Admiring Light
Menu
  • Home
  • Review Index
  • Shop Talk
  • Technique and Vision
  • Opinion
  • Portfolio
  • Site Index
  • About
    • Privacy Policy
Menu

OM-D E-M5 IS Effectiveness with Long Lenses

Posted on June 24, 2012June 24, 2012 by Jordan Steele
Olympus E-M5 with Canon FD 50-300mm f/4.5L. A 2x Teleconverter was added for this test.

In body IS has been touted as a great stand in for optical IS for many years,  However, in practice, these systems often have fallen flat when it comes to stabilizing longer lenses.  The IS can’t shift enough to counteract the movement of a really narrow field of view, and as a result becomes largely irrelevant.  However, the in-body IS system on the Olympus OM-D E-M5 has proven to be the best implementation of IBIS thus far.  However, I was still curious about how well it could perform with really long lenses.

With lenses from wide angle to moderate telephoto, I’ve found the E-M5 to be capable of stabilizing a lens by an average of three to four stops over the typical rule of thumb for  ‘hand holdable’ shutter speed, which is 1/(35mm equivalent focal length).  For micro 4/3 it’s 1/(2 x focal length).  I’ve used up to 300mm lenses with decent stabilization on the E-M5, which is equivalent in field of view to a 600mm lens on full frame.  But I wanted to see how it would do with a REALLY long lens.

The Test

Typical shot – (this is IS ON, 1/320 sec)

I used my Olympus E-M5 and the Canon FD 50-300mm f/4.5L with a Tamron 2x FD teleconverter.  This turns the lens into a 100-600mm f/9, which has a field of view equivalent to a 1200mm lens on full frame!

I then took aim at the light on my garage from a distance of about 20 feet, focused with 7x live view and took five shots hand held at each shutter speed in one stop increments from 1/160 second to the nominal ‘handholdable’ speed of 1/1250 second.  I did this same test with IS on and with IS off.

I then evaluated the shots at 100%, noting whether the shot was sharp, had relatively small amounts of camera shake (so not sharp, but still with general shapes and outlines present), or heavy blur (visible streaking).

The results are below:

IS OFF:

  • 1/160 sec: 0 sharp, 1 mild blur, 4 heavy blur
  • 1/320 sec: 1 sharp, 3 mild blur, 1 heavy blur
  • 1/640 sec: 0 sharp, 5 mild blur, 0 heavy blur
  • 1/1250 sec: 4 sharp, 1 mild blur, 0 heavy blur
  • 1/2500 sec: 5 sharp, 0 mild blur, 0 heavy blur

IS ON:

  • 1/160 sec: 1 sharp, 3 mild blur, 1 heavy blur
  • 1/320 sec: 4 sharp, 1 mild blur, 0 heavy blur
  • 1/640 sec: 5 sharp, 0 mild blur, 0 heavy blur
  • 1/1250 sec: 5 sharp, 0 mild blur, 0 heavy blur
  • 1/2500 sec: 5 sharp, 0 mild blur, 0 heavy blur

So, to sum up: the E-M5’s In body IS system is still effective even with very long legacy lenses.  It took until the ‘rule’ handholdable speed to get sharp shots without IS, with 4 out of 5 sharp.  However with the E-M5’s in body IS, this drops all the way to 1/320 sec at the same hit mark of 4 of 5 sharp.  At 1/640 second and faster, every shot is sharp.  I feel confident saying that with proper handholding technique, the E-M5 is good for two full stops of extra handholdability with a lens with a field of view like that of a 1200mm lens on full frame.  Impressive!

6 thoughts on “OM-D E-M5 IS Effectiveness with Long Lenses”

  1. Pingback: E-M5 IBIS tested with a REALLY long lens - Micro Four Thirds User Forum
  2. bousozoku says:
    June 27, 2012 at 3:12 pm

    I wish I could say the same for the E-5’s IBIS. I don’t see it helping at all with just the Zuiko Digital 50-200mm lens.

    Reply
  3. Mithun says:
    August 12, 2012 at 12:55 pm

    Wouldn’t it be great if you could also publish some of those pictures you’ve taken, showing both with and without shake/blur ?

    Reply
  4. Pingback: Effectiveness of Mega/Power OIS and IBIS - Page 2 - Micro Four Thirds User Forum
  5. Pingback: Micro 4/3 Year in Review @ Admiring Light
  6. Mark says:
    September 11, 2013 at 9:20 am

    Why shoot something so close? Surely it would be a better test to shoot something at a longer distance where shake is more exaggerated?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow Me:

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on InstagramFollow Us on Mastodon

Most Popular Posts

  • "Full Frame Equivalence" and Why It Doesn't Matter (286)
  • Fuji X-Pro 2 vs. Sony A7 II: Noise Comparison (70)
  • Fuji 56mm f/1.2 vs. Panasonic Leica 42.5mm f/1.2 Nocticron (63)
  • Review: Metabones Speed Booster (Canon FD to Fuji X) (56)
  • Review: Olympus OM-D E-M5 (48)

Recent Comments

  • Sam Taylor on My Favorite Photos of 2022
  • Damien on Review: TTArtisan 50mm f/1.4 ASPH (RF Mount)
  • Jordan Steele on Review: TTArtisan 50mm f/1.4 ASPH (RF Mount)
  • Damien on Review: TTArtisan 50mm f/1.4 ASPH (RF Mount)
  • padam19 on Review: Canon RF 800mm f/11 IS STM

Archives

©2023 Admiring Light | Theme by SuperbThemes
We use cookies to personalize content and ads and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. You may consent to the use of cookies or opt out. Accept Reject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

SAVE & ACCEPT