Review: Panasonic Lumix LX100

Electronic Viewfinder and Rear Screen

The LX100 features a corner EVF like a lot of recent compacts and small mirrorless cameras, though the one on this camera is a bit nicer than several of its closer competitors.  The LX100’s EVF is a 2.79 million dot (effective) EVF, though it uses a sequential display.  The result is a viewfinder that is extremely clear and detailed, though it can show color artifacts when panning the camera quickly.  The viewfinder isn’t huge, at an effective 0.63x magnification (in full frame terms), but it is similar in size to something like the Olympus OM-D E-M5 or the Fuji X-E2, and notably larger and more detailed than something like the Sony RX100 III and especially larger than Panasonic’s sister interchangeable lens GM5.

In real world use the EVF is quite good, with extremely low lag, low noise in dim light and quick refresh. The only real downside is the fact that it’s a 16:9 viewfinder, so if you’re shooting in 4:3 aspect ratio, the view will be pillar boxed and quite a bit smaller than when shooting at the wider aspect ratios. When utilizing manual focus, by default an enlarging square comes up in the middle of the viewfinder that shows the enlarged area in the center of the frame with the full framing surrounding it.   As a result, manual focus using the EVF is quite nice.

The rear screen on the LX100 is a 920,000 dot screen that is clear and has fairly good color and contrast.  As I mentioned earlier, I do wish the screen tilted and swiveled, and I very much wish it was touch capable.  However as a display it works just fine.  In harsh daylight, the rear screen can be somewhat difficult to see, especially off-axis.

The rear display of the LX100
The rear display of the LX100

While the displays are quite good overall, the biggest problem I encountered was somewhat of a disconnect in apparent brightness in the viewfinder and actual exposure, especially when shooting outside.  The viewfinder seems to show a brighter image than what will be recorded.  As a result, I often backed off exposure thinking that I was overexposing, and when I imported the photos to look at them, I found I had underexposed by nearly a stop.  What made this more frustrating is that this occurred when using the zebra stripe feature to show blown highlights, set to 100%.  (Panasonic offers to show the Zebra striping at 80%, but this is all but useless).

Performance and Autofocus

The LX100 operates fairly quickly for the most part.  The only major delays in operation are a short delay upon turning the camera off and on while the lens retracts, and slow zoom operation.  Otherwise, the camera is quick and responsive.  Files are written quickly, shutter lag is short and EVF refresh is quite nice.  I never found myself waiting on the camera during general use.  As I said, the only real exception to this is the zoom speed, which is no faster than any other compact camera.  I was hoping zoom operation would be more along the lines of modern power zoom lenses such as the Sony 18-105mm f/4 G, but that may have been hoping for too much.  Still, I have to think that zoom operation could be sped up at least a little.

One quirk of the camera happens when reviewing images.  After looking at images for a short while (in the neighborhood of 15 seconds or so), the lens will retract.  This isn’t ideal, but it’s not too bad.  What is bizarre is if you shut the camera off after this happens, the camera will extend the lens back out, then pull it back in to shut it off, adding several seconds where you can’t stash the camera back in your pocket or a bag.

Autofocus on the LX100 is similar to the recent Panasonic Micro 4/3 cameras, and features the excellent Depth By Defocus system as found in cameras like the GH4.  Focus is extremely fast and, for the most part, extremely accurate.  A few times, especially in lower light or when the AF Macro mode is engaged, the camera would think it was in focus when it was extremely out of focus.  This didn’t happen often enough to be a problem, however, and the good news is that it’s blatantly obvious in the viewfinder when this occurs, so you won’t be missing shots unless you’re not paying attention.

Continuous autofocus was quite impressive in the limited amount of time I had to test it out.  The camera can easily track most subjects with ease, and maintain good accuracy and a high hit rate.  The 11fps burst mode and 5fps with live view will come in handy for the occasional action shot, though due to the limited zoom range, this isn’t a camera that is likely to see much use for sports shooting.

Clip-On Flash

 

The LX100's Clip-On Flash
The LX100’s Clip-On Flash

The LX100 lacks a built-in flash, but the camera comes with a small flash that clips into the hotshoe and is powered by the camera.  While the clip-on flash sits higher than most built-in flashes, it still is a small, forward facing flash.  As a result, while red-eye won’t be too much of a problem, the harsh direct-flash look of a typical compact is still present.

The LX100 also had a problem with my Metz 50 AF-1 flashgun that I use with my Micro 4/3 cameras.  While it worked fine in manual mode, it was unable to utilize TTL flash with the LX100, which I found rather disappointing.  Perhaps this flash isn’t compatible with the leaf shutter of the camera.  However, one great thing about the LX100 is that leaf shutter enables high-speed flash sync, of 1/2000s maximum when at wide apertures, and 1/4000s at f/4 and smaller.  This can be a great camera to use with an external flash for use outdoors in full sunlight, even at wider apertures.

Continue: Key Features

Tags:

Comments

18 responses to “Review: Panasonic Lumix LX100”

  1. Chris Avatar
    Chris

    Great review. I’ve been wanting this camera ever since its announcement and your review continues to feed my lust. Can you compare the AF speed, AF tracking, and image quality to the Sony a6000? That is what I have right now and have been considering selling it for the LX100…

  2. Eric Cote Avatar

    Is it a production unit or pre-prod Jordan? On mine (production unit), when I’m reviewing the photos and the lens is retracted, if I turn the camera off, it just shut up. the lens don’t go out and back in.

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      It’s a production camera. Odd. Wonder if it’s a setting to change.

      1. Eric Cote Avatar

        I thought it could be the Zoom Resume setting but it does not make a difference. On a side note, by pure luck, I found out that when you are in the menus, if you use the zoom lever, it jumps one page ahead 🙂

    2. Stewart Mac Avatar

      My LX100 operates like this as well. The camera just shuts down with no lens movement.

  3. Ironymous Avatar
    Ironymous

    Overall, good review. I am in the market for one of these to replace an OMD EM5.

    But I do wish people would give credit where it is due. 1) Panasonic came out with retro designs long before the X series was a glint in Fuji’s eyes. In fact, this LX100 is not a copy of Fuji, it’s a copy of the Panasonic LX5/Leica Digilux 2, an excellent fixed-lens camera which I still own. 2) The Fuji “playbook” was actually a copy of other manual rangefinder cameras that had come before it, so it’s hardly “Fuji’s playbook”.

    I get the feeling that now that the Sony A7-II sports 5-axis stabilisation, in 5 years’ time everyone will say the new X and Y is copying from “Sony’s playbook”. But it’s not the first time Olympus innovations have been stolen and then ret-conned as the other manufacturer’s “innovation”.

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      The LX5 doesn’t have controls anything like this camera. And if course Fuji borrowed from old cameras. It’s great that they did, but aside from Leica, who has been doing it non stop, no one else really used this control scheme in the past 15 years. Now it’s becoming more common, and that’s a good thing. I love that Panasonic went this route for the LX100.

  4. Kevin Avatar
    Kevin

    Nice review Jordan! I am currently trying out this camera for the week, and I’ve had an awful time with auto white balance in the JPEG images. I noticed in your review you recommend shooting RAW, which I do, but when I shoot my Fuji X camera or Sony RX100M2 I’ll only keep the RAW if the JPEG didn’t come out the way I’d hoped.

    Today I shot pictures of my kids playing outside and noticed in all the JPEGs my kids all had blue lips? I was again using AWB, which is flawless on my Fuji, and somewhat problematic on the RX100, but seems completely unreliable on the LX100. Any suggestions?

    Thank you,

    Kevin

    1. Mike Avatar
      Mike

      I had a similar problem shooting indoor photos under tungsten or mixed fluorescent lighting. People’s noses and cheeks had an alcoholic red glow, where the skin was not pasty white, and even male lips were bright magenta.

      After lengthy research, I discovered that Panasonic regards the visible spectrum as extending from 380nm to 780nm. The MFT sensor used in the LX100 and all G series cameras has extended red sensitivity and no IR filter. Like Leica M8 owners, one must use a UV/IR filter (available from B+W in 43mm) to get normal skin tones.

      Or one can use the LX100 or a Lumix G camera to replace the expensive Nikon D810A to record hydrogen-alpha emissions at 696nm. With deep red filter (B+W 091) and the camera set to monochrome, one can also get white leaves in the high infrared. Enjoy!

      1. Leo Avatar
        Leo

        Mike, can you post some pics using that filter?

  5. George Avatar
    George

    Soft corners, evf like a dim small tunnel, ISO 1600 at best indoors, fuzzy pictures. Didn’t like it, returned it. Give me a gm1 or gm5 with a 20mm 1.7 prime that is sharp as nails

  6. […] their predecessors.  My favorite camera out of the two manufacturers was the 4/3 sensor compact Panasonic LX100, which was released a few months […]

  7. Leo Avatar
    Leo

    Hi Jordan, just a question. I am now using the 2nd. battery because I thought the 1st. one was defect. But this one I must charge every week even if I haven’t made any pictures. What is your average time (number of pictures) with 1 charge? I enjoy the lx100 since November but the charging is very unpleasant.

  8. Dan Avatar
    Dan

    Similar to your experience with the Metz 50 AF-1, I noticed the camera doesn’t work well with my smaller Metz 24 AF-1. It looks like it uses the flash at full power at all times.

    Very dissapointing…

    1. Akiva Shapero Avatar
      Akiva Shapero

      Try the Metz- 26AF-1 Digital. It has a version for the LX100.

  9. Bruce Rubenstein Avatar
    Bruce Rubenstein

    When I updated the firmware for my Metz 50 AF-1 to the latest one on the Metz site, the flashed worked fine. The only problem is that the new update program doesn’t work with the new firmware and had to use an older program from a couple of years ago.

  10. https://ultimatecookware.joomla.com Avatar

    It’s actually a cool and helpful piece of information. I’m happy that you
    just shared this helpful info with us. Please keep us informed like this.
    Thank you for sharing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search


Categories


Recent Posts


  1. I think it is near Hillsboro.

  2. This article got me thinking… Why does Canon make RF S lenses starting with 18mm when most full frame RF…

  3. Great review. I shoot Nikon and may try an old Nikon D200 and see how it compares with the new…