Admiring Light
Menu
  • Home
  • Review Index
  • Shop Talk
  • Technique and Vision
  • Opinion
  • Portfolio
  • Site Index
  • About
    • Privacy Policy
Menu

Review: Zeiss Loxia 21mm f/2.8 Distagon T*

Posted on February 18, 2016February 18, 2016 by Jordan Steele

Contents

  • 1Construction and Handling
  • 2Image Quality
  • 3Conclusion
  • 4Image Samples

Conclusion

Pros

  • Beautifully crafted lens with a solid metal build and weather sealing
  • Great feel to the manual focus ring
  • Compact
  • Outstanding sharpness right from f/2.8 and from corner to corner stopped down
  • Exceptional contrast and color response
  • Pleasing bokeh
  • Excellent flare resistance
  • Good control of chromatic aberration
  • Very nice sunstars

Cons

  • Focus ring and aperture ring are too close together
  • Focus throw is a bit short
  • Sensor reflections show easily on the A7 II (though not entirely the fault of the lens)

The Loxia 21mm f/2.8 Distagon is a lens truly worthy of the Zeiss name.  They managed to create a compact lens that performs brilliantly through almost all aspects of imaging.  Images show outstanding sharpness and stunning color and contrast, producing that signature Zeiss ‘pop’ in spades. Even the bokeh is fairly nice.  While the lens handles well and has outstanding manual focus damping, I did feel that the close proximity of the aperture and focus rings caused some issues in the field, but overall, there’s really nothing to complain about.  Zeiss has crafted a simply outstanding ultra-wide here.

So should you buy it?  If you like primes for ultra-wide and can swing that rather hefty $1,499 price tag, then yes, you should run to your nearest retailer and pick one up.  However, as much as I loved the lens, it’s not a lens for everyone.  Many people, including myself, tend to prefer using zooms in the ultra-wide range.  In this range, small focal changes can make a big difference to the angle of view and the final composition.  I often find it cumbersome to switch between, say, an 18mm, 21mm and 24mm lens.  As such, a lot of shooters will prefer to go the route of the Sony Zeiss FE 16-35mm f/4.  The 16-35mm is $150 cheaper, is both wider and longer, and still features some of the Zeiss magic color and contrast that the Loxia displays.  It’s also very sharp.  It’s not as good as the Loxia in any of those ways, but it’s fairly close. For my shooting, the 16-35mm makes more sense.

However, if you are fine shooting with primes for ultra-wide work (and especially if you love the 21mm focal length), then there’s no need to look any further.  The Loxia 21mm is truly exceptional, and supplants the Fuji 14mm as the finest wide-angle lens I’ve had the pleasure to use.

Image Samples

Click on an image to enlarge

Early Morning Flags - Sony A7 II with Zeiss Loxia 21mm f/2.8 Distagon @ f/11
Early Morning Flags – Sony A7 II with Zeiss Loxia 21mm f/2.8 Distagon @ f/11
Indian Run Falls - Sony A7 II with Zeiss Loxia 21mm f/2.8 Distagon @ f/16
Indian Run Falls – Sony A7 II with Zeiss Loxia 21mm f/2.8 Distagon @ f/16
Indian Run Cascade - Sony A7 II with Zeiss Loxia 21mm f/2.8 Distagon @ f/16
Indian Run Cascade – Sony A7 II with Zeiss Loxia 21mm f/2.8 Distagon @ f/16
Stop Shadow - Sony A7 II with Zeiss Loxia 21mm f/2.8 Distagon @ f/8
Stop Shadow – Sony A7 II with Zeiss Loxia 21mm f/2.8 Distagon @ f/11
Snowy Blocks - Sony A7 II with Zeiss Loxia 21mm f/2.8 Distagon @ f/11
Snowy Blocks – Sony A7 II with Zeiss Loxia 21mm f/2.8 Distagon @ f/18
Morning in Columbus - Sony A7 II with Zeiss Loxia 21mm f/2.8 Distagon @ f/11
Morning in Columbus – Sony A7 II with Zeiss Loxia 21mm f/2.8 Distagon @ f/11
Hayden Run Falls - Sony A7 II with Zeiss Loxia 21mm f/2.8 Distagon @ f/16
Hayden Run Falls – Sony A7 II with Zeiss Loxia 21mm f/2.8 Distagon @ f/16
Deer Overlook - Sony A7 II with Zeiss Loxia 21mm f/2.8 Distagon @ f/2.8
Deer Overlook – Sony A7 II with Zeiss Loxia 21mm f/2.8 Distagon @ f/2.8
Winter Plants - Sony A7 II with Zeiss Loxia 21mm f/2.8 Distagon @ f/11
Winter Plants – Sony A7 II with Zeiss Loxia 21mm f/2.8 Distagon @ f/16
Indian Run Creek - Sony A7 II with Zeiss Loxia 21mm f/2.8 Distagon @ f/11
Indian Run Creek – Sony A7 II with Zeiss Loxia 21mm f/2.8 Distagon @ f/11
Lines to the City - Sony A7 II with Zeiss Loxia 21mm f/2.8 Distagon @ f/16
Lines to the City – Sony A7 II with Zeiss Loxia 21mm f/2.8 Distagon @ f/13

If you enjoyed this review, check out the rest of my reviews in the Review Index
Pages: 1 2 3

11 thoughts on “Review: Zeiss Loxia 21mm f/2.8 Distagon T*”

  1. Marc Baillargeon says:
    February 19, 2016 at 8:17 am

    Jordan,
    Excellent review as usual! This for sure is an extremely desirable lens but I concur with you on the practicality of using the Sony/Zeiss FE 16-35mm. The one-stop gain and marginally better performance with the Loxia, is not for me enough to overcome the convenience of carrying a single zoom.
    On the other hand, I really look forward to hear from you on the forthcoming Voigtlander 10mm and 12mm in E-mount. Both are appreciably outside the 16-35mm range to make them potentially very interesting. And I love those extreme wide-angle perspectives!
    Thanks again!
    Marc

    Reply
  2. Chris says:
    February 19, 2016 at 5:09 pm

    Interesting observation about the sensor reflection. I was wondering if sensor reflection is also visible in the image “Sunlight – Sony A7 II with Sony FE 28mm f/2 @ f/16” on the third page of your review of the Sony FE 28mm, or is that just regular flare?

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      February 19, 2016 at 5:53 pm

      That’s illumination of the dirt on the window I was shooting through.

      Reply
  3. Alex says:
    March 12, 2016 at 7:56 am

    Good review! Did you had a chance to use the Loxia with a filter system? I’m interested whether it works with the Lee 75 system.

    Reply
  4. Pingback: Loxia 21mm lens in Stock and shipping in USA. New reviews from Admiringtlight and Photochirp. | sonyalpharumors
  5. Thomas says:
    April 4, 2016 at 1:02 am

    Is this lens designed specifically for the Sony? (I’m assuming so) that is some serious quality. When you reviewed this the 16mm Fuji wasn’t made yet. Is it the same type of lens? Is there anyway of adapting this bad boy to an XPro2 and retaining that quality. Which Sony is this made for? All E mount? Thanks for the review and these great images. Looks like 4×5 almost.

    Reply
  6. Mark says:
    June 8, 2016 at 10:03 pm

    Thanks for the informative review, Jordan!.

    What do you think: Could the field curvature of the lens be due to the distortion correction?

    You’ say the “thick sensor cover glass” in the Sony cameras make adequate lens constructions like a Loxia necessary. I remember Cicala from LensRentals demonstrating, that third party lenses deliver optical performance according to the thickness of the sensor cover glass in the particular camera. That’s why I’m wondering whether the sensor cover glass in the A 6000 / A 6300 is as thick as that in the A 7 series? And do you know what third party lens makers offer lenses that in the said sense are suited to the Sony cameras?

    Thank you again!

    Reply
  7. Pingback: Loxia 21mm f/2.8 – Site Title
  8. Pingback: Carl Zeiss Loxia 2.8/21 ??????????? | ?????????????
  9. Pingback: Review: Voigtländer 21mm f/3.5 Color-Skopar (Sony E-mount) - Admiring Light
  10. Bruno says:
    August 28, 2020 at 2:16 am

    Hello Jordan, although English is not my native language, I am always carefully checking your comments and conclusions. Really great insights!
    One thing that hit me when checking the ultra wide angle / wide angle reviews you and others specialists are running is that I do not see any good test of the Sony FE 20 mm f:1,8 G (or anything as good as what you are doing). Any plan to review this lens?
    Thank you.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow Me:

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on Instagram

Most Popular Posts

  • "Full Frame Equivalence" and Why It Doesn't Matter (286)
  • Fuji X-Pro 2 vs. Sony A7 II: Noise Comparison (70)
  • Fuji 56mm f/1.2 vs. Panasonic Leica 42.5mm f/1.2 Nocticron (63)
  • Review: Metabones Speed Booster (Canon FD to Fuji X) (56)
  • Review: Olympus OM-D E-M5 (48)

Recent Comments

  • Harry on Review: Tamron 70-180mm f/2.8 Di III VXD
  • Jordan Steele on Review: Tamron 70-180mm f/2.8 Di III VXD
  • Harry on Review: Tamron 70-180mm f/2.8 Di III VXD
  • Harry on Review: Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM
  • Jordan Steele on Review: Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM

Archives

©2021 Admiring Light | Theme by SuperbThemes
We use cookies to personalize content and ads and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. You may consent to the use of cookies or opt out. Accept Reject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.