Admiring Light
Menu
  • Home
  • Review Index
  • Shop Talk
  • Technique and Vision
  • Opinion
  • Portfolio
  • Site Index
  • About
    • Privacy Policy
Menu

Review: Carl Zeiss FE 35mm f/2.8 Sonnar T* ZA

Posted on December 27, 2013December 27, 2013 by Jordan Steele

Contents

  • 1Around the Lens: Build Quality and Handling
  • 2Focus Performance
  • 3Image Quality
  • 4Conclusion
  • 5Image Samples

Conclusion

fe35_topPros

  • Compact and well-built body handles beautifully on the camera
  • Autofocus is fast and accurate
  • Excellent manual focus feel
  • Images are sharp right from f/2.8 across most of the frame, and stopped down, images are sharp throughout
  • Outstanding contrast provides plenty of pop while still producing pleasing portraits
  • Excellent color that is vibrant without being oversaturated
  • Minimal distortion
  • Excellent control of chromatic aberration
  • Low vignetting
  • Fairly good bokeh

Cons

  • Fairly expensive for a 35mm f/2.8 prime, at $800 US
  • Flare can be an issue with light sources near the edges of the frame
  • Really should be f/2 for the price

Carl Zeiss and Sony have created an excellent wide-angle lens for the FE lineup.  The lens produces images that are sharp and contrasty, with excellent color, low aberrations and fast autofocus in a small, lightweight and well-built package.  The lens handles beautifully on the A7, and indeed, many shooters will feel at home being able to shove an A7 or A7r with this lens into a jacket pocket and get extremely high image quality out of this portable combo.

The only real downside to the lens is that it’s not a very fast lens, especially given the price.  For $800, this really should be an f/2 lens, especially as a 35mm option on a full-frame camera.  The lens is only $100 less expensive than Fuji’s 23mm f/1.4, which is two full stops faster, allows for one full stop shallower depth of field and has similar optical quality (and in some ways superior optical quality). Canon’s 35mm f/2 IS for their SLRs is $200 cheaper, a stop faster and has image stabilization. The modest maximum aperture, while keeping size down, negates one of the big benefits of a full-frame camera, and that’s the ability to use faster lenses and get shallower depth of field.  If they had chosen to make a slightly larger f/2 lens with similar quality, and charge slightly more, most people would have no need for any other 35mm lens.  As it is, Sony or Zeiss will likely end up adding a 35mm f/1.4 to the system, which given the prices of current FE lenses, will likely cost an arm and a leg.

On its merits alone, however, it is an excellent lens.  Whether it is worth the money to you will be up to the individual, but know that if you do shell out the cash, you’ll be gaining an outstanding optic in a small, well-built package.

Image Samples

Click on an image to enlarge

Winter Sunset - Sony A7 with Zeiss FE 35mm f/2.8 @ f/4
Winter Sunset – Sony A7 with Zeiss FE 35mm f/2.8 Sonnar T* ZA @ f/4
Winter Berries - Sony A7 with Zeiss FE 35mm f/2.8 Sonnar T* ZA @ f/2.8
Winter Berries – Sony A7 with Zeiss FE 35mm f/2.8 Sonnar T* ZA @ f/2.8

 

Shadow of Myself - Sony A7 with Zeiss FE 35mm f/2.8 Sonnar T* ZA @ f/8
Shadow of Myself – Sony A7 with Zeiss FE 35mm f/2.8 Sonnar T* ZA @ f/8
Snowy Chairs - Sony A7 with Zeiss FE 35mm f/2.8 Sonnar T* ZA @ f/2.8
Snowy Chairs – Sony A7 with Zeiss FE 35mm f/2.8 Sonnar T* ZA @ f/2.8
Car Icicles - Sony A7 with Zeiss FE 35mm f/2.8 Sonnar T* ZA @ f/2.8
Car Icicles – Sony A7 with Zeiss FE 35mm f/2.8 Sonnar T* ZA @ f/2.8
Playing - Sony A7 with Zeiss FE 35mm f/2.8 Sonnar T* ZA @ f/2.8
Playing – Sony A7 with Zeiss FE 35mm f/2.8 Sonnar T* ZA @ f/2.8
South - Sony A7 with Zeiss FE 35mm f/2.8 Sonnar T* ZA @ f/2.8
South – Sony A7 with Zeiss FE 35mm f/2.8 Sonnar T* ZA @ f/2.8
Hayden Run Falls, Dublin, OH - Sony A7 with Zeiss FE 35mm f/2.8 Sonnar T* ZA @ f/5.6
Hayden Run Falls, Dublin, OH – Sony A7 with Zeiss FE 35mm f/2.8 Sonnar T* ZA @ f/5.6
Dogfight - Sony A7 with Zeiss FE 35mm f/2.8 Sonnar T* ZA @ f/2.8
Dogfight – Sony A7 with Zeiss FE 35mm f/2.8 Sonnar T* ZA @ f/2.8
Snowy Umbrellas - Sony A7 with Zeiss FE 35mm f/2.8 Sonnar T* ZA @ f/8
Snowy Umbrellas – Sony A7 with Zeiss FE 35mm f/2.8 Sonnar T* ZA @ f/8
Pages: 1 2 3

9 thoughts on “Review: Carl Zeiss FE 35mm f/2.8 Sonnar T* ZA”

  1. Trevor Batchelor says:
    January 18, 2014 at 6:00 am

    Thanks for the down to earth review of the Sony/Zeiss 35mm Sonnar. I am about to buy one of these for my Sony a7.

    If you think that this lens is expensive in the USA you will have to pay £700 GBP if you lived here in the UK.
    Fortunately for me a friend is hopefully bringing me one from the states this week for $800 = £487GBP.

    Well, thats Cameron’s rip off Britain for you !

    Reply
  2. Steve P. says:
    September 9, 2014 at 4:49 am

    Thanks a lot for the review. Very nice images here, but the real reason for my post is I can’t resist pointing out that in your “shadow of myself” shot, your shadow bears an uncanny resemblance to that of Chief Wiggum from The Simpsons. I assume we can’t see his right arm because he’s busy eating a doughnut!

    Reply
  3. Peter says:
    September 9, 2015 at 3:16 pm

    Great review. I just got the a7rii with the 35 mm. Its a Great lens, because it’s so portable – AND for aVIDEO it’s perfect, since I like to use the 35 mm crop, so it’s equivalent to a 50mm. The continuous focus in video works great as well on this versatile lens! However, I’m looking forward to try out my NIKON nikkor 50 mm 1.4 on this camera! Also a small , light and much cheaper lens with fine results on the Nikon.

    Ps. What do you recommend for editing the new raw format on mac? Lightroom / photoshop? Aperture can’t handle those files…

    Reply
  4. John Rhodes says:
    February 16, 2016 at 7:22 pm

    Interesting. I just sent mine back because the vignetting was terrible but when I look at your shots I can’t see it. Almost like mine was faulty. I was shooting jpeg,f8,shadow comp auto, hood off on an A7R and still had bad drop off – not just in the corners but up the whole side. And it was not symmetrical as the right side was slightly worse than the left. I don’t understand why the camera did not compensate?

    Peter, I have the Nikkor AIS 50mm 1.4 with a Fotodiox adapter and it is excellent on the A7R. Far better than I expected and far better than the afore mentioned FE 35/f2.8. It is not as sharp as the FE but it is very sharp and consistent across the frame with no vignetting at all. Jpeg straight out of the camera with no correction is all excellent across the frame. It is obviously a bit mushy at 1.4 but still good and by f2.8 everything is great. By f5.6/f8 it’s incredible. I have owned that lens for 25 years! I even toyed with buying a second hand Nikkor AIS 35/f1.4 to replace the FE 35/2.8 but that is probably pushing my luck!

    Reply
  5. ???????????????????????? says:
    March 9, 2016 at 9:10 am

    Everything is very open with a very clear description of the issues.

    It was definitely informative. Your website is useful.
    Thanks for sharing!

    Reply
  6. Heikki says:
    August 19, 2016 at 6:08 am

    Thank you for this review! It would be extremely interesting to compare this lens to canon 40mm f2.8 + adapter combination. The size and focal length are close to the zeiss, the price is only one third of the zeiss’.

    Reply
  7. Carl Harding-Palmer says:
    July 19, 2017 at 1:06 pm

    Great review, very thorough. I have after much searching found the lens I’m looking for. Once again great review and thanks.

    Reply
  8. Wondergecko says:
    October 5, 2017 at 1:25 am

    Interesting to see this one against the almost identical Samyang 35 2.8!

    Reply
  9. Pingback: FE?????????? Sonnar T* FE 35mm F2.8 ZA??????? | ?????????????

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow Me:

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on Instagram

Most Popular Posts

  • "Full Frame Equivalence" and Why It Doesn't Matter (286)
  • Fuji X-Pro 2 vs. Sony A7 II: Noise Comparison (70)
  • Fuji 56mm f/1.2 vs. Panasonic Leica 42.5mm f/1.2 Nocticron (63)
  • Review: Metabones Speed Booster (Canon FD to Fuji X) (56)
  • Review: Olympus OM-D E-M5 (48)

Recent Comments

  • Julian Heath on Review: Laowa 15mm f/4.5 Zero-D Shift
  • Jordan Steele on Canon RF 70-200mm f/4L IS vs. Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS
  • Jon on Canon RF 70-200mm f/4L IS vs. Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS
  • Roland on Review: Olympus M.Zuiko 7-14mm f/2.8 PRO
  • ruoktu on Using Manual Focus Lenses on Mirrorless Cameras

Archives

©2021 Admiring Light | Theme by SuperbThemes
We use cookies to personalize content and ads and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. You may consent to the use of cookies or opt out. Accept Reject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.