Admiring Light
Menu
  • Home
  • Review Index
  • Shop Talk
  • Technique and Vision
  • Opinion
  • Portfolio
  • Site Index
  • About
    • Privacy Policy
Menu

Review: Sony a6400

Posted on April 7, 2019April 7, 2019 by Jordan Steele

Contents

  • 1Construction and Handling
  • 2Controls and Operation
  • 3Viewfinder and Rear Screen
  • 4Autofocus
  • 5Performance
  • 6Key Features
  • 7Image Quality
  • 8Video
  • 9Conclusion
  • 10Image Samples

Key Features

Connectivity

The a6400 has the same wireless connectivity options as other recent Sony mirrorless cameras, with support for Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connections, plus NFC for contactless pairing for image transfer and remote control. Most of these functions work fairly well, though there are small hitches here and there that prevent it from being a fully seamless operation.

With Wi-Fi connectivity, the camera can transfer JPEG images in reduced or full size to a connected smartphone or tablet, and this process is relatively pain-free.  Images can be transferred immediately upon viewing by tapping your phone to the NFC symbol on the side (provided you’ve already installed the PlayMemories app on your phone), or multiple images can be transferred by selecting in camera on the phone.

The a6400’s Remote Control works, but is still very limited compared to the earlier PlayMemories app.

Wi-Fi also has built-in remote control, but just like I noted in my A7 III review, Sony has somewhat crippled the remote shooting application.  You are able to change most shooting parameters on the remote device, but not all of them, and most infuriatingly, you can’t select your focus point on the phone.  When Eye AF is active, this works fine for portrait shooting, provided you have one person in frame, or multiple at the same plane of focus, but it is problematic when shooting group shots (one of the main reasons you’d use a remote application), and when shooting things like landscapes, where focus point selection can be critical.  I’m not sure why this feature was removed, as it was available in the enhanced remote shooting application that used to come in the PlayMemories store before they axed it.  Sony has already developed the software for this to work, so I have no idea why it isn’t present on their current cameras…it’s somewhat infuriating.

The Bluetooth connection is very handy for reducing the trouble of pairing the camera for Geotagging.  In theory, one just needs to turn on geotagging in the app, turn on Bluetooth, and the camera will pair and record location for all subsequent shots.  Pairing is a bit unintuitive, as it must be done through the app in order for it to work.  If you pair the camera with bluetooth outside the app, it will show as connected on the phone, but the app won’t see the camera.  Once that’s set up, the camera does connect seamlessly to the phone for geotagging…with one small quirk, at least on Android.  With an Android phone, you get to take advantage of the NFC connectivity above, but with the bluetooth connection, it will only connect if the screen is awake.  Once connected, you can lock your phone and shoot, but if you turn the camera off, when you turn it on, you will need to at least wake the screen to allow the camera to connect to the phone.  It’s a bit of an annoyance, but at least you don’t need to fully unlock the phone to get it to connect.

Intervalometer

When Sony got rid of the PlayMemories store with the Mark III versions of the A7 series cameras, they got rid of some really nice software.  The advanced remote shooting mentioned above, a unique smooth reflections app that stacked multiple images in-camera to create a stacked RAW file, some filter apps that I never really found useful, and an in-camera intervalometer for time-lapse shooting.  While most of these are still gone as of now (Sony, please bring back Smooth Reflections), one of them does appear again as a built-in function, and that’s interval shooting.

The a6400’s built-in intervalometer is easy to use

The Intervalometer is quite easy to set up.  You choose a start time delay, which can be as short as one second after pressing the button up to 99 minutes.  You then set the interval between photos (between 1 second and 60 seconds), and finally the number of shots to capture (up to 9,999).  Taking those 10,000 shots with a 60 second interval will take 166 hours to complete, but you can do it if you have some sort of external power source attached.   The camera also does the math for you, telling you the total time to capture the sequence at the current settings.  You can also set the camera to autofocus between frames if you like, with a sensitivity for AF changes.  It’s quite simple, and works the way you’d expect it to work.

Other Items of Note

  • Like all recent Sony cameras (and most recent mirrorless cameras), the a6400 has an electronic shutter option for truly silent shooting.  Also, like most of Sony’s cameras, the readout speed isn’t exactly the best, so while silent shutter can be used in both single shot and burst modes, it’s probably best used for subjects without a lot of motion.  In shots where a subject or the camera are moving quickly, the silent shutter will introduce rolling shutter artifacts due to the slow readout.  It is excellent for candid portraits or event work, however.
  • Like the more recent A7 series bodies, the a6400 has an excellent Auto ISO feature, which allows the user to set how fast the shutter speed will be at a minimum.  When set to Auto ISO (standard), the camera will shoot at a minimum shutter speed of 1 / (focal length * 1.5).  This is the standard hand holding rule for sharp shots that has been a rule of thumb for decades.  However, if you want to modify that, either because you are more or less steady than ‘average’, or your lens has optical stabilization, or you need to stop motion, you can change the minimum shutter speed algorithm to be faster or slower, in one stop increments, over the standard rule.  If this isn’t enough flexibility, you can also manually set a minimum shutter speed between 30 seconds and 1/4000s.
  • The a6400 uses the same NP-FW50 battery that has been a standard for the majority of Sony’s mirrorless cameras.  While I understand the size implications of moving to a larger battery, I do wish they had opted to make the camera just a bit larger to try to fit the new big Z battery in it.  As they didn’t want to change the form factor that much, we are stuck with the average at best FW50 battery, which allows the camera to be used for around 300 shots on a full charge.  For heavy shooting days an extra battery or two will be necessary.
  • Sony cameras continue to lack in-camera RAW conversion capability, and I find this more and more egregious the longer it goes missing.  At this point, almost every other manufacturer offers in-camera RAW conversion, and Sony is being left behind in this area.
  • Like the a6300, but unlike the a6500, the a6400 does not feature in-body image stabilization.  It would definitely have been nice to have, but I think Sony really wanted to hit that $900 price point to compete with Fuji’s X-T30.  It also leaves some room for the a6500 at its higher price point.  I do think eventually all of the APS-C cameras will have IBIS, but I think we’ll have to wait for the next generation.

Continue: Image Quality and Video

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5

16 thoughts on “Review: Sony a6400”

  1. Marco says:
    April 8, 2019 at 12:43 am

    Do you have set back button focus? If yes then set the focussing to the shutter button and then you should be able to select in the remote app the focus point.
    At least this is was the workaround with the a6000
    Cheers

    Reply
    1. George says:
      April 8, 2019 at 12:17 pm

      I second that..

      Reply
    2. George says:
      April 8, 2019 at 12:19 pm

      I second that.. It has also happened to me with the a6000 and it is frustrating that they have not fixed it yet..
      Jordan the pictures are awesome. Nice review!

      Reply
    3. Jordan Steele says:
      April 8, 2019 at 12:21 pm

      I do not have back button focus set. The remote shooting app in the newer cameras is not the same app as on the earlier PlayMemories store and with the a6000. The current remote shooting app does not allow remote moving of the focus point at all. It’s the same with the A7 III.

      Reply
  2. Trailblazer says:
    April 8, 2019 at 10:18 am

    Well-done review with great examples.

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      April 8, 2019 at 12:23 pm

      Thanks!

      Reply
  3. Pepou says:
    April 13, 2019 at 7:25 am

    I’m surprised that the combo a6400+sigma56mm f1.4 is more used than a7iii+sony85mm f1.8.
    Why ? I’m curious.

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      April 13, 2019 at 7:27 am

      It’s not necessarily more used… But when both are sitting there, grabbing the a6400 for candids is the better choice. However, with the just released Firmware 3 for the A7 III, the AC system has closed the gap a bit (though the tracking capability of the a6400 is still better).

      Reply
  4. Lloyd says:
    April 24, 2019 at 2:12 pm

    Question from non-photography expert…… When you use the Sigma 150-600 you have to use a mount converter, correct, to get autofocus, auto-exposure? Could you describe your setup when using that particular lens, and how you like it with the a6400? Suggest any other similar alternatives that wouldn’t require the use of converter?
    thanks….

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      April 24, 2019 at 2:18 pm

      Yes, it’s the Canon EF mount version, adapted to Sony using the Sigma MC-11 adapter. The adapter works well with the lens, and while I’m sure the focus speed and accuracy isn’t quite as good as it is on a native Canon camera, it works quite well. Focus is generally accurate and even tracking AF is pretty good as long as the subject isn’t quickly moving very close to you. I’ve been relatively pleased. The lens is sharp enough on the a6400, but it’s notably better on the A7 III in that department due to the lower pixel density. I’ll have a review of that lens sometime in the next few weeks.

      As to native alternatives: right now there’s pretty much only one: the FE 100-400mm GM, and then you can add a 1.4x TC to get similar range (though at a smaller aperture). That’s a pricey combo, though.

      Reply
  5. Maciek says:
    June 2, 2019 at 2:58 am

    Any review of Sigma 56 planned ?

    Reply
    1. Jordan Steele says:
      June 29, 2019 at 2:47 pm

      Yes! I have most of it written, but have been swamped at my day job as of late, so haven’t had time to finish it up. Hopefully this week!

      Reply
      1. Maciek says:
        July 14, 2019 at 10:21 am

        Thanks 🙂
        Still waiting for this.

        I’m thinking about dumping FF Sony and leave only APS-C.
        I have right now A7II + A5100 (as small camera).
        I’m thinking about 10-18 + 18-135 (and 16-50) + 56/1.4 + 28/2 as a travel kit (and maybe Rokinon 12/2 for astro)
        And 2 bodies: A6400 + A5100.

        What do you think ?

        Reply
        1. Maciek says:
          July 14, 2019 at 10:24 am

          FF alternative for me is 16-35/4 + 70-200/4 + 85/1.8 + new 35/1.8.
          It has low light (and probably sharpness) advantage but it’s much heavier.

          Reply
  6. Derek says:
    June 29, 2019 at 2:08 pm

    Thanks for the usual thorough review, Jordan. Have you had a chance to see if the new tracking functions work with the Sigma f/2.8 trio of primes? The impressive AF has me tempted to try Sony out, but it’s my understanding that the older Sigma primes haven’t been able to take full advantage of Sony’s AF technology, and I was curious if this were still the case with the new tracking mode, too. Thanks!

    Reply
  7. Richard Pither says:
    November 17, 2019 at 9:01 am

    Thanks for another solid review Jordan.
    How does the A6400 autofocus compare to the A7iii (for wildlife)?
    Is real-time tracking an important consideration?

    Cheers.
    Richard

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow Me:

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on Instagram

Most Popular Posts

  • "Full Frame Equivalence" and Why It Doesn't Matter (286)
  • Fuji X-Pro 2 vs. Sony A7 II: Noise Comparison (70)
  • Fuji 56mm f/1.2 vs. Panasonic Leica 42.5mm f/1.2 Nocticron (63)
  • Review: Metabones Speed Booster (Canon FD to Fuji X) (56)
  • Review: Olympus OM-D E-M5 (48)

Recent Comments

  • Harry on Review: Tamron 70-180mm f/2.8 Di III VXD
  • Jordan Steele on Review: Tamron 70-180mm f/2.8 Di III VXD
  • Harry on Review: Tamron 70-180mm f/2.8 Di III VXD
  • Harry on Review: Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM
  • Jordan Steele on Review: Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM

Archives

©2021 Admiring Light | Theme by SuperbThemes
We use cookies to personalize content and ads and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. You may consent to the use of cookies or opt out. Accept Reject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.