Admiring Light
Menu
  • Home
  • Review Index
  • Shop Talk
  • Technique and Vision
  • Opinion
  • Portfolio
  • Site Index
  • About
    • Privacy Policy
Menu

Review: Canon RF 800mm f/11 IS STM

Posted on May 30, 2022May 30, 2022 by Jordan Steele

Contents

  • 1Construction and Handling
  • 2Autofocus
  • 3Image Stabilization
  • 4Image Quality
  • 5Conclusion
  • 6Image Samples

Conclusion

Pros

  • Extremely compact and lightweight for an 800mm lens
  • Excellent image stabilizer
  • Accurate autofocus
  • Good image sharpness
  • Pleasing bokeh
  • Nice color and pleasing rendering
  • Good control of chromatic aberrations
  • Affordable
  • Fun!

Cons

  • f/11 constant aperture
  • Autofocus is only moderate in speed
  • Autofocus limited to the central 50% of the image frame
  • Lower contrast than most modern lenses
  • No rotating tripod collar
  • Hood not included

The Canon RF 800mm f/11 IS STM continues the trend of unique and relatively high quality consumer-grade lenses from Canon. Like I discussed in my review of the 16mm f/2.8 STM and the 100-400mm f/5.6-8, I’m having a lot of fun with these lightweight lenses from Canon. When the lens was first announced, like many I dismissed it immediately as too slow and limited. If you are in that camp, and you want a lightweight and compact lens with a lot of reach, I would strongly recommend trying out this lens.

I was quite pleased to see that image quality is very good for such an optic. While not reaching the lofty heights of Canon’s big white supertelephotos, the RF 800mm f/11 produces images with good sharpness, nice bokeh and an overall pleasing rendering that punches above its price point and weight. The biggest compromise for that size, cost and reach is the fixed f/11 aperture, which means that this lens is going to require higher ISOs for fast shutter speeds, especially in lower light situations. The slow aperture also limits the autofocus area, which can make it a little more difficult to track subjects.

While dedicated bird photographers will likely want to save up for the considerably more expensive 600mm f/4 or 800mm 5.6, those who are more casual wildlife shooters, or simply want to be able to carry a very long lens while not breaking their back will be well pleased with the 800mm f/11. It’s a really compelling lens, even at its current $999 price point. Recommended!

Image Samples

Click on an image to enlarge

Brown Cowbird – Canon EOS R5 with Canon RF 800mm f/11 IS STM @ f/11, 1/500s, ISO 3200
Squirrel Eating – Canon EOS R5 with Canon RF 800mm f/11 IS STM @ f/11, 1/1250s, ISO 2500
Woodpecker – Canon EOS R5 with Canon RF 800mm f/11 IS STM @ f/11, 1/1600s, ISO 3200
Bluejay – Canon EOS R5 with Canon RF 800mm f/11 IS STM @ f/11, 1/1600s, ISO 3200
Pink Dogwood – Canon EOS R5 with Canon RF 800mm f/11 IS STM @ f/11, 1/100s, ISO 400
Doves – Canon EOS R5 with Canon RF 800mm f/11 IS STM @ f/11, 1/1000s, ISO 2500
Squirrel – Canon EOS R5 with Canon RF 800mm f/11 IS STM @ f/11, 1/1250s, ISO 2000
Bald Eagle – Canon EOS R5 with Canon RF 800mm f/11 IS STM @ f/11, 1/1000s, ISO 1250
Moon – Canon EOS R5 with Canon RF 800mm f/11 IS STM @ f/11, 1/30s, ISO 200
Female Cowbird – Canon EOS R5 with Canon RF 800mm f/11 IS STM @ f/11, 1/800s, ISO 3200
If you enjoyed this review, please take a look at my other reviews in the Review Index.
Pages: 1 2 3

4 thoughts on “Review: Canon RF 800mm f/11 IS STM”

  1. Tom says:
    July 6, 2022 at 6:37 am

    Hi. I noticed your recent lens reviews are being tested on r5 camera, did you upgrade from r6. Which one will you recommend as I’m having hard time to decide … and which 2 lenses will you buy first with let’s say R5 ?

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      July 12, 2022 at 9:27 am

      Yes, I purchased the R5 last January, and it has now been my primary camera for the past year and a half. The two cameras are extremely similar, and really only differ in the sensor in most practical sense. (of course mode dial vs. digital mode dial is another, plus a few very minor settings.) So, if you need 45MP or 8K video, the R5 is your camera. If 20MP is fine for your needs, the R6 is every bit as capable. AF is identical between them, as is IBIS, general handling, etc. The R5 has a nicer EVF, but the difference isn’t enormous, and it has a slightly larger rear screen. However, all the other stuff is very minor and not worth upgrading to the R5 if you don’t need the extra resolution.

      As to lenses, that’s a very personal decision, and it’s not something that I could certainly answer for you. It really depends on what you shoot. For me, the two most used are my RF 14-35/4L and 24-105/4L, but if I could only have two lenses, I’d probably swap the 24-105 for the 70-200mm/2.8. Then again, you can do just fine if you’re on a budget with the 24-105 STM and the 50/1.8. If you shoot more wildlife, then the 100-400 (if budget constrained) or 100-500L (if not) are great options. Too many possibilities to really guide, but I could do about 90% of my photography with my 3 zoom setup of 14-35, 24-105 and 70-200. The other lenses I own are certainly useful for certain things, but maybe not essential.

      Reply
  2. Gianluca says:
    August 3, 2022 at 5:04 am

    Thank You very much, I’d used this lens con EOS R and I agree totally your conclusions. A very good lens, in its peculiarity and for its price

    Reply
  3. padam19 says:
    January 11, 2023 at 6:33 pm

    It is worth mentioning that with cameras like the R3 and R6 Mark II the focusing area sees a big increase.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow Me:

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on InstagramFollow Us on Mastodon

Most Popular Posts

  • "Full Frame Equivalence" and Why It Doesn't Matter (286)
  • Fuji X-Pro 2 vs. Sony A7 II: Noise Comparison (70)
  • Fuji 56mm f/1.2 vs. Panasonic Leica 42.5mm f/1.2 Nocticron (63)
  • Review: Metabones Speed Booster (Canon FD to Fuji X) (56)
  • Review: Olympus OM-D E-M5 (48)

Recent Comments

  • Frank on Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS vs. Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L
  • Giorgio on A Tripod in the Sky – DJI Air 2S Review
  • Sam Taylor on My Favorite Photos of 2022
  • Damien on Review: TTArtisan 50mm f/1.4 ASPH (RF Mount)
  • Jordan Steele on Review: TTArtisan 50mm f/1.4 ASPH (RF Mount)

Archives

©2023 Admiring Light | Theme by SuperbThemes
We use cookies to personalize content and ads and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. You may consent to the use of cookies or opt out. Accept Reject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

SAVE & ACCEPT