Admiring Light
Menu
  • Home
  • Review Index
  • Shop Talk
  • Technique and Vision
  • Opinion
  • Portfolio
  • Site Index
  • About
    • Privacy Policy
Menu

Review: Zeiss FE 55mm f/1.8 ZA Sonnar T*

Posted on May 20, 2015May 21, 2015 by Jordan Steele

Contents

  • 1Construction and Handling
  • 2Autofocus
  • 3Image Quality
  • 4Conclusion
  • 5Image Samples

The Zeiss FE 55mm f/1.8 Sonnar has been around since the beginning of Sony’s full frame E-Mount launch, and a lot of people consider it an outstanding lens.  I thought about not doing an FE 55mm f/1.8 review, as it’s been out for a while, but after using the lens over the past two weeks, I simply have to share my thoughts and feelings on this lens.

Zeiss FE 55mm f/1.8 Sonnar on the Sony A7 II
Zeiss FE 55mm f/1.8 Sonnar on the Sony A7 II

Construction and Handling

The FE 55mm f/1.8 shares the same all-metal construction that is found on essentially all the Sony Zeiss lenses.  The smooth aluminum barrel has no creaks or movement at all, and the only control is the finely ribbed focus ring. The lens is reassuringly solid and has a subtle heft to it.  It’s not a huge lens, though it is a bit longer than most normal prime lenses.  Overall, the 55mm f/1.8 balances well on pretty much any Sony body. One somewhat interesting, though inconsequential fact about this lens is that the front element is concave, rather than the typical convex elements seen in most lenses.  This doesn’t affect use in any way, but I thought it was somewhat interesting.

Zeiss FE 55mm f/1.8 ZA Sonnar T*
Zeiss FE 55mm f/1.8 ZA Sonnar T*
The manual focus ring is well damped and very smooth to operate. Like all the Sony E-mount native lenses, the focus is fly-by-wire, so there are no hard stops and no focus scales present.  The lens comes with caps, a case and a lens hood.  The hood is somewhat large in comparison to the lens body, but provides good shading and protection. It’s nicely constructed of plastic with a metal band around the base near the lens.  This band doesn’t do anything, but it feels nice and a bit more premium as a result.  It’s a nice touch. The bayonet mount for the hood is recessed slightly, and is similar to the hood attachments for many of the other Sony/Zeiss E-mount lenses.

The FE 55mm f/1.8 isn't the most compact normal lens, but it's not large either.
The FE 55mm f/1.8 isn’t the most compact normal lens, but it’s not large either.

Autofocus

The FE 55mm f/1.8 sports a very fast and quiet autofocus motor.  The lens locks focus very quickly on both the A7 II and the APS-C a6000 in good light, and slows somewhat it dimmer light.  However, that slowing is relatively minor for the most part, and speed is still pretty good when shooting higher contrast subjects in low light. I have noticed that when shooting people in lower light situations, that sometimes the lens will hunt through the range a bit, which can slow things down somewhat.  Part of this is that I found it best to use the smallest focus point setting on the camera, due to the relatively shallow depth of field that an f/1.8 lens can generate on a full-frame body.  Using larger focus points, especially when shooting closer up to people, would often have the lens focus on eyebrows instead of eyes, which can be notable in these situations.

The lens does not feature an optical image stabilizer, which is common among normal prime lenses.  It would have been nice, given the APS-C normal prime from Sony has optical stabilization, but I don’t view it as a major downside, especially if you’re shooting on the A7 II.

Continue: Image Quality

Pages: 1 2 3

20 thoughts on “Review: Zeiss FE 55mm f/1.8 ZA Sonnar T*”

  1. carlos says:
    May 21, 2015 at 7:58 am

    the cz ultron for the icarex system from the early 70s had a concave front element. that lens is supposedly very well regarded. i wonder if these lenses share similar designs. here is a link to that particular lens.
    http://vintage-camera-lenses.com/carl-zeiss-ultron-50mm-1-8/

    Reply
  2. Al says:
    May 24, 2015 at 9:24 pm

    Thanks for your review! How would you compare this one to Sigma 60 2.8 DN on A7II ? Does it really 4x better as price ? How much slower is the AF on Sigma?

    Thanks

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      May 24, 2015 at 9:58 pm

      Well, the Sigma is an APS-C only lens, so on the A7 II, it’s not a competitor.

      Reply
      1. Al says:
        May 25, 2015 at 3:31 pm

        Thanks for your response, Jordan. APS-C only ? But it can be mounted onto A7II, and shot in FF mode too, with some vignetting. People also reported removing baffle and reducing vignetting, with further processing in LR for even more vignetting reduction.

        Reply
        1. Jordan Steele says:
          May 25, 2015 at 4:26 pm

          It will mount, and the lens is excellent. You have to decide whether saving the cash is worth losing some resolution, having to crop every image manually, having a notably longer focal length (once cropped, it’ll be closer to a 70mm FOV), and over a stop slower aperture. I view something like a manual focus 50/1.4 or 55/1.2 to be a much stronger ‘competitor’ than dealing with that regularly.

          The Sigma 60 is an amazing optic, and the choice is much tougher if you’re an APS-C shooter (and where I think it makes more sense to shoot the 60.) The 55 sings on full frame.

          Reply
  3. Arnie Prince says:
    May 25, 2015 at 2:36 pm

    Jordan, excellent comprehensive assessment of the virtues of the Zeiss FE 55mm f/1.8 ZA Sonnar T. So much so that I have opted to purchase the lens coupled with the A7II and a Metabones adapter (for my Nikon lenses). Thank you.

    Reply
  4. Pingback: Sony Tidbits… | sonyalpharumors
  5. Chris says:
    May 28, 2015 at 11:29 am

    Your “Morning in Columbus” shot is exceptional.

    What is your impression of the focusing speed differences between the Sigma 60 2.8 and the FE 55 1.8 on the A6000? I’ve read that the Sigma 60 2.8 never received a firmware update to take full advantage of the A6000’s improved focusing, but does this translate to a meaningful difference in focusing speed?

    Reply
  6. Louis says:
    June 22, 2015 at 10:53 am

    Thanks, Jordan, for a great review of a great lens. I currently own an A6000 with a Sigma 60 mm 2.8 DN. I am extremely impressed with the images that I am getting from this system. Even so, I am looking at the Sony 55 mm 1.8 ZA for a number of reasons: (1) the Zeiss lens can take full advantage of the A6000 hybrid autofocus, the Sigma can not; (2) the extra 1.3 stops, (3) the Zeiss lens will make for a smooth transition to full-frame, when I do upgrade.

    My question for you is how the Sigma and Zeiss compare in terms of sharpness, both center and corners, and contrast on the A6000? Thanks.

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      June 22, 2015 at 12:25 pm

      I haven’t tested them side by side on the a6000, but my impression from using them is that there’s very little to distinguish them at similar apertures on APS-C, with regards to sharpness.

      Reply
  7. Pingback: Zeiss Ultron 1.8 | Movie News Infos
  8. Pawlitzek Rene says:
    August 15, 2015 at 10:18 am

    I recently bought the Sony A7II and thought about this lens. In the end, I decided to reuse the old Contax Carl Zeiss Tessar f2.8/45mm:

    example

    Reply
  9. Andres says:
    January 2, 2016 at 1:04 am

    Nice review! Where did you get the wrist strap on this photo:

    https://admiringlight.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/fe55_table.jpg

    🙂

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      January 2, 2016 at 9:03 am

      Gordy’s camera straps. http://gordyscamerastraps.com

      Reply
  10. Gordo Rad says:
    January 20, 2016 at 6:14 pm

    Great review…Great images.

    Reply
  11. Pingback: Sony-Zeiss FE 55mm f/1.8 | Spuelbeck.net Photography
  12. Gary says:
    March 8, 2016 at 5:30 pm

    Hey Jordan, I was just wondering if the lens hood that your lens came with has a little play. I can wiggle mine 1-2mm (rotating) when it’s mounted in any orientation. Just wanted to know if this is normal since the rest of the lens seems to have a perfect fit and finish.

    Reply
  13. Pingback: Review: Sony Zeiss FE 50mm f/1.4 ZA Planar T* - Admiring Light
  14. Pingback: ?????????? Sonnar T* FE 55mm F1.8 ZA??????? | ?????????????
  15. Pingback: ???Sonnar T* FE 55mm F1.8 ZA??????????????????????? | ?????????????

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow Me:

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on InstagramFollow Us on Mastodon

Most Popular Posts

  • "Full Frame Equivalence" and Why It Doesn't Matter (288)
  • Fuji X-Pro 2 vs. Sony A7 II: Noise Comparison (70)
  • Fuji 56mm f/1.2 vs. Panasonic Leica 42.5mm f/1.2 Nocticron (63)
  • Review: Metabones Speed Booster (Canon FD to Fuji X) (56)
  • Review: Olympus OM-D E-M5 (48)

Recent Comments

  • Eric Wojtkun on My Favorite Photos of 2022
  • Jordan Steele on “Full Frame Equivalence” and Why It Doesn’t Matter
  • Leon on “Full Frame Equivalence” and Why It Doesn’t Matter
  • Clarke jones on Review: TTArtisan 50mm f/1.4 ASPH (RF Mount)
  • Anonymous on Sony A7 III vs. A7 II – Noise Comparison

Archives

©2023 Admiring Light | Theme by SuperbThemes
We use cookies to personalize content and ads and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. You may consent to the use of cookies or opt out. Accept Reject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

SAVE & ACCEPT