Admiring Light
Menu
  • Home
  • Review Index
  • Shop Talk
  • Technique and Vision
  • Opinion
  • Portfolio
  • Site Index
  • About
    • Privacy Policy
Menu

Review: HandeVision Ibelux 40mm f/0.85 (Sony E-Mount)

Posted on August 31, 2014August 31, 2014 by Jordan Steele

Contents

  • 1Construction and Handling
  • 2Speed
  • 3Image Quality
  • 4Conclusion
  • 5Image Samples

Conclusion

ibelux_frontPros

  • Good central image sharpness at wide apertures and very sharp in the center stopped down
  • Outstanding bokeh when focused closer up
  • Simply beautiful and unique look when shooting closer up at wide apertures
  • Ultra-fast f/0.85 aperture for very shallow depth of field shooting

Cons

  • Extremely large and very heavy
  • No tripod collar
  • Image edges are soft, even stopped down
  • Very high spherical aberration at wide apertures (leads to that great rendering above, but it can’t be turned off)
  • Notable chromatic aberration
  • Very high purple fringing at wide apertures
  • Extreme vignetting at f/0.85
  • Bokeh is busy in the foreground and when focused at further distances
  • Un-damped focus ring
  • Long minimum focus distance
  • Extremely expensive

The Ibelux 40mm f/0.85 is an extremely unique lens: It has the fastest aperture of any current interchangeable lens on the market.  When used for portraits or closer subjects, the 40mm can produce images with a truly magical feel to them.  If you enjoy this low contrast look, it delivers in spades.  Shooting wide open, the lens produces good central image sharpness and excellent background bokeh, and you get this lens to shoot wide open.

However, this great look can only take you so far, and the truth is, the lens does one thing really well, and beyond that the Ibelux 40mm f/0.85 just really isn’t a very good lens.  It has tons of lens aberrations, mediocre borders at small apertures, very high purple fringing, and low contrast.  Then there’s the fact that the lens is absurdly large and heavy, and exceedingly expensive for what amounts to mediocre performance in most situations.

Frankly, it’s a lens that is essentially impossible to recommend. If you are a Sony shooter and want an ultra-fast native lens, the Mitakon 50mm f/0.95 will actually produce more background blur, and it costs less than half what the Ibelux costs and weighs significantly less.  If you are shooting Micro 4/3, sacrifice the 1/3 stop of aperture and get the Voigtländer 42.5mm f/0.95 – it’s a much better lens overall and a fraction of the size.

If you shoot Fuji or simply must have something in the 40mm range with this speed, adapting an old fast manual focus lens and adding a SpeedBooster is the more sensible way to go as well.  My Canon FL 55mm f/1.2 with Speed Booster (39mm f/0.9) costs a total of $625 ($225 for the lens and $400 for the Speed Booster), weighs half what the Ibelux weighs, and generally outperforms it.  It has much higher contrast and similar sharpness wide open, while massively outperforming it at smaller apertures and further focus distances (though the Ibelux produces notably smoother bokeh close up).

The enormous size makes it uncomfortable to use, a pain to carry and something you are far more likely to leave at home when you pack your bag. And simply put, given the overall performance of the lens, the asking price of $2,070 US is absurd. To put the weight and cost of the lens in perspective, for the price of this lens, you could buy a brand new Sony A7 full frame body, an adapter and a Minolta Rokkor 58mm f/1.2 (which will give you a very similar look in focal length and background blur).  The resulting Camera AND Lens together would weigh 2/3 of a pound less than the Ibelux 40mm by itself, while saving you a few dollars and producing better images.

While I love the look this lens produces up close, there are simply too many flaws outside of the main usage scenario and too many better options for a fraction of the cost and weight.  I applaud IB/E Optics for daring to produce such a design, but unfortunately, in the real world, it’s simply a lens that doesn’t make sense.

Image Samples

You will notice that the majority of the shots here are at f/0.85.  There’s a reason for that.  If you aren’t buying this lens to shoot at f/0.85, then you shouldn’t buy the lens.  Get a Voigtlander 40mm f/1.4 for $400 and get something that weighs next to nothing and is significantly better at the same apertures.

(Click on an Image to Enlarge)

Disguised - Sony NEX-6 with Ibelux 40mm f/0.85 @ f/0.85
Disguised – Sony NEX-6 with Ibelux 40mm f/0.85 @ f/0.85
Rickshaw Driver - Sony a6000 with Ibelux 40mm f/0.85 @ f/0.85
Pedicab Driver – Sony a6000 with Ibelux 40mm f/0.85 @ f/0.85
Arena Grand - Sony NEX-6 with Ibelux 40mm f/0.85 @ f/2.8
Arena Grand – Sony NEX-6 with Ibelux 40mm f/0.85 @ f/2.8
Boston's - Sony a6000 with Ibelux 40mm f/0.85 @ f/0.85
Boston’s – Sony a6000 with Ibelux 40mm f/0.85 @ f/0.85
Concert - Sony a6000 with Ibelux 40mm f/0.85 @ f/0.85
Concert – Sony a6000 with Ibelux 40mm f/0.85 @ f/0.85
Fish - Sony a6000 with Ibelux 40mm f/0.85 @ f/0.85
Fish – Sony a6000 with Ibelux 40mm f/0.85 @ f/0.85
Flower in the City - Sony a6000 with Ibelux 40mm f/0.85 @ f/0.85
Flower in the City – Sony a6000 with Ibelux 40mm f/0.85 @ f/0.85
FMMF - Sony a6000 with Ibelux 40mm f/0.85 @ f/0.85
FMMF – Sony a6000 with Ibelux 40mm f/0.85 @ f/0.85
Watching the Show - Sony a6000 with Ibelux 40mm f/0.85 @ f/0.85
Watching the Show – Sony a6000 with Ibelux 40mm f/0.85 @ f/0.85
Hibiscus - Sony NEX-6 with Ibelux 40mm f/0.85 @ f/0.85
Hibiscus – Sony NEX-6 with Ibelux 40mm f/0.85 @ f/0.85
Arch Top - Sony NEX-6 with Ibelux 40mm f/0.85 @ f/5.6
Arch Top – Sony NEX-6 with Ibelux 40mm f/0.85 @ f/5.6
Concessions - Sony a6000 with Ibelux 40mm f/0.85 @ f/0.85
Concessions – Sony a6000 with Ibelux 40mm f/0.85 @ f/0.85
Love at a Concert - Sony a6000 with Ibelux 40mm f/0.85 @ f/0.85
Love at a Concert – Sony a6000 with Ibelux 40mm f/0.85 @ f/0.85
FMMF - - Sony a6000 with Ibelux 40mm f/0.85 @ f/0.85 (note the purple fringing)
FMMF – – Sony a6000 with Ibelux 40mm f/0.85 @ f/0.85 (note the purple fringing)
Reveling in Music - Sony a6000 with Ibelux 40mm f/0.85 @ f/0.85
Reveling in Music – Sony a6000 with Ibelux 40mm f/0.85 @ f/0.85
Pages: 1 2 3

9 thoughts on “Review: HandeVision Ibelux 40mm f/0.85 (Sony E-Mount)”

  1. Pingback: First Impressions: HandeVision Ibelux 40mm f/0.85 - Admiring Light
  2. Pingback: Sony Tidbits… | sonyalpharumors
  3. Dave R. says:
    September 11, 2014 at 8:23 am

    Just to point out, I believe the Canon 50mm f/0.95 rangefinder lens predated the Leica 50mm f/0.95 Noctilux. Anyway, thanks for the review.

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      September 11, 2014 at 8:53 am

      Yes, but I was more referring to the fact that before this rush on f/0.95 and faster lenses in the past 5 years, only Leica still actually produced a lens that fast. The Canon 50/0.95 was discontinued decades ago when their rangefinder system went defunct.

      Reply
  4. Raj says:
    September 21, 2014 at 10:47 am

    Thanks for the detailed review. What adapter would you recommend to mount the Voigtlander 40mm f/1.4 on an A6000? What about a Fotasy ANLM Pro?

    Reply
  5. David says:
    November 27, 2015 at 7:07 am

    I don’t really understand this lens; on M43 it’s got the bokeh equivalent of an 80mm f1.7 on full frame.
    Why not buy a cheap full frame camera and a canon 85mm f 1.8? Or if money is not object a Batis and an A7? the whole deal is not that much more than this lens, and lighter.

    On APSC it acts like a 60mm f 1.4 or so; meh. Why not buy a fast 55mm??

    Reply
  6. David says:
    November 27, 2015 at 7:09 am

    But I don’t really understand this lens; on M43 it’s got the bokeh equivalent of an 80mm f1.7 on full frame.
    Why not buy a cheap full frame camera and a canon 85mm f 1.8? Or if money is not object a Batis and an A7? the whole deal is not that much more than this lens, and lighter.

    On APSC it acts like a 60mm f 1.4 or so; meh. Why not buy a fast 55mm??

    Reply
  7. Pablo says:
    May 14, 2017 at 2:24 am

    Jordan, great review! Do you know if the A6300 and the A6500 also have the same banding issue as the A6000 when shooting at super fast apertures?

    Reply
  8. Pingback: KIPON IBELUX 40mm F0.85 Mark I / II ??????????? | ?????????????

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow Me:

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on Instagram

Most Popular Posts

  • "Full Frame Equivalence" and Why It Doesn't Matter (286)
  • Fuji X-Pro 2 vs. Sony A7 II: Noise Comparison (70)
  • Fuji 56mm f/1.2 vs. Panasonic Leica 42.5mm f/1.2 Nocticron (63)
  • Review: Metabones Speed Booster (Canon FD to Fuji X) (56)
  • Review: Olympus OM-D E-M5 (48)

Recent Comments

  • Eric Wojtkun on My Favorite Photos of 2020
  • Harry on Review: Tamron 70-180mm f/2.8 Di III VXD
  • Jordan Steele on Review: Tamron 70-180mm f/2.8 Di III VXD
  • Harry on Review: Tamron 70-180mm f/2.8 Di III VXD
  • Harry on Review: Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM

Archives

©2021 Admiring Light | Theme by SuperbThemes
We use cookies to personalize content and ads and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. You may consent to the use of cookies or opt out. Accept Reject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.