Admiring Light
Menu
  • Home
  • Review Index
  • Shop Talk
  • Technique and Vision
  • Opinion
  • Portfolio
  • Site Index
  • About
    • Privacy Policy
Menu

Review: Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM

Posted on January 1, 2021February 15, 2021 by Jordan Steele

Contents

  • 1Construction and Handling
  • 2Autofocus and Image Stabilization
  • 3Image Quality
  • 4Conclusion
  • 5Image Samples

Image Quality

Canon’s 70-200mm zoom lenses have long been among the best, and consistently provide outstanding image quality, with excellent sharpness and good bokeh throughout the zoom range. The RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS fits right in with that legacy.

Sharpness

The RF 70-200mm f/2.8L is a very sharp lens, as one would expect from a pro-grade telezoom. Central image sharpness is very high from f/2.8 from 70mm through about 165mm, and is a little bit softer towards 200mm, but still very good. Corner sharpness is good wide open at 70mm, and very good from 100-200mm. Stopping down just one stop brings central sharpness to exceptional levels at all focal lengths and the edges and corners become very sharp as well, yielding excellent corner to corner results at smaller apertures throughout the zoom range.

The RF doesn’t really break any new ground in comparison to the latest EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III, but it doesn’t really need to, given the optical prowess of that lens. Click here for a 100% crop of the focus point on the image below.

New Year’s Eve – Canon EOS R6 with Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS @ 135mm, f/2.8, 1/125s, ISO 200

In short, you can feel free to use the RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS at the aperture needed for the depth of field required and can count on it to deliver sharp shots. The lens maintains its solid performance even at infinity and f/2.8, where the lens is capable of delivering excellent cross-frame sharpness at a distance.

Bokeh

One of the primary uses of a fast 70-200mm lens is for portraiture and for isolating details from the background. The bokeh, therefore, is fairly important on a lens such as this. I’m pleased to say that bokeh is very pleasing with the RF 70-200mm f/2.8L. Background blur is generally quite smooth, with evenly illuminated specular highlights.

Stay on the Trail Canon EOS R6 with Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM @ 135mm, f/2.8, 1/500s, ISO 100

There is some minor mechanical vignetting wide open, which causes a mild cat’s eye effect in the corners, but it’s not particularly egregious on this lens. The lens aperture has 9 rounded blades that maintain a mostly circular appearance stopped down, and indeed bokeh remains quite good at smaller apertures. Overall, a very nice performance here, making the lens very well suited to shallow depth of field work.

Color, Contrast and Chromatic Aberration

The RF 70-200mm f/2.8L shows outstanding color and contrast, straight from f/2.8. Images are rich and punchy, and only a mild increase in contrast is noted from f/2.8 to f/4. This isn’t very surprising, as pretty much all high end lenses nowadays have great color and contrast, but the RF 70-200mm does a truly excellent job here.

Immigrant Statue – Canon EOS R6 with Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM @ 200mm, f/2.8, 1/200s, ISO 100

Lateral Chromatic Aberration control is also excellent, with essentially no field relevant CA to speak of. Likewise, longitudinal CA is very well controlled, with only minor green and red tints behind and in front of the focus point at f/2.8. Stopping down quickly removes any residual traces of CA.

Distortion, Flare and Vignetting

The Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L shows a bit of barrel distortion at the 70mm mark, which transitions to mild pincushion distortion as the focal length increases. Distortion is visible, but easily corrected with a lens profile with minimal effect on overall image quality.

The RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS does show a rather mixed performance with regards to flare. When the sun is in the background and out of focus, or out of frame, the effect on image contrast is minimal, with low veiling flare and minimal ghosting. However, at the longer focal lengths with the sun in the frame and predominantly in focus, there can be rather strong ghosting artifacts in purple and green that can cause significant damage to images, as can be seen in what I found to be the worst case scenario below:

Veteran’s Memorial, Columbus, OH – Canon EOS R6 with Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM @ 177mm, f/8, 1/8000s, ISO 100

Vignetting is mild at the wider end of the zoom range, and becomes more prominent and fairly strong towards 200mm. Stopping down to f/4 significantly reduces vignetting and it’s essentially gone by f/5.6. In my opinion, there’s not much to worry about there.

Overall, the RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM is an outstanding short telephoto zoom lens. Excellent sharpness, very nice bokeh, low chromatic aberrations and outstanding color and contrast make this a worthy professional-grade zoom.

Continue: Conclusion and Image Samples

Pages: 1 2 3

1 thought on “Review: Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM”

  1. Harry says:
    January 7, 2021 at 2:02 am

    I am wondering about AF descriptions – Tamron 2.8/70-180 mm on Sony = extremely fast
    and this Canon RF 2.8/70-200 mm on Canon = very fast
    I had used Tamron on Alpha 9 against Sony 2.8/70-200 mm GM – witch I rate only “fast” – but then I must rate the Tamron on Alpha 9 = slow!
    And the Canon is feeling a lot faster then both.
    Do you agree?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow Me:

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on InstagramFollow Us on Mastodon

Most Popular Posts

  • "Full Frame Equivalence" and Why It Doesn't Matter (288)
  • Fuji X-Pro 2 vs. Sony A7 II: Noise Comparison (70)
  • Fuji 56mm f/1.2 vs. Panasonic Leica 42.5mm f/1.2 Nocticron (63)
  • Review: Metabones Speed Booster (Canon FD to Fuji X) (56)
  • Review: Olympus OM-D E-M5 (48)

Recent Comments

  • Eric Wojtkun on My Favorite Photos of 2022
  • Jordan Steele on “Full Frame Equivalence” and Why It Doesn’t Matter
  • Leon on “Full Frame Equivalence” and Why It Doesn’t Matter
  • Clarke jones on Review: TTArtisan 50mm f/1.4 ASPH (RF Mount)
  • Anonymous on Sony A7 III vs. A7 II – Noise Comparison

Archives

©2023 Admiring Light | Theme by SuperbThemes
We use cookies to personalize content and ads and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. You may consent to the use of cookies or opt out. Accept Reject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

SAVE & ACCEPT