Review: Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM

Review: Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM

Conclusion

Pros

  • Good zoom feel, with smooth focus ring and tactile control ring
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
  • Image Stabilization is excellent
  • Very good image sharpness across the frame at all focal lengths
  • Good bokeh for a standard zoom
  • Excellent color and contrast
  • Longitudinal chromatic aberration is well controlled
  • Reasonable distortion performance for a 4.4x zoom
  • Versatile focal length range

Cons

  • Some wobble in the lens barrel
  • A bit of lateral CA, though correctable
  • Poor flare resistance

The 24-105mm has become a staple lens for Canon since the introduction of the original EF 24-105mm f/4L back in 2005. The range from a fairly wide 24mm to a mid-telephoto 105mm provides tremendous versatility. Coupled with a constant f/4 aperture, the lens is both fast enough to be useful for isolating subjects while also maintaining a reasonable size and weight. The RF 24-105mm f/4L is the best of the three lenses Canon has made in this focal length. It’s a lens with surprisingly good and even sharpness throughout the focal range, and the other imaging characteristics are predominantly on a high level.

The lens shows a weakness against bright light, and I wish the extending barrel were a bit more robustly constructed, but beyond those there’s almost nothing to complain about. At $1,099, the lens isn’t exactly cheap, but it is well worth its cost for the convenience and optical performance you get from the lens. The lens also has quick and accurate autofocus and an excellent optical image stabilizer. Overall, it’s a core lens for the RF system, and one that I think most photographers would be happy to have in their kit. Highly recommended.

Image Samples

Click on an image to enlarge.

Cedar Falls – Canon EOS R with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 39mm, f/16, 8s, ISO 100
Front Street, Columbus, OH – Canon EOS R6 with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 24mm, f/8, 1/125s, ISO 100
Autumn Trees – Canon EOS R6 with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 50mm, f/8, 1/3s, ISO 100
Leveque Tower at Sunset – Canon EOS R6 with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 91mm, f/8, 1/6s, ISO 100
Main Street Bridge at Sunset – Canon EOS R6 with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 94mm, f/8, 1/6s, ISO 100
Massies Creek, OH – Canon EOS R6 with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 50mm, f/16, 6s, ISO 100
Columbus, OH – Canon EOS R6 with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 30mm, f/11, 1/60s, ISO 100
Columbus at Dawn – Canon EOS R with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 40mm, f/16, 0.8s, ISO 100
Cedar Falls – Canon EOS R with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 32mm, f/16, 8 sec, ISO 100
Wooded Path – Canon EOS R6 with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 29mm, f/8, 2.5s, ISO 100
Sunrise in the Woods – Canon EOS R with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 24mm, f/7.1, 1/25s, ISO 100
Dublin Link at Sunrise – Canon EOS RP with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 50mm, f/16, 1/200s, ISO 100
Statehouse Flowers – Canon EOS RP with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 28mm, f/11, 1/80s, ISO 400 (four shot focus stack)
Library Lines – Canon EOS RP with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 91mm, f/9, 1/60s, ISO 200
Cedar Falls – Canon EOS R with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 24mm, f/16, 5s, ISO 100
Parking Garage – Canon EOS R6 with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 50mm, f/8, 1/250s, ISO 100
Columbus – Canon EOS R with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 24mm, f/10, 1/15s, ISO 100
Upper Falls – Canon EOS R with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 33mm, f/10, 1.3s, ISO 100
Riverfront Parking – Canon EOS R6 with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 28mm, f/10, 1/160s, ISO 100

If you enjoyed this review, check out my other reviews in the Review Index.

Pages: 1 2 3

Comments

4 responses to “Review: Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM”

  1. Adam Avatar
    Adam

    Excellent review, I’ve owned multiple copies of this lens and with side-by-side comparison I’ve noticed quite a bit of difference regarding centering or corner sharpness (weirdly, one lens was even very slightly wider than the other one at all settings)
    Hopefully I can find a good copy again, not the most exciting lens, but also it is extremely good as an all-rounder and the size & weight balance is so good on the EOS R.
    Worth adding that for video, it is parfocal (maybe electonically corrected), the focusing is smooth and silent, and the focus breathing is negligible as well (helps a lot with focus stacking, too).

  2. Kevin Goss Avatar
    Kevin Goss

    Thank you for this review. I am contemplating moving up to a full-frame R from a crop DSLR and I want to make sure I am getting a “good” lens to go with it. I am a bit taken back on the price but the example photos are very good in the article. This is definitely a step up from the older EF 24-105 (not the L) and I will get the full frame width! If you have any suggestions of comments to me on moving to the R series I would appreciate it.

  3. Luka Avatar
    Luka

    “There can be a slight hint of a bright ring outline in certain situations…” you’ve got the same results with the RF 70-200 F2.8 but you didn’t write that over there!?

    1.  Avatar
      Anonymous

      Sorry, I saw those on another website… Delete my comment or perhaps shad some light on the subject?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search


Categories


Recent Posts


  1. I think it is near Hillsboro.

  2. This article got me thinking… Why does Canon make RF S lenses starting with 18mm when most full frame RF…

  3. Great review. I shoot Nikon and may try an old Nikon D200 and see how it compares with the new…