Admiring Light
Menu
  • Home
  • Review Index
  • Shop Talk
  • Technique and Vision
  • Opinion
  • Portfolio
  • Site Index
  • About
    • Privacy Policy
Menu
Panasonic GX1 Sensor

Review: Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1

Posted on January 17, 2012February 24, 2013 by Jordan Steele

Contents

  • 1Build Quality / Ergonomics
  • 2Menus/Touch Screen
  • 3Performance/AF
  • 4Flash
  • 5Image Quality
  • 6Video
  • 7External Viewfinder - LVF2
  • 8Conclusion
  • 9Sample Images

Panasonic GX1 Review

Photographers who use the Micro 4/3 system of Compact System Cameras have long been awaiting a true upgrade to Panasonic’s original rangefinder style interchangeable lens mirrorless camera, the GF1.  The GF2 and GF3 saw a repositioning of the the GF series into a more consumer oriented device, eschewing many external controls found on the GF1 in the name of simplification, presumably to entice point and shoot users to upgrade to the GF cameras.  While the GF1 is older, it is in many respects superior to the subsequent GF series cameras due to its ergonomics, multiple dials and buttons for direct access to often used controls, and flash hotshoe.  (The GF2 has a hotshoe, but this was discarded on the GF3).

Enter the new DMC-GX1. Panasonic has responded to critics of the later GF line by finally giving photographers a true successor to the GF1.  The GX1 has an updated, 16 megapixel Live MOS sensor, shoots 4.2 frames per second in burst mode, incorporates a touch screen and retains all the external controls of the GF1, while adding even more quick access functionality.  Additionally, the body is slightly smaller, yet easier to handle due to the contoured rubber grip.  I’ll take a look at how this camera performs, its quirks, its successes and failures.

Panasonic GX1 with Olympus 17mm f/2.8

Build Quality / Ergonomics

The GX1 is a compact, rangefinder style body that is clad in an aluminum skin that is lightweight, yet sturdy.  With a pancake lens like the Panasonic 14mm or 20mm, or the Olympus 17mm, it is small enough to fit in a jacket pocket.   It is available in both silver and black painted finishes;  I happen to have the silver version.  The buttons on the back are metal, which is different from the G and GH series bodies which have plastic buttons.  The metal buttons give a very positive and satisfying click when pressed.  The top plate is matte plastic with good quality fit and finish.  As a nice touch, “Lumix” is engraved in the metal, and “GX1″ is raised.  The biggest change to the GX1 from the GF series is the addition of a chunky contoured rubber grip.  The grip is perfectly contoured to fit your hand, and it even works well when slipping your middle finger along it when carrying it around (which is more comfortable than carrying in the shooting position).

The rear of the camera is dominated by the 3” touch sensitive LCD screen.  Panasonic has provided a small, yet comfortable thumb rest to support the camera.  I find that the shape of the grip and thumb rest forces your hand to a very specific grip for shooting.  Luckily, this grip is comfortable and allows for easy access to camera controls.

Ergonomically, Panasonic did a very good job for such a small camera.  While the grip isn’t as comfortable as the GH2 due to the size, it’s very good considering the size of the body.  Buttons are well placed and those that would be prone to accidental pressing with the heel of your palm are recessed, yet still easily accessed when needed.  There are two programmable function buttons, the typical four way buttons that control direction as well as ISO, WB, Drive mode and AF.  There is also a dedicated display button, a Quick menu button for changing other parameters and an AF/MF button for quick switching between focus modes.

On top, there is the mode dial, which contains the usual P, A, S, M shooting modes, plus two customizable settings, a scene mode and creative art filters.  The rest of the top plate contains the on/off switch, the metal shutter button, a dedicated movie shutter button and the iA button for toggling the intelligent Auto mode on and off.

The click thumb wheel on the back operates the same as on all other recent Panasonic G series cameras, though it’s a little smaller than on the GH2/GH1/G1, etc.  The first day I used the camera,  it was a bit stiff and finicky, but has been broken in now and feels good, though still not as nice as the GH2’s, presumably due to size.  Clicking the wheel transitions between changeable values when setting parameters (aperture and exposure compensation in aperture priority, aperture and shutter speed in manual, etc), or activates the zooming for focus assist if using an adapted manual focus lens, which makes using adapted lenses a breeze.  Because of Micro 4/3 short register distance, nearly every SLR and rangefinder lens can be adapted for use on the GX1.  I use a variety of adapted lenses on my cameras, so this is a very welcome part of the Panasonic user interface.

There is no built in viewfinder on the GX1, so the rear LCD is used for both settings and composing the image.  Panasonic does offer a brand new add on electronic viewfinder (EVF) which gives a 1.4x magnification ratio (equivalent to a 0.7x full frame viewfinder) with 1.44 million dots in sequential field display.  The new viewfinder, DMW-LVF2, is only compatible with the GX1 as of this writing.  The GF series cameras must use the earlier LVF1, due to a change in accessory ports made for the GX1.

GX1 with Canon FD 200mm f/2.8 and Live Viewfinder LVF2

Overall, the camera feels good in hand and all major controls are quickly accessed.  The only negative is directly related to size.  With most Micro 4/3 lenses, the grip is sure and there is plenty of room for your fingers.  On some wider lenses, such as the Leica 25mm f/1.4, the fingers can be a bit cramped.  Also, if you are using a large lens, such as the Panasonic 100-300mm zoom, or an adapted telephoto, such as the Canon FD 200mm f/2.8 pictured above, the size can be a bit too small.  I much prefer the grip of the G or GH series cameras for long lens work.  It is a minor issue, however, since the weight when using such lenses is generally supported by the left hand.

Menus/Touch Screen

Like all recent Panasonic bodies, the 3″ LCD is a touch panel as well, and it works very well.  The LCD is a 460k resolution panel.  While I would prefer to see a higher resolution screen in 2012, the screen does display colors accurately and is crisp enough for good composition and is passable for manual focusing, though using the camera’s ability to zoom in when manually focusing is a great aid when using the LCD.

Panasonic has made some changes to the touch screen operation and the quick menu system that are for the better.  Like on other touch G series cameras, most major functions that have dedicated controls can also be changed via touch screen (but aren’t required to be).  The screen is a resistive touch panel, though it looks somewhat different than the screen used in the GH2, G2 and G3.  It is glossier, and at first glance appears to be a capacitive screen.  While capacitive touch panels are more responsive, they can’t be operated with gloves on, so I am glad they stuck with resistive for this LCD.  You can set focus point and focus point size just by tapping, which is is fast and intuitive.  There is a new touch activated pull out drawer which has two more customizable function buttons activated via touch, as well as the touch shutter control.  It doesn’t get in the way and is a nice way to get to other settings quickly.    This is a nice improvement over the touch interface in the GH2.

One nice addition to the GX1 is an electronic level.  This can be brought up via the Display button, or a shortcut assigned to one of the four customizable buttons.  It is easy to use and doesn’t disrupt composition as well.  My favorite part of the electronic level is that this addition has FINALLY brought automatic image rotation to Panasonic bodies with all lenses.  Prior to the GX1, Panasonic bodies only rotated verticals automatically when using an OIS lens.

I’m not going to discuss menus here too much.  If you’ve used any recent Panasonic Micro 4/3 body, you will instantly be at home with the menu system, as it is largely unchanged.  The only new items are those that are specific to the GX1, which are few and far between.  Overall, I find the menus to be relatively logically ordered, though they could still use some cleanup, as many of the sections are several pages long.  Panasonic has improved somewhat in the naming of its function items, but some functions are still rather ambiguous, and require a peek at the manual to figure out what they do the first time.

Next up: Performance:

Pages: 1 2 3

36 thoughts on “Review: Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1”

  1. Pingback: Featured forum post: Panasonic GX1 Mini-Review - Page 2 - Micro Four Thirds User Forum
  2. rogerml says:
    January 18, 2012 at 9:14 am

    Great review, JS. Thx for sharing!
    Btw, – love your b+w portrait (GX1, Leica 25mm f/1.4, ISO 160, Off camera strobe), in the photo samples’ end.

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/rogerml

    Reply
  3. Peter Arbib says:
    January 18, 2012 at 9:43 am

    Excellent review, thanks
    Peter

    Reply
  4. thomas says:
    January 18, 2012 at 3:58 pm

    thank you, great review.

    Reply
  5. Pingback: Panasonic GX1 and 100-300mm firmware updates (+review and in Stock status) « b r e a k m e l o d y
  6. Ranger 9 says:
    January 18, 2012 at 4:45 pm

    Thanks for a straightforward, understandable review. But could you please explain something you wrote about the viewfinder? You said:

    Panasonic does offer a brand new add on electronic viewfinder (EVF) which gives a 1.4x magnification ratio (equivalent to a 0.7x full frame viewfinder)

    When dealing with viewfinder magnifications, I’m more accustomed to seeing the viewfinder image compared to subject size rather than sensor size. For example, my Epson R-D 1 camera has a finder magnification of 1.0x — which means that when I look through it, the apparent size of the subject is the same size as the same subject viewed with the naked eye. This is a great feature of the R-D 1, because it allows the user to keep both eyes open at all times; both eyes see exactly the same magnification.

    The R-D 1 is a true rangefinder camera with an optical viewfinder, so the lens in use doesn’t make any difference; on cameras with through-lens viewfinders, the finder-magnification spec also has to specify the focal length in use. For example, my Nikon D300’s viewfinder magnification supposedly is 0.94x with a 50mm lens… so if I’ve got a 50 on the camera, look through the viewfinder, and then open my other eye and view the subject, the viewfinder image will look slightly smaller.

    You can probably tell from this that finder magnification is an important spec for me! So can you explain what you mean when you say the GX-1’s finder magnification is 1.4x, or that that’s equivalent to 0.7x on a camera of a different format?

    If I’m looking through the GX-1’s finder with a “normal” lens (presumably 20mm or 25mm) on the camera, how will what I see compare in size to the same subject viewed with the naked eye?

    Thanks…

    Reply
  7. Jordan Steele says:
    January 18, 2012 at 6:56 pm

    Ranger 9 –

    The reason micro 4/3 viewfinder magnifications are somewhat confusing is that they use the 50mm lens definition as well, even though it’s a longer field of view. It’s a 1.4x magnification with the 50mm reference. With the 25mm reference (as it should be), it’s a 0.7x viewfinder.

    As a result, the viewfinder has the same apparent size as a full frame cammera with a 0.7x viewfinder (which, incidentally is the same size as the Canon 1Ds Mark II). Make sense? Since your D300 is a 1.5x crop sensor, but is using the 50mm reference, it is equivalent in size to a 0.62x Full frame viewfinder. So, the LVF2 will have a larger viewfinder image than your D300. Thanks for the comments, everyone!

    Reply
  8. Bob Bowné says:
    January 18, 2012 at 8:38 pm

    Nice to see a competent review with some REALLY great image samples that show some creativity and show the traits of the reviewed product! No brick walls…amazing!
    Nice work….review and photos.
    Have the camera. Love it. Your review is spot on.

    Reply
  9. Forseti says:
    January 18, 2012 at 9:51 pm

    Hi,
    Tks for the excellent review. Really awesome pics of the kid, and the black and white portrait really rocks..me!

    I’m a relative newbie in the photo realm, and processing raw seems challenging, will the jpegs churn out similar quality to ur shots posted here?

    Much Tks!

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      January 22, 2012 at 11:41 am

      JPEG processing on this camera seems to be a little better than on previous Panasonic cameras I’ve used. If the light isn’t too strong, and you dial back noise reduction in the JPEG engine (Film Styles), you can get very good results. I don’t have a ton of experience with the JPEGs, though, as I almost always shoot RAW, simply because I get a little better dynamic range, more detail and the ability to set white balance and color balance after the fact.

      Reply
  10. ian drury says:
    January 21, 2012 at 5:41 am

    Many thanks for your excellent review, it provides an ‘owners’ opinion of how this camera performs, much more realistic compared to magazine ‘pro’ reviews and articles.

    Reply
  11. Pingback: The Mirrorless Camera Industry and the Search for the Perfect Camera – Part 2 » Admiring Light
  12. Madalene Burningham says:
    January 24, 2012 at 6:51 am

    Recently i came accross your web site and have been reading along. I thought I might leave my initial remark. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this web site very frequently.

    Reply
  13. Kirk Merritt says:
    January 24, 2012 at 6:43 pm

    Nice thoughtul review, if they had included a built in EVF I’d jump in. For now sticking with my G3. A better mix for me. The images in your review are exceptional, you have a great eye and that’s a gift.

    Kirk

    Reply
  14. Luc de Schepper says:
    January 28, 2012 at 3:42 pm

    Excellent real-life review. Great images also, thanks!

    Reply
  15. Salome Marroguin says:
    January 31, 2012 at 3:14 pm

    Hi. Just simply want to leave a quick commentary and inquire where you grabbed your particular page graphics I will be launching own internet page and absolutely appreciate your design.

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      February 2, 2012 at 2:27 pm

      I use WordPress to publish this site, with a customized version of the Graphene theme. The images, of course, are all my own photographs.

      Reply
  16. lisandra says:
    February 1, 2012 at 10:20 am

    Fantastic review, I link it often. Just like I like em, with comparisons and good samples.

    Reply
  17. Pingback: Best Unsung Feature of the Panasonic GX1 @ Admiring Light
  18. Mei Waguespack says:
    April 2, 2012 at 2:44 pm

    I love your blog 🙂

    Reply
  19. Posterous says:
    April 21, 2012 at 5:48 am

    Once I originally commented I clicked the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and now every time a remark is added I get 4 emails with the same comment. Is there any manner you’ll be able to remove me from that service? Thanks!

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      April 21, 2012 at 8:09 am

      Unfortunately, I can’t seem to find anything in WordPress to remove notifications. Do the emails have a link to unsubscribe or anything? I’ll continue to try and figure out how to do this.

      Reply
  20. Looking for a Salon in Oklahoma City? says:
    September 14, 2012 at 2:13 am

    you posted here nice article about the best topic. i have shared your this nice blog on fb wall.

    Reply
  21. Robert in Arabia says:
    October 19, 2012 at 6:08 am

    I learn a lot every time I visit your site. Your photographs are outstanding.

    Reply
  22. Lean Muscle says:
    November 17, 2012 at 10:31 pm

    Thanks for the information/review. I have been wanting to get a good quality camera for some hobby photog. and this was very informative.

    Reply
  23. John Rappold says:
    January 20, 2013 at 1:46 pm

    Great review, and I love your sample shots. Got the GH3 in late November and love it. Looked seriously at the GX1 to replace my GH2 to use as my carry cam. Unfortunately, I like to shoot a lot of video, so the GX1 doesn’t work for me. Hopefully the GX2 will up the video for some 60P and 24P 1080 goodness with more manual control.

    Reply
  24. cosinaphile says:
    February 2, 2013 at 3:22 am

    caught this late but better late than never

    great

    Reply
  25. Pete says:
    February 23, 2013 at 2:00 pm

    I really like your site. I too have a GX1 and I am curious whether you use an external flash and if so would you recommend it.

    Reply
  26. Arrow CW says:
    February 26, 2013 at 4:02 am

    couldnt agree more

    Reply
  27. Pingback: Panasonic GX1 Review | Emptyclip.de
  28. Pingback: Review: Fujifilm X-M1 @ Admiring Light
  29. Pingback: Review: Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7 @ Admiring Light
  30. Andrew Devlin says:
    January 23, 2014 at 8:49 am

    I simply want to leave a quick commentary and inquire where you grabbed your particular page graphics I will be launching own internet page and absolutely appreciate your design. Unfortunately, I like to shoot a lot of video, so the GX1 doesn’t work for me. Hopefully the GX2 will up the video for some 60P and 24P 1080 goodness with more manual control.

    Reply
  31. Eva A. Hall says:
    March 27, 2014 at 12:59 am

    Thanks for some other informative web site.
    Where else may I get that kind of info written in
    such an ideal way? I have a undertaking that I am simply now
    operating on, and I have been on the glance
    out for such info.

    Reply
  32. Shoukat says:
    February 26, 2018 at 7:33 am

    Nice work!

    Reply
  33. Matthew says:
    February 2, 2019 at 12:26 pm

    If you want to improve your knowledge just keep visiting this site and
    be updated with the most up-to-date information posted here.
    viagra online

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow Me:

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on InstagramFollow Us on Mastodon

Most Popular Posts

  • "Full Frame Equivalence" and Why It Doesn't Matter (288)
  • Fuji X-Pro 2 vs. Sony A7 II: Noise Comparison (70)
  • Fuji 56mm f/1.2 vs. Panasonic Leica 42.5mm f/1.2 Nocticron (63)
  • Review: Metabones Speed Booster (Canon FD to Fuji X) (56)
  • Review: Olympus OM-D E-M5 (48)

Recent Comments

  • Eric Wojtkun on My Favorite Photos of 2022
  • Jordan Steele on “Full Frame Equivalence” and Why It Doesn’t Matter
  • Leon on “Full Frame Equivalence” and Why It Doesn’t Matter
  • Clarke jones on Review: TTArtisan 50mm f/1.4 ASPH (RF Mount)
  • Anonymous on Sony A7 III vs. A7 II – Noise Comparison

Archives

©2023 Admiring Light | Theme by SuperbThemes
We use cookies to personalize content and ads and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. You may consent to the use of cookies or opt out. Accept Reject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

SAVE & ACCEPT