Admiring Light
Menu
  • Home
  • Review Index
  • Shop Talk
  • Technique and Vision
  • Opinion
  • Portfolio
  • Site Index
  • About
    • Privacy Policy
Menu

Review: Voigtländer 40mm f/1.2 Nokton

Posted on July 24, 2018January 17, 2021 by Jordan Steele

Contents

  • 1Construction and Handling
  • 2Image Quality
  • 3Conclusion
  • 4Image Samples

Conclusion

Pros

  • Solid all metal construction with excellent haptics
  • Quite compact given the quality of the optics and the fast maximum aperture
  • Sharp over most of the frame from f/1.2 and very sharp stopped down
  • Beautiful bokeh
  • Excellent color and contrast
  • Good flare resistance
  • Aperture ring can be declicked

Cons

  • High vignetting
  • A bit of chromatic aberration
  • Some barrel distortion
  • Spherical aberration causes softness at wide apertures when focused close
The 40mm f/1.2 Nokton is an impressive lens

I simply have to say: I love this lens.  From the moment I looked at the first batch of photos from this lens, I was hooked.  There’s something about the rendering that just speaks to me, and I found it to be nearly the perfect focal length for everyday use.  The lens is sharp right from f/1.2, and is extremely sharp stopped down. Bokeh is generally very good, and color and contrast are excellent. Portraits taken with the 40mm f/1.2 just pop, and it makes for a great landscape lens as well.

The $1,099 price might seem a bit steep for an all-manual lens, but the versatility and optical quality make it very much worth that price of entry.  This is an outstanding effort from Voigtländer.  Where’s my wallet?

Image Samples

Click on an image to enlarge.

Columbus Reflected – Sony A7 III With Voigtländer 40mm f/1.2 Nokton @ f/11
Duck on the Pond – Sony A7 III With Voigtländer 40mm f/1.2 Nokton @ f/1.2
Blooming City – Sony A7 III With Voigtländer 40mm f/1.2 Nokton @ f/4
Bench at Night – Sony A7 III With Voigtländer 40mm f/1.2 Nokton @ f/1.2
Coneflowers in the City – Sony A7 III With Voigtländer 40mm f/1.2 Nokton @ f/2.8
Sunset below the Sycamore – Sony A7 III With Voigtländer 40mm f/1.2 Nokton @ f/16
Summer afternoon – Sony A7 III With Voigtländer 40mm f/1.2 Nokton @ f/22
Frustrated – Sony A7 III With Voigtländer 40mm f/1.2 Nokton @ f/1.2
Telescope – Sony A7 III With Voigtländer 40mm f/1.2 Nokton @ f/1.2
Columbus Reflected – Sony A7 III with Voigtländer 40mm f/1.2 Nokton @ f/13 (3 image stitch)
Ducks – Sony A7 III With Voigtländer 40mm f/1.2 Nokton @ f/1.2
Through the Leaves – Sony A7 III with Voigtländer 40mm f/1.2 Nokton @ f/11
Summer Puddle – Sony A7 III With Voigtländer 40mm f/1.2 Nokton @ f/22
Portrait – Sony A7 III With Voigtländer 40mm f/1.2 Nokton @ f/1.2
City Sunrise – Sony A7 III with Voigtländer 40mm f/1.2 Nokton @ f/11
Pages: 1 2 3

15 thoughts on “Review: Voigtländer 40mm f/1.2 Nokton”

  1. Pingback: Voigtländer 40mm f/1.2 FE review at Admiringlight: "I love this lens" - sonyalpharumors sonyalpharumors
  2. Pingback: ??? NOKTON 40mm F1.2 E-Mount????????????????????????? | ?????????????
  3. Pingback: ???? ???40mm f/1.2 FE
  4. Pingback: ???? ???40mm f/1.2 FE
  5. Edwin Verhulst says:
    October 7, 2018 at 5:22 am

    Thanks for this review. Your description match my own findings. I love this lens. Since I bought it last april it is my preferred lens on the A7R3.

    Reply
  6. Sylvain G. says:
    October 12, 2018 at 6:06 am

    Hello,

    Very nice review as always. The lens seems indeed very convincing !
    Do you still own it ?
    Hopefully you can get your hands on a Batis 40mm to review 🙂

    I’d be interested to see your take on it “AF vs larger aperture” and the different rendering approaches.

    Thanks for your nice articles.

    Reply
  7. Trevor McGrath says:
    June 17, 2019 at 6:16 am

    Interest review! I currently own the 12mm and love it on the A7III. Could advise on the 40mm for use on Astrophotography. The f1.4 aperture and size is a great fit but would the quality be a bit soft when using wide open?

    Reply
  8. ADIB LORINI NAJAR says:
    August 6, 2019 at 5:18 pm

    Fiquei muito interessado nessa lente.

    Ela é compatível com Sony A6.000?

    Necessita de adaptador?

    Obrigado!

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      August 7, 2019 at 3:41 pm

      Sim, esta lente é compatível com o Sony a6000. Não requer um adaptador … tem um E-mount.

      Desculpe se o Português é pobre … eu tive que usar o Google Translate.

      Reply
  9. ADIB LORINI NAJAR says:
    August 9, 2019 at 11:30 am

    Está perfeito, eu uso direto o Google Translate, Jordan!
    Confio muito nos seus comentários e me apaixonei por esse pedaço de vidro! As fotos são maravilhosas!
    Tenho a lente do kit e uma 55-210 mm. Considero duas lentes escuras e fico um pouco decepcionado, principalmente com a nitidez dessas lentes. Sou um fotógrafo amador e aprendiz, comecei há um ano atrás.
    Não encontrei no Brasil nenhum importador desse produto. Nem no Paraguai, país vizinho que as vezes visito, em função da isenção de impostos. Se encomendá-la via importação pagarei praticamente o dobro, em função dos impostos. Pagaria o valor referente a praticamente um mês de salário. Acho um pouco alto para um fotógrafo amador – no Brasil o dólar está cotado em R$ 4,00, ou seja, pagaria mais de R$ 8.000,00.
    Que outra lente você me sugere com ampla abertura, versátil para fotos de paisagens, retratos, com boa ótica e que não exceda os U$ 1.000,00??
    Continue postando seus artigos maravilhosos.
    Abraços!

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      August 29, 2019 at 7:45 am

      Como você está usando uma a6000, recomendo o excelente trio de lentes f / 1.4 da Sigma (16 mm f / 1.4, 30 mm f / 1.4 e 56 mm f / 1.4). Todos são excelentes opticamente e bastante acessíveis.

      Reply
      1. ADIB LORINI NAJAR says:
        November 19, 2019 at 12:56 pm

        Um amigo viajou aos EUA e acabou comprando para mim. Recebi ontem e já fiz umas fotos. Estou amando … Obrigado pela resenha.

        Reply
  10. Anonymous says:
    September 24, 2019 at 6:35 am

    I have the BATISE 40MMF2 ;
    Wanted the auto focus function and have had stellar results with the other Bastise lenses I have the 18mm , 25mm and the 85mm , I use these in landscape with Nisi Filters.
    The Nokton 40mm 1.2 was my first choice but wanted to use the auto focus in street situations. I have shot with many adapted Voigtlander lenses from the 12mm , 40mm F4 , 50mm ( 1.1 ), 75mm F1.8 and I have had great results with all.
    Why Voigtlander Cosina ? The filmic look to break from the harshness of the electronic images… megapixel wars… I also shoot a fine 90mm 2.8 A. Schact Ulm , these I have two of. They have the rounded Aperture with 16 aperture blades for superb bokeh and scintillating high lights. Shoot the Canon 0.95 too.
    For the build quality there is no other way to go back to the BEST of the metal German quality , or even early Canon L39 quality but for the Voigtlander glass. Cosina is a superb manufacturing house of impeccable standards.
    I will get the 40mm 1.2 as my next lens however I am torn between the NEX version or the M mount bayonet , as I use the adapters without hesitation on the lenses.
    One last thought … if any of you are using more than Sony bodies, the M mount is the Cat’s Meow.
    Again : Cosina is a great house. Voigtlander is a great legacy lens.
    Bang for the buck …. Leica if you must. But if eating and travelling , Voigtlander is the preferred tool.

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      September 24, 2019 at 8:44 am

      There are two big reasons why using the E-mount version on Sony bodies is preferable to the M-mount version adapted.

      1) The sensor cover glass is a much different thickness than that used by Leica. As such, a lot of Voigtlander lenses show worse performance towards the edges when using the M mount adapted version. The E-mount versions are slightly modified optically to account for the difference in cover glass thickness and sensor design. This doesn’t make nearly the difference on something like the 40mm as it does on the ultra-wide angles (where the difference is significant), but it’s still worth noting.

      2) When using the adapted lens, you lose electronic contact information. This has three impacts. First, you have no EXIF data, so looking up aperture after the fact (or even which lens you used) is impossible. Second, you lose the ability for the camera to tell when you are focusing. With the shallow depth of field of the 40mm f/1.2, having the camera auto-magnify the focus area when focusing is very helpful for quick and accurate focusing on your subject. Third, because the camera can’t know how close you are focusing, you lose some of the axes of stabilization with the in-body IS, reverting to a 3-axis stabilization rather than the full 5-axis stabilization that is available with the E-mount version, since distance information is passed to the body through the lens contacts.

      However, if you shoot both systems it may make more sense to shoot the M mount version. Do be careful on the wide angle lenses, though….the 12mm and 15mm are notably worse when using the M mount on Sony than they are on Leica, or when using the native E-Mount version.

      Reply
  11. stephen says:
    December 21, 2019 at 8:06 pm

    I use a leica m 262 and my favourite lens is my wonderful 35mm f2.4 summarit but this voigtlander lens appeals to me for trying some wide open portraits.
    Great review backed up by some varied and superb quality images.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow Me:

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on Instagram

Most Popular Posts

  • "Full Frame Equivalence" and Why It Doesn't Matter (286)
  • Fuji X-Pro 2 vs. Sony A7 II: Noise Comparison (70)
  • Fuji 56mm f/1.2 vs. Panasonic Leica 42.5mm f/1.2 Nocticron (63)
  • Review: Metabones Speed Booster (Canon FD to Fuji X) (56)
  • Review: Olympus OM-D E-M5 (48)

Recent Comments

  • Mr Mark Dell on Review: Fujifilm XF10
  • Bob Dumon on Zeiss Touit 12mm f/2.8 vs Fujinon 14mm f/2.8 R
  • Bob Dumon on Review: Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR
  • Jordan Steele on Review: Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR
  • Bob Dumon on Review: Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR

Archives

©2022 Admiring Light | Theme by SuperbThemes
We use cookies to personalize content and ads and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. You may consent to the use of cookies or opt out. Accept Reject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

SAVE & ACCEPT