Admiring Light
Menu
  • Home
  • Review Index
  • Shop Talk
  • Technique and Vision
  • Opinion
  • Portfolio
  • Site Index
  • About
    • Privacy Policy
Menu

Review: Canon EOS R

Posted on December 22, 2018December 22, 2018 by Jordan Steele

Contents

  • 1EOS R - A new beginning for Canon
  • 2Construction and Handling
  • 3Operation and Controls
  • 4Viewfinder and Rear Screen
  • 5Autofocus and Performance
  • 6Notable Features
  • 7Image Quality
  • 8Conclusion
  • 9Image Samples

Conclusion

Pros

  • Very solid build quality
  • Excellent grip and feel in the hand
  • Crisp and detailed EVF with good refresh rate
  • Rear screen is bright, sharp and has excellent touch implementation
  • Single shot Autofocus is extremely fast and generally very accurate
  • Very good sensor dynamic range
  • Excellent color response
  • Good control of noise at high ISO
  • Top LCD may be useful for some photographers
  • Great Wi-Fi implementation
  • Excellent Menus
  • Early lenses show great promise for the lens ecosystem

Cons

  • Some poor control decisions like the Multifunction touch bar (which is awful) and the lack of a focus point joystick
  • EVF ‘hitches’ a bit when taking a shot and lags in reflecting exposure changes
  • Video is severely compromised by a 1.7x crop in 4K shooting
  • Continuous AF is very hit or miss
  • Battery life is fairly poor
  • Only one card slot
  • No AF tracking at top burst rate
  • Eye AF has serious limitations

The EOS R is Canon’s first true attempt at creating a high-end mirrorless camera, and they have done a really nice job in some areas, while falling quite flat in others.  The camera has great ergonomics, with a pleasing deep grip that feels wonderful in the hand.  The EVF and rear screen are excellent.  Both are sharp, clear and high-resolution with good refresh rate and nice color.  The sensor is a bit old, but still does a very nice job, producing detailed shots with excellent color response, good dynamic range, and good noise control, though both dynamic range and noise control fall a bit short of its closest rivals.  Autofocus is excellent in single shot mode, though I had a very different experience when shooting continuous AF.  When shooting moving subjects, the camera would sometimes do a great job, and other times would fare rather poorly, so I couldn’t really trust it for tracking motion. Canon outfitted the camera with a very nice feature set and the early RF lenses truly cater to the high-end shooter.

However, despite this focus on the high-end shooter with the lens lineup, the EOS R has some truly baffling limitations, especially when viewed from the perspective of the professional or the advanced amateur.  The lack of a second card slot is going to immediately rule out the camera for many pros, but the biggest issue for me was some of the terrible control decisions.  The multifunction touch bar is atrocious to use, with zero tactile feedback and laggy operation, and I missed having a joystick to move AF points.  Video mode is also quite compromised, by essentially eliminating wide-angle 4K shooting unless you purchase lenses made for crop-sensor DSLRs, and continuous AF doesn’t work between shots at the fastest burst rates.

In all, the camera gets a lot right and a lot wrong.  The EOS R is certainly capable of producing excellent images, and for the most part, I enjoyed shooting with it.  However, the camera disappoints in a few key areas, and ultimately I can’t really recommend it to anyone but the true Canon diehard who wants a mirrorless camera to use seamlessly with their existing EF mount lenses. At $2,299, the EOS R is $300 more expensive than the Sony A7 III and the Nikon Z6, but doesn’t ever justify its extra cost. The EOS R is a good effort for a first iteration, but it falls short of the competition. It might be wise to wait for the next model before diving in.

Image Samples

Click on an image to enlarge.

Cedar Falls – Canon EOS R with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 32mm, f/16, 8 sec, ISO 100
Autumn Leaves – Canon EOS R with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 105mm, f/4, 1/20s, ISO 100
Columbus at Dawn – Canon EOS R with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 35mm, f/16, 0.6s, ISO 100
Upper Falls – Canon EOS R with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 70mm, f/10, 1.6s, ISO 100
Columbus – Canon EOS R with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 24mm, f/10, 1/15s, ISO 100
Hidden Falls – Canon EOS R with Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L @ 200mm, f/18, 6s, ISO 100
Cedar Falls – Canon EOS R with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 24mm, f/16, 5s, ISO 100
LeVeque Tower – Canon EOS R with Sigma 100-400mm f/5-6.3 @ 156mm, f/18, 0.6s, ISO 100
Devil’s Bathtub – Canon EOS R with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 33mm, f/11, 1s, ISO 125
Seal of Columbus – Canon EOS R with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 74mm, f/4, 1/20s, ISO 100
Cedar Falls – Canon EOS R with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 39mm, f/16, 8s, ISO 100
Autumn Woods – Canon EOS R with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 31mm, f/16, 15s, ISO 100
Upper Falls – Canon EOS R with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 33mm, f/10, 1.3s, ISO 100
Columbus at Dawn – Canon EOS R with Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS @ 40mm, f/16, 0.8s, ISO 100
If you enjoyed this review, check out my other reviews in the Review Index
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5

3 thoughts on “Review: Canon EOS R”

  1. Reiner says:
    December 23, 2018 at 2:20 pm

    I really don’t understand the purpose of coming up with a mirrorless camera that is just as big as a DSLR. The main reason to go mirrorless is for the size reduction and light weight compared to the DSLR alternative. Canon and Nikon are so young to the game that every other mirrorless manufacturer are in their 4th or 5th iterations and way advanced. Talk about playing catch up. A self-defeating approach. Lets not even talk about the price of admission.

    Reply
    1. Ag says:
      December 23, 2018 at 6:17 pm

      My main reason to go mirrorless is to get the picture as what you see in the monitor. And I absolutely love the size of eos r. Feel so comfortable.

      Reply
  2. Jim Moon says:
    December 31, 2018 at 2:48 pm

    Good review. I always appreciate your “honesty.” I would also be very interested in your review of the Panasonic G9. Any possibility of that happening?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow Me:

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on Instagram

Most Popular Posts

  • "Full Frame Equivalence" and Why It Doesn't Matter (286)
  • Fuji X-Pro 2 vs. Sony A7 II: Noise Comparison (70)
  • Fuji 56mm f/1.2 vs. Panasonic Leica 42.5mm f/1.2 Nocticron (63)
  • Review: Metabones Speed Booster (Canon FD to Fuji X) (56)
  • Review: Olympus OM-D E-M5 (48)

Recent Comments

  • Harry on Review: Tamron 70-180mm f/2.8 Di III VXD
  • Jordan Steele on Review: Tamron 70-180mm f/2.8 Di III VXD
  • Harry on Review: Tamron 70-180mm f/2.8 Di III VXD
  • Harry on Review: Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM
  • Jordan Steele on Review: Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM

Archives

©2021 Admiring Light | Theme by SuperbThemes
We use cookies to personalize content and ads and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. You may consent to the use of cookies or opt out. Accept Reject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.