Review: Canon EOS R

Conclusion

Pros

  • Very solid build quality
  • Excellent grip and feel in the hand
  • Crisp and detailed EVF with good refresh rate
  • Rear screen is bright, sharp and has excellent touch implementation
  • Single shot Autofocus is extremely fast and generally very accurate
  • Very good sensor dynamic range
  • Excellent color response
  • Good control of noise at high ISO
  • Top LCD may be useful for some photographers
  • Great Wi-Fi implementation
  • Excellent Menus
  • Early lenses show great promise for the lens ecosystem

Cons

  • Some poor control decisions like the Multifunction touch bar (which is awful) and the lack of a focus point joystick
  • EVF ‘hitches’ a bit when taking a shot and lags in reflecting exposure changes
  • Video is severely compromised by a 1.7x crop in 4K shooting
  • Continuous AF is very hit or miss
  • Battery life is fairly poor
  • Only one card slot
  • No AF tracking at top burst rate
  • Eye AF has serious limitations

The EOS R is Canon’s first true attempt at creating a high-end mirrorless camera, and they have done a really nice job in some areas, while falling quite flat in others.  The camera has great ergonomics, with a pleasing deep grip that feels wonderful in the hand.  The EVF and rear screen are excellent.  Both are sharp, clear and high-resolution with good refresh rate and nice color.  The sensor is a bit old, but still does a very nice job, producing detailed shots with excellent color response, good dynamic range, and good noise control, though both dynamic range and noise control fall a bit short of its closest rivals.  Autofocus is excellent in single shot mode, though I had a very different experience when shooting continuous AF.  When shooting moving subjects, the camera would sometimes do a great job, and other times would fare rather poorly, so I couldn’t really trust it for tracking motion. Canon outfitted the camera with a very nice feature set and the early RF lenses truly cater to the high-end shooter.

However, despite this focus on the high-end shooter with the lens lineup, the EOS R has some truly baffling limitations, especially when viewed from the perspective of the professional or the advanced amateur.  The lack of a second card slot is going to immediately rule out the camera for many pros, but the biggest issue for me was some of the terrible control decisions.  The multifunction touch bar is atrocious to use, with zero tactile feedback and laggy operation, and I missed having a joystick to move AF points.  Video mode is also quite compromised, by essentially eliminating wide-angle 4K shooting unless you purchase lenses made for crop-sensor DSLRs, and continuous AF doesn’t work between shots at the fastest burst rates.

In all, the camera gets a lot right and a lot wrong.  The EOS R is certainly capable of producing excellent images, and for the most part, I enjoyed shooting with it.  However, the camera disappoints in a few key areas, and ultimately I can’t really recommend it to anyone but the true Canon diehard who wants a mirrorless camera to use seamlessly with their existing EF mount lenses. At $2,299, the EOS R is $300 more expensive than the Sony A7 III and the Nikon Z6, but doesn’t ever justify its extra cost. The EOS R is a good effort for a first iteration, but it falls short of the competition. It might be wise to wait for the next model before diving in.

Image Samples

Click on an image to enlarge.

Cedar Falls – Canon EOS R with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 32mm, f/16, 8 sec, ISO 100
Autumn Leaves – Canon EOS R with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 105mm, f/4, 1/20s, ISO 100
Columbus at Dawn – Canon EOS R with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 35mm, f/16, 0.6s, ISO 100
Upper Falls – Canon EOS R with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 70mm, f/10, 1.6s, ISO 100
Columbus – Canon EOS R with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 24mm, f/10, 1/15s, ISO 100
Hidden Falls – Canon EOS R with Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L @ 200mm, f/18, 6s, ISO 100
Cedar Falls – Canon EOS R with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 24mm, f/16, 5s, ISO 100
LeVeque Tower – Canon EOS R with Sigma 100-400mm f/5-6.3 @ 156mm, f/18, 0.6s, ISO 100
Devil’s Bathtub – Canon EOS R with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 33mm, f/11, 1s, ISO 125
Seal of Columbus – Canon EOS R with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 74mm, f/4, 1/20s, ISO 100
Cedar Falls – Canon EOS R with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 39mm, f/16, 8s, ISO 100
Autumn Woods – Canon EOS R with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 31mm, f/16, 15s, ISO 100
Upper Falls – Canon EOS R with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 33mm, f/10, 1.3s, ISO 100
Columbus at Dawn – Canon EOS R with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 40mm, f/16, 0.8s, ISO 100
If you enjoyed this review, check out my other reviews in the Review Index

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5

Comments

3 responses to “Review: Canon EOS R”

  1. Reiner Avatar
    Reiner

    I really don’t understand the purpose of coming up with a mirrorless camera that is just as big as a DSLR. The main reason to go mirrorless is for the size reduction and light weight compared to the DSLR alternative. Canon and Nikon are so young to the game that every other mirrorless manufacturer are in their 4th or 5th iterations and way advanced. Talk about playing catch up. A self-defeating approach. Lets not even talk about the price of admission.

    1. Ag Avatar
      Ag

      My main reason to go mirrorless is to get the picture as what you see in the monitor. And I absolutely love the size of eos r. Feel so comfortable.

  2. Jim Moon Avatar
    Jim Moon

    Good review. I always appreciate your “honesty.” I would also be very interested in your review of the Panasonic G9. Any possibility of that happening?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search


Categories


Recent Posts