Review: Panasonic Lumix G Vario 35-100mm f/2.8 X OIS

Image Quality – Sharpness

Panasonic 35-100mm f/2.8 OIS @ 100mm, f/2.8

As micro 4/3 zoom lenses go, the 35-100mm f/2.8 is among the sharpest, if not THE sharpest, but it does fall slightly short of the very best 70-200mm f/2.8 lenses for DSLRs. I used to own the downright incredible 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II for Canon, and the 35-100 doesn’t quite reach that lofty level of performance, though it is very good. Images are quite sharp over the majority of the frame at f/2.8 throughout the zoom range, and are especially sharp at the wider end. Edges and corners are a little softer here.

100% crop of image to right (click to enlarge)

Stopping down to f/4 brings the center into outstanding territory and the corners into the very good range. It’s not going to match something like the Olympus 75mm f/1.8, but for all but the most discerning pixel peepers, sharpness is on a very high level. I have high quality standards in this department, and I don’t have any reservations about shooting the lens wide open.

Image Quality – Bokeh

Bird over Columbus – Panasonic 35-100mm f/2.8 @ 100mm, f/2.8

The 35-100mm f/2.8 is a mixed bag when it comes to bokeh. For situations where you’re shooting at closer focus distances, say, for portraiture, the bokeh is very pleasing. There are no obvious fringes on specular highlights, and it’s relatively creamy. I find that the combination of wide open sharpness and good bokeh at these distances makes this a very attractive lens for portraits, especially in situations where you need to change focal lengths quickly.

At the other end, at more medium to long focus distances, the bokeh becomes busier. While I’ve seen worse, I’ve also seen much better. When shooting at these distances, it is worth it to watch your background for high frequency patterns, such as branches or high detail items.

Image Quality – Chromatic Aberration, Color and Flare

The Panasonic 35-100mm f/2.8 controls chromatic aberration very well. There is a small amount of lateral CA on Olympus bodies (it’s corrected on Panasonic bodies), but it’s very minor and extremely easy to correct entirely with one click in Lightroom. Even if uncorrected, you’d be hard pressed to spot it if you aren’t looking for it. Longitudinal CA is controlled very well, with no obvious green or magenta fringes appearing in the bokeh. I also noted high resistance to purple fringing.

The lens has good color response, though nothing particularly exceptional. Contrast is very even, allowing for very nice rolloff with portraits and skin tones, but contrasty enough to give a little pop to other types of subjects. Due to the narrow angle of view and the deep lens hood provided with the lens, flare isn’t something you will generally have to worry about. I didn’t test it without the hood, as I will always use a hood on a lens like this.

Next: Conclusion and Image Samples

Comments

18 responses to “Review: Panasonic Lumix G Vario 35-100mm f/2.8 X OIS”

  1. lisandra Avatar
    lisandra

    That last one is truly sharp! 65 f2.8 primes for 1500$? Sign me up!

  2. tgutgu Avatar
    tgutgu

    There are numerous reports in the German Systemkamera Forum that the 2.8/35-100mm lens does not really have 100mm at the long end. Forum members and owners of the lens claim that it is only a 35-85mm lens in reality, which would be more than the usual tolerances.

    Did you find anything similar? Helpful review, by the way.

    Kind regards

    Thomas

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      I don’t do testing of that sort, and I’d have to research and figure out a good way to test that (I suppose it’s simple geometry to find AOV), but it is plausible. The only thing I have to compare it to is the Oly 75/1.8, and indeed, to match FOV on the 35-100, I need to be at about 82mm to get the same AOV as the 75/1.8. 100mm is certainly longer than the 75/1.8. By how much, I couldn’t say.

      Then, I remembered: like many telephoto zooms like this, the real measurement needs to be taken at infinity. (my little quick test was at about 5 feet). Internally focusing lenses tend to shorten focal length at closer distances, and zooms likely further than primes, so it is quite possible that it’s very close to accurate at infinity, but a little shorter at closer focus distances. For instance, the Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 VR is only 135mm at minimum focus distance, and I think I recall the Canon 70-200 shortening to about 150-160mm at that focus distance.

      So, I took a few test shots out my window, and while at 75mm, the 75/1.8 is still SLIGHTLY longer, I’d put the difference at no more than 1mm (it’s extremely close to the same framing). At 80mm on the zoom, it’s a tighter perspective, and 100mm much tighter still. So, I would say the 35-100 may shorten in a similar manner to most modern 70-200 zooms at the closer focus range, but it appears to be pretty close to marked focal lengths at infinity.

    2. Jesper Avatar

      That’s true, and the confusion is because of the majority thinks 43 has a crop factor of 2X. Which is not true, by default many 43 (M43) cameras are set to take stills in 4:3 ratio. For that ratio the crop factor is actually 1.85.

      http://photo.stackexchange.com/questions/24642/what-is-the-crop-factor-for-four-thirds-cameras-considering-aspect-ratios

  3. […] shown off as a ‘concept lens’ with its still yet to be announced 35-100mm brother (reviewed here) in August of last year, serious photographers who used the Micro 4/3 system started to lick their […]

  4. mimstyle Avatar
    mimstyle

    Can beat the same in full frame, this is tthe best lens ever !

  5. […] >>> Panasonic Lumix G Vario 35-100mm f/2.8 X OIS Review: By Admiring Light Share this:FacebookGoogle +1TumblrLinkedInTwitterRedditStumbleUponDiggPrintPinterestEmailLike […]

  6. Cal Williams Avatar

    Thank you, Jordon, for this great review of the 35-100. When this lens was first announced, I wasn’t all that excited by it, and I was seduced by the excellent 75mm as a fairly long alternative. However I now see what the happy owners of the 35-100 can do with it, and am having second thoughts. Although I am very comfortable with my other m43 primes, the 75mm, for all of its excellent sharpness and charactor, is a focal length that doesn’t seem to be clicking for me. I don’t do much portrature, and find 75mm a bit too long – 45mm is just fine. As I am saving for the eventual Pany 150mm prime, which I figure will sell for well north of $2000, I may have to sell the 75mm in order to buy the 35-100, which with its water resistance and wide range, should be more usefull to me. The flip side of having this great selection of lenses for m43 is that, unless one wins a lottery, it is difficult to settle on the most cost-effective kit! Keep up the good work – I enjow your blog very much.

  7. TomS Avatar
    TomS

    I really appreciate the time you put into this write-up. I’ve been shooting and developing film, as a hobby since a child and have just jumped from a Canon G10 I purchased a bit more than four years ago to the OMD, which I plan to use for professional work. I pushed myself to learn every nook and cranny of that G10, pulling its full potential and seriously cannot wait to invest the same time and love into understanding the absolute limits of this camera. Obviously, purchasing the first lens will be a big occasion.

    Knowing my comfort zone, I was sure I was going to invest in the 12mm, though after reading more about this lens, I am likely going to go another direction. Being assured the quality is there, in a range new to me, gets me really excited to go out, shoot and learn.

    I’ve been reluctant to join some of the online conversations, though I felt compelled to say thank you and let you know I will continue to look here for opinions and guidance as it seems you and your audience are (you might say) more level-headed.

    All the best in the new year!

  8. tomK Avatar

    Thanks for this review. Realistic overview with great sample pics. Anxious to try one out.

  9. Marcus Avatar

    I am just waiting for my GH3, this lens and the 12 – 35 as a more portable alternative to my Nikon D3s kit.

    I would not expect this to outdo my Nikkor 70-200 2.8 VRII but then that lens costs over $1000 more than this one!

    It looks like a great lens though and the GH 3 looks like a great camera, so I am looking forward to seeing what I can achieve with them and intend to produce paid jobs with the system which I am confident can be done although not every job.

  10. Tony Avatar
    Tony

    Just got my lens today.

    $1,500. Disappointed, lens says, “Made in China.”

    WTF?

    1. Edward Fox Avatar

      Yes, I was surprised when I rec’d the lens too… usually Japan reserve the best technology in-house but then again all my Olympus gear including prime lens are made in China, and I never had any problems. I guess China is the new Japan & Tailand is the old China.

  11. Jay Gould Avatar

    Hi Jordan, thank for this and the 12-35 f/2.8 review. I am a new convert to the Olympus OMD EM-5 body; selling a lot of heavy Canon 5D3 + lenses gear. I also purchased the Panasonic 12-35, 35-100, and 100-300 f/2.8 lenses.

    My question: please explain the use/interaction between the OIS on the lens and the Olympus 5-axis image stabilization system. I had thought with the Olympus 5-axis image stabilization system you should turn off the OIS. I will leave it on pending hearing from you. Cheers, Jay

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      Sorry I didn’t see this comment until today: With the Panny lenses with OIS switches, you need to choose one or the other. I have found the E-M5’s In body IS to be generally a little better than the 35-100’s OIS, so I generally turn off the lens IS unless I’m using my Panny GX1. If you leave both on, they will compete, and horribly blurry images will result.

  12. Ed Avatar
    Ed

    Jay,
    I too recently picked up the Olympus OM-D EM-5 and was wondering if you’ve taken the35-100mm Panasonic lens thru it’s paces and whether you’ve found any issues to be concerned about. I’m seriously thinking about getting this lens but haven’t found enough reviews using this in combination with the OMD. Any feedback would be appreciated.

    Thanks – Ed

  13. Nobuyuki Sakamoto Avatar

    After reading your recent Nocticron review, I wanted to see what you thought about the 35-100mm lens. I’ve not had good luck with it, and lens flare, with the lens hood in place was awful with the sun out of the frame. The Panasonic repair facility found it to be normal.

    I never thought to turn off the IS for certain shutter speeds to increase clarity, so I will try this. When I sent this lens away, I bought the Olympus 12-40mm f/2.8 lens and noticed how much better the GH3 seemed to be–in color, in sharpness, in most any aspect. I’m glad you’ve had better luck with the 35-100mm lens than I have.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search


Categories


Recent Posts


  1. I think it is near Hillsboro.

  2. This article got me thinking… Why does Canon make RF S lenses starting with 18mm when most full frame RF…

  3. Great review. I shoot Nikon and may try an old Nikon D200 and see how it compares with the new…