Admiring Light
Menu
  • Home
  • Review Index
  • Shop Talk
  • Technique and Vision
  • Opinion
  • Portfolio
  • Site Index
  • About
    • Privacy Policy
Menu

Review: Sigma 135mm f/1.8 DG HSM Art (Sony E Mount)

Posted on November 11, 2018February 12, 2021 by Jordan Steele

Contents

  • 1Construction and Handling
  • 2Autofocus
  • 3Image Quality
  • 4Conclusion
  • 5Image Samples

Sigma has recently jumped into the full-frame E-Mount system by creating new native E-Mount versions of many of their very well received Art series lenses. Today I’m looking at one of those well regarded lenses, the Sigma 135mm f/1.8 DG Art for Sony E-Mount. The Sigma 135mm f/1.8 is a monster of a lens, with big size, big weight, and top-notch optics.

The Sigma 135mm f/1.8 Art on the Sony A7 III

Construction and Handling

The Sigma 135mm f/1.8 is a big lens at over 5 inches long and weighs two and a half pounds. This is one giant hunk of glass, metal and plastic and the weight is felt when carrying it for an extended period of time. The 135mm f/1.8 is constructed of a mix of high quality metals and plastics, with a metal mount. The body has a predominantly plastic exterior, with the portion of the barrel from the focus scale to the mount in metal. A seam halfway up the metal portion denotes the area where presumably the same lens parts are used for all mounts, and the mount-specific part of the barrel begins.

Sigma 135mm f/1.8 Art

This piece that extends to the mount narrows considerably, and this provides clearance for your fingers to fit around the camera grip despite the overall chunky nature of the lens. The overall effect is one of solid quality. There are two switches on the side of the lens: a focus limiter that switches between the full focus range, 0.875m to 1.5m, and 1.5m to infinity, and the AF/MF toggle switch. Both switches click with a nice solid action.

The main control on the lens is the enormous rubberized focus ring, which is very well damped and very smooth to operate. Because Sigma is not really retooling these Art series lenses specifically for the E-mount, they are among the very few E-mount autofocus lenses that have a true mechanically coupled focus mechanism. The focus ring directly focuses the lens elements, and there’s a focus scale on the lens as well.

The lens comes with a substantial lens hood made of high quality plastic that shields the front element from any stray light.  Like most Sigma lens hoods, the hood stays very tight to the body when reversed, which thankfully doesn’t substantially increase the lens’s rather substantial girth when stowed.

The Sigma 135mm f/1.8 with lens hood

Autofocus

You’re going to hear me gush a fair bit about the optics contained in this lens on the next page, here we come to the one downside to the lens: autofocus is average at best.

In good light, autofocus has reasonable speed, and locks fairly surely. In dimmer light, focus slows down a fair bit, and getting the lens to lock focus in single shot mode becomes a bit of a challenge depending on the contrast of the focus target. In both cases, accuracy in single shot AF mode is generally good, though I did have it miss focus on occasion, though the misses didn’t seem to have any pattern to them.  I had a few misses in dimmer light, but also a few misses in good light stopped down.

Running – Sony A7 III with Sigma 135mm f/1.8 @ f/1.8 (Continuous AF with EyeAF)

The good news, however, is that in continuous AF mode, focus is much more sure, and this extends to EyeAF in continuous AF mode, which works very well for portrait shooting. Shooting action with the lens works fairly well, but very quick changes toward or away from the camera can cause the lens to lag slightly.  Considering the huge amount of glass to move, the performance is reasonable, but autofocus is still the weakest part of the lens. With that said, for the type of shooting that one is likely to do with the Sigma 135mm f/1.8, it performs just fine.

Edit: 2/12/21: While it doesn’t directly compare to the Sony E-Mount version of this lens, I thought I would mention autofocus of the Canon EF mount version on RF mount cameras. I have obtained a copy of the 135mm f/1.8 for use on my Canon R5, and autofocus on that body with that version of the lens is significantly faster than what I experienced with the E-mount version. Focus is swift and accurate, even in dim light. Of course the optics are identical between versions, which as you’ll read in the next section, is a very, very good thing.

Continue: Image Quality

Pages: 1 2 3

7 thoughts on “Review: Sigma 135mm f/1.8 DG HSM Art (Sony E Mount)”

  1. Pingback: Sony Tidbits...(Matt Granger giving away a free A7rIII) - sonyalpharumors sonyalpharumors
  2. Pingback: ???135mm F1.8 DG HSM?????????????????????? | ?????????????
  3. Pingback: ????135mm F1.8 DG HSM?
  4. Pingback: ???? ??135mm f/1.8?E?????
  5. Gabriel says:
    March 12, 2019 at 9:02 am

    Been coming to your site for a while and was pretty surprised to see you were a fan of the mech keyboards too!
    Only just joined the mass drop for the next round of Canvas

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      March 12, 2019 at 9:06 am

      It’s a great keyset. I’m excited for the delivery of my Holy Pandas.

      Reply
  6. Joel says:
    February 27, 2023 at 9:42 am

    Great review thank you! Exactly the information I came looking for. Was surprised to see scioto mile! That’s about a mile from where I live.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow Me:

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on InstagramFollow Us on Mastodon

Most Popular Posts

  • "Full Frame Equivalence" and Why It Doesn't Matter (288)
  • Fuji X-Pro 2 vs. Sony A7 II: Noise Comparison (70)
  • Fuji 56mm f/1.2 vs. Panasonic Leica 42.5mm f/1.2 Nocticron (63)
  • Review: Metabones Speed Booster (Canon FD to Fuji X) (56)
  • Review: Olympus OM-D E-M5 (48)

Recent Comments

  • Eric Wojtkun on My Favorite Photos of 2022
  • Jordan Steele on “Full Frame Equivalence” and Why It Doesn’t Matter
  • Leon on “Full Frame Equivalence” and Why It Doesn’t Matter
  • Clarke jones on Review: TTArtisan 50mm f/1.4 ASPH (RF Mount)
  • Anonymous on Sony A7 III vs. A7 II – Noise Comparison

Archives

©2023 Admiring Light | Theme by SuperbThemes
We use cookies to personalize content and ads and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. You may consent to the use of cookies or opt out. Accept Reject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

SAVE & ACCEPT