanting this camera ever since its announcement and your review continues to feed my lust. Can you compare the AF speed, AF tracking, and image quality to the Sony a6000? That is what I have right now and have been considering selling it for the LX100…

  2. Eric Cote Avatar

    Is it a production unit or pre-prod Jordan? On mine (production unit), when I’m reviewing the photos and the lens is retracted, if I turn the camera off, it just shut up. the lens don’t go out and back in.

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      It’s a production camera. Odd. Wonder if it’s a setting to change.

      1. Eric Cote Avatar

        I thought it could be the Zoom Resume setting but it does not make a difference. On a side note, by pure luck, I found out that when you are in the menus, if you use the zoom lever, it jumps one page ahead 🙂

    2. Stewart Mac Avatar

      My LX100 operates like this as well. The camera just shuts down with no lens movement.

  3. Ironymous Avatar
    Ironymous

    Overall, good review. I am in the market for one of these to replace an OMD EM5.

    But I do wish people would give credit where it is due. 1) Panasonic came out with retro designs long before the X series was a glint in Fuji’s eyes. In fact, this LX100 is not a copy of Fuji, it’s a copy of the Panasonic LX5/Leica Digilux 2, an excellent fixed-lens camera which I still own. 2) The Fuji “playbook” was actually a copy of other manual rangefinder cameras that had come before it, so it’s hardly “Fuji’s playbook”.

    I get the feeling that now that the Sony A7-II sports 5-axis stabilisation, in 5 years’ time everyone will say the new X and Y is copying from “Sony’s playbook”. But it’s not the first time Olympus innovations have been stolen and then ret-conned as the other manufacturer’s “innovation”.

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      The LX5 doesn’t have controls anything like this camera. And if course Fuji borrowed from old cameras. It’s great that they did, but aside from Leica, who has been doing it non stop, no one else really used this control scheme in the past 15 years. Now it’s becoming more common, and that’s a good thing. I love that Panasonic went this route for the LX100.

  4. Kevin Avatar
    Kevin

    Nice review Jordan! I am currently trying out this camera for the week, and I’ve had an awful time with auto white balance in the JPEG images. I noticed in your review you recommend shooting RAW, which I do, but when I shoot my Fuji X camera or Sony RX100M2 I’ll only keep the RAW if the JPEG didn’t come out the way I’d hoped.

    Today I shot pictures of my kids playing outside and noticed in all the JPEGs my kids all had blue lips? I was again using AWB, which is flawless on my Fuji, and somewhat problematic on the RX100, but seems completely unreliable on the LX100. Any suggestions?

    Thank you,

    Kevin

    1. Mike Avatar
      Mike

      I had a similar problem shooting indoor photos under tungsten or mixed fluorescent lighting. People’s noses and cheeks had an alcoholic red glow, where the skin was not pasty white, and even male lips were bright magenta.

      After lengthy research, I discovered that Panasonic regards the visible spectrum as extending from 380nm to 780nm. The MFT sensor used in the LX100 and all G series cameras has extended red sensitivity and no IR filter. Like Leica M8 owners, one must use a UV/IR filter (available from B+W in 43mm) to get normal skin tones.

      Or one can use the LX100 or a Lumix G camera to replace the expensive Nikon D810A to record hydrogen-alpha emissions at 696nm. With deep red filter (B+W 091) and the camera set to monochrome, one can also get white leaves in the high infrared. Enjoy!

      1. Leo Avatar
        Leo

        Mike, can you post some pics using that filter?

  5. George Avatar
    George

    Soft corners, evf like a dim small tunnel, ISO 1600 at best indoors, fuzzy pictures. Didn’t like it, returned it. Give me a gm1 or gm5 with a 20mm 1.7 prime that is sharp as nails

  6. […] their predecessors.  My favorite camera out of the two manufacturers was the 4/3 sensor compact Panasonic LX100, which was released a few months […]

  7. Leo Avatar
    Leo

    Hi Jordan, just a question. I am now using the 2nd. battery because I thought the 1st. one was defect. But this one I must charge every week even if I haven’t made any pictures. What is your average time (number of pictures) with 1 charge? I enjoy the lx100 since November but the charging is very unpleasant.

  8. Dan Avatar
    Dan

    Similar to your experience with the Metz 50 AF-1, I noticed the camera doesn’t work well with my smaller Metz 24 AF-1. It looks like it uses the flash at full power at all times.

    Very dissapointing…

    1. Akiva Shapero Avatar
      Akiva Shapero

      Try the Metz- 26AF-1 Digital. It has a version for the LX100.

  9. Bruce Rubenstein Avatar
    Bruce Rubenstein

    When I updated the firmware for my Metz 50 AF-1 to the latest one on the Metz site, the flashed worked fine. The only problem is that the new update program doesn’t work with the new firmware and had to use an older program from a couple of years ago.

  10. https://ultimatecookware.joomla.com Avatar

    It’s actually a cool and helpful piece of information. I’m happy that you
    just shared this helpful info with us. Please keep us informed like this.
    Thank you for sharing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search


Categories


Recent Posts


  1. I think it is near Hillsboro.

  2. This article got me thinking… Why does Canon make RF S lenses starting with 18mm when most full frame RF…

  3. Great review. I shoot Nikon and may try an old Nikon D200 and see how it compares with the new…