Admiring Light
Menu
  • Home
  • Review Index
  • Shop Talk
  • Technique and Vision
  • Opinion
  • Portfolio
  • Site Index
  • About
    • Privacy Policy
Menu

Review: Sony 35mm f/1.8 OSS

Posted on January 29, 2015January 30, 2015 by Jordan Steele

Contents

  • 1Construction and Handling
  • 2Autofocus and Image Stabilization
  • 3Image Quality
  • 4Conclusion
  • 5Image Samples

Sony’s APS-C lens lineup has grown steadily over the past several years with several quality prime lenses. One of those lenses is the Sony 35mm f/1.8 OSS. Almost every camera system in the world has a relatively fast ‘normal’ lens, that is a lens that has a focal length similar to the length of the diagonal of the film or image sensor. While the fast normal prime lens is ubiquitous, only rarely has that normal lens been equipped with optical image stabilization. Of course, stabilization alone without optics to make use of that OSS system doesn’t mean much, so let’s see how this lens performs.

The Sony 35mm f/1.8 OSS on the Sony a6000
The Sony 35mm f/1.8 OSS on the Sony a6000

If you’re not familiar with my reviews, I review from a real world shooting perspective. You won’t find lens charts or resolution numbers here. There are plenty of other sites that cover those. I review products on how they act for me as a photographic tool.

Construction and Handling

The Sony 35mm f/1.8 is a compact, lightweight lens that is rather unremarkable in the looks department. Frankly, in pictures, I thought it was a somewhat ugly and cheap looking lens, so I was pleasantly surprised to see the feel of the barrel and fit and finish are actually quite nice in person. The lens barrel is constructed of lightweight metal and the lens stays constant length while focusing. The broad focus ring is the only external control, and it too is metal and finely ribbed. The front filter threads and bayonet hood mount are plastic. Overall, the package is tightly assembled and feels very nice in the hand. The focus ring is nicely damped and turns smoothly.

The Sony 35mm f/1.8 OSS
The Sony 35mm f/1.8 OSS

Given the small size of the APS-C Sony bodies, a small lens is a great thing to have, and the 35mm f/1.8 handles very well on something like the a6000, and should handle well on any E-mount body. Sony includes a petal-type lens hood made of high quality plastics that snaps securely in place and reverses tight to the lens body to keep the overall package very small when stowed in a camera bag.

Autofocus and Image Stabilization

The 35mm f/1.8 OSS is equipped with a very quiet and quick linear focus motor. The lens focuses quite quickly in almost any situation on the a6000. In dim light, focus definitely slows down, but even in these situations, it’s acceptable in speed and maintains high accuracy, even wide open.

One of the key features of the 35mm f/1.8 is the Optical Steady Shot (OSS) system, which is Sony’s name for optical image stabilization. The OSS system is marketed as allowing for an additional 4 stops of stabilization for hand-holding. As with most stabilization claims, Sony’s assertion of 4 stops is a bit optimistic. Using the 1/(35mm effective focal length) rule (which works for me), this would correspond to a typical shutter speed of around 1/3 second, which is rarely achievable. I do think that 3 stops is a decent estimate of effectiveness, however, as I am able to get consistently sharp shots at speeds between 1/6 and 1/10 second. While this isn’t among the best optical stabilization systems I’ve used, it is quite a good showing and adds great extra value for low light shooting.

Continue: Image Quality

Pages: 1 2 3

33 thoughts on “Review: Sony 35mm f/1.8 OSS”

  1. Pingback: Sony Tidbits… | sonyalpharumors
  2. Pingback: Sony 35mm f/1.8 OSS |
  3. Chris says:
    February 5, 2015 at 2:55 pm

    Hi Jordan,

    interesting review! I personally find 35mm on APSC somewhere in between. It is still not wide enough to capture more than one person, but not tele enough to focus more on portrait. The SEL50 IMHO has nicer bokeh and rendering. However, you also have the Fuji 35/1.4 and showed nice portraits with that. Guess I am more of an candidate for the SEL24, but that is without OSS and even used expensive. Hmm….
    What is your preferred focal length?

    Best regards,
    Chris

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      February 11, 2015 at 8:58 am

      I’ve always really liked the normal focal length – it’s a good general purpose length, though it of course has its limitations. I was, for a long time, one who preferred the 50/100mm (FF equiv) field of view for two main primes, but I’ve grown to quite like the 35/85 doublet. As such, I often carry the 23/1.4 and 56/1.2 on my Fuji cameras, though I like to shoot with the 35mm on APS-C as well, enjoying both the 35/1.8 on my a6000 and the Fuji 35/1.4 on my Fuji bodies. On m4/3, I loved the Panasonic 25/1.4, so still in that ~50mm equivalent range.

      As time has gone on, especially as I test a lot of different lenses for this site, I’ve become a lot more adept at adjusting how I approach a subject based on what lens I have, as well as the converse: adjusting my framing and positioning and then choosing the lens (my preferred method when shooting for myself).

      Reply
  4. Louis says:
    February 9, 2015 at 6:38 am

    I have been reading that this lens, and other lenses from Sony, have shown an inordinate amount of centering problems. Have you experienced such with this lens or other Sony lenses?

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      February 11, 2015 at 8:48 am

      My copy of the 35/1.8 does not show any obvious centering defects. I’ve had lenses that have had decentered elements (from several different manufacturers), so I know the effects.

      Reply
  5. perdre du poids says:
    March 28, 2015 at 8:00 pm

    Hi theere Dear, are you in fact vvisiting this web
    site regularly, if so then yyou will without doubt obtain pleasant knowledge.

    Reply
  6. Harvey says:
    November 5, 2015 at 12:10 pm

    Thanks for another great review! I am considering buying this lens but am concerned about the longitudinal chromatic aberration. I like to expose to the right, often blowing out the background, so how problematic is the longitudinal CA likely to be for me at wider apertures? Thanks again.

    Reply
  7. strip club says:
    October 1, 2016 at 7:05 pm

    I all the time emailed this website pozt paage t? all
    my contacts, ?s if like to read it next my links
    will to?.

    Reply
  8. Klaus says:
    October 4, 2016 at 5:10 am

    They also provide guidelines and tricks for any person who is thinking of moving.
    Article Source: Best Deal Movers , no matter how
    big or small your project is, you can always count on us for a 100% stress-free move.
    These few guidelines will ensure that you get the best international moving services and make your relocation a breeze.

    Reply
  9. bon de reduction internet says:
    October 7, 2016 at 7:44 am

    Hi, I think your website might be having browser compatibility issues.

    When I look at your blog site in Chrome, it looks
    fine but when opening in Internet Explorer, it
    has some overlapping. I just wanted to give you a quick heads up!
    Other then that, awesome blog!

    Reply
  10. Social Manager says:
    October 16, 2016 at 8:37 pm

    ?h my goodness! Impr?ssive article ?ude! Thanks,
    However I am going th?ough d?fficulties with yolur RSS.
    I don’t know why I can’t oin it. Is there anybody having
    similar RSS problems? Anynody who knows th? solution can you kindly respond?

    Thanx!!

    Reply
  11. Deirdre says:
    November 25, 2016 at 6:02 am

    I only recently bought my first SLR camera, the Sony a5000 this year (which comes with a 16-50mm/3.5-5.6) and want to buy my second lens for it. I am considering this lens, as I have read elsewhere it’s a great ‘second lens’ choice, but it is pricey.

    I have also read you review for the Sigma 19mm f/2.8, and it’s lower price make it more attractive, naturally. But I cannot find an example of these lenses compared side-by-side.
    All I know for definite is that I want a larger aperture, which both of these offer.

    Does the extra spec and aperture size of this lens warrant the heftier price-tag, in your opinion? I am a total amateur and I want to expand the range of photographs I can take, and I don’t know which lens offers me the most interesting options to further develop my photography.

    Apologies for long message, if anyone has advice it would be much appreciated!

    Reply
  12. comparatif nettoyeur vapeur says:
    January 11, 2017 at 10:03 am

    Hello, the whole thing is going sound here and ofcourse every one is sharing information, that’s actually fine, keep up writing.

    Reply
  13. codepromo-cadeau.com says:
    January 16, 2017 at 7:34 pm

    Great blog right here! Additionally your website loads up fast!
    What web host are you using? Can I get your associate hyperlink in your host?
    I wish my website loaded up as quickly as yours lol

    Reply
  14. avis rue des parfums says:
    January 21, 2017 at 4:40 pm

    Nice post. I learn something new and challenging on blogs I
    stumbleupon everyday. It’s always helpful to read articles from other
    authors and use something from their sites.

    Reply
  15. classichackcsr.wordpress.com says:
    January 21, 2017 at 7:32 pm

    Thanks for sharing your info. I truly appreciate your efforts and I
    am waiting for your further post thanks once again.

    Reply
  16. giaxelandcruiser2018.blogspot.com says:
    March 4, 2017 at 2:46 am

    Simply wish to say your article is as amazing. The clearness
    in your post is simply excellent and i can assume you are an expert on this subject.
    Well with your permission let me to grab your RSS feed to keep up
    to date with forthcoming post. Thanks a million and please keep up the
    enjoyable work.

    Reply
  17. strip club barcelona says:
    March 28, 2017 at 2:55 am

    I thionk thhe admin off this web page is genuinely working hard in favor of his website,
    ffor thee reason that here eevery stuff is quality based material.

    Reply
  18. white water movie kevin bacon says:
    April 1, 2017 at 7:10 am

    Guides who skilled Colorado River rafting in the mid- 1980’s know large water.

    Reply
  19. social traffic says:
    April 16, 2017 at 4:26 pm

    Hello, i believe that i noticed you visited my website thus i
    got here to go back the choose?.I am attempting to
    find issues to enhance my website!I suppose its adequate to make use of a few of your ideas!!

    Reply
  20. facebook search tool says:
    April 25, 2017 at 6:47 pm

    Hi mates, nice post and nice arguments commented at this
    place, Iamm really enjoying by these.

    Reply
  21. Colorado College says:
    May 1, 2017 at 12:24 pm

    Hey nice post! I hope it’s ok that I shared this on my Facebook,
    if not, no problem just let me know and I’ll delete it.

    Regardless keep up the great work.

    Reply
  22. Sony Credit Card says:
    May 21, 2017 at 12:39 pm

    Hey nice post. I hope it’s ok that I shared this on my Twitter, if not, no worries just tell me
    and I’ll remove it. Regardless keep up the great work.

    Reply
  23. defi skincare products says:
    July 3, 2017 at 3:19 pm

    I really value your work, Great post.

    Reply
  24. Andres says:
    July 12, 2017 at 1:31 pm

    Valuable information. Lucky me I discovered your site accidentally, and I am surprised why this accident
    did not happened in advance! I bookmarked it.

    Reply
  25. cheap cat boots says:
    July 26, 2017 at 2:11 pm

    Excellent post. Keep writing such kind of info on your page.
    Im really impressed by it.
    Hi there, You have performed an excellent job. I’ll definitely digg it and for my part suggest
    to my friends. I’m sure they will be benefited from this web
    site.

    Reply
  26. Pingback: The First Sony E-Mount Lenses You Should Buy
  27. application packaging jobs india says:
    November 15, 2017 at 3:02 am

    On the property front, technologically advanced purifiers enable you to ensure protection against anything left
    in on the treatment facility level. Downloading apps
    implies that you’ll save on all of the games packaging and
    harmful chemicals mixed up in output of every one of the CDs and
    manuals. While solar power systems are generally expensive
    for install, the savings they generate more than repay your initial investment.

    Reply
  28. Minoan lines says:
    December 2, 2017 at 8:44 am

    Wiith havin so much content and articles do you evr run into any issues of plagorism or copyright infringement?
    My website has a lot of exclusive content I’ve either authored myseelf or outsourced but it seems a lot of it is popping itt up all over the web without myy permission. Do yoou know any wawys
    to help prevent content from being ripped off? I’d certainly appreciate it.

    Reply
  29. Anonymous says:
    December 25, 2017 at 4:17 pm

    Greed and fear drive prices to far up or down then, prices return to more realistic value.
    So this way you can be actually defining how much maximum loss which you’ll want to bear.
    The biggest winner inside resume risk aversion may be the Japanese Yen.

    Reply
  30. times now epaper says:
    April 5, 2018 at 7:45 pm

    Thanks in favor of sharing such a good thinking, article is nice,
    thats why i have read it entirely

    Reply
  31. Cost Of A New Bathroom says:
    May 16, 2018 at 2:47 pm

    Oh man. I am just definitely going to work with this.

    Cost Of A New Bathroom

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow Me:

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on InstagramFollow Us on Mastodon

Most Popular Posts

  • "Full Frame Equivalence" and Why It Doesn't Matter (288)
  • Fuji X-Pro 2 vs. Sony A7 II: Noise Comparison (70)
  • Fuji 56mm f/1.2 vs. Panasonic Leica 42.5mm f/1.2 Nocticron (63)
  • Review: Metabones Speed Booster (Canon FD to Fuji X) (56)
  • Review: Olympus OM-D E-M5 (48)

Recent Comments

  • Peter on A Tripod in the Sky – DJI Air 2S Review
  • Eric Wojtkun on My Favorite Photos of 2022
  • Jordan Steele on “Full Frame Equivalence” and Why It Doesn’t Matter
  • Leon on “Full Frame Equivalence” and Why It Doesn’t Matter
  • Clarke jones on Review: TTArtisan 50mm f/1.4 ASPH (RF Mount)

Archives

©2023 Admiring Light | Theme by SuperbThemes
We use cookies to personalize content and ads and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. You may consent to the use of cookies or opt out. Accept Reject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

SAVE & ACCEPT