Review: Sony A7

Wi-Fi

a7_wifiLike most every camera of any consequence released in 2013, the A7 features built-in WiFi capabilities.  It’s a feature I never would have really thought I needed last year, but over the course of this year has become something that I would require in any new camera purchase.  I just can’t see myself owning any new camera without it.

Sony packed in the usual functionality: image transfer, remote control and geotagging capabilities are all present.  The feature I tend to use most on WiFi enabled cameras is image transfer, and Sony makes it a relatively smooth process.  During image review, just press the center button and a menu pops up to send it to a mobile device.  You can then connect to the camera’s WiFi network and transfer the image using Sony’s app.  While the app is a little sparse, it works fine.

Sony doesn’t have adjustable RAW conversion on the camera (at least that I was able to locate), but it does automatically create a JPEG of your RAW file when transferring to a smartphone.  This is nice and removes a step that many other makers require you to perform before shooting an image to your phone.

The remote control works just fine, though there weren’t a whole lot of adjustments that could be made.  By that, I mean essentially no adjustments can be made.  Moving the focus point was challenging as well, which seemed unnecessarily difficult.   Now, I should mention, that there is an update to the built-in remote app that adds many of these features, but it requires connection to the Sony camera app store and a manual update.

Speaking of that, the ability for Sony to add future functionality via camera apps is a great thing, and relatively unique in the industry.  In the time I had the camera, there were few options for apps, but this should grow over time.

Focus Peaking

Like the NEX series beforehand, the A7 features focus peaking to aid in manually focusing.   This overlays a color of your choice on the highest contrast areas of an image, therefore showing you what parts of the image are in focus.  The A7’s focus peaking is very visible, but unfortunately, I found it to be rather imprecise.  To aid in visibility, it seems Sony sets the threshold for the peaking outline to be a little too lax.  As a result, when focusing with very fast lenses, the focus point isn’t precisely outlined.  Many times I thought I was dead on in focus only to review the images later and find the focus point slightly ahead of or behind where I wanted it.  While the peaking on the Fuji X series isn’t nearly as easy to see as that on the NEX, I’ve found it much more precise in practice.  When using lenses such as my Rokinon 85mm f/1.4 or Canon FL 55mm f/1.2, I eventually just turned off peaking and used the native display of the EVF.

Exposure Warning Zebra

The A7's Zebra Highlight Warning
The A7’s Zebra Highlight Warning

The A7 has a lot of features, and I won’t cover all of them here, but one that I hadn’t seen before that I found extremely useful was the ‘Zebra’ setting, which overlays a diagonal striped pattern in areas that are overexposed.  Many other cameras have exposure warning highlights.  For instance, Olympus has red and blue highlights for over and under-exposure, but this is the first time I’ve seen it as a zebra stripe, and it works extremely well.  The overexposed areas simply jump out at you when composing, and you can easily dial back exposure to make sure you don’t lose detail in critical areas.

What’s also nice is you can select at what level the striping occurs.  I set it for 100%+, since I just wanted to know when the sensor was clipping, but you can set it as low as 70%.  It’s worth noting that these settings are for the current JPEG output, and mildly blown highlights are easily recovered in the RAW file.  Once I used it, I never turned it off.

Continue: Image Quality

Comments

15 responses to “Review: Sony A7”

  1. Ron Avatar
    Ron

    Great review, thank you. The Winter Street photo gave me the feeling I was walking there myself.

    1. Glenn Avatar
      Glenn

      That’s an interesting comment, ” the feeling I was walking there myself”. I’ve noticed that some shots, usually made on a full frame camera, with a lens around 35 – 50mm, have a look that you feel you could just walk right in to the scene. They have a certain sense of depth that’s hard to convey in two dimension (a photo). Anyone else see that? Why do they look that way?

      1. padam Avatar
        padam

        Put it like this way: it is a bit like listening a well-recorded music in audio system, which being set-up really well. When you listen to something like this, it is a bit like “being there”.

        The larger sensor, the better.
        So this effect you are talking about is even more apparent with images taken by a medium or especially large format cameras, they really give an even stronger 3D effect from a still image.

        By the way, thanks for the review Jordan, very well-written.
        Adam

  2. Crix Avatar
    Crix

    Thanks for your review! One suggestion: It would be great if you could also add the used aperture to your sample pictures ????
    A question since I. Can’t browse the other reports on mobile: do you see the WB as similar to the Nex cameras?

  3. HF Avatar
    HF

    Very nice article.
    I would welcome a comparison or opinion of how the Sony A7 compares to the Olympus OMD EM1 and Fuji X-E2.
    Even though FF in a comparably small body looks promising, I don’t see the advantage anymore when using
    fast zooms (24-80/2.8, stabilised, or 70-200/2.8, with low focusing distances), since these will be large and heavy. Is there any point buying
    this camera if you only stick to primes (35mm, 50mm, 85mm) with apertures larger then 2, if you don’t print large
    and don’t have rangefinder lenses?
    Your opinion would be welcome.

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      I’m actually working on an opinion piece that covers many of these things. Look for it in the next week.

  4. […] not Adobe) -> LeicaBoss. A7r review at SonyAlphaLab. Full review of the A7 has been posted at Admiring Light. Full review of the Zeiss 35mm FE lens at Admiring Light. A7r unboxing series on Flickr. Nice A7r […]

  5. Plex Avatar
    Plex

    Hello Jordan, great review !!!… I’m trying to decide between Oly e-m1 or Sony A7(R) …
    I had a X–E1 in the past but didn’t like the AF and slow response… I hope this is better with the A7(r)?
    Would go to the e-m1 but I’m really loving very small dof… really like the sunset photo here!!!

    Really surprised the jpeg quality of the A7 is that bad…is this better via Raw and lightroom conversion?

    Thanks in advance!!
    Plex

  6. Franck Avatar

    hello !
    I’m thinking to change my NEX 7 by this A7, but maybe !?? it’s much better to wait for the Sony news il the early of january.
    Thank you for this test

  7. chris giammona Avatar
    chris giammona

    Jordan

    What adaptors were you using for the Rokinon and Vivitar lenses (canon mount)?

    Thanks

    Chris

  8. Chuck Avatar
    Chuck

    Jordan – The A7 does not have IBIS, which, to me, is a “Con”. And that shutter noise – forget it. Prediction – I bet we will see the class-leading Oly 5-axis IBIS licensed to Sony and incorporated in the next version of the A7. But, for me, the bottom line is that I’m sticking with my Oly E-M1, Pany GX7, and Fuji X-E1. Nice review. Thanks.

  9. […] enthusiasts and pros had been eagerly awaiting for years: A full-frame mirrorless camera.  The Sony A7 and A7R provide bodies with incredible image quality in a small package.  While the starting […]

  10. Blogophile Avatar

    It’s not really a sucessor, they’re continuing to sell the A7 and A7r along with the A7s, each has different features that will appeal to different users, for example the A7s has great low light potential but only half the Megapixels of the A7.

  11. […] AF/MF/AEL button.  This button location was one of the few ergonomic problems I mentioned in my review of the original A7.  However, the simple act of angling the back plate has made this button location significantly […]

  12. Moe Avatar
    Moe

    Hello. I hope you can help me. I have an A7 and I also am seeing squiggly lines in the noise. They really look like little hairs and lint etc. When I take two identical sequential pictures, the squiggly lines and specks do not remain in the same place. They are definitely unique to each exposure.

    This does not happen at ISO 100, but is very visible at 1600.

    I had a Nikon d5100 that did not have this problem. The noise was uniform, and got courser as ISO increased, but was composed of uniform graininess, not little squiggly hair looking lines.

    This noise shows up in my raw files IDENTICALY. I shoot raw+jpg and the exact same noise will be in each exposre.

    At first I thought this could not be sensor dust because it is different with each exposure, but then it occurred to me that if the shutter is opening and closing with each exposure, it could be moving little hairs and specks around on the shutter.

    Any info you have on this phenomenon would be great, because I have not heard of this weird looking noise on any other camera.

    Also, do you know if the a72 has same problem? And also what about a6000?

    Thanks for any help.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search


Categories


Recent Posts


  1. I think it is near Hillsboro.

  2. This article got me thinking… Why does Canon make RF S lenses starting with 18mm when most full frame RF…

  3. Great review. I shoot Nikon and may try an old Nikon D200 and see how it compares with the new…