The Fujifilm X100V features the same X-Trans 4 sensor in the X-Pro 3 and X-T4. It’s a 26 megapixel APS-C sensor, and it’s been proven to be one of the better APS-C sensors on the market. The X100 series also sees its first upgrade to the lens since the line was introduced. The lens is still a 23mm f/2 lens, but the optics have been upgraded for better resolution, especially when shooting close up. Let’s dive into image quality.
The X100 cameras have always featured a pancake 23mm f/2 lens, but the X100V sees an improvement in the optics for the first time. While the lenses look identical from the exterior, the optical design of the lens in the X100V has been completely redesigned from the four previous X100 models. Both are 8 element 6 group lenses, but the design of the lens is drastically different in the X100V. First, there are two aspherical elements in the X100V lens, while the older lens only has one. Second, every single one of the eight elements in the lens has been redesigned. Below is a block diagram of the lens in the X100V compared to the lens in the X100F (and previous models).
The new lens does yield some notable improvements, and remedies what was the previous weakness in the 23mm f/2 lens: close up wide open performance. Earlier X100 models showed softness and spherical aberration when shooting closer subjects at f/2, but the X100V’s lens shows very sharp results at all apertures regardless of focus distance. At f/2, sharpness is excellent in the central 80% of the image frame, with a small amount of softening towards the edges. Stopping down a stop or two brings those edges and corners up to excellent levels as well, and the lens is capable of excellent cross frame sharpness at f/4 and smaller.
While a 23mm f/2 lens on APS-C won’t yield huge amounts of background blur, I have to say I really like the performance of the X100V’s lens with regards to bokeh. From a technical standpoint, it’s not excellent. There is some bright ring outlining on specular highlights and a bit of nervousness in busy backgrounds when shooting at moderate distances. However, for my own taste, there’s just something about the rendering that I really like.
The bokeh has a bit of character and the way the sharpness falls off to blur is just excellent. I found myself enjoying the overall way the lens renders for things like environmental portraits, despite the rougher than average bokeh. There’s enough depth of field to show good focus of the subject, and the blur in the background helps the subject pop.
When shooting close up, bokeh becomes much smoother. This is also the case when using the TCL-X100 to produce a 33mm f/2 lens. The shot below was taken from about a foot and a half away, at f/5.6 to gain a bit more depth of field.
The sensor in the X100V is the same X-Trans IV sensor found the Fujifilm X-T4, and that sensor has been very well received for its excellent image quality. Of course, the same is true here. For an APS-C sensor, performance is excellent. Dynamic range is outstanding, and the camera can render highlights and shadows in contrasty light on par or better than any other APS-C camera I’ve used, and better than some full-frame sensors.
As with most X-Trans sensors, tonal rolloff is beautiful, and the transition of colors is smooth and pleasing. Color has always been one of Fujifilm’s strengths, and a lot of that is down to the excellent film simulations. These can be used for a quick modification of JPEG output, but most RAW converters, including Lightroom and Capture One, have native support for them as well. This allows for an excellent starting point when developing RAW images. The Provia simulation is probably the truest to life and provides pleasing, fairly neutral color that really looks lovely in a wide variety of situations. I very much also like the Classic Chrome and the new Classic Negative simulation for shooting candids of people. These produce more muted colors and give a more nostalgic feel to the images.
The X-Trans IV sensor is a 26 megapixel sensor that can resolve high levels of detail. Lightroom has improved substantially over the years at processing X-Trans images, but I find that Capture One is still a significant step up for X-Trans cameras, and is able to extract the full level of detail from the sensor, without the presence of any artifacts from the unique filter array. Noise control is pretty good for an APS-C camera, but there has been a bit of stagnation in the industry with regards to noise for the past few years. The X100V produces relatively clean images up through ISO 800, with ISO 1600 and 3200 showing some fine-grained noise that I find perfectly acceptable for most situations. I also find ISO 6400 and 12,800 to be quite usable, though with some visible noise. ISO 25,600 is a bit too far for everyday use, but can be used in a pinch for small prints or web use. ISO 51,200 starts to fall apart, and I would not recommend using it.
Overall, the image quality of the X100V is excellent. It’s got a high quality sensor and a good lens, and the camera is more than capable of producing extremely high-end results in a compact package. One thing that is starting to feel like a missing item, though, is image stabilization. The X100V lacks image stabilization in both the lens and sensor, and it’s something I miss when shooting with the X100V instead of my IBIS equipped mirrorless cameras.
9 thoughts on “Review: Fujifilm X100V”
Nice review, and a special thanks for mentioning the compatibility of the WCL-X70 with the X100V, as well as the DIY mod to make it automatically recognized by the camera. I had a WCL-X70 gathering dust on the shelf, and it’s now working well with my X100V. Thanks!
Thanks. Glad it was helpful!
Thanks for the very nice review Jordan.
I wish you had time to review Eos M6 mark ii with 22mm F2 (pancake, very pocketable combination) or with 32 mm 1.4 lens.
I am in between X100V and M6ii .
My travelling businessman side needs a pocketable everyday camera and my more enthusiast side needs more choices in lenses. And I should add the family use of videos to the list of needs.
I have a Sony 7 iii that I really enjoy when I am in pure vacation. However it gets too heavy and bulky when added lenses and I need an additional camera bag when I walk on the streets for discovery. Yes I know it is not comparable to the SLRs but I am getting old.
I think it comes down to what you really want out of the smaller camera. For a single lens solution to just pop in a jacket pocket, it’s hard to do much better than an X100V. I think if you want a smaller interchangeable lens camera, something like the a6400 makes more sense…there are some really nice smaller lenses like the Sigma primes, and you can use your existing FE lenses as well.
The M6 II is a great camera from what I’ve seen. But I don’t know how much sense it makes to get a different system to your Sony. Especially since I don’t see Canon investing too much more in EF-M.
these are the right questions and considerations.
The end results with my Sony A7 iii are more than satisfying, on the other hand, the process of taking pictures is not so much fun. I also consider to go to A7 c (being more compact in size) and use my lenses.
Not being everyday photographer, the Sony menu is a challenge. I learn and then forget again where to find things. At one point, you turn to “Auto” to catch things, which is upsetting.
If I go to Fuji or to Canon, I will sell Sony & FE lenses and buy an adapter for my old K (Pentax) lenses.
I have not known any Fuji user who was complaining from their camera. X100( ) is very popular and for good reasons (as you have explained).
The possible discontinuation of EF-M is not scary for me. It already have the lenses that I would need, plus, if I really need, with the adapter option, the whole Canon lens arsenal offers enough. My major hold is rainy days, the lack of weather seal.
I guess what I am looking for is the hands on user reviews.
Thanks again for the review and taking time to answer me.
I also thank you for helping me to make my decision on A7 iii at the time. It served the purpose well, when I was shooting my daughters Volleyball games. It was a joy when you set the parameters and shoot. The speedy game at the low light of the high school gyms was no problem.
Do you have any opinions on the TCL lens shot wide open? I’ve seen heaps online how it is really soft on the earlier x100 cameras so I would like to know if the new lens on the V will mitigate it’s wide open deficiencies…
Another great review, Jordan. Just wondering if you never found time to review the Ricoh GR iii, or you don’t feel it’s enough of a competitor to X100 type P&S?
I seem to have missed out on how useful it could be for a specific kind of purpose, albeit not as versatile as the X100V.
It seems built for street, candid, and travel work. The GR iii x has a new 40 mm lens with a crop mode. A review will be much appreciated!
Hi Jordan, nice work here. I am fairly new to the 100V, which I like especially for the film simulations. I don’t shoot a whole lot of portraits, I’m more interested in landscapes and showing people outdoors. One aspect of photography that escapes me is sharpness. Let’s say I am photographing a 100-year-old barn from 75 feet. What settings would give me the sharpness image? Gordon Ovenshine, Pittsburgh, Pa. Some people say two stops for wide open, other suggest f/11.
You want to shoot at an aperture that will give you the depth of field needed without going too small. f/11 on an APS-C camera like the X100V is going to start softening the image due to diffraction. I still use f/11 if needed for depth of field, but it won’t yield the sharpest image. On the X100V, the lens is sharpest between f/4 and f/8, so I’d shoot at f/5.6 if there isn’t any foreground detail as well, or stop down to f/8 or even that f/11 if needed to get everything you wish in focus.