Admiring Light
Menu
  • Home
  • Review Index
  • Shop Talk
  • Technique and Vision
  • Opinion
  • Portfolio
  • Site Index
  • About
    • Privacy Policy
Menu

Review: Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art (Sony E-Mount)

Posted on December 14, 2019April 16, 2020 by Jordan Steele

Contents

  • 1Construction and Handling
  • 2Autofocus
  • 3Image Quality
  • 4Conclusion
  • 5Image Samples

Conclusion

Pros

  • Very good sharpness from f/1.4 and excellent across the frame stopped down
  • Generally pleasing bokeh in most situations
  • Good color and contrast
  • Low chromatic aberration
  • Low distortion
  • Accurate autofocus that works great with Eye AF
  • Very solidly constructed
  • Affordable

Cons

  • High vignetting wide open
  • Some ghosting and flare when stopped down
  • Bokeh can get a bit busy at further focus distances

I’m going to cut to the chase: I love this lens.  I like the way the lens renders; the sharpness is very good right from f/1.4; the autofocus works very well and best of all, it’s extremely affordable.  The lens retails for $899, but recently has regularly been on sale for as low as $649, with even some deals available to even further reduce that price.  Despite being regularly less than half the price of the Sony 35mm f/1.4, it’s actually the better lens optically, and about on par with it in autofocus.  Sigma’s new 35mm f/1.2 appears to be a bit better and a lot bigger and more expensive, but I think the older f/1.4 Art still makes a strong argument for a place in your bag.  It’s got great optics, very nice autofocus, is built very well and doesn’t break the bank.

Because the Sigma 35mm f/1.4 has been around a while, it often gets overlooked.  When it was released, it was praised as perhaps the best 35mm lens on the market.  While progress has marched on, and a few other optics may now be worthy of that crown, the 35mm f/1.4 is still a very good lens that competes very well with lenses twice its price. It’s quickly become one of my favorite lenses, and I’ve used it a lot over the past several months.  Highly recommended.

Image Samples

Click on an image to enlarge.

Wild Flower – Sony A7 III with Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art @ f/2.5, 1/2500s, ISO 100
Blustery Evening – Sony A7R IV with Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art @ f/11, 8s, ISO 100
Reading – Sony A7R IV with Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art @ f/1.8, 1/125s, ISO 1250
Cedar Falls – Sony A7 III with Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art @ f/16, 8s, ISO 100
VIP – Sony A7 III with Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art @ f/1.4, 1/2500s, ISO 100
Jet Enginer – Sony A7 III with Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art @ f/1.4, 1/40s, ISO 200
Jogger – Sony A7 III with Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art @ f/11, 1/80s, ISO 100
Reading – Sony A7R IV with Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art @ f/1.4, 1/125s, ISO 500
Nyx – Sony A7 III with Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art @ f/1.4, 1/80s, ISO 1000
Daisy in the City – Sony A7 III with Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art @ f/2.5, 1/500s, ISO 100
Jogging – Sony A7 III with Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art @ f/8, 1/250s, ISO 100
Watching TV – Sony A7 III with Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art @ f/1.4, 1/80s, ISO 800
If you enjoyed this review, please take a look at my other reviews in the Review Index.
Pages: 1 2 3

9 thoughts on “Review: Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art (Sony E-Mount)”

  1. Manfred says:
    December 15, 2019 at 7:15 am

    Hi Jordan,
    Enjoying your review as always. Very nice pictures. I agree that this lens is overlooked. Esp. in the closed focus areas and landscape I am using this lens on 7rii . Compared with the Zeiss 1.4/35 mm the Sigma is very competitive in regard to natural colors and 3 d. After the firmware upgrade the autofocus improved a lot.
    Manfred

    Reply
  2. Eugene says:
    December 15, 2019 at 6:27 pm

    Hi Jordan, thank you for this thoughtful review. I wanted to ask your opinion on the weather sealing on this lens? Based on some quick internet research, it seems like there is partial weather sealing, but the lens is not completely weather sealed — but I was wondering if you have any thoughts on the adequacy of weather sealing based on your real world user experience?

    Sigma’s website says the lens is sealed at the mount: “Making the mount native to the lens makes possible a more rigid and stable feel to the lens. Featuring a special surface treatment to enhance strength, the brass bayonet mount offers a high-precision fit and exceptional durability. The mount connection area incorporates rubber sealing for dust- and splash-proof construction.” (https://www.sigma-global.com/en/lenses/cas/service/se_mount)

    Officially, there is no sealing in the barrel, but the Lens Rentals blog said this in 2015 (presumably about the EF version): “Despite the fact that Sigma clearly states this is not weather resistant lens, there’s still some foamed gasket material around the filter barrel.” (https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2015/12/sigma-35mm-f1-4-dg-hsm-art-lens-teardown)

    Reply
  3. David says:
    December 17, 2019 at 9:05 am

    Nice to see a review of this sometimes a bit (for FE) neglected lens. Stellar shots as usual. Regarding the camera strap, are you comfortable holding the camera by its strap, or putting it on a tripod, with a lens like this? Genuine query, I have no superfast 35s (I love the EF 35/2 IS USM and with MC11 fw 1.27 it can even af in relative gloom).

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      December 19, 2019 at 11:31 pm

      I don’t have any issues with this lens on a tripod or holding it by the grip (I use a wrist strap, so I’m holding the camera.) It’s really not that heavy of a lens. Now, I was wary when using something like the Sigma 100-400mm, which doesn’t have a tripod collar, and is fairly big and cantilevered out. Never had an issue, but still made me nervous.

      Reply
  4. Scott says:
    December 18, 2019 at 1:50 pm

    I really enjoy a sharp lens. My Sony 90MM f2.8 rarly leaves my A7R III and makes my 55 1.8 look soft wide open. I wonder if I should spend the extra money and just get the new Sigma 35 f1.2? Any thoughts on the matter Jordan. Excellent review btw 😉

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      December 19, 2019 at 11:32 pm

      If you want the absolute best, the 35/1.2 appears to be about as good as one can get. Also, I’ve heard amazing things about Tamron’s new 35/1.4 as well, though you’d need to adapt that from Canon EF mount. Still, I find the 35mm f/1.4 more than good enough for my needs.

      Reply
      1. Scott says:
        January 10, 2020 at 12:41 pm

        **UPDATE** Hi Jordan: When your right, your right and YOU WERE RIGHT. Ended up returning the 1.2 and keeping the Siggy 35 f/1.4. Turns out the sharpness difference is only negligible wide open and while the 1.2 may be a tad sharper, it’s the 1.4’s rendering that is superior to my eye … looks more artistic to me. The 1/2 stop of light, de-clickable aperture ring and focus hold button , at the end of the day, simply did not justify the nearly $900 price difference in the two lenses. As a bonus, the 1.4 is almost a pound lighter! 😉

        Reply
  5. Scott says:
    January 5, 2020 at 7:21 am

    I ended up going with the 1.2. As an early adopter of the original Siggy 1.4 back in ’13, I’ve always been a fan of this lens however the aperture ring, de-click feature and programmable AF button on this latest version are most desirable to me. That said, the sharpness at f1.2 is intoxicating … wow just wow.

    Reply
  6. Torbjörn says:
    August 23, 2020 at 7:38 am

    Hi Jordan,
    Thanks for an excellent review. I just bought the lens in a cash back campaign and intend to use it with my A7iii. How would you compare the result with XF 23mm f/1.4 R / XT20 combo? I have the XT20 as well but have never got the 1.4/23 due to the rather high price.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow Me:

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on InstagramFollow Us on Mastodon

Most Popular Posts

  • "Full Frame Equivalence" and Why It Doesn't Matter (288)
  • Fuji X-Pro 2 vs. Sony A7 II: Noise Comparison (70)
  • Fuji 56mm f/1.2 vs. Panasonic Leica 42.5mm f/1.2 Nocticron (63)
  • Review: Metabones Speed Booster (Canon FD to Fuji X) (56)
  • Review: Olympus OM-D E-M5 (48)

Recent Comments

  • Eric Wojtkun on My Favorite Photos of 2022
  • Jordan Steele on “Full Frame Equivalence” and Why It Doesn’t Matter
  • Leon on “Full Frame Equivalence” and Why It Doesn’t Matter
  • Clarke jones on Review: TTArtisan 50mm f/1.4 ASPH (RF Mount)
  • Anonymous on Sony A7 III vs. A7 II – Noise Comparison

Archives

©2023 Admiring Light | Theme by SuperbThemes
We use cookies to personalize content and ads and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. You may consent to the use of cookies or opt out. Accept Reject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

SAVE & ACCEPT