Review: Zeiss FE 35mm f/1.4 ZA Distagon T*

Review: Zeiss FE 35mm f/1.4 ZA Distagon T*

Image Quality

With the lens eschewing size concerns for performance, the 35mm Distagon needs to perform, and perform it does.

Dispatch - Sony A7 II with Zeiss FE 35mm f/1.4 Distagon @ f/1.4 (click to enlarge)
Dispatch – Sony A7 II with Zeiss FE 35mm f/1.4 Distagon @ f/1.4 (click to enlarge)

Sharpness

Zeiss is well-known for creating sharp lenses, and the 35mm f/1.4 is another great example to add to that reputation.  The lens starts out strong right from f/1.4 with very good, even resolving power across the image frame.  While it’s not razor-sharp at f/1.4, there is more than enough detail resolved for most any purpose, especially at closer focus distances.  Near infinity at f/1.4, the lens still produces good image sharpness, though the edges of the frame soften slightly here due to a bit of field curvature.

Stopping down to even f/2.0 brings a bump in cross frame resolution, with the lens pulling truly excellent levels of detail out of a scene.  Stopped down even further, it’s simply tack sharp all the way into the corners.  The lens is still slightly better at closer focus distances than it is at infinity, but only the pickiest of pixel peepers will notice or care, as the lens is very capable of producing highly detailed landscape images at small apertures, across the entire frame.  While it falls just short of the amazing sharpness of the Zeiss FE 55mm f/1.8, it is indeed one of the sharpest 35mm lenses (or equivalents for smaller formats) that I’ve ever had the pleasure to use.

Click on the image to the right to view a large size image taken at f/1.4. Click on the green arrow at the bottom to fully enlarge.

Color and Contrast

The other thing for which Zeiss has built a strong reputation is rich image contrast and vibrant color, and the 35mm f/1.4 is again cut from the same cloth as other great Zeiss lenses in this department.  The 35mm f/1.4 Distagon produces rich contrasty images at all aperture settings. Combined with high sharpness and quick falloff to blur outside of the focus plan, the 35mm f/1.4 truly produces images that almost seem to pop out of the screen or print, without being overly harsh.  This look gives images a special quality that is hard to achieve with many other lenses.

Bokeh

One of the primary uses of a fast wide-angle lens is separating a subject from a background while including some context.  As such, the bokeh is of great importance in a lens such as this.  Often, when lenses are highly corrected for image sharpness, the bokeh tends to suffer and take on a bit of a nervous quality.  Somehow, Zeiss has managed to not fall into this pattern.

Purple Azalea - Sony A7 II with Zeiss FE 35mm f/1.4 Distagon @ f/1.4
Purple Azalea – Sony A7 II with Zeiss FE 35mm f/1.4 Distagon @ f/1.4

The 35mm f/1.4 produces images with largely excellent bokeh.  Backgrounds melt pleasingly away from the plane of focus.  Specular highlights are evenly illuminated with only the slightest hint of a bright outline.  The nine aperture blades are rounded, keeping out of focus highlights looking circular until the lens is stopped down to f/5.6 or beyond.  The only negative to the bokeh is the presence of some light onion-ring centers due to the aspherical elements used in the lens.  In all, I was very impressed with the rendering of the bokeh.  Combined with the high contrast and sharp images, the bokeh helps create a look that is simply beautiful.

Chromatic Aberration, Flare, Distortion and Vignetting

So far, I really haven’t said a single thing that’s negative about the optical properties of the lens, but it is not a flawless lens. While color, contrast, sharpness and bokeh are all outstanding, the 35mm f/1.4 does exhibit a few minor issues with lens aberrations.

The 35mm f/1.4, like many fast prime lenses, can exhibit longitudinal chromatic aberration at wide apertures, showing up as a magenta fringe in out of focus areas in front of the focus point and a green fringe behind the focus point.  In certain circumstances, purple fringing can occur on high contrast borders as well.  However, all things considered, these are quite well controlled for a fast wide-angle lens, and only rarely come into play in most day-to-day shooting. Lateral chromatic aberration, however, is very impressively controlled.  I didn’t see any field relevant lateral CA during my shooting.

Distortion can be seen in this shot - Sony A7 II with Zeiss FE 35mm f/1.4 Distagon @ f/5.6
Native barrel distortion can be seen in this shot – Sony A7 II with Zeiss FE 35mm f/1.4 Distagon @ f/5.6

The 35mm Distagon also shows a bit of barrel distortion.  In most cases, you won’t notice it, but if shooting architecture or other scenes with straight lines, the slight bulge of distortion can be easily seen.  Out of camera JPEGs and the lens profile included in Lightroom will help eliminate almost all of the distortion.

Like almost every f/1.4 lens ever made, the 35mm f/1.4 also shows visible vignetting at wide apertures, though it’s reduced to moderate levels by f/2.8 and is imperceptible by f/5.6.  Nothing to worry about here, in my opinion.

The lens also turns in a fairly good performance against bright light, though again slightly less than perfect.  Overall contrast remains high when a bright light source is in the frame, though small, but prominent ghosting can be induced.  This appears as a bright green blob in the frame, occasionally accompanied by a red ghost as well.  However, the flare is generally not a major issue.  In the shot below (click to enlarge), you can see the green flare ghosts in the lower left center of the image frame if you look closely, but they don’t detract from the overall image.

Sunrise - Sony A7 II with Zeiss FE 35mm f/1.4 Distagon @ f/8
Sunrise – Sony A7 II with Zeiss FE 35mm f/1.4 Distagon @ f/8

Overall, the lens is incredibly impressive optically.  What Zeiss and Sony have created is simply one of the finest 35mm lenses around.   It’s a lens that performs well at wide apertures and small apertures, close up and far away, is sharp and yet still retains pleasing bokeh.  In short, it’s an outstanding lens that can produce extremely high quality images in most any situation.

Continue: Conclusion and Image Samples

Comments

15 responses to “Review: Zeiss FE 35mm f/1.4 ZA Distagon T*”

  1. […] Review: Zeiss FE 35mm f/1.4 ZA Distagon T* » […]

  2. […] FE 35mm f/1.4 ZA Distagon T* review at Admiringlight. Loxia 35mm review at Photographyblog. Lensbaby Velvet 56mm f1.6 review (Sony A Mount) at […]

  3. Freddy Avatar
    Freddy

    Good morning from Spain.

    Congratulations on the review, high quality, as all you do.

    Many doubts plague me.

    I am a lover of old objectives with the corresponding adapter.

    In these objectives I have the problem of infinity focus and loss of sharpness.

    I understand that I may not be a native objective.

    Loxia thought when I saw that wonderful,, fully manual focus omenaje old school.

    Happy and saving money Loxia vine and on the market for 35 f1.4 mounts E.

    Smoke made my head literally.

    The party continues and appears BATIS.

    I am a sea of doubt.

    I want the maximum image quality.

    I can not get to OTUS

    Within this range below 2000 euros.

    What do you recommend me?

    batis 25f2

    35 f 1.4

    Loxia 35 F 2

    Thank you very much for your work

    greetings from Spain

    1. Jordan Steele Avatar

      It’s really hard for me to comment on this, as I haven’t used the Loxia 35mm (I hope to shortly), and the Batis 25mm is not out yet. I do think the Batis 25 and the 35s are different lenses, and I wouldn’t consider them as for the same types of shooting. Between the two 35s, provided the Loxia is similar in optical quality (again, I haven’t used it), I’d lean towards that simply for size. However, if you’re after simply the best optical quality, I don’t think you can go wrong with the FE 35/1.4. I can’t imagine the Loxia would actually outperform it, and even if there was a very slight edge, you’re splitting hairs that would be essentially impossible to distinguish in a final image.

      1. Scott Edwards Avatar

        This exchange is particularly helpful. One, perhaps, dumb question: Which is better for landscapes – the 25 or 35 framing? In other words, the Batis 25 or the Sony Zeiss 35?

        1. Jordan Steele Avatar

          Well, it’s going to depend on the scene and your desired framing. I’ve used lenses as wide as a fisheye and as long as 300mm equivalent for landscapes.

  4. Freddy Avatar
    Freddy

    Jordan thank you very much for your comment, I decided to go to the 35 f1.4 🙂
    Thank their stories so well made.
    Good afternoon from Spain
    Freddy

  5. Adam Avatar
    Adam

    Thanks for the great review.your findings are almost same as mines…im using this lens for a few months and i can easily say this is the best lens i ever used (be sure used many glasses)…i just bought 2nd A7body to weld this glass on it…i also recommed 55 zeiss which is an another mind blowing glass.

  6. Pete Avatar
    Pete

    Thank you for taking time to test this great lens and write this informative review. I have to agree with all you wrote. For past 3 months I was jumping between CV 35/1.2, FE 35/2.8 and Loxia 35/2. I couldn’t justify keeping them all, but each one has some great advantages: CV has very unique bokeh, FE got AF and nice colors and Loxia has a great separation of subjects and nice contrast. I just got FE 35/1.4 and this is all 3 lenses in one: great bokeh, AF and nice contrast. I am still getting used to the size and weight, but so far this lens let me sell other three with no regrets! Thanks you again.

  7. without gym Avatar

    Hello colleagues, its great piece of writing regarding
    tutoringand entirely defined, keep it up all the time.

  8. t3 prices Avatar

    It is a legit site. If your looking for illegal steroids that is the place to find
    them. They sell top quality testosterone enhancing products

  9. Theofanis Avatar
    Theofanis

    I like your particular attention to details in your reviews.i always read your review last,since you are the catalyst in my decision making process on anything I buy.
    Much appreciation.

  10. […] lens. Length: 112 mm Diameter: 79mm Weight: 630g Filter Thread: 72mm Price (August 2017): 1410€/$ Review at admiringlight | Amazon.com | Amazon.de | ebay.com | ebay.de (affiliate […]

  11. […] unique glass types and molding processes.  This is highly evident in the extremely large and heavy Sony/Zeiss FE 35mm f/1.4 and other recent full-frame f/1.4 wide angle primes. Voigtländer has eschewed that design […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search


Categories


Recent Posts


  1. I think it is near Hillsboro.

  2. This article got me thinking… Why does Canon make RF S lenses starting with 18mm when most full frame RF…

  3. Great review. I shoot Nikon and may try an old Nikon D200 and see how it compares with the new…