Admiring Light
Menu
  • Home
  • Review Index
  • Shop Talk
  • Technique and Vision
  • Opinion
  • Portfolio
  • Site Index
  • About
    • Privacy Policy
Menu

Review: Sigma 60mm f/2.8 DN Art (Sony E-Mount)

Posted on July 31, 2014 by Jordan Steele

Contents

  • 1Construction and Handling
  • 2Autofocus Performance
  • 3Image Quality
  • 4Conclusion
  • 5Image Samples

Image Quality

Upper Falls, Hocking Hills, OH - Sony a6000 with Sigma 60mm f/2.8 @ f/8
Upper Falls, Hocking Hills, OH – Sony a6000 with Sigma 60mm f/2.8 @ f/8

Sharpness

The Sigma 60mm f/2.8 is a budget telephoto lens, but when it comes to image quality, the lens delivers and delivers well.  The lens is extremely sharp right from f/2.8, with excellent central sharpness and even very good borders wide open.  Stopping down brings the 60mm f/2.8 into utterly outstanding territory.  The majority of the frame is blisteringly sharp, and while the very edges aren’t quite as sharp as the center, they are still very sharp all the way into the corners.  Indeed, the 60mm f/2.8 is one of the sharpest lenses available for a mirrorless camera today, in the same realm as the Fujifilm 56mm f/1.2, the Leica 42.5mm Nocticron, the Olympus 75mm f/1.8 and the Zeiss 50mm f/2.8 Touit Macro.  Of course, it has a more modest maximum aperture and no macro capabilities, but for a lens this cheap to be capable of this level of resolution is extremely impressive.

Bokeh

With a short telephoto focal length providing the field of view similar to a 90mm lens on a full frame camera, one of the prime uses for such a lens will be portraiture.  As such, the quality of the out of focus areas is quite important.  The Sigma 60mm f/2.8 provides generally quite nice bokeh, though it falls short of exceptional.  Out of focus areas are smoothly rendered and specular highlights avoid bright rings for the most part.  However, the presence of aspherical elements does cause a bit of onion-ring like structure to those highlights.  While the f/2.8 maximum aperture isn’t going to provide tons of subject separation, the lens provides enough blur to provide for very pleasing portraits.  A very solid performance in this area.

Staring - Sony a6000 with Sigma 60mm f/2.8 @ f/2.8
Staring – Sony a6000 with Sigma 60mm f/2.8 @ f/2.8

Color, Contrast and Chromatic Aberration

The Sigma 60mm f/2.8 continues its strong optical performance with a nice rich color palette and crisp contrast throughout the aperture range. There is little change in the contrast profile even wide open, producing punchy images whatever your depth of field needs happen to be.

The lens puts in a strong performance with regards to chromatic aberration control as well.  Lateral chromatic aberration is negligible and longitudinal CA is also relatively well controlled.  No issues here.

Distortion, Flare and Vignetting

Again, the Sigma 60mm produces excellent characteristics when it comes to distortion, with nothing field relevant in that department.  The lens also works quite well against bright light, with flare and ghosting of minimal concern. While the it isn’t impossible to make the lens flare, it does so only in very specific circumstances when the sun is in a very specific part of the frame.  Otherwise, it’s nothing to worry about.

The Sigma 60mm has some mild vignetting at f/2.8 that is predominantly gone by f/4.

You may be asking yourself: Is there really nothing to complain about with this lens optically?  Well, it’s f/2.8 only, but that’s really about it.  Sigma has done something remarkable and created a low-cost lens that is simply spectacular optically.  The Sigma 30mm f/2.8 is an outstanding lens, and the 60mm is even better.

Continue: Conclusion and Image Samples

Pages: 1 2 3

23 thoughts on “Review: Sigma 60mm f/2.8 DN Art (Sony E-Mount)”

  1. Peter says:
    August 1, 2014 at 12:39 am

    Great to read another one of your good (I.e. well-done) reviews. Since I have one friend who doubted me when I said i thought my 60mm Sigma was sharper than my 45mm Olympus (same effective focal length on my E-M1 as the 60mm on my NEX 6) I smiled when I read how sharp you found this sigma to be… And you shot it on a 20mp camera!

    Peter F.

    Reply
  2. Tony says:
    August 1, 2014 at 6:01 pm

    Hello,

    Did you check if there’s any update for the lens on the NEX6? I think there was an update for the 30mm version that allows PDAF to work in the center (Just 5 points).

    I know that A6000 (Which I have) has the update already installed on the camera, and I can use PDAF (Again only 5 dots in the center) using my 30mm Sigma 2.8.

    Reply
  3. db says:
    August 4, 2014 at 3:28 am

    I have this lens together with the 30/2.8. it is really as good as you say.
    Now, I wonder if IQ of A6000 + Sigma 60/2.8 match the IQ of A7 + FE 55/1.8 at base ISO for static shots with better perspective and wider depth of field.

    Reply
  4. Pingback: Sony TidBits… | sonyalpharumors
  5. Lucas says:
    August 5, 2014 at 9:53 am

    Very nice review, I intend to buy the Sigma 60mm f/2.8 DN Art and the 30mm for my A6000. I just wish they had image stabilization, since Sony’s “E” mount bodies don’t have it!

    Reply
  6. Chris says:
    September 8, 2014 at 12:01 pm

    I am buying the Sony a6000 and like what I read about the sharpness of the Sigma 30mm & 60mm. In practical use is the 5-point PDAF limitation on Sigma lenses adequate for AF tracking of people in street photography? Is the lack of image stabilization on the Sigma 60mm much of a factor when hand-holding in street photography?

    Reply
  7. video game collecting 101 says:
    October 5, 2014 at 7:17 pm

    This blog was… how do you say it? Relevant!!
    Finally I’ve found something which helped me.

    Thank you!

    Reply
  8. bill m. says:
    December 17, 2014 at 12:53 pm

    Very close to purchasing the a6000. Would like to start with one lens. Thinking either the standard 16-50 kit, the Sigma 30/2.8, or the Sony 35/1.8. Any real world advice? Currently not into video, but that may change with the 6000 later.
    Also, anyone have any thoughts on using Canon EF mounts with adapter on the 6000 or would I be better selling them off and going with lenses designed for mirrorless? I understand they will be manual focus only.

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      January 9, 2015 at 7:39 am

      If you’re going to be using this as a main camera, the Sony 35/1.8 is the way I’d go. I have both the 35/1.8 and the Sigma 30mm, and while the Sigma 30 is brilliant (especially for the price), the extra aperture and optical stabilization is nice to have. At f/2.8 they are close to each other optically.

      Reply
    2. Claude B. says:
      January 23, 2016 at 3:36 pm

      Don’t put away your 16-50 Kit lens, do your DDs on Flickr, on Sony A6000 group and others, you wills it is not a perfect lens but not a bad lens.

      Reply
  9. Clement says:
    January 26, 2015 at 9:11 pm

    Thanks for the real-world reviews! I am considering this Sigma 60mm vs. the Sony 50mm f1.8 for my a6000. Have you given the Sony a try, and if so, what differences have you found?

    Reply
    1. Tim Crooke says:
      March 11, 2015 at 1:01 am

      I too am very interested in this comparison, any input from anyone would be greatly appreciated. cheers!

      Reply
    2. Romar says:
      August 10, 2015 at 5:03 am

      I’m torn between these two lenses as well.

      Reply
    3. Claude B. says:
      January 23, 2016 at 4:13 pm

      I agree it is not an easy decision. Finally, i decide for the Sigma 60mm, a perfect portrait lens.
      As Jordan mention it is very sharp at f/2.8.
      The question is The Sony 50mm at f/ 1.8 it is as sharp as the Sigma 60mm at f 2.8?
      Is the sharpness of the Sony 50mm have to reach f/ 2.8 to get the same quality as the Sigma 60mm?

      Reply
  10. Ryan says:
    March 30, 2015 at 5:49 pm

    Great review!

    Reply
  11. George says:
    September 1, 2015 at 6:50 pm

    Fantastic photo of the reflected glen. I wanted to say I appreciate your reviews. the real world reference is a boon to the photographer world

    Reply
  12. Pingback: Review: Sigma 30mm f/1.4 DC DN (Sony E-Mount) - Admiring Light
  13. LAM says:
    November 17, 2016 at 10:04 am

    Sigma 60mm vs. the Sony 50mm f1.8

    Sigma 60mm Art is an APSC format Lense

    whilst

    Sony 50mm f1.8 is a Full frame format lense

    Reply
    1. WONG says:
      November 21, 2016 at 10:49 pm

      So If U have two SONY camera such as A6300(APSC) & A7ii(Full Frame like me, U will choose to get Sony 50mm F1.8 for sure. In fact, the firmware available now do support Phase Detection Focus mechanism.

      Reply
  14. Emmi says:
    June 15, 2017 at 6:52 pm

    I know a few others asked the same question, but I’m curious about your opinion on the lack of image stabilization (when used on a6000 since it has no IBIS). Does this have a huge affect on shooting in low light?

    Reply
  15. Pingback: ???????????????? 60mm F2.8 DN??????? | ?????????????
  16. Pingback: ???60mm F2.8 DN??????????????????????????? | ?????????????
  17. Pingback: ????60mm F2.8 DN? ? ????????????????? ? ??????????

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow Me:

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on InstagramFollow Us on Mastodon

Most Popular Posts

  • "Full Frame Equivalence" and Why It Doesn't Matter (288)
  • Fuji X-Pro 2 vs. Sony A7 II: Noise Comparison (70)
  • Fuji 56mm f/1.2 vs. Panasonic Leica 42.5mm f/1.2 Nocticron (63)
  • Review: Metabones Speed Booster (Canon FD to Fuji X) (56)
  • Review: Olympus OM-D E-M5 (48)

Recent Comments

  • Peter on A Tripod in the Sky – DJI Air 2S Review
  • Eric Wojtkun on My Favorite Photos of 2022
  • Jordan Steele on “Full Frame Equivalence” and Why It Doesn’t Matter
  • Leon on “Full Frame Equivalence” and Why It Doesn’t Matter
  • Clarke jones on Review: TTArtisan 50mm f/1.4 ASPH (RF Mount)

Archives

©2023 Admiring Light | Theme by SuperbThemes
We use cookies to personalize content and ads and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. You may consent to the use of cookies or opt out. Accept Reject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

SAVE & ACCEPT