Admiring Light
Menu
  • Home
  • Review Index
  • Shop Talk
  • Technique and Vision
  • Opinion
  • Portfolio
  • Site Index
  • About
    • Privacy Policy
Menu

Review: Olympus 8mm f/1.8 Fisheye PRO

Posted on February 10, 2016 by Jordan Steele

Contents

  • 1Construction and Handling
  • 2Autofocus
  • 3Sharpness
  • 4Bokeh
  • 5Contrast, Color and Chromatic Aberration
  • 6Distortion, Flare and Vignetting
  • 7Conclusion
  • 8Image Samples

Sharpness

Fisheyes have a challenge: So much is included in the frame that you often want all of it to be sharp.  Thankfully, the Olympus 8mm f/1.8 delivers and delivers well in this department.  The 8mm fisheye is an exceptionally sharp optic.  Even at f/1.8, the center (and majority of the frame) is absolutely razor-sharp.  In the center of the frame at all apertures, it rivals the very best lenses in the Micro 4/3 system.  We’re honestly at Nocticron and Olympus 75mm territory here, if not possibly a cut above.

Rock House - Olympus E-M10 Mark II with Olympus 8mm f/1.8 Fisheye @ f/5.6
Rock House – Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II with Olympus 8mm f/1.8 Fisheye @ f/5

The edges take a bit longer to catch up, with some softness on the edges and corners wide open, which quickly sharpen by f/2.8 and provide excellent sharpness deep into the corners by f/5.6. A truly outstanding performance.  I will note, however, that my review sample showed some slight decentering, as my right edge of the frame showed a bit more softness than the left.  In fact, at f/1.8, my left edge was reasonably sharp while the right was soft.  However, even with this slight decentering defect, the lens was still sharp to the corners by f/5.6, which rendered the impact of this error to be minimal in field use.

Bokeh

Bokeh on a fisheye?  With this lens, yes.  When focused at closer distances, the lens shows pronounced blur, and amazingly, that blur is very pleasing.  I was surprised to see that the bokeh produced by the 8mm f/1.8 is smooth, even and quite good to my eye.  Specular highlights are evenly illuminated and there’s gentle falloff between colors in the background.

Killerspin - Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II with Olympus 8mm f/1.8 Fisheye @ f/1.8
Killerspin – Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II with Olympus 8mm f/1.8 Fisheye @ f/1.8

Contrast, Color and Chromatic Aberration

The 8mm f/1.8 fisheye produces images with exceptional color and contrast.  Much like the other PRO badged lenses in the Olympus lineup, care has been taken in the design of this lens to produce excellent contrast and rich color even at f/1.8.  There’s really no change in the drawing style of the lens at various apertures.  Only at extremely close focusing distances does the lens drop off a bit in contrast, likely due to some spherical aberration induced by the close focusing.

The lens exhibits extremely minimal lateral chromatic aberration, such that you’d be hard pressed to see it in any images. It can produce some longitudinal CA, however, most visible when shooting close up at wide apertures.  It’s not too bad, but it’s definitely there if you’re shooting a high contrast subject with parts that fall outside the plane of focus.  Some fringing can also occur on high contrast edges, though it’s more blue than the typical purple fringing that can sometimes occur.  In all, though, the 8mm performs fairly well in this regard.

Distortion, Flare and Vignetting

Being a fisheye, the lens is designed to have massive distortion, which renders straight lines as curved unless they don’t pass through the center of the image.  On the opposite side of this, curved lines and circles will see less distortion than on a rectilinear ultra-wide angle.  The distortion is often one reason for selecting a fisheye lens, though personally, I enjoy fisheyes for the opportunities afforded by their extreme field of view.  While the fisheye distortion will be incredibly obvious when shooting subjects with straight lines, such as buildings, shooting other subjects can often hide the distorted nature of the fisheye.  Shooting landscapes with the horizon in the center, or without a reference point can capture views that no other lens can while hiding the fisheye distortion.  Believe it or not, shots captured with people, when they are not placed at the edges of the frame and shot at a moderate distance can show only minor distortion of features.  You’ll see two self portraits in the image sample section: one where I maximize distortion, and one where it’s much more subtle.

Flare can be an issue in some shots - Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II with Olympus 8mm f/1.8 Fisheye PRO @ f/ 5.6
Flare can be an issue in some shots – Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II with Olympus 8mm f/1.8 Fisheye PRO @ f/ 5 (HDR of 3 shots)

Flare performance is rather important in a fisheye lens, as the extreme width will place the sun in the frame in many outdoor compositions.  The Olympus 8mm shows only average resistance to flare, however.  I’ve definitely seen worse flare performance in fisheyes, but I’ve also seen much better.  It is quite possible, depending on the sun’s position in the frame, to induce rather large multi-colored flare ghosts.  This can sometimes enhance images, but more often than not, it will detract a bit from the final image.

The 8mm f/1.8 also shows notable vignetting at f/1.8, though this eases fairly quickly and by f/4, it’s invisible in real world shooting.

In all, the performance of the 8mm fisheye is outstanding.  Only less than perfect flare performance really mars what is otherwise an exceptional optic.

Continue: Conclusion and Image Samples

Pages: 1 2 3

6 thoughts on “Review: Olympus 8mm f/1.8 Fisheye PRO”

  1. Nobuyuki Sakamoto says:
    February 13, 2016 at 3:51 pm

    I’ve found it quite useful at skate parks, my usual shooting habitat. I’ve also used it recently to test against an ultra wide angle Tokina for Nikon. It’s been very good overall and keeps up whether shooting stills or video, using it on E-M1, GH4, or GX8.

    Reply
  2. peniole says:
    February 15, 2016 at 3:29 am

    Would really love to hear your take on how it compares to the Olympus 4/3 f3.5 version which I have. Does it justify an upgrade? Fisheye sample images on my 500px page are all, except for one, shot with the old Oly both on a 4/3 E-500 and newer mirrorless Oly’s. TIA

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      February 15, 2016 at 7:35 am

      Unfortunately I have no experience with the 4/3 lenses.

      Reply
    2. Greg says:
      August 19, 2016 at 8:28 am

      The original Zuiko 8mm f3.5 shows tons of CA used on my E-M1 and E-M5 II bodies. I still have it and use at times as I do not yet own the Micro f1.8, but it’s just a matter of time….

      Reply
  3. Tom says:
    February 16, 2016 at 10:06 am

    I recently purchased the 7.5 Rokinon and it is fantastic. It’s turning out to be more than a once-in-a-while lens for me. For hiking, it can’t be beat, it’s easy to defish and the sharpness and contrast is stellar.

    Now I’ve been thinking about that 1.8 the Olympus offers and am very interested. To capture some late evening or even night time photography- now that would be quite the advantage. I’ll wait for the price to drop a bit, but I think this lens is worth it.

    Reply
  4. Pingback: ??????????M.ZUIKO DIGITAL ED 8mm F1.8 Fisheye PRO??????? | ?????????????

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow Me:

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on Instagram

Most Popular Posts

  • "Full Frame Equivalence" and Why It Doesn't Matter (286)
  • Fuji X-Pro 2 vs. Sony A7 II: Noise Comparison (70)
  • Fuji 56mm f/1.2 vs. Panasonic Leica 42.5mm f/1.2 Nocticron (63)
  • Review: Metabones Speed Booster (Canon FD to Fuji X) (56)
  • Review: Olympus OM-D E-M5 (48)

Recent Comments

  • Harry on Review: Tamron 70-180mm f/2.8 Di III VXD
  • Jordan Steele on Review: Tamron 70-180mm f/2.8 Di III VXD
  • Harry on Review: Tamron 70-180mm f/2.8 Di III VXD
  • Harry on Review: Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM
  • Jordan Steele on Review: Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM

Archives

©2021 Admiring Light | Theme by SuperbThemes
We use cookies to personalize content and ads and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. You may consent to the use of cookies or opt out. Accept Reject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.