Admiring Light
Menu
  • Home
  • Review Index
  • Shop Talk
  • Technique and Vision
  • Opinion
  • Portfolio
  • Site Index
  • About
    • Privacy Policy
Menu

Review: Sigma 60mm f/2.8 DN Art (Sony E-Mount)

Posted on July 31, 2014 by Jordan Steele

Contents

  • 1Construction and Handling
  • 2Autofocus Performance
  • 3Image Quality
  • 4Conclusion
  • 5Image Samples

Today I’m taking a look at the newest member of Sigma’s trio of lenses for mirrorless cameras, the 60mm f/2.8 DN Art, which is available for Sony E-mount and Micro 4/3.  The 60mm keeps a similar body style and the same f/2.8 maximum aperture as the 19mm and 30mm lenses that preceded it.  The DN series has a reputation for low-cost and high optical quality, and the 60mm f/2.8, which is priced at a mere $239, hopes to match or exceed the other two lenses in this new line.

The Sigma 60mm f/2.8 DN Art on the Sony a6000
The Sigma 60mm f/2.8 DN Art on the Sony a6000

If you’re not familiar with my reviews, I review from a real world shooting perspective.  You won’t find lens charts or resolution numbers here.  There are plenty of other sites that cover those.  I review products on how they act for me as a photographic tool in real-world shooting. 

Construction and Handling

The Sigma 60mm f/2.8 DN Art is built with the same body construction as the other two DN Art lenses.  The 60mm is a compact and lightweight lens with a thin metal shell in a two-tone black or silver finish and a metal mount.  The copy reviewed here is the black model.  The base of the lens shell is a matte finished black with a silver inset ‘A’ for the ‘Art’ designation.  The rest of the lens body is taken up by the broad focus ring, which is finished in a very shiny black paint.  While the overall effect looks fantastic, the smooth shiny black finish on the focus ring is quite prone to fingerprints. The lens includes a nice lens case as well as a lens hood.  In another appreciated twice, the three DN primes all utilize the same hood and lens caps, allowing you to bring one and share if desired.

Sigma 60mm f/2.8 DN Art with supplied hood
Sigma 60mm f/2.8 DN Art with supplied hood

The focus ring turns smoothly and has a bit of damping to provide a nice manual focus feel when using the ring.  The lens is a bit longer than the other two Sigma mirrorless primes, but it’s still a small and lightweight lens that will handle beautifully on any of the E-Mount cameras.  The lens also shares the same floating focus group with the other two lenses, which will rattle when the lens is jostled and the camera is off.  While the construction isn’t up to the standards of a pro-grade lens, it is tightly assembled and quite well-built considering the low price.

Autofocus Performance

The Sigma 60mm features a very quiet and relatively fast autofocus motor.  The focusing is notably faster than that of the Sigma 30mm f/2.8, though it falls short of the fastest lenses available for E-mount.  still, focus is quick and very accurate in single shot mode.

Unfortunately, the Sigma 60mm doesn’t appear to be compatible with the phase-detect focusing in recent Sony cameras, and as such doesn’t provide a good experience when shooting on continuous autofocus.  Some have mentioned that it will work with the center AF point, but I was unable to get the camera to track focus on a moving subject with the 60mm f/2.8.

Continue: Image Quality

Pages: 1 2 3

23 thoughts on “Review: Sigma 60mm f/2.8 DN Art (Sony E-Mount)”

  1. Peter says:
    August 1, 2014 at 12:39 am

    Great to read another one of your good (I.e. well-done) reviews. Since I have one friend who doubted me when I said i thought my 60mm Sigma was sharper than my 45mm Olympus (same effective focal length on my E-M1 as the 60mm on my NEX 6) I smiled when I read how sharp you found this sigma to be… And you shot it on a 20mp camera!

    Peter F.

    Reply
  2. Tony says:
    August 1, 2014 at 6:01 pm

    Hello,

    Did you check if there’s any update for the lens on the NEX6? I think there was an update for the 30mm version that allows PDAF to work in the center (Just 5 points).

    I know that A6000 (Which I have) has the update already installed on the camera, and I can use PDAF (Again only 5 dots in the center) using my 30mm Sigma 2.8.

    Reply
  3. db says:
    August 4, 2014 at 3:28 am

    I have this lens together with the 30/2.8. it is really as good as you say.
    Now, I wonder if IQ of A6000 + Sigma 60/2.8 match the IQ of A7 + FE 55/1.8 at base ISO for static shots with better perspective and wider depth of field.

    Reply
  4. Pingback: Sony TidBits… | sonyalpharumors
  5. Lucas says:
    August 5, 2014 at 9:53 am

    Very nice review, I intend to buy the Sigma 60mm f/2.8 DN Art and the 30mm for my A6000. I just wish they had image stabilization, since Sony’s “E” mount bodies don’t have it!

    Reply
  6. Chris says:
    September 8, 2014 at 12:01 pm

    I am buying the Sony a6000 and like what I read about the sharpness of the Sigma 30mm & 60mm. In practical use is the 5-point PDAF limitation on Sigma lenses adequate for AF tracking of people in street photography? Is the lack of image stabilization on the Sigma 60mm much of a factor when hand-holding in street photography?

    Reply
  7. video game collecting 101 says:
    October 5, 2014 at 7:17 pm

    This blog was… how do you say it? Relevant!!
    Finally I’ve found something which helped me.

    Thank you!

    Reply
  8. bill m. says:
    December 17, 2014 at 12:53 pm

    Very close to purchasing the a6000. Would like to start with one lens. Thinking either the standard 16-50 kit, the Sigma 30/2.8, or the Sony 35/1.8. Any real world advice? Currently not into video, but that may change with the 6000 later.
    Also, anyone have any thoughts on using Canon EF mounts with adapter on the 6000 or would I be better selling them off and going with lenses designed for mirrorless? I understand they will be manual focus only.

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      January 9, 2015 at 7:39 am

      If you’re going to be using this as a main camera, the Sony 35/1.8 is the way I’d go. I have both the 35/1.8 and the Sigma 30mm, and while the Sigma 30 is brilliant (especially for the price), the extra aperture and optical stabilization is nice to have. At f/2.8 they are close to each other optically.

      Reply
    2. Claude B. says:
      January 23, 2016 at 3:36 pm

      Don’t put away your 16-50 Kit lens, do your DDs on Flickr, on Sony A6000 group and others, you wills it is not a perfect lens but not a bad lens.

      Reply
  9. Clement says:
    January 26, 2015 at 9:11 pm

    Thanks for the real-world reviews! I am considering this Sigma 60mm vs. the Sony 50mm f1.8 for my a6000. Have you given the Sony a try, and if so, what differences have you found?

    Reply
    1. Tim Crooke says:
      March 11, 2015 at 1:01 am

      I too am very interested in this comparison, any input from anyone would be greatly appreciated. cheers!

      Reply
    2. Romar says:
      August 10, 2015 at 5:03 am

      I’m torn between these two lenses as well.

      Reply
    3. Claude B. says:
      January 23, 2016 at 4:13 pm

      I agree it is not an easy decision. Finally, i decide for the Sigma 60mm, a perfect portrait lens.
      As Jordan mention it is very sharp at f/2.8.
      The question is The Sony 50mm at f/ 1.8 it is as sharp as the Sigma 60mm at f 2.8?
      Is the sharpness of the Sony 50mm have to reach f/ 2.8 to get the same quality as the Sigma 60mm?

      Reply
  10. Ryan says:
    March 30, 2015 at 5:49 pm

    Great review!

    Reply
  11. George says:
    September 1, 2015 at 6:50 pm

    Fantastic photo of the reflected glen. I wanted to say I appreciate your reviews. the real world reference is a boon to the photographer world

    Reply
  12. Pingback: Review: Sigma 30mm f/1.4 DC DN (Sony E-Mount) - Admiring Light
  13. LAM says:
    November 17, 2016 at 10:04 am

    Sigma 60mm vs. the Sony 50mm f1.8

    Sigma 60mm Art is an APSC format Lense

    whilst

    Sony 50mm f1.8 is a Full frame format lense

    Reply
    1. WONG says:
      November 21, 2016 at 10:49 pm

      So If U have two SONY camera such as A6300(APSC) & A7ii(Full Frame like me, U will choose to get Sony 50mm F1.8 for sure. In fact, the firmware available now do support Phase Detection Focus mechanism.

      Reply
  14. Emmi says:
    June 15, 2017 at 6:52 pm

    I know a few others asked the same question, but I’m curious about your opinion on the lack of image stabilization (when used on a6000 since it has no IBIS). Does this have a huge affect on shooting in low light?

    Reply
  15. Pingback: ???????????????? 60mm F2.8 DN??????? | ?????????????
  16. Pingback: ???60mm F2.8 DN??????????????????????????? | ?????????????
  17. Pingback: ????60mm F2.8 DN? ? ????????????????? ? ??????????

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow Me:

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on InstagramFollow Us on Mastodon

Most Popular Posts

  • "Full Frame Equivalence" and Why It Doesn't Matter (286)
  • Fuji X-Pro 2 vs. Sony A7 II: Noise Comparison (70)
  • Fuji 56mm f/1.2 vs. Panasonic Leica 42.5mm f/1.2 Nocticron (63)
  • Review: Metabones Speed Booster (Canon FD to Fuji X) (56)
  • Review: Olympus OM-D E-M5 (48)

Recent Comments

  • Frank on Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS vs. Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L
  • Giorgio on A Tripod in the Sky – DJI Air 2S Review
  • Sam Taylor on My Favorite Photos of 2022
  • Damien on Review: TTArtisan 50mm f/1.4 ASPH (RF Mount)
  • Jordan Steele on Review: TTArtisan 50mm f/1.4 ASPH (RF Mount)

Archives

©2023 Admiring Light | Theme by SuperbThemes
We use cookies to personalize content and ads and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. You may consent to the use of cookies or opt out. Accept Reject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

SAVE & ACCEPT