Admiring Light
Menu
  • Home
  • Review Index
  • Shop Talk
  • Technique and Vision
  • Opinion
  • Portfolio
  • Site Index
  • About
    • Privacy Policy
Menu

Review: Canon EOS R

Posted on December 22, 2018December 22, 2018 by Jordan Steele

Contents

  • 1EOS R - A new beginning for Canon
  • 2Construction and Handling
  • 3Operation and Controls
  • 4Viewfinder and Rear Screen
  • 5Autofocus and Performance
  • 6Notable Features
  • 7Image Quality
  • 8Conclusion
  • 9Image Samples

Notable Features

Top LCD Display

The EOS R is one of only a handful of mirrorless cameras that have a top LCD display. The EOS R’s top display shows information on two pages of the screen, which can be toggled by pressing the button to the right of the screen.  Long pressing this button inverts the display and turns on the backlight to make it visible in the dark. The main portion of the display shows current shooting mode, exposure compensation, the shooting parameters of the current mode (aperture, shutter speed, or both depending on mode), ISO, battery life and connectivity.  The second page shows more or less the remaining pertinent info, including drive mode, shots remaining, picture style, etc.

A lot of people are really excited to have a top LCD showing settings, however, it really didn’t do anything for me.  It does provide some information at a glance, but overall, I find it either redundant or annoying, as some things disappear on the rear screen in most modes and only appear on the top screen. Battery life is one such thing. Battery life only appears on the rear screen when looking at the all settings display, and not when in the live view shooting modes. For battery level, you have to look at the top. However, every other thing in the top display *is* echoed on the rear of the display. In all, with mirrorless cameras, I tend to look at the rear display for my info.

The top display’s second page of information

Perhaps most annoying is that when the camera is off, the top display only displays the current mode and whether WiFi is set to be on. None of the shooting parameters are shown when the camera is off, so it’s useless as an ‘at a glance’ display for current settings when the camera is off. As such, except for battery level, I tended to ignore it.

Wi-Fi / Bluetooth

Like essentially all modern cameras, the EOS R comes packed with Wi-Fi connectivity, as well as bluetooth.  The EOS R’s implementation is one of the better ones for this sort of connectivity.  I found the setup to be a little frustrating at first, but once things are connected initially, the camera was extremely quick to connect to my phone.  I predominantly use Wi-Fi on my cameras to transfer images to my phone for easy review and sharing, and the Canon does this with ease.  As I’ll discuss in a bit, Canon also includes in-camera RAW conversion, which I very much appreciated.

Remote shooting works quite well

Geotagging takes advantage of the bluetooth connection, and allowed for seamless tagging of images once the app was opened on the phone, even when turning the camera on and off.  Remote control is also possible, with full adjustment of settings in the remote app, and a fairly good live feed of the image preview.  I didn’t use the remote shooting much, but it worked very well in my limited testing.

In-Camera RAW Conversion

One of the things I miss most from my Fujifilm and Olympus cameras when I’m shooting with Sony is the ability to create JPEG images, including adjustments from a captured RAW file in the camera.  I use this feature when available so I don’t have to shoot RAW+JPEG and can still transfer selected images in high-resolution to my phone.  Thankfully, Canon has an in-camera RAW converter, and it is quite easy to use with the excellent touch screen controls.  The in-camera RAW converter allows you to adjust things like the output size, overall exposure level, picture style and lens optimizations.  However, it’s a fairly limited level of control compared to what Fujifilm offers, for instance.  There’s no means to control highlight tone or shadow tone, image sharpness, etc.  The picture styles control portions of this, but these are macro changes, with little opportunity for fine tuning.  Still, even a somewhat limited in-camera RAW conversion feature is far better than none at all.

The EOS R’s in-camera RAW conversion

Odds and Ends

Below are a few other thoughts I’ve had that don’t really warrant a full section, but are definitely worth noting.

  • Metering on the EOS R is tied to the focus point position, even when evaluative metering is selected.  It always has a bit of a bias towards the focus point.  I am not used to this, and I never became used to it in my time with the camera.  I’d have exposure set, switch focus point, and then have to adjust exposure again.  It was quite frustrating to use, especially if trying to stack focus on a tripod, as I had to switch to manual mode or activate exposure lock when shooting between the foreground and background.
  • Battery life was about on par with most mirrorless cameras, which is rather disappointing.  Sony realized (perhaps a bit too late), that the tiny batteries in their early mirrorless cameras were not suitable for a full-day’s shooting, and so updated their cameras to a much larger battery.  The EOS R’s battery isn’t particularly small, to be honest, but the camera sucks a fair bit of power, and so around 300 shots on a charge was pretty typical for me in my time with the camera.
  • There is no in-body image stabilization on the EOS R.  What was once a niche feature has become a mainstay of mirrorless cameras, leaving Canon as the only major mirrorless camera maker now without a single body that offers it.  While most of Fujifilm’s cameras also lack IBIS, they did include it on their top-end X-H1, meaning that the EOS R joins the Leica SL as the only current mirrorless cameras on the market at a price of $2,000 or higher without in-body image stabilization.  While Canon’s lens based IS is very good, they need to add this feature in the next iteration, or this will be a big mark against the RF mount cameras going forward.  IBIS is a great feature to have and can allow for notably lower ISO shooting for static subjects or where longer exposures are desired, for all lenses.
  • Canon put a single SD card slot into the EOS R, a mistake that Nikon also duplicated with the Z6 and Z7, and I honestly have no idea what they are thinking.  While the casual shooter may have no need for dual card slots on a regular basis, for professionals, especially those that shoot events like weddings and other once in a lifetime moments, the lack of a second card slot for backup makes the EOS R a complete non-starter.  I would never consider shooting a wedding with only a single card slot.  Cards don’t fail often, but I have had them fail.  If that happens on a professional wedding shoot?  It could just cost you your career.

Continue: Image Quality

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5

3 thoughts on “Review: Canon EOS R”

  1. Reiner says:
    December 23, 2018 at 2:20 pm

    I really don’t understand the purpose of coming up with a mirrorless camera that is just as big as a DSLR. The main reason to go mirrorless is for the size reduction and light weight compared to the DSLR alternative. Canon and Nikon are so young to the game that every other mirrorless manufacturer are in their 4th or 5th iterations and way advanced. Talk about playing catch up. A self-defeating approach. Lets not even talk about the price of admission.

    Reply
    1. Ag says:
      December 23, 2018 at 6:17 pm

      My main reason to go mirrorless is to get the picture as what you see in the monitor. And I absolutely love the size of eos r. Feel so comfortable.

      Reply
  2. Jim Moon says:
    December 31, 2018 at 2:48 pm

    Good review. I always appreciate your “honesty.” I would also be very interested in your review of the Panasonic G9. Any possibility of that happening?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow Me:

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on InstagramFollow Us on Mastodon

Most Popular Posts

  • "Full Frame Equivalence" and Why It Doesn't Matter (288)
  • Fuji X-Pro 2 vs. Sony A7 II: Noise Comparison (70)
  • Fuji 56mm f/1.2 vs. Panasonic Leica 42.5mm f/1.2 Nocticron (63)
  • Review: Metabones Speed Booster (Canon FD to Fuji X) (56)
  • Review: Olympus OM-D E-M5 (48)

Recent Comments

  • Anonymous on Ready for Launch!
  • Jordan Steele on Canon EOS R8 – First Impressions
  • J Williams on Canon EOS R8 – First Impressions
  • Davide on Review: Tamron 70-180mm f/2.8 Di III VXD
  • Peter on A Tripod in the Sky – DJI Air 2S Review

Archives

©2023 Admiring Light | Theme by SuperbThemes
We use cookies to personalize content and ads and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. You may consent to the use of cookies or opt out. Accept Reject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

SAVE & ACCEPT