Review: Canon RF 16mm f/2.8 STM

Review: Canon RF 16mm f/2.8 STM

When the first details about the Canon RF 16mm f/2.8 STM leaked in 2021, the lens sounded intriguing: the RF system could certainly use a mid-range ultra-wide prime. When later leaks suggested that the lens would cost only $299 and would be the same size as the nifty-fifty RF 50mm f/1.8, I thought there was simply no way that could be true. The lens had to be for a new APS-C RF mount camera, or the leaked dimensions and price had to be wrong. You see, ultra-wide lenses for full-frame aren’t typically all that small, and they are almost never inexpensive. But the leaks were all 100% correct, and today I’m going to review Canon’s $299, ultra-compact ultra-wide prime lens for full-frame RF mount. Let’s dive in.

Canon EOS R5 with the RF 16mm f/2.8 STM

Construction and Handling

When you see the RF 16mm f/2.8 STM for the first time, it looks instantly familiar. That’s because it shares the exact same lens body as the RF 50mm f/1.8. The two lenses are identical in size, and nearly identical in weight. Only a closer look at the focal length number on the barrel, or the different looking front element gives you an indication that this is a different lens. The RF 16mm f/2.8 is extremely compact and lightweight, but like all of Canon’s RF lenses, it’s nicely constructed, with a polycarbonate lens body and a metal lens mount.

The RF 16mm f/2.8 STM and RF 50mm f/1.8 STM share the same lens body

Due to its extremely small size and light weight, the lens handles almost as if there’s nothing on the camera, and you’ll barely feel it if adding it to the bag. I’ve found it to be the perfect small lens to pop in the bag for day hikes where you don’t want to carry much gear but still may need an ultra-wide focal length. Now, when I want to travel light, I’ll bring the RF 16mm, the RF 24-105mm f/4L and, if I feel like I need a little more reach, my tiny Minolta MD 135mm f/3.5.

The 16mm has a dual-purpose ring on the front of the lens, which can be switched between a focus ring and the RF-specific control ring. The ring turns smoothly and with a nice amount of damping. Unlike RF lenses with dedicated control rings, this ring does not click when turning.

Like all of Canon’s non-L series lenses, the RF 16mm does not come with a lens hood, but Canon’s EW-65C is a nice locking, reversible and compact lens hood, and can be purchased for $30. When the lens was released, it sold for only $25, but has since seen a small price increase. This is fairly affordable by Canon’s standards, and due to the wider field of view, I didn’t hesitate to pick up the hood. With that said, Canon still should be including these hoods in the box, even on their affordable lenses. Almost all other lens makers include hoods with lenses at any price point.

The RF 16mm f/2.8 STM with optional hood, on the EOS R6

The RF 16mm f/2.8 has a 43mm filter thread, and can take a polarizing filter without vignetting, though due to the way the lens focus barrel extends and retracts, I found it easier to attach and detach filters when the camera is powered on and the lens tube partially extended. When the camera is turned off, the focus group fully retracts and makes it difficult to get a grip on a polarizing filter to unscrew it.

Autofocus

The 16mm f/2.8, like many of Canon’s consumer grade lenses for the RF system, utilizes a stepping motor (STM) for autofocus. While Canon’s STM motors are typically slower and a little noisier than their USM motors, the one in the 16mm f/2.8 is reasonably quick and relatively quiet as well. Much of this may be due to the shorter focus throw inherent in wide angle lenses. In use, the STM motor works very well for this lens, providing quick and quiet autofocus with good accuracy.

The RF 16mm f/2.8 does not have an optical image stabilizer built in, but it works well with the in-body stabilization of the R5 and R6, and I was typically able to achieve sharp hand-held exposures of around half a second to one second in duration.

Continue: Image Quality

Pages: 1 2 3

Comments

2 responses to “Review: Canon RF 16mm f/2.8 STM”

  1. Albert Avatar
    Albert

    Best value for the money, outperforms a much more expensive lens i bought years ago.Heavy barrel distortions are corrected by camera software.Hyperfocal distance is easy to achieve by manual tuning.
    An easy to use lens for all purposes

  2. Scott Stoness Avatar
    Scott Stoness

    Great review.

    I have this lens and r5/r8. I do lots of backpacking for landscape. This (16mm) lens plus canon RF 24-105 STM lens and R8 is a fantastic package – light and capable when every gram counts. [ I also have the RF 15-30 STM but it weighs 200grams more.] Sometimes when the trail is short or elevation gain is small, I use same and replace r8 with R5 and sometimes I bring the 15-30 instead of the 16 if I can afford the weight. On the R5, you can use the 16mm as your walk about lens in APSC mode at 24mm with IBIS.

    I agree that where it shines is when you don’t need to correct the barrel distortion – eg landscape without super straight objects. For landscape the barrel distortion is sufficient especially because at 16mm, your struggles will not be the edges but keeping level to not have bowed trees. I am more tempted to bring a 15mm shift lens than an better Iq lens.

    In short, if you are a canon backpacker, this is the uwa lens you ought to have for travel and backpacking.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search


Categories


Recent Posts


  1. I think it is near Hillsboro.

  2. This article got me thinking… Why does Canon make RF S lenses starting with 18mm when most full frame RF…

  3. Great review. I shoot Nikon and may try an old Nikon D200 and see how it compares with the new…